The corporate press is awash in articles speculating about the future of the Republican Party after Donald Trump. Will it purge pro-Trump elements and return to some semblance of its pre-2016 form, or double down on Trumpism and Trump, defending him even in the face of a major electoral loss and a Senate impeachment trial?
Most such articles entirely misunderstand what’s going on with the GOP and how to think about Trump’s takeover of the party. One of the worst was just published in The Atlantic, written by Chris Hayes of MSNBC under the absurd headline, “The Republican Party Is Radicalizing Against Democracy.”
I hate to respond to anything published in The Atlantic these days, much less anything written by Hayes, but his meandering take is so slyly but profoundly backwards it must meet a response. The thrust of his argument is that Republicans have given up on policy fights of the past and are instead motivated today by “a set of resentments (often intensely gendered and racialized) about who will run the country.”
As evidence, he cites the election of 2004, in which gay marriage and the Iraq War were major motivating issues for GOP voters. Today, most Republicans oppose the Iraq War and don’t really care about gay marriage, at least as a matter of public policy. He also notes the disconnect between the GOP donor class, which cares about things like corporate tax cuts and deregulation, and ordinary Trump voters, who, says Hayes, above all want a party that fights for them like Trump did—an accurate if oversimplified description.
But Hayes is wrong to explain all this in terms of “gendered and racialized” resentments, as if Trump voters either don’t understand or don’t care about policy, and view the GOP simply as a vehicle to express their prejudices. A more cogent (and less contemptuous) explanation requires a deeper understanding of how and why the Republican Party changed since 2004. Specifically, it requires an understanding of why many conservatives agreed to support George W. Bush’s Republican Party in the first place, and why they came to regret that support.
There are two parts to this. The first has to do with policy and the divide between the donor class and the GOP establishment on the one hand, and Trump’s Republican base on the other. That divide is stark, and the two sides have been drifting apart for decades.
In 2016, Trump exposed that drift for the chasm it had become, not by stoking “a set of resentments” but by giving voice to policies that GOP voters really cared about but that their party leaders and the donor class had begrudgingly paid lip service to—like abortion and immigration and trade—then totally ignored whenever Republicans gained power.
Trump won the Republican nomination by exposing and exploiting this rift in the GOP. By siding with the voters on issues they care about over and against the donor class, Trump was also able to bring in new voters to the party and win the presidency.
In so doing, he pointed the way forward for the GOP to become a populist conservative party—unapologetically patriotic and pro-American, yes, but also willing to use the power of the federal government to help ordinary people rather than always serve special interests. That his time in office saw more victories for special interests (corporate tax cuts, deregulation) than ordinary Americans is a testament to the power of the donor class and its sway over the GOP establishment in D.C.
Republicans Need A Fighter
That’s only one part of the explanation. The second part—what Hayes and the rest of the corporate press chalk up to cultural “resentments”—is about wanting a party that stands up to the overwhelming forces of the far left that dominate the media, academia, Hollywood, Big Tech, and corporate America. That doesn’t mean Republicans don’t care about policy, it just means they also care about other things less obviously tied to a specific policy agenda.
Republican voters might have acquiesced on gay marriage, for example, but that doesn’t mean they agreed to being forced to bake cakes for gay weddings. They might have made peace with the Affordable Care Act, but that doesn’t mean they support Catholic nuns being forced to provide birth control in violation of their religious beliefs. They might be willing to use a person’s preferred pronouns or talk about the legacy of slavery in America, but that doesn’t mean they’ll tolerate the insanity of transgenderism or the institutionalization of critical race theory in public schools.
It’s worth noting that all these things that were once thought of as cultural issues are now, thanks entirely to Democrats, also policy issues that require pushback. Until Trump came along, almost no Republican leader was willing to fight them.
So when Hayes asks, “What if the overwhelming number of Trump supporters simply won’t vote to give control to the Democratic Party, even if the party is pushing agenda items they like? What if the driving imperative for the large majority of voters—but particularly for those on the aggrieved right—is that they want their people in control?” The answer is that the driving imperative for the large majority of GOP voters is that they want to be left alone, and they know an increasingly radicalized Democratic Party won’t ever leave them alone.
Hell, until Trump won, no one even knew there could be a “politician” like Trump. No one imagined someone could run for elected office, get elected and do what they SAID they would do. Republican or Democrat, the likes of Trump was never seen. I know that wasn’t what I envisioned; I just wanted to keep the criminal Hillary’s corrupt hands off the Supreme Court.
No, the Demediacrats don’t understand this; they never will. Not only have they never seen a representative that represents, they don’t want one. They want one that plays the game, that makes them rich; they assume the politician will get rich in the process as well. But, what would you expect? Why would anyone even serve if not to enrich themselves?
Democrats offer nothing to me that would induce me to vote for any of them. Even if a Democrat representative would be more appealing than a Republican, they would still merely be a part of a party that does not share my values and does not look out for the best interests of this country or its citizens. Yet, they can’t understand why people would take a gamble (which paid off enormously) on a guy like Trump than support hate, open borders, suppressed rights, racism, gender insanity, illegal immigrants and putting every possible interest before the interests of our own nation.
Because Democrats out-do the last lie with the next lie, we lose sight of the HELL they put this nation through with their Russian collusion hoax. They KNEW their entire argument was based on lies, but it was the best gambit they had at the time to counter Trump doing exactly what he said he would do and succeeding. Yet, someone expects us to TRUST and VOTE for these people? I can’t even fathom how such people could rehabilitate their credibility, and that of course goes for the media as well.
We simply aren’t ready to submit just yet.
No other President since Reagan cared more fort he American People and less for the Illegal Aliens that Biden the Stupid got released