Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

As I’ve said, Democrats have largely left DeSantis alone, and for good reason.

Much how they donate to GOP primary runners who they want to win because they are easier to beat in the general election (how the f*ck that is legal, I have no idea), they want DeSantis to run because they have a plan to destroy him.

“(how the f*ck that is legal, I have no idea)”

On what conceivable grounds would it be made illegal?

Well, if I were like you and in the grip of pagan gods, such that men can be women and anything goes…no right or wrong…I can see how you’d ask such a stupid question.

Paying money to corrupt your opponent’s primary is wrong, undemocratic, and just cowardly.

Indeed, there are no laws against it…but it makes the elections have less authority, if any at all. It’s just the usual cowards taking the usual liberties to gain the usual power.

Demonic, to its core.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

“Demonic, to its core.”

You guys use this word so much that it has lost all meaning.

No. It’s finally gained meaning after decades of having none.

Maybe you want to figure out what god you’re really serving, ace.

And it’s fun to have you utterly at a loss for offering any counter argument to the idea that corrupting a primary with money is wrong, defaulting to the almost clock-work umbrage you take at the word “demonic.”

It’s like you’re on a string.

“utterly at a loss for offering any counter argument to the idea that corrupting a primary with money is wrong”

You gave no real argument as to why it is; you just asserted it. I’d like to take all private money out of elections, but, if we’re doing the whole “money is speech” thing, then deal with it.

The money you’re complaining about is simply Lefty speech saying “deal with the results of your insanity, MAGAs.”

“It’s like you’re on a string.”

Speaking of which, that’s one of your stock phrases that you trot out whenever *your* string is pulled.

Last edited 1 year ago by Michael