Trump: We have to accept Syrian refugees because they’re living in hell back home

I get it, you really hate Donald Trump.
So much so, that you are willing to use a tactic that conservatives slam liberals for:
The Dishonest and Misleading Title
Your title:
“Trump: We have to accept Syrian refugees because they’re living in hell back home”
What Trump actually said:
“The Syrian refugee crisis is “so horrible” that he would consider allowing the U.S. to accept some of the displaced refugees. ”
Hell, I want the borders closed and those here illegally gone, but even I would consider allowing some to enter legally for humanitarian reasons.
After being carefully vetted to attempt to insure that they want to fit in and contribute to this great country, and not demand that this country fit itself to them.

Further, re Nigel Farage:
“He’s nominally open to accepting refugees too but he questions how many of the thousands coming to Germany are true refugees and how many are simply immigrants looking for better pay and welfare benefits. Quote: “We must be mad to take this risk with the cohesion of our societies.” He out-Trumped Trump!”
Ummm, no, he didn’t out-Trump Trump. He said the same thing that Trump said, just using different words.

@Nanny G: #2
Exactly. Trump’s critics are missing one BIG thing:
One of the reasons that Trump is increasingly popular with the bible-belt men without college degrees (sarc/off) and so many other normal, average Americans is that he listens to us, and is not afraid to modify his stances to reflect what we want.
How many other presidential candidates do that?
After all, if we want immigrants to fit themselves to our nation, shouldn’t we want our politicians to fit themselves to us?
There is no guarantee that Trump is sincere, but no one else is even listening.

Sadly, the United States MUST accept some refugees since the US (Obama) almost single-handedly CREATED the problem. Of course, Obama won’t suffer a bit for his stupidity, but the rest of the world will.

Naturally, the UN will not insist that Russia, Iran or China take in any refugees and they will continue to oppose the policies that would resolve the problems.

“I would consider allowing some to enter legally for humanitarian reasons.”

Why? Would 50,000 make a difference? 200,000?
There must be a BILLION people out there who are suffering and who have been suffering for far longer than Obama has been in office. They are not Obama’s responsibility and they are not OUR responsibility.

Population growth beyond sustainable levels caused this mess, and nature self corrects over-population. If the rest of the World bails out these refugees, it just teaches the lesson that there is no accountability for irresponsible reproduction. “Vet each person.” RIGHT!

Funny how some of you have been critical of the fact that Obama and Hillary “evolved” on gay marriage when the public got there first, but when Trump flip-flops, you credit him with being flexible and responsive. Order of double standard for two, coming right up!

#Bill #8:

“What’s the matter… can you see what an influx of more Muslims could to to acceptance of gay culture now?”

No. Your record for mistaken assumptions remains unblemished.
I am not worried about Muslim acceptance of gays. Not here, and not in the “Muslim World.”
I thought that I made that clear before this, but for the feeble-minded, there it is again.

Radical Islam is nothing new, just as radical Christianity has… been around.
I have noticed that when one religion radicalizes, the opposing religions also radicalize, somewhat akin to the theory that the existence of God essentially created the diametrically opposite existence of the Devil, one exactly countering the other to maintain balance in the Universe.
I wish the weather was as dependable as your predictable inclination to blame Democrats for everything. Keep up the good work!

Have you BEEN to the Middle East? There’s virtually NOTHING THERE! The people have NOTHING TO DO! They can’t grow enough food to feed themselves and they can’t make things anybody wants to buy. Ever hear that idle hands are tools of the devil?
Well, THEY ARE! There are way too many people who have nothing better to do than take things from other people, INCLUDING LIFE! What else have they got to do? And that’s Obama’s fault? That’s rich!

But keep blaming Obama, because it lets you off the hook. You don’t have to justify your moral bankruptcy as long as you can blame it on somebody else.
If you aren’t part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.

@Ditto: #10
Yes. My wife’s parents were legal immigrants. It cost them a fortune to gain their citizenship, and they valued it accordingly.
I can honestly say that her family loved the USA more than I did at the time, but then, at the time I was an eighteen year old liberal.
I’ve since grown up, or at least grown more experienced.

Two Out of Three Hispanics Oppose Immigration Increase

Two out of three Hispanics oppose the establishment’s campaign to increase the annual inflow of migrants into the United States., according to an Aug. 20 report by Gallup.

That’s good news for Donald Trump, who has made pro-American immigration reform the centerpiece of his campaign.

It is bad news for Jeb Bush, who claims he can boost the one-in-four Hispanic support for the GOP by inviting more foreign blue-collar and college-graduates to compete for the jobs sought by American Hispanics.

Only 34 percent of U.S.-born Hispanics, and 33 percent of foreign-born Hispanics, want to increase legal immigration, said the Gallup report.

Sixty-four percent of each group of Hispanics want migration to be reduced or leveled, said Gallup, which released the report under a misleading headline, “U.S. Support for Increased Immigration Up to 25%.”

Twenty-six percent of self-identified Hispanics born in the United States, all of whom can vote, want legal migration to be reduced. However, the percentage of Hispanics opposing increases may be much higher, partly because a growing number of Hispanics now identify themselves as core white Americans.

Thirty-one percent of foreign-born Hispanics, few of whom can vote, want migration to be reduced.

A late-August poll by Rasmussen showed that 54 percent of whites, 38 percent of blacks, and 42 percent of “others,” most of whom are Hispanics, believe illegal immigration is “very serious.” An additional 51 percent of blacks, and 29 percent of “others,” say illegal immigration is “somewhat serious.”

The same poll showed that 37 percent of “other,” and 32 percent of blacks, say that amnesty would encourage more illegal immigration.

Those poll numbers are beneficial for Trump, and help explain why he’s supported by 31 percent of Hispanics, and 25 percent of African-Americans, according to an early September poll from SurveyUSA.