The Senate Dem Rape Culture That Made Biden

Loading

When Joe Biden allegedly sexually assaulted Tara Reade in the hallway of the Russell Senate Office Building, the storied building was home to an entire culture of Senate Democrat sexual predators.

The Russell Building is the home of the Kennedy Caucus Room. After Senator Ted Kennedy’s death, the ‘Kennedy’ part was added to the Caucus Room to honor the notorious sexual predator whose actions had led to the death of Mary Jo Kopechne. Mary Jo was one of the many young women drawn to public service by the idealistic speeches of the Kennedy clan’s political scions only to suffer at their hands.

The renaming of the Caucus Room to honor one of the Senate’s worst predators was spearheaded by Senator Chris Dodd, his longtime friend and the other man in the infamous story of the ‘Waitress Sandwich’. The ungentlemanly tale detailed in GQ began with Kennedy and Dodd getting their dates, “two very young blondes”, drunk. Blonde and young, sometimes underage, was how Ted liked them.



A waitress quoted in the story, notes, “They’d always get their girls very, very drunk.”

With the girls away, Dodd and Kennedy reportedly decided to have some fun with their waitress.

“As Gaviglio enters the room, the six-foot-two, 225-plus-pound Kennedy grabs the five-foot-three, 103-pound waitress and throws her on the table. She lands on her back, scattering crystal, plates and cutlery and the lit candles… Kennedy then picks her up from the table and throws her on Dodd, who is sprawled in a chair. With Gaviglio on Dodd’s lap, Kennedy jumps on top and begins rubbing his genital area against hers, supporting his weight on the arms of the chair,” the story of the waitress sandwich continued.

Dodd wasn’t just a good friend of Ted Kennedy, but of Joe Biden.

The two Senate Democrats were longtime pals who shared a campaign plane in 2008. Biden later told a reporter, “I’m for him. If I can’t make it, I’m for him.” When Dodd retired, Biden, by then in the Obama administration, released a statement that began with, “Senator Dodd is one of my best friends in life.”

Dodd moved from the Senate to running Hollywood’s MPAA. A few years later, both men were working together with China’s Xi to get more movies released in China. Biden’s assistance to Jeffrey Katzenberg of Dreamworks, who got to sit alongside President Xi, paid off with a big Hollywood fundraiser.

But Dodd was on really good terms with Harvey Weinstein. The Hollywood sexual predator gave Dodd more cash than he did any other politician.

“I’ve known Harvey for 25, 30 years, and we’ve been friends,” the Senate Democrat admitted. “He was very helpful to me as a candidate for Congress and as a senator over the years.”

Dodd was accused of failing to come forward and condemn Weinstein. Biden did condemn the Hollywood mogul, but his speeches about powerful men taking advantage of women rang hollow. Not only did Biden hire Anita Dunn, the Obama adviser who had been brought in as part of Harvey Weinstein’s damage control team, but he maintained his relationship with Dodd.

Dodd has endorsed Biden and functioned as his surrogate on the campaign trail.

Back in the spring of 1993, when Biden allegedly assaulted Reade, Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd were the future Veep’s colleagues in the Senate. That was also the year that President Clinton allegedly groped Kathleen Willey when she came to ask him for help. Democrats had Clinton’s back. There was no reason for Biden to have worried that his alleged Clintonesque behavior would ever come back to haunt him.

There was nothing abnormal about prominent Democrats crudely assaulting women in Washington D.C.

The nineties were the twilight of an era in Washington D.C. A year before Biden’s alleged assault in the Russell Office Building, Senator Brock Adams, a lefty Democrat, was accused of drugging and raping a 24-year-old congressional aide. Democrats continued to stand by Adams despite the allegations. But facing the possibility of losing a Senate seat that he had only won narrowly; Adams did not run again.

Eight women eventually came forward to accuse Adams of groping or otherwise assaulting them.

Adams might have been a cautionary tale for Biden, but for the fact that Democrats had stood by him until a preponderance of accusations and bad polls forced their hand. The United States Senate’s Select Committee on Ethics and its Democrat majority refused to investigate Adams. He was never charged for a series of what, if they were true, consisted of a series of carefully preplanned sexual assaults.

None of this was strange or surprising.

Senator Ted Kennedy, the Democrat “lion of the Senate”, could be seen in Michael Kelly’s account, ordering his limo to pull up to the curb to proposition two 16-year-old Senate pages. One of Kennedy’s high-ranking aides was described as a pimp “whose real job was to procure women for Kennedy”.

The Clinton years, with their tawdry second coming of the Kennedys, was the last hurrah of the old Democrat club whose privileges including mauling the female help working in Washington D.C. Clinton’s impeachment, outwardly futile, made D.C. misbehavior into a national issue and exacted a price. The misconduct didn’t stop, but it was slowly forced underground. By the new century, Senate members, who usually harbored futile presidential ambitions, had learned to exercise a little discretion.

At least by Kennedy standards.

Even in 2008, the Senate pool was reserved for men because some senators liked to swim naked. Who were they? Joe Biden has been accused of swimming naked in front of female secret service agents.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

he did swim naked in front of a USSS agent. her report is interesting.

When Joe Biden allegedly sexually assaulted Tara Reade in the hallway of the Russell Senate Office Building, the storied building was home to an entire culture of Senate Democrat sexual predators.

Note to Mr. Greenfield: “Allegedly” means that no “when” has actually been established, and that “where” is based on nothing more than a claim.

As for “Senate Democrat sexual predators”, Greenfield can stuff it up his own butt. Or better yet, down his lying pie hole, from which an equal volume of manure apparently issues forth.

How does being a “Shillman Journalism Fellow” relate to being a far-right shill? Anyone who wants an answer to that question can look up Robert J. Shillman. Among other things, he’s the self-appointed “Chief Culture Officer” of his own company. He’s a funder of multiple propaganda and disinformation operations, including James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, where the lies begin with the name of his organization. If the so-named goddess were real, she’d probably strike O’Keefe down with a lightning bolt.

@Greg:

I have thought about Sleepy Uncle Joe and the claims against him and I’m going to go with the Democrat philosophy; he needs to prove he’s innocent of the claims against him.

@Greg:

Note to Mr. Greenfield: “Allegedly” means that no “when” has actually been established, and that “where” is based on nothing more than a claim.

Um… no. Not by YOUR rules. Just an accusation, no matter how thin or unsubstantiated, means guilt and drop out of the race. As you yourself argued, for these accused, there is not “innocent until proven guilty”. Just guilty. In fact, Biden himself holds that view. After all, this is not a trial… it’s a “job interview”.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-view-remarks-justice-brett-kavanaugh-tara-reade?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20foxnews%2Fpolitics%20%28Internal%20-%20Politics%20-%20Text%29

More than likely, there is substantiation to Reade’s accusation. YOU just have to prove otherwise. YOUR rule.

Your problem is that you don’t want a consistent application of any particular set of rules.

You complain about Biden’s flagrant nepotism in the case of his son having a job with a company in Ukraine by way of his father’s name, while simultaneously thinking it’s perfectly OK for Trump to pass out security clearances, White House advisory positions, and secret diplomatic missions to members of his immediate family; you condemn Biden on the basis of an accusation from an attention-seeking, delusional woman whose claims have been publicly contradicted by numerous friends and acquaintances, but overlook Trump’s long history of misconduct, and the fact that he kept a full-time bag man on the payroll to pay off various accusers. You deny it even when the man’s own recorded words have made plain his attitudes toward women. You’ll jump on any misstatement Biden has made, while ignoring the fact that Trump LIES constantly, often directly contradicting what he asserted to be true on a previous occasion.

It’s ludicrous. But it there’s nothing funny about it, considering what you’re trying to perpetuate for yet another four years.

@Greg:

Your problem is that you don’t want a consistent application of any particular set of rules.

Well, I don’t want YOUR rules to become the standard (though it has been the Democrat model) because I believe people are innocent until proven guilty, rather than guilty when proven politically useful. However, I WOULD enjoy seeing you Democrats apply the same rules upon Biden as you did upon Kavanaugh.

You complain about Biden’s flagrant nepotism in the case of his son having a job with a company in Ukraine by way of his father’s name

Yes, I do, because all the evidence indicates that is the case. However, that is my OPINION. What I want to see is an investigation and any appropriate subsequent trials. The same goes for Hillary’s emails, Uranium One, etc, etc, etc. Unlike Democrats, I don’t look to condemn and destroy based on an accusation or even kangaroo court show-trials like the Democrats put on for impeachment. I want the rule of law, due process and respect for justice restored. Democrats stand in the way of that.

Funny you pretend to worry about security. You are happy with the fact that Obama allowed NSA data to be mined by unsecured contractors and used later for political retribution. None of Trump’s security clearances has caused such damage.

What makes Reade “delusional”? The fact you don’t like what she says? She is willing to testify under oath. What we clearly see is how Democrats protect their own against any and all accusations. They pretend to honor “BelieveHer” but this is only when it can be aimed in the proper direction. Not as a rule.

https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/katrina-trinko/joe-biden-justin-fairfax-and-end-believe-all-women

This is how Biden and other Democrats SOMETIMES feels women should be believed. Notice the absence of a reliance on evidence or proof.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-view-remarks-justice-brett-kavanaugh-tara-reade?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29

Yeah, I want to see Democrats held to their own standards. Maybe then they would learn to appreciate and respect the Constitution.

What makes Reade “delusional”?

We could start with what she says about her father. I don’t believe Daddy was subjecting her to mental and physical abuse by declining to pick up the tab for acting school and suggesting that she should instead study law, but that’s how she sees it. She seems to view the entire world through a victim’s lens:

I am one of the vanquished by powerful men. It is hard and awful to write or say it out loud but there you have it. I want to believe that I have complete control of my destiny and I did try. However, my career was sidelined not once or twice but three times, because of powerful men that decided my fate. It is humbling and embarrassing to admit this defeat but true. And I am only going to share two examples.

Then there’s the dramatic change in what she alleges to have happened with Biden. This was the story she told, only a year ago. We’ve now progressed from the original claim that he made her feel uncomfortable to an allegation of “digital rape”. But hey, she’s now got both a national spotlight and a large audience eager to believe and promote the new story for very obvious political reasons.

@Greg: Well, wait a second… you believed without reservation in Blaise Ford’s credibility and she didn’t want to speak publicly, lied about fear of travel, lied about when she had her home remodeled, lied about being coached for her polygraph, couldn’t remember where the “assault” happened or how she got to that location or got home. THAT doesn’t seem a bit “delusional”, at best… a total and complete lie most likely?

Hey, no doubt she was spoiled and expected everything handed to her… she was working for and believing in Biden. Duh. That doesn’t mean Biden didn’t rape her.

As with Trump, Reade’s story changes. We know that’s so, because there’s a record of what she claimed in April 2019, and it’s very different from what she is claiming now.

What about the claims of the 25 women who have accused Donald Trump of improper conduct? Maybe you should look into those.

I’ve heard more than enough from Reade to figure her out. I can figure her out as easily as I can figure out that Frontpage Mag is pure, unadulterated garbage. “The Senate Dem Rape Culture That Made Biden”… You should wash your hands after handling that sort of manure.

@Greg:

You believe Christine Ford based on NADA.

Joe Biden is seen on video after video being all handsey with women yet you think he is innocent of the accusations. Well, if he is innocent, why doesn’t he prove it?

At least the Democrats don’t need toilet paper. They have you to lick their asses.

Christine Ford isn’t a pathetic, attention seeking sad-sack with a persistent victim complex and a record of accusation-making, obviously desperate for a spotlight and changing her story as needed to get there. Christine Ford had much to lose by coming forward, and nothing to gain by doing so.

Which of the two do you identify with, Gruntilda? Maybe you should turn down the vulgarity a notch.

I think there should be a law that if witnesses are under oath, those asking the questions should be considered under oath as well.

@Greg:

Christine Ford isn’t a pathetic, attention seeking sad-sack with a persistent victim complex and a record of accusation-making, obviously desperate for a spotlight and changing her story as needed to get there. Christine Ford had much to lose by coming forward, and nothing to gain by doing so.

No, Christine Ford was a pathetic liar. No where, when or who could she ever say. It was all made up by the DNC operatives. Sad you’re too stupid to know that. But I imagine ever if you did, you would never admit it.

Maybe you should turn down the vulgarity a notch.

The vulgar (you) deserve nothing but vulgarity.

We need to be able to see Biden’s records. Why doesn’t he and the U of Delaware release them?

@Greg:

As with Trump, Reade’s story changes. We know that’s so, because there’s a record of what she claimed in April 2019, and it’s very different from what she is claiming now.

Unlike Trump, there are corroborative witnesses that support her accusations. As you Democrats have proven, anyone can whip up an accusation. However, making that credible is another story.

Blaise Ford’s accusations against Kavanaugh were suspect from the beginning due to the overtly political way in which Feinstein wielded them. Then, she got her investigations and hearings and the accusations were PROVEN to be baseless, not just brushed away because a bunch of Democrats WANT to believe the accused.

You are on record believing the accused is guilty until they prove themselves innocent. Why is your belief so different now, Greg? How about answering that, because the only logical answer is the typical liberal hypocrisy.

What about the claims of the 25 women who have accused Donald Trump of improper conduct? Maybe you should look into those.

Why haven’t you already? The answer, of course, is you HAVE. They have been LABORIOUSLY examined and, obviously, no substance found.

I’ve heard more than enough from Reade to figure her out.

As soon as she accused a Democrat you figured her out. You determined, on the basis of party, you would declare her a liar. Just like the rest of your scumbag party.

Christine Ford isn’t a pathetic, attention seeking sad-sack with a persistent victim complex and a record of accusation-making, obviously desperate for a spotlight and changing her story as needed to get there.

Well, not since she got her $1,000,000 GoFundMe payoff.

Tell us, WHAT, with the guaranteed full support of the Democrat party and the Democrat media did Baise Ford of California have to possibly lose? No doubt that $1 million reward for trying to help destroy a totally innocent man was discussed in advance.