Where is Huma Abedin’s Laptop?…

Loading

An August 2018 release from the FBI Vaulton the Hillary Clinton email investigation revealed the Anthony Weiner/Huma Abedin laptop containing Clinton emails (350,000) and Blackberry communications (344,000) was never reviewed for intrusion prior to the 2016 election.

Does anyone at the DOJ/FBI even care about this issue any longer? … or was the can-kicking operation successful?



First, the frustrating context:

From the Boston Marathon bombing investigation through the San Bernardino terrorist attack; passing the Garland, Texas cartoon terror shooting; and continuing through Orlando’s Pulse Nightclub; and then through the Parkland shooting and into Las Vegas -via the Mandalay Bay- we always knew something was wrong with the apparatus, the institutional apparatus, of the FBI… but it wasn’t until 2017 with James Comey, Andrew McCabe and the transparently corrupt Clinton exoneration and candidate Trump set-up scheme that we fully grasped the scale and scope of the corruption.

It is disconcerting to accept that the institution of the FBI is corrupt, soup-to-nuts, including every aforementioned field office and participant therein. But reality doesn’t care about our feelings; it just stares us in the face – until we accept it.

Talking heads always approach the FBI issues with a co-dependent and enabling qualifier: “we’re not talking about the field agents”, they say.

Um, no; that’s nonsense.

If the institution is corrupt, then every entity within it is corrupt – until such time as the corruption is removed.

50 “rank and file” agents were working for Special Counsel Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann.   Has a single whistleblower been identified other than a single Supervisory Special Agent in the FBI who contacted the Inspector General about how the Comey memos were being manipulated.

Enter FBI Director Christopher Wray.

FBI Director Wray seems like an affable person who is, by all reasonable evaluations, entirely way-over-his-head in dealing with the systemic rot, cancer and corruption.

Sound harsh? Go back and WATCH the post IG report (Clinton email investigation) press conference; it’s not harsh. It takes a particular kind of corruption manager to stand in front of a national audience and tell the world there was no bias in the Clinton email investigation… yet, he’s going to put every employee of the FBI through “bias training”?

Yeah, un-huh.

No bias… but everyone needs bias training. Gotcha.

Perhaps a more nonsensical statement was declared somewhere…. but I couldn’t remember one… until…. well, until the same DOJ/FBI released the FISA applicationconstructed by the institution of the FBI to target Carter Page. This is where we read:

Page #2. They say: “The target of this application [Carter Page] is an agent of a foreign power”. [emphasis mine]

Page #4. The FBI spell out their definition of a “foreign agent” — basically, somebody who KNOWINGLY engages in clandestine intelligence activities for a foreign power, or who KNOWINGLY conspires with others to do the same.

Then in the very next paragraph: “This application targets Carter Page. The FBI believes Page has been the subject of targeted recruitment by the Russian Government” [again emphasis mine].

How the heck can Carter Page be a “foreign agent” who “knowingly engaged in” activities “for a foreign power“, but at the same time be a “target for recruitment” by the same foreign power?

Meanwhile we have the FBI Director Christopher Wray managing the corruption. Key word “managing“. He’s not confronting it… he’s not removing it… he’s managing it. In essence, he’s a useful idiot for the corrupt interests of the DC swamp.

So that’s the backdrop for yet another heavily redacted {{eyeroll}} FBI vault release in August 2018 on FBI records relating to the Clinton non-investigation:

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Did you write this, Curt? It says “by Curt” up top.

@Florence Cole: To find the original please click read more. Its in RED at the bottom of Curt posting an Article.

The FBI made no investigation of Clinton …none the determined the end before giving them all immunity.
Perhaps someday the American People will see justice for a government official sharing, in real-time, top secret communications with China.

@kitt:

@Florence Cole: To find the original please click read more. Its in RED at the bottom of Curt posting an Article.

He knows. It’s the same clown that harasses Curt for everything Curt posts.
AJ by any other name………………………………………………

@retire05: Yes, troll feeding is a side hobby. They never learn any new tricks, I think he may be drinking again.

@kitt:

Why doesn’t Curt do the decent thing and acknowledge the writer? It says “by Curt” because he cut and pasted the piece? Curt needs a byline for that? Pretty lame. Very dishonest.

Imagine being a writer and seeing your words appear under “by Curt”. In the real world, it’s called plagiarism.

@Florence Cole: Sober up and get a life sweetie. How about attempt to read the article and comment on the subject.

@kitt:

Do you understand that words have meanings? Can you grasp that writers do not appreciate seeing their works under someone else’s byline?

@Florence Cole: Do you understand IDGAF?
I can explain but I can help you understand.

@Florence Cole:

Curt posted it. The link is the source, which the reader must click if the reader wants to see the complete article.

Here we go again… another (?) liberal whining about how difficult it is for them to figure out what everyone else knows instead of commenting on the issue of agents lying to the IG and the FBI apparatus protecting criminals that put US security in serious jeopardy that probably got human assets killed.

@DrJohn:

Dr. John, I hear that, but you fail to give credit to the writer, or even acknowledge the writer, at the BEGINNING of the post. Don’t you feel that the writer whose work you have reproduced, should receive credit at the outset? I’d appreciate a serious response.

@Florence Cole:

No. People are familiar with this style. It’s very common.

@DrJohn:

No? Writers don’t deserve credit at the beginning of a piece? Seriously?

What you do here is called piracy, Dr. John.

It’s common? Common where?

You should rethink your position and give proper credit where it’s due.

@Florence Cole:

You should mind your own business but we all know that liberals want to tell everyone else what to do.

Start your own website and run it the way you want to.

AJ by any other name……………………

is still a jerk.

@DrJohn:

No. People are familiar with this style. It’s very common.

Exactly. It’s the style I’ve seen used on just about every blog site. Even when writing research papers, the source being referenced is either at the bottom of the page or at the back of the paper depending on which style is used, MLA or APA.

@retire05:

Start your own website and run it the way you want to.

Too much work and effort. It’s far easier to stalk Curt.

@Florence Cole:

What you do here is called piracy, Dr. John.

Arrrr! We be pirates! Ye be having a foremast rammed up ye poop deck and makin’ like a heavy sea! Arrr!

@Florence Cole: Gary, Gary, Gary

@Curt: Thanks dearie, maybe we can comment on the criminal bahavior of the FBI, CIA, NSA and other weaponized agencies pushing for a NWO using China as the model.