The photo’s of 3 of Tookie’s victims can be seen below. They are graphic so don’t click on them unless you can handle it.
Albert Owens
Tsai-Shai Chen Yang
Yu-Chin Yang Lin
You may recall the name Joseph C. Phillips if you were a Cosby Show fan. He played the husband to Lisa Bonet character. He wrote the below column and it’s a doozy:
Standing outside the walls of San Quentin prison, the rapper Snoop Dogg urged California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to grant clemency to convicted murderer Stan ?Tookie? Williams. Williams, the co founder of the notorious street gang the Crips, was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1979 slayings of Albert Owens, Yen-I Yang, his wife, Tsai-Shai Chen Yang, and their daughter, Yu-Chin Yang Lin. Barring intervention by the governor, he will die by lethal injection on December 13. Speaking before a thousand young people and supporters, Snoop lectured the governor: “Stanley `Tookie’ Williams is not just a regular old guy, he’s an inspirator?His voice needs to be heard.”
Snoop, Mike Farrell, Danny Glover, Jamie Foxx and the other celebrity voices now raised in support of Williams offer a clear picture of the distorted moral vision of the Hollywood left. It is a vision that finds virtue contemptible and props up homicidal maniacs who write bad children’s books as role models for the masses.
The argument for commutation of Tookie?s sentence centers on all the good work he has done since going to prison. The series of children’s books he has written and his work to stop gang violence is proof of his redemption. His death, they say, will only serve to rob those youth currently in gangs or considering joining gangs, of hope. Witness that his supporters do not claim that Tookie is innocent of his crimes. They are not seeking that Williams be released, only that his sentence be commuted. Williams, however, has never admitted guilt. That little inconsistency suggests the great ?inspirator? is not only an unrepentant murderer, but a liar as well.
The portrayal of Williams as some pied piper of peace for the gang community also holds very little water. A quick review of Book Scan shows the Tookie series of books have hardly been blockbusters. His top seller, ?Gangs and Violence? has sold 330 books. Another book ?Gangs and Wanting to Belong? sold exactly two copies. No one is reading his books, least of all his two sons, one of whom is serving time in San Quentin. The other was just arrested on charges of aggravated rape. Poor book sales are not reason to send someone to the execution chamber, but then Williams was not convicted of lackluster book sales. He was found guilty of shooting four innocent people in cold blood, a fact his supporters continue to forget.
Here again, wealthy celebrities are telling hard working, law-abiding citizens that the example offered by them is inadequate to save their communities; the models of competence, creativity and virtue that are alive in these neighborhoods is simply insufficient. No matter that hundreds of young people find the strength of character ? the hope — to resist the gang life. No matter that many of the stars have themselves found the strength to rise out of the tough streets. All that means nothing as compared to the words and example of Tookie Williams.
On Sunday November 13, one week before the ?Save Tookie? rally at San Quentin, fourteen-year old William Cox and a friend were attending a neighborhood carnival when they were gunned down by a man who mistook them for rival gang members. Cox, who was not in a gang, was struck in the chest and died at the scene. That is the evil wrought by Stanley Williams!
Of course Snoop and Danny Glover did not hold a rally for William Cox. His death went unnoticed by the Hollywood commissars of compassion. They were too busy trying to save the life of a cold-blooded killer to notice one more young life snuffed out by gang violence. That tells you all you need to know about the corrupt vision the Hollywood left has for America.
Also today the California Supreme Court voted down another appeal by Tookie:
The California Supreme Court refused Wednesday to halt the scheduled execution of convicted killer Stanley Tookie Williams, the Crips gang founder who became an anti-gang activist while in prison and whose supporters claim has redeemed himself.
In a last-ditch legal move, defense attorneys petitioned the high court earlier this month, alleging shoddy forensic testing and other errors may have wrongly sent Williams to San Quentin State Prison, where he is scheduled die by injection Dec. 13.
And finally, WorldNetDaily wrote about his supposed “good behavior” while in prison:
While Williams’ celebrity cheerleaders have claimed he has been a model prisoner throughout his sentence and have pointed to this as evidence of his rehabilitation, the DA’s report contains 11 examples of incidents for which he was disciplined, beginning in 1981 and continuing through 1993. They include:
* a violent fight with another inmate June 30, 1981, in which he repeatedly struck the prisoner while kneeling over him;
* a refusal to line up for a return to his cell Jan. 26, 1982, in which he threatened a guard;
* throwing a chemical substance in the eyes of a guard Jan. 28, 1982, in an attack that resulted in chemical burns and emergency treatment;
* a second attack on a guard with a chemical substance Jan. 29, 1982;
* an attack on another inmate Feb. 16, 1984, in which Williams only stopped beating the prisoner when a warning shot was fired;
* a threat to kill a guard June 8, 1984;
* the beating of another inmate July 4, 1986 that only ceased when armed officers arrived on the scene;
* another fight with an inmate that led to his own stabbing, reportedly retaliation for his ordering another inmate to be stabbed;
* his continued association with the Crips street gang led to administrative segregation Oct. 19, 1988;
* the beating of another inmate Dec. 24, 1991, that only stopped after a warning shot was fired;
* another fight with other inmates July 6, 1993, in which a stabbing instrument (shank) was recovered.
The DA’s report also says Williams threatened all of the jurors after they found him guilty.
“Specifically, the defendant looked at the jurors and said he ‘was going to get all’ of them,” said the report. “After learning of this threat, the trial judge inquired of the jury foreperson. The foreperson confirmed the defendant mouthed the words ‘I’m going to get each and every one of you m—–f——.”
But still, the dumb and the blind will flock to his side. Those same people are at the side of cop-killer Mumia and now they are at the side of this piece of shit.
I worry that our fake Republican Governor will issue clemency to this guy.
Previous:
Fry Tookie Fry
If Tookie Had Been White
Tookie Must Die
Buh Bye Tookie
Crips Founder Loses Again
See author page
Curt, I’d appreciate it if you didn’t delete this post – I’ll do my best to cause no offence, but a point’s been put to me, and I’d like to answer it.
Alex – respect for you to even being involved with these conversations at 14. Most folks your age are mainly preocupied with computer games and pussy, and it’s always nice to find an exception to the rule.
But… Do you really think it enhances your argument to call me a ‘hypocritical fag’? I don’t think I’ve been particularly hypocritical – I’ve made my point, same as anyone else, and I’ve stuck with it. As for me being a fag – I’m still with the girl I met at 16. It’s been a decade now, and we’re very happy.
As for ‘there’s very little point in writing this’… I think that assumption has been proved true. I’ve made my point, and nobody listened, or cared – ergo, it was ultimately pointless. Such is life.
And in regard to ‘that’s what the media is [are, technicaly – it’s a plural] there for’ – well, yes, in a perfect world. But in the real world, they have their own agenda, and their own message – I’m not saying it’s all lies, but one should always look for bias. Be dispassionate.
I’d agree that my comments have no statistical backing, but outside of pure science – whose do? We’re swapping opinions here – it’s art, not science. But I’d refute your argument that they have no logical backing – you may not agree with my logic, but it’s there…
And Tookie? Clearly, your point that ‘NOBODY wanted him to live’ is erroneous. You might not agree with the people that did, but there was a fairly sizeable movement to preserve his life. I’m not with them – I don’t know the facts of the case(s) in question. The only thing that really bothered me was the enjoyment people seemed to be taking in his death. If someone has to be excecuted, it should be a matter of utilitarianism – not pleasure.
Finally, in regard to your grammar – I’m really not that bothered 😉 But I’m a (semi) professional author, and I’ll admit to carelessly making more mistakes than you mention… These things happen, when one starts rambling on. Still, give me the address, and I’ll give you your real total.
Step back, mate. You clearly have points to make, but your vitriol detracts from your argument. Be calm, and be collected.
All the best,
Dave
WEll, I am a 14 year old male quite involved in these types of discussions. Here is what I have to say…
The interesting conversation between Dave and Curt. WEll, I want to point out that we kind of got off topic. But I have to agree that Dave is a hypocritical fag. That simple. I respect your opinion, however I want to point out a few questions I have in your arguments and pointless banteringg against Curt and others. Tell me Freud, while you were masturbating with self-satisfaction after writing your rigorous psychological analysis of their blogs, did it occur to you that nobody forced you to read anything on this site? You can bash me all you want, and throw all your cool high level words you learned in college, but that wont change the fact that you are being really gay about this. Curt said something, and then out of nowehre you decidded that your opinion is the right one, and that you could bash Curt, and people who shared his opinions. YOu are a condescending asshole, and i just wanted you to know that. Well, here we go. Your first post on this blog, (that is ruining the internet!!!! what the hell, nothing is ruining the net)
Then you have the audacity to say “There’s probably little point in writing this” Well, you, for one care. Or at least you give enough of “a point” to write a vitriol saturated blog as if you’re some how above it all.
Yes, it’s quite clear that you have better things to do with your time. I mean, posting blogs to strangers on the internet is quite a fruitful endeavor, right up there with, oh I don’t know, maybe GETTING A JOB? You know, I was wondering: if you don’t have a job, then who’s paying for you to be on the internet? Who’s paying your electricity bills? Who’s paying you enough so that you can not only afford to eat every day, but that you have so much extra that you can afford the luxury of logging on and sending candid blogs to random people on the internet? Who? Tell me, how did posting this blog possibly help to improve your pathetic situation? u’re bald, scrawny, unemployed and haven’t had sex for over eight years (thankfully), at least you can take solace in the fact that your one and only argument in your post wasn’t flawed by a glaring contradiction, right? Oh wait.
WHo really gives a shit if you were at a trial or have been listening to the media? Thats what the media is there for. Now, I for one hate the media, but you look past the plain point that Tookie killed 4 innocent people, and started a notorious gang responsible for the degeneration of our nation. The media did not get that wrong Dave. THus it is certainly not weak grounds. But again I have no problem with you thinking that he deserves to live.
Here is where it gets hairy…
Why did you have to go and dis Curt like that man? And then you go off on an “america is being hated” tangent. Dont give me that bullshit. HOW the fuck are you supposed to know that “a lot” of people hate america? And god forbid what if they do? It didnt even fit in that argument!!!
And how it’s people like us who are the causes. WHere did you come up with this Dave? It seems to me that you are posting comments that have no logical, or statisical backing. Thats cool, make shit up to sound really smart. Then just pull in some random opinions and make fun of stereotypes. O, lord, hes gotta stereotype southerners who he thinks share the responsibilty of how Europe looks at us. What the fuck man, where did you find the material to correlate that shit.
Dave, you generalize a lot, I hope you really dont mean it, but NOBODY wanted Tookie to live. Nobody, that means EVERYONE wanted him to. Dramatic prose, or just extreme exagerations, regardless you sound like a fucking cry baby. It comes down to this Dave. You argue something, somone challenges you. YOu cant react like a nice person, so you have to get some big words and then contradict past arguments of your own, and just blabber to confuse people into believing that what you are saying makes sense.
Advice for Dave:
1. Stop being a pussy. If you’re going to cuss, just do it.
2. Shut up. You don’t know anything.
3. Get a vasectomy.
ANd on a side note in regards to my grammar and spelling, as of this writing, I’ve written 283 web pages containing over 122,000 words. Let’s say that hypothetically each page contained 3 typos (the actual number is much lower than that, but for the sake of argument bear with me). So that would make a grand total of 849 typos on my web site, or 0.7% of the total words on my site incorrect. That’s less than one percent of all the words on this blog spelled incorrectly given this generous model. Hell, even if I had 5 mistakes per page, that would still only make 1,415 or 1.15% of the words spelled incorrectly.
So if someone throws out a blanket stereotype about europeans, its “ill-thought-out blogshite”?
Yet, you can offer a suggestion like; “Dust off the communal braincell, and try *thinking* for once.”
And why do you assume that no one puts any faith in the Old Testament. Are we all supposed to jump through hoops because a roman emperor and some church “officials” decided what was to become part of the new christianity and what was not?
Our level of enjoyment, which you amazingly seem to be able to glean from a few lines of script, is that justice has been served. After 26 years, justice has been served. Please take your narrow mind and predeterminism elsewhere.
I’m against the death penalty but not on this scumbag. I’m so happy that he is dead although I wanted him to be tortured and strangled, molested, raped, beheaded, and other stuff but USA is not like that. Anyways, so happy to hear that this flea is dead. I will have a party tonight and cheer for Arnold. I thought that he was dumb but turned out that the California governor has some sense. THANK YOU ARNOLD. FUCKU TOOKIE. I hope that you burn in hell with thousands of needles of pain inflicting on every nerve cells of your fucking brain. HAAHAHAHAHAHAH
As a lefty myself I won’t shed a tear for this scumbag. In fact, it’s too bad Mumia won’t fry or we coulda had a two-fer. I wouldn’t lump all leftists together with the Hollywood types though, that’s like me calling all rightists Pat Robertsons. Thanks for the opportunity to put in my two cents.
-Me
living the life of a gangster comes with consequences, when you take peoples life the chances of you yourself greatly goes up, if tookie williams was on the street he would have already been killed. hes been in jail for 26 years, and has only been acting right for the last 10. he refuses to cooperation, and I can repect that, but if this was your crime and you got caught than stick your chest out and take your punishment, dont try to hide behind kids books and dont try to act like you are so change when you are still calling-shot for the crips in jail. having a fake-ass gangbanger like snoop speak for doesnt mean shit. ok, so your supposedly worried about the and want to inspire them, look at snoop, all he talks about is guns, weed, and bitches. And the reason
i called him a fake gangbanger is because it must be really easy to be a crip when you got security like the dam president.
tookie, die knowing that this gang you that you started has called so many youngsters to die for not a dam thing.
rest in piss
To grant clemency to Tookie would be a miscarriage of justice of the worst kind.
It is revisionist history; a vicious attempt to try to re-write the deadly deeds of a true scoundrel.
Greg Daulton
Sacratomato
What’s the purpose of even having consequences if the consequences are never carried out as intended and ordered. But instead waivered. To me, it’s very simple, as an United States citizen and in some states it’s no secret that if you kill another person you can be found guilty and sentenced to death. If you do not want to be begging for your life from behind bars as they move you closer and closer to the chosen method of death, then stay the hell out of trouble. So… now Tookie wants forgiveness? That’s an issue he needs to take up with his God. His consequences are set, they were a long time ago and it’s time that the government see this through.
AND what kind of message will be sent to the up-and-coming criminal element? That if you want to kill a few innocent people, go for it because down the line you can just wiggle yourself out of the consequences by saying you’re sorry and I’m a changed person. Great.
I linked you (and the excellent comment by Bookworm).
http://blogidaho.com
RG