Facebook monitors the offline behavior of its users to determine if they should be categorized as a “Hate Agent,” according to a document provided exclusively to Breitbart News by a source within the social media giant.
The document, titled “Hate Agent Policy Review” outlines a series of “signals” that Facebook uses to determine if someone ought to be categorized as a “hate agent” and banned from the platform.
Those signals include a wide range of on- and off-platform behavior. If you praise the wrong individual, interview them, or appear at events alongside them, Facebook may categorize you as a “hate agent.”
Facebook may also categorize you as a hate agent if you self-identify with or advocate for a “Designated Hateful Ideology,” if you associate with a “Designated Hate Entity” (one of the examples cited by Facebook as a “hate entity” includes Islam critic Tommy Robinson), or if you have “tattoos of hate symbols or hate slogans.” (The document cites no examples of these, but the media and “anti-racism” advocacy groups increasingly label innocuous items as “hate symbols,” including a cartoon frog and the “OK” hand sign.)
Facebook will also categorize you as a hate agent for possession of “hate paraphernalia,” although the document provides no examples of what falls into this category.
The document also says Facebook will categorize you as a hate agent for “statements made in private but later made public.” Of course, Facebook holds vast amounts of information on what you say in public and in private — and as we saw with the Daily Beast doxing story, the platform will publicize private information on their users to assist the media in hitjobs on regular American citizens.
Breitbart News has already covered some of the individuals that Facebook placed on its list of potential “hate agents.” Paul Joseph Watson eventually was categorized as “hateful” and banned from the platform, in part, according to the document, because he praised Tommy Robinson and interviewed him on his YouTube channel. Star conservative pundit Candace Owens and conservative author and terrorism expert Brigitte Gabriel were also on the list, as were British politicians Carl Benjamin and Anne Marie Waters.
More at Breitbart
So, when people like Hillary and Biden call a large swath of the population deplorable”, “racist” and “dregs” simply because of how they vote, does Facebook ban them? Apparently not, huh?
Omar and Tlaib have not been removed for their anti-Semitism. Al Sharpton is still on Facebook. Farrakhan still has his Facebook page (I checked) and though I didn’t see what he has posted, he has made a few hateful comments on occasion. And his associates, those who have been seen with him, Obama, Waters, Jesse Jackson, Sharpton, Bill Clinton… THEY haven’t been banned.
Facebook and Twitter are private enterprises; they can do whatever they want (though they should not receive one nickel of taxpayer subsidies; I hope they don’t). I only wish they could be honest about how they want to turn their platforms into liberal propaganda organs, like the rest of the media has become.
Social media has its own idea of free speech, what ever they agree to. Its why you can find pedophiles and jihadists but not pro constitution or those who are pro life.
Meta data has made them very wealthy your personal data and web habits, a vast spying network on everyone to be used against you, for something you may have posted long long ago.
Twitter is the worst an echo chamber of liberal degenerate deviants. Even peoples private webpages are subject to twitters censorship.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/twitter-youtube-suppress-expose-on-pinterests-bias-and-censorship-cite-privacy_2962415.html