When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nathan Blue
6 months ago
As I’ve said, Democrats have largely left DeSantis alone, and for good reason.
Much how they donate to GOP primary runners who they want to win because they are easier to beat in the general election (how the f*ck that is legal, I have no idea), they want DeSantis to run because they have a plan to destroy him.
Well, if I were like you and in the grip of pagan gods, such that men can be women and anything goes…no right or wrong…I can see how you’d ask such a stupid question.
Paying money to corrupt your opponent’s primary is wrong, undemocratic, and just cowardly.
Indeed, there are no laws against it…but it makes the elections have less authority, if any at all. It’s just the usual cowards taking the usual liberties to gain the usual power.
And it’s fun to have you utterly at a loss for offering any counter argument to the idea that corrupting a primary with money is wrong, defaulting to the almost clock-work umbrage you take at the word “demonic.”
“utterly at a loss for offering any counter argument to the idea that corrupting a primary with money is wrong”
You gave no real argument as to why it is; you just asserted it. I’d like to take all private money out of elections, but, if we’re doing the whole “money is speech” thing, then deal with it.
The money you’re complaining about is simply Lefty speech saying “deal with the results of your insanity, MAGAs.”
“It’s like you’re on a string.”
Speaking of which, that’s one of your stock phrases that you trot out whenever *your* string is pulled.
Ron and Trump should work together to ensure this plan doesn’t come to fruition. Those two united can flip the script and destroyed the GOPe once and for all.
You could have 12 years to transform this country and clean house of all the corrupt bureaucrats.
As I’ve said, Democrats have largely left DeSantis alone, and for good reason.
Much how they donate to GOP primary runners who they want to win because they are easier to beat in the general election (how the f*ck that is legal, I have no idea), they want DeSantis to run because they have a plan to destroy him.
“(how the f*ck that is legal, I have no idea)”
On what conceivable grounds would it be made illegal?
Well, if I were like you and in the grip of pagan gods, such that men can be women and anything goes…no right or wrong…I can see how you’d ask such a stupid question.
Paying money to corrupt your opponent’s primary is wrong, undemocratic, and just cowardly.
Indeed, there are no laws against it…but it makes the elections have less authority, if any at all. It’s just the usual cowards taking the usual liberties to gain the usual power.
Demonic, to its core.
“Demonic, to its core.”
You guys use this word so much that it has lost all meaning.
No. It’s finally gained meaning after decades of having none.
Maybe you want to figure out what god you’re really serving, ace.
And it’s fun to have you utterly at a loss for offering any counter argument to the idea that corrupting a primary with money is wrong, defaulting to the almost clock-work umbrage you take at the word “demonic.”
It’s like you’re on a string.
“utterly at a loss for offering any counter argument to the idea that corrupting a primary with money is wrong”
You gave no real argument as to why it is; you just asserted it. I’d like to take all private money out of elections, but, if we’re doing the whole “money is speech” thing, then deal with it.
The money you’re complaining about is simply Lefty speech saying “deal with the results of your insanity, MAGAs.”
“It’s like you’re on a string.”
Speaking of which, that’s one of your stock phrases that you trot out whenever *your* string is pulled.