The Many, Many Tales of Madison Cornbread Are Disintegrating Like Toilet Paper In a Stream of Piss

Loading

By Ace

Tony Ornato, the head of White House security that Madison Cornbread claims told her about Trump’s attempt to Commandeer The Beast, says he was “shocked” to hear such a claim and that it simply never happened.

A source close to former Trump Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Tony Ornato says he did not brief Jan. 6 Committee witness Cassidy Hutchinson on one of the major allegation she made to the committee Tuesday….
 
However, a source close to Ornato told Fox News that Ornato watched the hearing yesterday and was shocked when Cassidy made the allegation about the steering wheel.
 
Both Bobby Engel, the top agent on Trump’s Secret Service detail who was in the car, and Ornato, who was not in the car, testified to the January 6 Committee in private over the past year, the source close to Ornato said.
 
Engel and Ornato never brought up part about steering wheel, according to that source. Both want to testify on the record again and refute the part about Trump grabbing or trying to grab the wheel. The driver of the SUV, who is unnamed, will also cooperate with the committee.

So everyone involved in this story — according to Madison Cornbread — is willing to testify that it didn’t happen, but the committee won’t call them to testify.
 
Meanwhile, Madison Cornbread allegedly made up her claim that Trump’s lawyer spoke to her on January 6th. He wasn’t even there, sources say. And the January 6 committee refuses to address questions about this.

Jack Posobiec
@JackPosobiecBREAKING: Multiple sources including one who was at the WH on Jan 6 tell me Cipollone was not there in the am when Hutchinson testified she spoke with him. J6 Cmtes is aware of this discrepancy & are ignoring media inquiries about it. Seems she made up the entire conversation

Mark Meadows: Madison Cornbread is lying about me seeking a pardon from Trump.

Ali Vitali
@alivitali
More pushback on Hutchinson testimony, this time from a Meadows spox telling
@nbcnews: “Meadows never sought a pardon and never planned to.” From my convos, as of now, there seems no change in their posture re: testifying w/ the cmte and privilege claims.

The Hill reports that Republicans are “dismissing” Madison Cornbread’s testimony, pointing to mere “factual disputes,” as if those are an acceptable reason to dismiss the well-crafted narrative she and Liz Cheney spent all week perfecting!

Republicans dismiss Hutchinson testimony, pointing to factual disputesFormer President Trump’s most vocal defenders in the House are working to undercut former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s explosive testimony at Tuesday’s Jan. 6 select committee hearing, calling it “hearsay” and pointing to disputes over statements she made.
 
Hutchinson, who was an aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, relayed fly-on-the-wall firsthand knowledge of conversations between Trump and top officials.
 
Those included Trump wanting to get rid of magnetometers outside his Ellipse rally to let in more of the crowd, that potential plans were discussed for Trump to travel to the Capitol on the 6th, and aides saying Trump was aware of “Hang Mike Pence” chants and thought he deserved it.
 
But there are disputes over other portions of her testimony, most notably the secondhand allegation that Trump lunged for the steering wheel of the car a Secret Service agent was driving away from the Ellipse rally when the Secret Service refused to take him to the Capitol building.
 
“The sham Committee’s star witness is already discredited less than 24 hours after her testimony. It was all hearsay. This is the Russia hoax playbook. Democrats’ media allies are simply repeating their outrageous and evidence-free accusations,” said Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), who was originally selected to be ranking member on the committee before House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) vetoed the choice.
 
Twitter accounts for the House Republican Conference and House Judiciary Committee Republicans fired off rapid response reactions to the hearing in real time, dismissing it and tearing down Hutchinson’s testimony.
 
“It’s literally all hearsay evidence,” the House Judiciary GOP account said.
 
Rep. Dan Bishop (R-N.C.) also tweeted live reactions to the hearing and the disputes that followed, alleging that the committee lied.
 
“I spent nearly 30 years trying cases in an adversarial court system designed to ferret out truth. Liz Cheney knows how it’s supposed to work, but she humiliated herself and the rest of this sham committee yesterday out of uncontrollable spite for Trump,” Bishop told The Hill in a statement.

NeverTrump has an easy answer to all this: Everyone’s lying except Madison Cornbread.
 
Here’s Noted Salon Hot 25 Conservative Blogger AllahPundit, for example.

Consider the possibility — just a possibility — that Tony Ornato and the agents are lying, whether because they feel personal loyalty to Trump or because they deem themselves duty-bound as an institutional matter not to embarrass the presidents they serve as Secret Service agents. I emphasize again that Trump, the Republican frontrunner for the 2024 nomination, promoted Ornato to a powerful political position inside his White House by making him deputy chief of staff, something I’ve never heard happen to a Secret Service agent. Ornato owes Trump. And may yet work for him again.

Remember, if you ever deny a claim made by his friends on the left, he’ll call you a “Trump Cultist” and “Reality Denier.” But when facts arise that destroy his cherished narrative, he has no problem with claiming, “The Secret Service just employs a lot of Crisis Actors who flood the media with false claims that brave truth-tellers are lying.”
 
You’re demanded to believe the left’s claims, but the left (including NeverTrump) is under no reciprocal obligation to believe any evidence that damages their own claims. It’s a one-sided double-standard, which is only possible for the same reason such obviously unfair schemes ever persist: because the people benefiting from the scheme control almost all of the power (in this case, the media/government power).
 
And what about those objections that nearly everything that Madison Cornbread attests to is just hearsay — I heard from someone who heard it from someone else?
 
Well, Super-Lawyer Andy McCarthy is here to reassure you that…. hearsay is awesome and also, this isn’t hearsay.

Now, about that. Some commentators are dismissing her description of what happened in the car as hearsay. That is part irrelevant and part inaccurate.To begin with, the federal rules of evidence do not apply to congressional proceedings. They also never apply to investigations, which is what the committee says it is conducting. The point of an investigation is to search for reliable, admissible evidence. For that, hearsay is not only allowed but encouraged — it’s often how we find out who has a probative, firsthand account.

Hey you old, decrepit bald woman — we know who has a firsthand account. Engels and Ornato. But the committee isn’t calling them because they’re not telling the made-up story that Madison Cornbread is. They are specifically calling the hearsay witness, and not the firsthand knowledge witnesses, because the people with actual knowledge dispute the claims of the hearsay witness.
 
Is hearsay still a wonderful investigative tool in this case, you nasty old biddy?

Furthermore, I am not even sure Hutchinson’s testimony in this regard would be inadmissible as hearsay if the rules of evidence did apply.As I related in the column, Hutchinson said she was informed about what (allegedly) happened in the car only minutes later by Tony Ornato, who ran security at the White House. Ornato was not speaking idly. He was reporting what happened to a top aide (Hutchinson) of the White House chief of staff (Mark Meadows), Ornato’s superior. Most significantly, if Hutchinson’s version of events is correct, Engel was with Ornato as he described what happened.
 
If Engel was present, engaged, and listening to what Ornato said, and the circumstances were such that, if Ornato got details wrong, Engel would naturally be expected to correct him, then Ornato’s words were by implication Engel’s words, as if he had spoken them himself. It would not be simply a matter of someone telling Hutchinson what that person saw Trump do; it would essentially be Engel telling Hutchinson what Engel did with Trump.

Irrelevant emphasis in the original.
 
I have no idea what exception to the hearsay rule he thinks is implicated here. I asked a lawyer to rack her brains, and she was also baffled.
 
Unless a legal moron can put me some information, it sure seems like this rapidly-declining old fuck has invented a brand new exception to the hearsay rule to claim Madison Cornbread’s testimony isn’t hearsay.
 
So NeverTrump is having a normal one, as they say.

Read more
 

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
33 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Yeah, along with actual solid evidence, hearsay can be used to support it, but when all you HAVE is hearsay, rumors and “I assumed”, you have shit.

As of June 30, the Secret Service hasn’t officially denied Hutchinson’s account, nor have the named individuals done so.

As of June 30, the Secret Service hasn’t officially denied Hutchinson’s account, nor have the named individuals done so.

Actually, they have, but like what is missing from your beloved klown kangaroo kommittee, that’s just truth, facts and stuff. Nothing you’ve come in contact with.

As of July 1, the Secret Service STILL hasn’t officially denied Hutchinson’s account, nor have the named individuals done so.

Did you know that Secret Service agent Tony Oranto is politically aligned with Trump?

Hutchinson said that Ornato had told her Trump had tried to grab the steering wheel and that Ornato had made those comments in a room with Robert Engel, the Secret Service agent in charge of Trump’s detail on the day.

Ornato was White House deputy chief of staff for operations at the time. He had been permitted to leave his Secret Service role temporarily in order to serve as deputy chief of staff in an unusual move for the service.

June 30, 2022 – Secret Service Ties to Trump Ring Alarm Bells Amid Jan 6. Revelations

So “hearsay” is your new gold standard. You never tire of being played for a fool. Calling Bob Mueller.

Discussion of two sugars lite cassiday is a complete waste of time She lied her pretty little ass off and most everyone knows that.

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

Your problem is that she ISN’T a submissive little office slave. She has more spine that any of Trump’s servile, intimidated toadies. You people don’t know patriots, honor, truth, or integrity when you see it. You totally lost that capacity when you sold your souls to a lying, mentally unbalanced conman from Queens.

Mark Meadows’ associate threatened ex-White House aide before her testimony

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Your problem is that she ISN’T a submissive little office slave. She has more spine that any of Trump’s servile, intimidated toadies.

You know, it doesn’t exactly take “spine” to go before a 100% partisan panel and tell them lies that promotes their agenda.

Two committee members and nearly all of the people who have testified are REPUBLICANS.

There’s NO evidence that ANY of witnesses have lied under oath.

What “agenda” are you referring to?

It takes spine to tell the truth when you’re exposing a vengeful s.o.b. whose followers have waged campaigns of intimidation against anyone who has contradicted his lies. They’ve made death threats elected officials who are members of their own party, against their families, and against campaign workers. EVERYONE IS AWARE OF THAT. Hutchinson’s testimony was rushed out of fear for her personal safety.

You know, it doesn’t exactly take “spine” to go before a 100% partisan panel and tell them lies that promotes their agenda.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Two committee members with “R”s behind their names, who were handpicked by the California drunkard, San Fran Nancy, and who agreed because they thought it would increase their popularity with the left, are trying to have their Hail Mary moment before they become D.C. history. Ironically, the majority of the nation doesn’t give a tinker’s damn about the J6 hearings.

As to the vengeful s.o.b.; nothing is a greater example of his actions than the kangaroo court trials held against those who did absolutely nothing, broke no laws, on January 6, 2021. Perhaps you, being the legal eagle you pretend to be, can tell us when “illegal parading” became a crime in D.C.?

Cassidy Hutchinson was a low rung staffer who has been out of a job for over a year. Of course, she got a big hug from The Lizard for giving what was meant to be an Oscar performance. Only problem, the people she claimed she overheard deny her b/s and have told (left wing) reporters they are willing to testify to such.

I could hope that you would finally wake up and realize that this is no different than Stalin’s show trials. But then, you still defend the Steele dossier as truthful. You are beyond help, Comrade Greggie.

If you don’t kiss Trump’s ring you’re not a Republican? If so, you’re talking about a personality cult, not a party.

Republicans had a legitimate political party. Obviously some of them have no intention of letting a crooked populace manipulator permanently steal it, and take America apart in the process.

There’s the common agenda some have made disparaging reference to.

Two committee members with “R”s behind their names…

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Trump is not Republican. Only asshole, failing Democrats say he is.

If you don’t kiss Trump’s ring you’re not a Republican? If so, you’re talking about a personality cult, not a party.

For all the great benefits and accomplishments Trump delivered for this country, people like you should be kissing his ass. You’re barely worthy of THAT.

San Fran Nancy

The San FranPsycho.

Those two believe the Democrats are going to win their effort to turn the US into a one-party nation and they want to be “reeducated” when it happens. They not only turned on their party, but more importantly, they’ve turned on the People, the Constitution and the Nation.

Like the boy who cried wolf, the Democrats usual lies have no weight.

They are ignored.

Touch Trump, and see what happens.

Democrats are violent, totalitarian, and waging a campaigns of intimidation.

Republicans and Independents (the actual majority in America) are now.

Hutchinson’s “testimony” is concocted and completely false.

Meanwhile, NATO and the US are moving thousands of troops to fight Russia.

Two committee members and nearly all of the people who have testified are REPUBLICANS.

Wrong. Cheazy and Kizzazzer are Democrat assets. All on the committee were picked by Pelosi for the specific purpose of lying to the American people. That means that, ultimately, all those who testified were chosen by Pelosi for the specific purpose of lying to the American people. Thus far, not one actual fact has emerged condemning Trump for ANYTHING. Just propaganda. Smear. Lies. More “Russian collusion”.

You think it takes some kind of “courage” to go before a totally partisan panel and recite the lies they told you to recite? That’s about a chickenshit as you can get.

Credibility not required for the anti-Trump faction. Go shopping today buy a clue.

Cameras Catch Telling Moment Between Liz Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson Right After Hearing

Last edited 1 year ago by Mully

Hell, for the left to accomplish its mission, credibility is an impediment. They can’t achieve their goals without lying.

Did you know that Secret Service agent Tony Oranto is politically aligned with Trump?

So? Probably every Secret Service agent is a patriot.

As of July 1, the Secret Service STILL hasn’t officially denied Hutchinson’s account, nor have the named individuals done so.

Actually, they have, but like what is missing from your beloved klown kangaroo kommittee, that’s just truth, facts and stuff. Nothing you’ve come in contact with.

Actually, they have…

Either post a link to that or stop saying it, because as of July 1, they HAVEN’T.

There are no facts to support the new Trump/insurrection hoax.

None.

Either post a link to that or stop saying it, because as of July 1, they HAVEN’T.

Post a link proving they haven’t.

Reply to 
Curt
 3 hours ago
As of June 30, the Secret Service hasn’t officially denied Hutchinson’s account, nor have the named individuals done so.

One of the best examples of mental retardation yet sans stolen election 2020.

Well, when you don’t care about finding the truth, just creating a false narrative to use for prosecution, it’s not too difficult a job.

Aside from being an opportunistic liar, I have noting against the lady, but at some point, there needs to be a PENALTY for blatantly lying under oath to support a political agenda. Our government is being destroyed by the lies and subterfuge.

Steve Bannon’s trial on two federal counts of criminal contempt begins July 18, 2022.

He was previously pardoned by Trump while awaiting trial on criminal charges of defrauding Trump supporters of over $1 Million.

Trump supporters are like abused women who keep crawling back to their abusers for more of the same.

Here a few of Cassidy’s whoppers:

1.) Cassidy Hutchinson said President Trump attempted to grab the steering wheel of “the beast” and wrestle control from the Secret Service on January 6th.

Truth: President Trump was not in “the beast” on January 6th.

Truth: Secret Service agents willing to testify against this ridiculous lie by young Cassidy. It never happened.

2.) Cassiday Hutchinson said President Trump grabbed the neck area of Secret Service agent Bobby Engel.

Truth: Bobby Engel willing to testify this was a lie.

3.) Cassidy Hutchinson said President Trump broke dishes and flipped tablecloths on January 6th.

Truth: President Trump refutes the nonsensical claim.

4.) Cassidy Hutchinson claimed to have written a handwritten note on January 6th.

Truth: Former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann wrote the note and testified to this fact under oath previously before the committee.

5.) Cassidy Hutchinson said her boss Mark Meadows called Roger Stone on January 5th to find out what would play out the next day on January 6th.

Truth: Roger Stone has never spoken to Mark Meadows outside of a conversation they held in a green room in 2019.

6.) Cassidy Hutchinson said Mark Meadows spoke with General Flynn on January 5th.

Truth: General Flynn has never had a phone conversation with Mark Meadows.

7.) Cassidy Hutchinson said General Flynn and Roger Stone participated by phone in a briefing in the war room in the Willard Hotel with Mark Meadows on January 5th.

Truth: Did not happen. Stone and Flynn have not spoken with Meadows on the phone, ever.

8.) Cassidy Hutchinson said Jeffrey Clark met with Rudy Giuliani and Trump campaign at White House.

Truth: This is false. They’ve never met or communicated.

https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1542239360413736961?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1542239360413736961%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2022%2F07%2Fsurprise-witness-cassidy-hutchinsons-nine-confirmed-lies-debunked-congressional-testimony-trump%2F

9.) Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Trump’s White House counsel Pat Cipollone was at the White House on the morning of January 6, 2021.

Truth: Pat Cipollone was NOT at the White House on January 6.