Trump to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization, wants FBI to pursue members

Loading

 

 

Finally

 

President Trump declared Sunday that he will designate the radical liberal group Antifa as a terrorist organization after a week of violent riots across the country.

“The United States of America will be designating ANTIFA as a Terrorist Organization,” the president announced in a midday tweet.

The president’s announcement came after another night of rioting across the country over the death of an African-American man at the hands of Minneapolis police. Cities across the country were consumed by clashes between protesters and police and countless fires and other criminal acts ranging from looting and theft to assault on officers and the use of incendiary devises.

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos that the rioting in most cities was being instigated by outsiders aligned with Antifa.

“The reports we’re receiving is that this is Antifa. They’re crossing state lines,” O’Brien said. “And we’ve seen this happen before. We saw it in Portland. We saw it in Seattle. We saw it in Berkeley. So, look, we’ll keep our eyes open for anyone else that wants to take advantage of the situation, whether it’s domestic or foreign.

More at JustTheNews

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
69 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Antifa scored a HUGE tactical victory with all this. They kicked the collective asses of multiple big city mayors and some governors as well. They burned, vandalized, and looted their cities. They kicked the shit out of their police. They attacked and terrorized innocent civilians. They hijacked peaceful protests. And as of now, they escaped relatively unscathed.

Now that they are being designated a terrorist organization, their victory should be short lived as they should lose the war. The question is, who is going to take them down? Special Ops would make quick work of them but using the military against domestic terrorists should be a no-no. Unfortunately, the task may fall to the FBI since they are still around. Given their role in Obamagate, can they be trusted to do the job? If they do get the task, they’ll need someone at the helm who knows how to take on street thugs as opposed to a bureaucrat whose main goal is to cover for the abuses of his comrades. That means Wray needs to go and someone like Sheriff Clarke needs to be put in there.

@another vet:

the fbi can’t even wipe its own ass, shake it off or even pull up its pants. Trump should have declared this terrorist group as an enemy of the state a long time ago. trace the money and the jihad ex pres. has his hands in this. best to call MOSSAD for some advice on handling this, they are pros at it.
what is truly amazing is that the mayors of all of these cities are democraps and told their police forces to stand down. maybe its time to stat investigating members of congress and their ties of antif++k America.

I am disappointed that this took so long. They should have been designated a domestic terrorist organization during the 2016 campaign.

@another vet:

They kicked the collective asses of multiple big city mayors and some governors as well.

All Democrats. Not too difficult. They all expect a federal bailout to restore their communities.

The FBI had a degenerate leadership during the Obama regime. Even now, they try to cover up and protect their reputation but I have no doubt they will go after ANTIFA vigorously. They can seek out and confiscate their finances, they can discover their leaders and arrest them. Hopefully, mayors and governors who coddle, aid and abet them can be held accountable for their crimes as well.

I would assume ANTIFA is already infiltrated with agents.

ANTIFA is just a label for a loose affiliation of activists sharing anti-fascist attitudes. There’s no coherent central organization and there’s no single underlying political philosophy or agenda. There certainly might be individual activists who should be watched, but there’s no central organization to infiltrate. The ANTIFA terrorist group is just one of Trump’s new boogie men.

People acting out based on nothing more than a shared attitude doesn’t make them an organization. If you legally define an attitude or behavior that way, you’ve just created an instrument of societal oppression that can be used at the whim of any authoritarian power structure that happens to come along. In a free democratic society, individuals who break laws are held accountable as individuals.

There has to be a coherent group to begin with before you can legally declare something to be a terrorist group. Even Trey Gowdy understands this. He just said as much on FOX News.

Antifa is funded by the OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION.https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/press-releases/open-society-institute-announces-small-donor-development-and-diversification-grant
Money from George Soros (and sons) goes to the top Antifa organizers who, in turn mete it out to minions (useful idiots) both wearers of the Antifa “uniform” as well as rabble on the scene at the time who help out for money.
There’s no actual membership rolls or dues, to be sure.
We have seen several videos of Antifa uniform wearing men handing out money (bet your bottom dollar it isn’t their personal money!) to blacks during these protests.
When the “peaceful” protests morph into arson and looting Antifa is behind it, getting it started.
The “broken window” theory is true.
Antifa knows this.
They go around breaking windows so later the opportunists in the rabble can easily loot.
Blacks, during the Ferguson riots complained to Antifa because the white leaders got big paychecks but they got no pay.
How quick you forget.

@Nan G:

Antifa is funded by the OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION.

The linked Open Society page says absolutely nothing about ANTIFA.

There’s no central ANTIFA organization. ANTIFA is a descriptive label for an odd assortment of small anti-authoritarian groups and individual activists, coordinating their “group” activities through social media postings and text messaging.

June 1, 2020 – Trump briefly taken to underground bunker during Friday’s White House protests

As protesters gathered outside the White House Friday night in Washington, DC, President Donald Trump was briefly taken to the underground bunker for a period of time, according to a White House official and a law enforcement source.

The President was there for a little under an hour before being brought upstairs.
A law enforcement source and another source familiar with the matter tell CNN that first lady Melania Trump and their son, Barron, were also taken to the bunker.
The law enforcement source familiar with protocol said that if authorities moved Trump, they would move all protectees, meaning Melania and Barron.

The second source told CNN that “if the condition at the White House is elevated to RED and the President is moved” to the Emergency Operations Center “Melania Trump, Barron Trump and any other first family members would be moved as well.”

Late Sunday night, the White House cautioned staffers who must go to work on Monday to hide their passes until they reach a Secret Service entry point and to hide them as they leave, according to an email which was viewed by CNN.
The email repeated mandates for maximum telework status and said there is still an “elevated security posture” due to the protests.

Trump praised the Secret Service the next day for its handling of the protests outside the White House Friday night in the wake of George Floyd’s death last week in Minneapolis.

The New York Times first reported Trump was taken to the presidential bunker.
On Saturday, only hours after the protests outside the White House had ended, Trump declared himself safe as he lashed out at the city’s Democratic mayor and raised the prospect of his supporters gathering in place that night in what would amount to a counter protest…

The writing on the wall says “This is not normal.” It certainly isn’t normal in America.

@Greg:

A law enforcement source and another source familiar with the matter tell CNN

Fake fake fake making shit up. They should name the “source or STFU.

“This is not normal.”

Seriously to protect the first family isnt normal? What a pile of dung you post, and twisted freaks that write it.
What isnt normal is Mayors allowing rioting without arrests.
Thug types covering license plates and systematically looting while peaceful protests occupy the entire police force just blocks over.
Antifa began in universities. Bikelock professor a member, the 99 percent movement a beginning. They are attempting to start a civil war..dont you see none of this is about justice.

@kitt, #8:

What isnt normal is Mayors allowing rioting without arrests.

Who told you there weren’t arrests? Trump? There were over 480 protest-related arrests over the weekend in Minneapolis alone.

I see that Comrade Greggie is spending his time, and energy, defending Antifa. No surprise. Antifa is not really anti-fascist, they are anti-capitalism, anti-conservative, anti-rule of law, but they are not really anti-fascist. They are individual groups, loosely connected to the same premise, co-opting a name from the 1940s who are communists/socialists.

So it is no surprise that Comrade Greggie would defend them, and their money man, George Soros.

George Soros isn’t your problem. Your problem is a number of observant, articulate, life-long conservatives, such as George Will:

June 1, 2020 – Trump must be removed. So must his congressional enablers.

Will was also a life-long republican—until 2016.

@Greg:

Your problem is a number of observant, articulate, life-long conservatives, such as George Will:

George Will is a conservative?

ROTFLMAO

Idiots frequently roll on the floor laughing. TRUMP IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE. Neither are his policies, his agenda, or their long-term consequences. He just makes occasional conservative noises.

@Greg:

you are truly two sandwiches short of a picnic basket when it comes to brains.

Yet I didn’t vote for the incompetent in the White House…

Trump cannot lawfully deploy active duty U.S. military troops for law enforcement purposes anywhere inside the United States other than the District of Columbia, without the request first having been officially made by the governor of the state to which they’re being sent.

Does he know that? Does he care? He just had peaceful protesters driven away with teargas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets, so that he could walk down the street and pose for photographs in front of a church holding up a bible.

We need a president, and we’ve got a reality television producer.

@Greg:

TRUMP IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE.

That’s a true statement. That’s why he won the election.

George Soros isn’t your problem.

Nazi sympathizers who can wreck nations with currency speculation, and also help to install a record-sealed cardboard cutout to take control of the country via the corrupt Democrat Party are always a problem.

ANTIFA is just a label for a loose affiliation of activists sharing anti-fascist attitudes.

Antifa is a fascist organization bent on overthrowing our elected leaders and our entire form of government.

You probably work with them, if not for them.

@Greg:

Trump cannot lawfully deploy active duty U.S. military troops for law enforcement purposes anywhere inside the United States other than the District of Columbia, without the request first having been officially made by the governor of the state to which they’re being sent.

Wow!!! Apparently Eisenhower didn’t know that when he sent 1,000 troops from the 101st to Little Rock, Arkansas.

The federal troops weren’t actively involved in the enforcement. They only provided support. Active enforcement was done by the Arkansas National Guard, which Eisenhower placed under federal control by way of an Executive Order.

Trump could always send federal troops to build a wall in front of the demonstrators.

@Greg:

The federal troops weren’t actively involved in the enforcement.

Federal troops escorted the Little Rock Nine into their high school, you idiot.

Trump could always send federal troops to build a wall in front of the demonstrators.

In every state in the nation. The National Guard in Arkansas, is still the NATIONAL Guard and can be called up by the President.. Admit you were wrong, weasel.

@Greg: Nice peaceful protestors vandalizing a church. If told to disperse and had they peacefully complied, tear gas and rubber bullets would not have been used. You see you are not fooling anyone commie boy.
Peacefully throwing Molotov cocktails and injuring 50 Secret Service agents.

@Greg:

Gassing peaceful demonstrators to clear the way for a photo op. Very nice.

You have the right to protest, but if you’re dumb enough to protest during a Left-wing riot, then you might get hit by a rubber bullet.

Or real one.

No sympathy from me, or any rational adult.

The protests serve no purpose beyond creating a environment for thugs to hide in and then strike.

@retire05, #20:

Federal troops escorted the Little Rock Nine into their high school, you idiot.

Escorting them wasn’t law enforcement, All Knowing One. It falls under the heading of crowd control, which federal troops can be called upon to do without invoking The Insurrection Act of 1807, and without violation of The Posse Comitatus Act or any other federal law.

@kitt:

Nice peaceful protestors vandalizing a church.

That happened yesterday evening. The protesters who turned up today were restrained and their behavior was within the law. They remained behind the line, nothing was thrown, no threats were made, and curfew wasn’t yet in effect. There was no call for teargas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets.

A famous Mayor Daley quote comes to mind.

@Greg: Did they follow requests to clear an area? Obviously not. Combative behavior will be met with combative enforcement.

@Greg:

Escorting them wasn’t law enforcement, All Knowing One.

Wordsmith all you want, Commie. The 101st was enforcing the law by escorting those nine teenagers into their high school.

Please, continue to show what an idiot you are.

@Greg:

ANTIFA is just a label for a loose affiliation of activists sharing anti-fascist attitudes.

ANTIFA is anti-fascist like the DPKR is a democratic republic. ANIFA IS fascist. The emulate the Nazi Brownshirts. They are well funded (Soros) and well organized.

The writing on the wall says “This is not normal.” It certainly isn’t normal in America.

Right. Democrats and their ANTIFA thugs are anti-American. But, we’ve been saying this for some time.

Yet I didn’t vote for the incompetent in the White House…

Yeah you did. But he’s gone now. Then you voted for a lying corrupt criminal that sold US uranium to Russians.

Gassing peaceful demonstrators to clear the way for a photo op. Very nice.

They weren’t peaceful. I watched it.

@MOS#8541:

what is truly amazing is that the mayors of all of these cities are democraps and told their police forces to stand down

They are either weak or support their comrades. Some of them like comrade DeBlasio have kids who came out in support of these thugs. The apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree. Perhaps this is the start of the civil war the left has been clamoring for.

maybe its time to stat investigating members of congress and their ties of antif++k America.

They’ve been defended by some. Notice how silent they’ve been in condemning the violence? That’s because they privately support it.

@Deplorable Me:

All Democrats. Not too difficult.

It seems to be the common denominator, doesn’t it? Didn’t dems also have the worse record dealing with the Chicom virus too?

Even now, they try to cover up and protect their reputation but I have no doubt they will go after ANTIFA vigorously.

They may see it as a way to restore their destroyed reputation. For spite, I’d rather see the task be given to another less corrupt agency.

I would assume ANTIFA is already infiltrated with agents.

They only infiltrate the Trump campaign.

@retire05:

You can never admit it when you’re wrong, even though you provide yourself with endless occasions for practice. You also don’t grasp the fact that insults are meaningless when the person they’re directed at realizes that they come from a fool.

I do not see much about the OANN reporter who asked at the press conference, “Is President going to prosecute government employees who support terrorists?” (This was paraphrased!)

When President declared that ANTIFA is a terrorist organization then ANTIFA members and anyone who supports them are subject to civil law under the RICO act. There are many very tough penalties that can be enforced quickly. Celebrities should consider their public support carefully.

@Randy: It’s not just the celebs, the MSM and demokrats are also in on it. The dems have been talking resistance and have been out to undo the election from day one. The evidence is simply too overwhelming to deny. They have staged and supported a coup, first with Russiagate, then their bogus impeachment, and then using the Coronavirus to shut down the economy and get their radical left wing agenda implemented, including voter fraud initiatives, in order to gain unrestricted power and transform the country into a Marxist one. The MSM and dems are covering for Antifa who has publicly stated for some time their goal is to topple the government and turn the country Communist. They are allies. Perhaps this is the next phase in their effort to topple POTUS. The coup has now gone from cold to hot. It’s time to realize this has become the next stage of a Marxist insurgency with Antifa being the street soldiers (their Red Army), Soros providing the financing, the dems providing political cover and giving them the street venue to enact their violence, and the MSM providing their propaganda support.

Right now the violence is centered on Blue areas. Their excuse is it’s to combat racism but that is a lie because it’s blacks and their businesses who are bearing the brunt of the violence. The dem mayors and governors hog tied the hands of the police allowing them to become punching bags. Should these demokrats let their violence spread to Red areas, then it will no longer be a law enforcement issue.

@another vet: Well, if it gets into my area, there a so many retired military, police and gun owners that protesting in the country will not at all be like protesting and burning and looting in the city.

@another vet:

Perhaps this is the next phase in their effort to topple POTUS. The coup has now gone from cold to hot.

I don’t know if this is a phase or a last resort. This desperate resort to fascist violence runs the risk of making Trump exceedingly popular.

Trump has, finally, outmaneuvered their coup by releasing the TRUTH (why it took so long, I don’t know. Perhaps to expose the lies near the election). There is no racial component in the George Floyd murder. The reaction is far out of proportion to the crime. The outrage and violence is totally manufactured. For what purpose? I think we know.

@Deplorable Me:

This is Special Operations Command’s definition of an insurgency:

The organized use of subversion and violence to seize, nullify,
or challenge political control of a region. Insurgency can also refer to the
group itself.

Sound familiar?

@another vet: They aren’t finished either, but if Trump follows through, any future Biden donations to them will be illegal. Their funding is toast. And they can be prosecuted across state lines, which can’t be done right now. That’s why they do the travel thing rather than burn their own cities.

Expect a lot more of this.

A tweet shared widely online during the protests sparked by the death of George Floyd — espousing a plan to bring violence to “residential areas… the white hoods” — was made to appear to be from antifa, the anti-fascist coalition. But the account behind the tweet was actually linked to a white nationalist group, according to Twitter.

June 2, 2020 – Viral Tweet ‘Alert’ Wasn’t From Antifa

@Meremortal: And they are cowards. I like watching them all scurry away every time the police line makes a shoulder-fake at them.

@Greg: I wonder, what was the racial component of Floyd’s death?

It’s pretty easy to imitate ANTIFA’s spread and inciting of violence; they;ve been doing it for a long time, with the Democrat’s blessings.

@Meremortal:

Their funding is toast.

It’ll be interesting to see who was funding them and giving them other support. Soros is a given. Most appear to be basement dwelling snowflakes who probably don’t make a lot of money. Someone has to be paying for all this and someone has to be organizing it. I’ve read that law enforcement officials say that these Antifa “tough guys” cry like babies when get into lock-up. Getting them to rat on their comrades should be easy. They should establish a task force to take them down and appoint someone who has experience in cracking the backs of an insurgency as this is way over the head of Wray. Gen. Raymond Odienero would be an excellent choice as would Gen. Petraeus, although he would be a big target for the left.

@Deplorable Me, #37:

Anyone concerned about the fate of American should be as worried about the Boogaloo Bois as about ANTIFA, but there hasn’t been a peep from Team Trump about those guys, nor about anyone similar. Why aren’t they a designated as a terrorist group? Why aren’t the Anarchists, which include bad actors on both the right and the left? Not even the damn Ku Klux Klan has been designated as a terrorist group. Why ANTIFA? Because that’s politically useful to the posturing jackanape in the White House.

Do you know how many armed radical statewide militia groups there are? They’re not really there with the intention of protecting the rule of law and social order. They all have some fantasy of establishing their own view of the rule of law and social order. They figure if they aren’t getting their own way, our constitutional system must have been compromised by their political enemies.

I wonder, what was the racial component of Floyd’s death?

I suppose we might start with an observation that he was black, and that he’s now dead, and that we’ve never seen anything like that play out in the case of a non-resisting, white arrestee. How many times have we seen something similar with a black citizen?

@Greg: So lets get to the root of the democrat run cities of racist cops. The fact this kneeling on people restrained not being a one off.
Just build them another Youth center that makes it all better.

@Greg:

I suppose we might start with an observation that he was black, and that he’s now dead, and that we’ve never seen anything like that play out in the case of a non-resisting, white arrestee.

Two words for you Comrade Greggie: JUSTINE DAMOND

Where were the protests then?

George Floyd was no Boy Scout:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8366533/George-Floyd-moved-Minneapolis-start-new-life-released-prison-Texas.html

Where are the protests for David Dorn?

@retire05, #41:

Devaluing a victim is typical of right-wing ass hats. You won’t hear this so much from traditional conservative Americans.

If someone is a black male, the odds are very much against him for avoiding run-ins with the legal system and incarceration from the start; if he falls into that trap, it then becomes even harder to find a responsible place in the world afterward.

Ignoring that obvious reality entirely, however, the fact that someone doesn’t measure up to your sudden interest in Boy Scout standards doesn’t justify a psycho cop slowly murdering him on the street. There are no circumstances where this is remotely acceptable.

So, I suggest you stuff this bogus argument up your rear end, where your brain might consider it further. Perhaps there will come a moment of miraculous insight.

@Greg:

Devaluing a victim is typical of right-wing ass hats. You won’t hear this so much from traditional conservative Americans.

I never devalued anyone. Pointing out that like Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin, George Floyd was no Boy Scout does not devalue his life. And you wouldn’t know a “traditional” conservative if they bit you in your ass.

If someone is a black male, the odds are very much against him for avoiding run-ins with the legal system and incarceration from the start;

Really? And you know that how? Because that is what you have been programed to know?

if he falls into that trap, it then becomes even harder to find a responsible place in the world afterward.

Well, having responsible parents would be a good start to avoid that “trap.” Or maybe having decent schools in low income areas in cities run by Democrats would be a start.

Ignoring that obvious reality entirely, however, the fact that someone doesn’t measure up to your sudden interest in Boy Scout standards doesn’t justify a psycho cop slowly murdering him on the street.

I don’t justify the actions of the cop, but I noticed you never said ONE DAMN WORD ABOUT JUSTINE DAMOND OR DAVID DORN. Why? Does they not fit with your agenda? It’s pretty hard to argue that white cops just kill blacks when a black cop kills an unarmed white woman in her pajamas.

So I suggest you stuff this bogus argument up your rear end, where your brain might consider it further. Perhaps there will come a moment of miraculous insight.

Projecting again, Comrade Greggie?

Admit it, Comrade Greggie, the Democrats want to keep blacks on Uncle Sam’s plantation. It means votes for them as they continue to promise much and deliver nothing. Pure “battered spouse” syndrome.

In the last week, 21 blacks have been murdered in Chicago. TWENTY-ONE. Where are the protests honoring them?

@Greg: greggie the rock, you just keep striking out! Devaluating someone who gets killed would be not mentioning anything about them. You greggie the rock devalued the white girls death by not even knowing who she was or how she got killed! I must admire your continuous effort to make sure you get everything wrong!

@retire05, #43:

I never devalued anyone. Pointing out that like Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin, George Floyd was no Boy Scout does not devalue his life.

Sorry, but I understand the motives for such statements perfectly well. They’re entirely obvious. The ONLY reason you or anyone brings into the discussion any negative bits of George Floyd’s personal history that you can dredge up is to try to shift some of the blame to the victim.

If that’s not so, what is the reason? It evidently isn’t about providing general information about the man. You don’t seem to take an equal interest in enumerating any of his positive points.

Really? And you know that how?

Because of statistics, Ducky. They paint a clear and unambiguous picture of a racially biased society that creates an oppressed minority, and then blames that minority for the inevitable negative consequences of the oppression. The fact that countless exceptional people manage to rise above that and succeed in spite of it doesn’t change the fact that there was something they had to rise above and succeed in spite of.

Well, having responsible parents…

…guarantees nothing. Nor does having irresponsible parents. That’s just trying to keep all the blame close to home.

I don’t justify the actions of the cop, but I noticed you never said ONE DAMN WORD ABOUT JUSTINE DAMOND OR DAVID DORN.

Because their unfortunate deaths were entirely different situations. Capt. Dorn was likely murdered by a common criminal who came out of the woodwork to rob a pawnshop under the cover of a civil disturbance. Justine Damond’s shooting was a tragic error on the part of a police office, who nevertheless was held responsible and sentenced to over 12 years in prison. Neither homicide bears any resemblance to the George Floyd incident. There’s no indication racial bias played a part in either—unless you want to focus on Noor’s ethnicity as a possible factor in his trial and sentencing. On that, I have no opinion.

Projecting again, Comrade Greggie?

Nope. Not at all.

@Greg:

Sorry, but I understand the motives for such statements perfectly well. They’re entirely obvious.

You understand squat. You are too frigging stupid to understand any thing.

The ONLY reason you or anyone brings into the discussion any negative bits of George Floyd’s personal history that you can dredge up is to try to shift some of the blame to the victim.

Where did I attribute blame to the victim? I didn’t, buttwipe. But I am sick of every time something bad happens the “victim” is portrayed as a saint who wouldn’t even own a fly swatter. Tell that to the woman Floyd helped rob white he held a gun to her stomach.

Because of statistics, Ducky.

Here’s a stat for you, buttwipe; of the 41 unarmed men shot and killed by police officers last year, 9 were black. NINE. That means that 32 were NOT black. This bullshit how cops are roaming the streets of our cities looking for black dudes to kill is just that, bullshit. And newsflash, moron, good parents, those that make sure their kids attend school and study, those that don’t do drugs or abuse alcohol, those that take their kids to church and raise their kids in a household with a mommy AND A DADDY, stand a hellofa lot better chance than those who don’t.

Capt. Dorn was likely murdered by a common criminal who came out of the woodwork to rob a pawnshop under the cover of a civil disturbance.

Oh, so that makes his life less important than George Floyd’s life? You’re one sick f**k.

.Justine Damond’s shooting was a tragic error on the part of a

BLACK

police office, who nevertheless was held responsible and sentenced to over 12 years in prison.

There I fixed it for you. And how nice of you to call Justine Damond’s murder a “tragic error” but you already have a rope for the Minneapolis cop involved in George Floyds death.

Neither homicide bears any resemblance to the George Floyd incident. There’s no indication racial bias played a part in either.

How do you know? Bottom line, you don’t, Comrade Greggie.

Why aren’t you out marching with your Antifa brothers? No guts?

Pointing out your obvious b.s. to anyone who might have missed it isn’t about trying to convince you of anything, but you’re not really expected to figure that out. Like Trump, you can’t get outside the bounds of yourself far enough to get a clear look at anything.

@Greg:

Pointing out your obvious b.s. to anyone who might have missed it isn’t about trying to convince you of anything, but you’re not really expected to figure that out.

The one pushing bullshit is you, Comrade Greggie. You absolutely ignore anything that doesn’t agree with your agenda.

Like Trump, you can’t get outside the bounds of yourself far enough to get a clear look at anything.

Notice you didn’t rag on Handsy Joey Biden for his photo-op where he took a knee to pander for votes. Talk about your cheap whore, that’s Joey.

If you think I will ever take a knee for any one, white, black, brown, red or yellow, you’re certifiably insane. I have not lead a “privileged” life and I am not going to apologize to anyone for what I worked for and I will not allow anyone to take it from me. So take your Commie crap and shove it where the sun never shines.

Retired U.S Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis, on June 3, 2020:

I have watched this week’s unfolding events, angry and appalled. The words “Equal Justice Under Law” are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand—one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values—our values as people and our values as a nation.

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.

We must reject any thinking of our cities as a “battlespace” that our uniformed military is called upon to “dominate.” At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society. It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part. Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them.

James Madison wrote in Federalist 14 that “America united with a handful of troops, or without a single soldier, exhibits a more forbidding posture to foreign ambition than America disunited, with a hundred thousand veterans ready for combat.” We do not need to militarize our response to protests. We need to unite around a common purpose. And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law.

Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that “The Nazi slogan for destroying us…was ‘Divide and Conquer.’ Our American answer is ‘In Union there is Strength.’” We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics.

Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead, he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.

We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another. The pandemic has shown us that it is not only our troops who are willing to offer the ultimate sacrifice for the safety of the community. Americans in hospitals, grocery stores, post offices, and elsewhere have put their lives on the line in order to serve their fellow citizens and their country. We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Park. We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution. At the same time, we must remember Lincoln’s “better angels,” and listen to them, as we work to unite.

Only by adopting a new path—which means, in truth, returning to the original path of our founding ideals—will we again be a country admired and respected at home and abroad.

Minneapolis Disaster: Fentanyl, Methamphetamine & Excited Delirium

The Case Against Officer Derek Chauvin Is Anything But Solid

The death of George Floyd after an interaction with the Minneapolis Police Department has rocked the world and while everyone reading this believes that an officer that put his knee in the back of Floyd’s neck for close to nine minutes was the cause of death, the facts and evidence are anything but that.

Now, before you quickly go the typical “you are justifying the murder” of Mr. Floyd, go ahead and take a step back.

Our job here is to give you the facts and whether you want to believe it or not, many of the facts are either not reported or not yet known and that should be concerning to every American.

But what we know at this time gives us reason to believe that the criminal case is weak at best and there are several reasons for that.

From the charging documents on Officer Derek Chauvin we hear, for the first time the issue of excited delirium.

We know Chauvin was concerned about it and that was the reason Floyd was subdued. We will know more when the body camera footage is released but oddly, that has not been done. Frankly, it makes us wonder what the footage shows and whether it supports the evidence of excited delirium.

The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine says that “Excited delirium is characterized by agitation, aggression, acute distress and sudden death, often in the pre-hospital care setting. It is typically associated with the use of drugs Subjects typically die from a heart attack and the majority of the patients die before hospital arrival.”

“All accounts describe almost the exact same sequence of events: delirium with agitation (fear, panic, shouting, violence and hyperactivity), sudden cessation of struggle, respiratory arrest and death.”

Once again, the body camera footage showing the initial encounter, discussions among officers and the call to paramedics about the issue of excited delirium will be a major factor in this case.

While much has been said about Officer Chauvin’s knee to Floyd’s neck, the medical examiner’s autopsy showed that Floyd did not die from from strangulation or asphyxiation. In fact, the autopsy showed no trauma to the body.

And before you respond with Michael Baden’s “independent” autopsy as reported by the media, understand that Baden is a hired man that also believed Michael Brown was shot in the back after looking at a diagram and that O.J. Simpson was innocent. Two specific items were noticed in his press conference that the media is not reporting.
1.He never said it was his “expert” opinion but rather his opinion. This is to protect his integrity as an expert witness.
2.Most importantly, Baden didn’t do an autopsy. He formed his opinion from watching the video and speaking to the family of Mr. Floyd.

Nothing he said can be brought into a criminal proceeding. It’s simply done to sway public opinion but we will get to him in another article. Back to the actual facts…….

According to the autopsy, Mr. Floyd had two specific drugs in his system, methamphetamine and fentanyl.

A narcotic that is 50 to 100 times stronger than heroin, fentanyl is associated with more drug overdoses than any other opioid.

And combined with methamphetamine, studies indicate that fentanyl has a higher chance of inducing fatal hyperthermia. And it just so happens that hyperthermia has a direct correlation with excited delirium.

Fentanyl is also unique among the opioids in its ability to cause muscle rigidity of the chest wall, diaphragm, and larynx. Known as “wooden chest syndrome,” it’s safe to say that the combination of this drug is a recipe for heart stoppage.

Combining the deadly effects of this drug combination along with the officer’s reaction to observing signs of excited delirium very likely paints the picture as to why Mr. Floyd ended up on the ground.

The American College of Emergency Physicians’ White Paper Report on Excited Delirium Syndrome recommends two specific responses by law enforcement if they observe signs of excited delirium.

Stating that “Deescalation does not have a high likelihood of changing outcomes significantly”

“The subjects require physical restraint (this is because if they continue to struggle it accelerates the death) combined with emergent sedation.”

“Once the decision to do this has been made, action needs to be swift and efficient, and performed with all responders present when feasible.”

This information probably shocks you and you can thank Mayor Frey and a corrupt media that has forgotten the art of investigative journalism for holding out these facts, but these will be the facts presented to a jury.

And that jury will have a decision to make “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Did George Floyd die from excited delirium caused by the ingestion of methamphetamine and fentanyl and the ensuing struggle (before he was subdued) or was being restrained on the ground the determining factor of the death?

A restraint by the way that may have looked horrible but it did not involve strangulation or asphyxia or even a bruise. Remember, the autopsy showed no trauma on the body.

Considering the neck restraint was department policy and restraining an individual suffering from excited delirium was the best practice according to multiple scientific journals, this case is not as simple as everyone would want you to believe.

Unlike the emotions running through the country at this time, it is these facts that will be looked at by a jury.

https://www.lawofficer.com/minneapolis-disaster/