For a man most famous for his stint on reality television who has always relished the company of celebrities, the inauguration of Donald Trump as President of the United States looks to be notable more for the absence of stars of stage and screen than their presence. The past week has seen opera singer Andrea Bocelli and Tony award winner Jennifer Holliday back out of participating after receiving significant backlash, including threats of boycott and even violence, from those who view the act of performing for the president-elect as unacceptable. Holliday told the Associated Press that “I didn’t see it as singing for Trump; I saw it as singing for the people on the mall.” But that attitude of graciousness and respect was not enough to sway the opinions of those clamoring for her to back out.
This is not an encouraging sign for the next four years. For those celebrities seeking a primer on how to interact with the political sphere in the era of Trump, they would be wiser to look to the model of another prominent star of the past: Frank Sinatra.
Sinatra had good relationships with nearly every president in his lifetime. He performed at the inaugurations and White Houses of members of both parties. As a young idol he met Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1944 at the White House, and campaigned for Harry Truman and Adlai Stevenson. He was close friends with John F. Kennedy, and came to have genial relationships with many presidents despite differences in party and personal dislike. Even while holding strong personal political opinions on a number of topics, Sinatra would swallow his disagreements and treat all presidents with respect.
There was no politician Sinatra disliked more than Richard Nixon. But after campaigning for Hubert Humphrey in 1968, he sent Nixon a congratulatory note applauding his work to reshape our relationship with Russia. Following Sinatra’s legendary testimony before the House Select Committee on Organized Crime, Nixon called him to congratulate him. When Sinatra announced he’d support Nixon’s re-election in 1972, his daughter Tina called him in a fury – he responded, “That’s the way it goes, kid – it’s a free country.”
In 1966, when Ronald Reagan was challenging Pat Brown for the governorship of California, Sinatra hosted fundraisers for Brown and decried Reagan as a “bore”. According to James Kaplan’s Sinatra: The Chairman, Sinatra told his friends “I can’t stand that f***ing Ronnie… Every time you get near the bastard he makes a speech and he never knows what he’s talking about.”
Kaplan quotes Peter Lawford as recalling Sinatra’s commitment that should Reagan ever win public office in California, he would move out of the state. A host of American celebrities in 2016 made similar commitments regarding a Trump victory – though precious few seem to be living up to their commitment to move, despite Meryl Streep’s dark warnings of a television landscape bereft of anything but football and mixed martial arts. Celebrities who have stuck up for the idea that the president-elect needs to be treated with respect, such as Nicole Kidman, or that his election is in part due to the arrogance of Hollywood “bullies”, such as Zoe Saldana, are the apparent exceptions to the new norm, where no celebrity would dare associate themselves with the man for whom nearly 63 million Americans voted.
And what about all those celberties who said they would leave america if trump was elected so why ar,nt they packing to bags and moving to africa,europe or jupiter? i sure wish they will leave so we dont have to put up with these morons anymore
Get ready kiddos the media is going to bash this President non-stop, some of it he will deserve. I had to turn on CSPAN to actually watch the inauguration the talking heads on every channel were relentless, Listen to the Parade, oh no their opinion was greater than what those bands practiced so hard for. The female on ABC fighting back tears as Hillary and Bill made an appearance,” she looks so sad”…Fox as bad ” look at that perfect salute, not like Bills,” Getting the role of the Code Talkers in WW2 wrong, NBC bash bash bash.
We will also be barraged with useless opinions of self important celebs joining marches and protests with the goal of look at me I think am relevant.
Nancy Sinatra is raking the Communists News Network(CNN)over the coals for their lies anyone for a few rounds of THESE BOOTS WERE MADE FOR WALKING ?
Back in that day, liberals were not like they are now. Liberalism had not yet completely failed, as it has today. The left can no longer afford dissent and those who give the impression they condone freedom of thought and action need to be brought into line.
No liberal is to be allowed to think for themselves and that goes double for any Hollywood liberal. Whenever it is possible, through the use of economic or social pressures or even physical violence, NO ONE is to be allowed to think for themselves. Once all opinions except for LIBERAL opinions are eradicated, they will have completed their work. Like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, dissent is not tolerated.
@kitt: I actually changed to PMSNBC: on time, just to see what they were saying. Of course, they were apoplectic so I didn’t watch long. I did switch to c span but they were having probs trying to cover the ANSWER protest which had about 8 protestors there. About 50 news people were there to cover those 8. Never saw them on regular tv.
@RedTeam: They should have been given 0 air time, an interview with a peaceful protester would be ok but covering rioters encourages them and sets a horrible example for children who should be watching from the classroom. It would be wonderful if every news station would report as if they were being watched by children in an educational setting, not a catty coffee clutch, give a brief history tidbit added here and there and allow the viewer to enjoy an event that was months in the planning.