Western Companies Are Happy To Cut Ties With Russia, But Stay Silent On Uyghur Genocide

Loading

By Ailan Evans

Western businesses have exited Russia in droves since the country’s invasion of Ukraine, often citing humanitarian reasons as justification — yet many continue to maintain healthy relationships with China.
 
Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, American and European companies, particularly in the technology and entertainment sectors, announced they would be restricting service and sales in the country, with many suspending operations altogether. However, many of these companies not only operate in China, but have been linked to alleged human rights abuses and forced labor of the Uyghur Muslim population.
 
Apple announced Tuesday it would no longer sell its products in Russia and that certain services would be suspended in the country, expressing solidarity with “all of the people who are suffering” from violence.
 
The American tech giant is active in China, where it manufactures many of its devices and sells to the Chinese market. It has also been alleged that Apple is complicit in the ongoing repression of Uyghurs; an investigation by The Information in May 2021 found that seven Apple suppliers were accused of using forced labor from China’s Xinjiang province.
 
The company has  previously lobbied on legislation aimed at curbing the use of forced labor in American supply chains. 
 
Apple reported $25 billion in revenue from the Greater China region in the first quarter of 2022 alone, almost as much as the company took in from the entirety of Europe, according to financial filings. The Chinese market was responsible for roughly 20% of the tech giant’s global revenue.
 
By comparison, Apple would lose roughly 1% of its global revenue by entirely exiting Russia, Politico reported.
 
Apple did not respond to requests for comment by the Daily Caller News Foundation; the company has previously condemned the use of forced labor and claimed it does not use it in its supply chains.
 
Another Silicon Valley giant, cloud computing company Oracle, publicly announced its exit from Russia Wednesday, citing “support of both the elected government of Ukraine and for the people of Ukraine.”
 
[the_ad id=”157875″]
 
Oracle maintains a presence in China, employing “hundreds of developers” at “three centers in Oracle China” and conducting research and development in the Shenzhen economic zone.
 
The company has also been accused of aiding human rights abuses in China; The Intercept published an investigation in February 2021 purporting to detail an Oracle marketing plan to sell its software to Chinese authorities for use in a domestic surveillance campaign.
 
Oracle characterized The Intercept’s reporting as “deeply at odds with reality” and noted that the company has been reducing its presence in China over the past few years, claiming the outlet failed to provide any evidence that the plans were implemented. The company did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment. 
 
U.S. clothing company Nike, which manufactures many of its products in China, has also been linked to forced labor, and has lobbied on bills that seek to excise Xinjiang slave labor from U.S. supply chains. The company said it was closing stores in Russia
 
The companies’ inconsistencies in their stance toward China and Russia have raised eyebrows among lawmakers such as Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio and Indiana Republican Rep. Jim Banks, who questioned their sincerity in comments to the DCNF.
 
“Corporations like Apple and Nike only seem to care about ‘human rights’ when it doesn’t seriously threaten their profit margin,”  Banks said. “These companies lobbied in favor of Uyghur slave labor. Recent PR stunts can’t erase their years of complicity in Communist China’s genocide.”
 
Banks, who chairs the Republican Study Committee, led the Countering Communist China Act which among other things restricts how certain American companies can do business with the Chinese state.
 
“China is Russia times a thousand. Their economy is way bigger, their military might is superior at this point,” Rubio said. 
 
“Let’s not forget there are American companies and their CEOs who are basically lobbyists for the Chinese government’s position on a range of issues because they’re desperate for market share over there, because they’ve got factories and production over there,” Rubio added.
 
European companies with strong ties to China have also exited Russia, with German industrial conglomerate Siemens announcing it would be freezing business in Russia Wednesday and claiming to “fully support all sanctions” against the country.
 
Siemens has invested heavily in China, claiming the country is now the company’s “second largest overseas market” and that the company has “4,600 R&D and engineering staff in Greater China, and 21 R&D hubs, as well as nearly 11,000 active patents and patent applications” in the country. By comparison, Russia accounts for roughly 1% of Siemens’ global sales, according to Siemens spokeswoman Kathrin Stangl.
 
“Siemens cooperates exclusively with suppliers who are committed to combating forced labor – this applies globally,” Stangl told the DCNF.  “In addition, the auditing of our suppliers – also performed by external auditors – includes the topic of ‘respect of human rights’ and explicitly mentions ‘the prohibition of forced labor.’
 
Disney said Monday it was pausing all new theatrical releases in Russia, citing “the unprovoked invasion of Ukraine and the tragic humanitarian crisis.”
 
“We will make future business decisions based on the evolving situation,” Disney said. “In the meantime, given the scale of the emerging refugee crises, we are working with our NGO partners to provide urgent aid and other humanitarian assistance to refugees.”
 
Disney has collaborated with China on several projects, most notably on a $5.5 billion investment to build the Shanghai Disney Resort and producing “Mulan”, which was partly filmed in the Uyghur home province of Xinjiang. The company has also allegedly censored content on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party, including a Simpsons’ episode referencing the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
 
Disney did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

china owns more of America than Russia. Recall several years ago, China went on a buying spree in the US at Xmas, Building and corporate board memberships were bought?? Oregon, Washington and CA. are now owned by china like the NBA. China has more dirt on the clintons than the fbi or cia. whore dog billy has an international educational foundation in HK named after him. he owns a hug mansion on repulse bay in HK. he has multiple banking accounts on mainland china.

I smell the stench of hypocrisy here. Conservatives, myself among them, watched in horror over the past decade or so when companies started getting involved in politics. Companies would bend the knee by withdrawing advertising from programing or networks if social media demanded it. They started openly proclaiming themselves in support of [insert favorite movement here]. Those that were in the business of any sort of media started editing and censoring opinions. All this was BAD, ok? 

But now we want those same businesses to walk away from multi-million (or billion) dollar investments based on social pressure. No, this is still wrong. If Congress were to pass a law declaring an economic embargo on X country, that’s fine – all businesses investing overseas accept political risk as part of the job. Congress should do this, allowing all US companies to do the right thing but for the right reasons – not because of the whims of social pressure, but because of a legal and national decision to stop providing economic support to certain countries.

But now we want those same businesses to walk away from multi-million (or billion) dollar investments based on social pressure. 

No, we want them to be consistent. If they are going to shut down businesses and events in Georgia, for instance, because they want election security or N. Carolina because they don’t want boys in girls’ restrooms, then follow that same moral compass in China, where far worse atrocities occur on a daily basis.

I want them to be consistant too. I want them to NOT endorse political positions. Sell your sodas, or phones, or whatever, and stay out of politics. If the law requires you to censor user content (like child-porn, incitement to violence etc), or not do business with certain countries, fine, obey the law, but stay out of politics.

It’s understandable that companies would be concerned about public image and avoid being associated with anti-social behavior. The problem with these companies is what they consider anti-social and what they are willing to accept for a dollar.

That’s not their concern. They should sell their sodas, cars or whatever else they sell in accordance with all applicable laws. That is their fiduciary responsibility to those who own the company. And that was the standard until only a few years ago when they started worrying about the Social Media Outrage industry attacking them. If the US (or any other country) wants to put the hurt on another country via economic sanctions, then do it properly – pass a sanctions bill in Congress, and let businesses obey it.

These companies are woke with just one eye open; not completely woke, just when it doesn’t hurt so much.

Lefties/prog/dems like the idea of corps acting as censors/authoritarian karens. Most American corps now lean left and their political moves are being cheered on by ignorant voters. I’m so olde that I remember when govt’s and corps work in unison – it’s fascism – the real kind, not the word the progs throw around like they throw around racist for just about anything they don’t like.