The day of Attorney General Bill Barr’s testimony in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, there was, as always, a selective leak dropped into the fray. With bated breath, we learned Special Counsel Robert Mueller had sent the attorney general a sternly worded letter grousing that Barr’s four-page March 24 explanation of the core conclusions of the Mueller report “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the Mueller’s “work and conclusions.”
The customary histrionics followed. Posturing Democrats on the judicial committee gave long soliloquies on Barr’s treacherous behavior. Sen. Mazie Hirono (D–HI) accusedthe attorney general of abusing his office and lying to Congress, and many others demanded his resignation. The usual suspects called for impeachment.
Barr had apparently masterminded the most inept cover-up in history, first by accurately laying out the outcome of the special counsel’s investigation. Then, after some light redactions (none instigated by the president), by releasing the report to the public so everyone in the entire world could read it for themselves.
Now, if a fresh observer to the Russia collusion circus only heard from Democrats, he might not know that the Mueller report had been public for weeks—sifted through and debated extensively. He certainly wouldn’t know that no criminality was uncovered. But most people heard something else. And Barr’s greatest sin had been preempting the collusion spin for the first time.
In his initial letter, the attorney general informed the public, before media was able to manipulate and confuse the core findings, that, despite its best efforts, the special counsel—an open-ended, unimpeded investigation with virtually no oversight—couldn’t find evidence to corroborate the prevailing myth that had been perpetuated for more than two years by Democrats and the political media.
By accurately conveying that the investigation had exonerated Trump and his administration of criminal conspiracy or coordination with the Russians, two years of ostensibly serious reporting was exposed as little more than Resistance fan fiction. Rather than take a moment’s self-reflection about how their actions had caused unprecedented political chaos, undermined trust in the electoral system, and crowded out legitimate coverage of the presidency, the entire collusion industry just moved its frenzied focus onto obstruction.
Well, under oath, the attorney general confirmed that he had spoken to Mueller on the phone and that the special counsel had been “very clear” that the AG’s letter laying out the conclusions was not inaccurate. There’s been no evidence to contradict his claim.
The AG’s letter had also accurately conveyed that Mueller, who it seems spent a lot of his efforts ferreting out unseemly Trumpian outbursts rather than finding nefarious Russians, punted on charges of obstruction. Volume II of the Mueller report, on the issue of obstruction, reads like a political document meant to incite Democrats into doing what the investigation did not. And that is Barr’s other sin: refusing to play Mueller’s game.
As National Review’s Rich Lowry noted, Mueller’s letter “shows how the special counsel—or people around him—was deeply concerned about the political spin around the report, especially if it wasn’t damaging enough to Trump.” It’s quite telling that for more than two years, the Mueller team only once thought it important enough to debunk the media’s misleading coverage of collusion (and this, probably when the investigation was functionally over) when there were dozens of instances that could have warranted a similar reaction.
According to the law, Mueller’s job ended when he handed in his report to the attorney general. Yet Barr, who was under no legal obligation to release any of the findings, offered Mueller a chance to review his letter before sending it to Congress. Mueller reportedly declined, only offering his own summary after the Barr letter had been released.
For Democrats and their allies, an investigation “not clearing” someone makes that someone as good as guilty if he happens to be a Republican. Sen. Kamala Harris (D–CA) actually accused Barr of failing to revisitthe underlying evidence in Mueller’s report before making a decision on obstruction. The same Democrats who acted apoplectic when Barr took a couple of weeks to go through redactions in the 400-page report want Trump’s AG to sift through the underlying evidence of a two-year, $35 million investigation and make his own recommendations … when, a year from now? What was the point of the Mueller report, then?
Mueller was their Messiah. He was going to lead them all to the Promised Land of Trump’s removal. Trump called Mueller’s “investigation” a witch hunt (which in the end, is what it was) so all the left circled their wagons around the righteous, honorable Mueller, who was doing god’s work (their god, the god of sedition).
Finally, Mueller’s report came out and… uh oh… NO collusion. None of what so many Democrats and so many blathering media faces had verifiable proof of. Also, no obstruction though, if you close one eye, squint the other and rapidly fan your hand in front of your face, there was some stuff that MIGHT look like obstruction.
Well, at that point, there were three options; one, admit they had been lying (or stupid) all along, that Trump had been found not just innocent but, having undergone the most extensive investigation of a human being in human history, is the most squeaky clean President we’ve ever seen. Or, two, turn on Mueller as an incompetent idiot that could not find all that evidence lying around like gold nuggets at Sutter’s Mill. But THEN they would have to admit to being liars or stupid for their groveling praise of Mueller (despite a long history of not-so-honorable achievements).
In the words of Ulysses Everett McGill, they were in a tight spot.
The entire left has chosen the third option; find a new villain. The new villain is Barr, who won’t play the Holder/Lynch game of supporting the deep state.
Now that Trump has been cleared of criminal conspiracy, it seems reasonable for the American people to have an understanding of how the Obama administration rationalized spying on its political rivals during a presidential election.
PANIC AND RUN PANIC AND RUN!
Because they already know.
did not harris rise to political aspirations on her back and oral sex?