It never fails. Every single time I write about Hillary Clinton, I get some version of the same response. “Move on, Republicans. Stop distracting from Donald Trump.” But wait. Didn’t she write a book that she wanted people to discuss? Doesn’t matter. Move along. Didn’t the New York Times just break news that further illustrates that she’s not just a terrible politician but also a terrible cultural standard-bearer for #MeToo? Doesn’t matter. Move along. Didn’t she do this at the Grammy awards last night?
A surprise appearance from Hillary Clinton reading Fire & Fury at the Grammys pic.twitter.com/VAYk70pqAj
— David Mack (@davidmackau) January 29, 2018
Doesn’t matter. Move along.
I can be dense, but I’m slowly learning the rules. When Hillary demonstrates fire and spirit and determination, then we should be all, “Yassss! Queen!” When Republicans push back, then we’re “obsessed.” We’re all into “whataboutism.” In other words, what “move along” really means is, “Shut up while we write the history of the 2016 election.”
Sorry, but no. The Left doesn’t get to hand us one of the worst and most corrupt major-party nominees in American history and then later recast the election as some sort of battle between good and evil. The Hillary rehabilitation project is the Left’s rehabilitation project, and they simply don’t get to launch it unopposed.
Leftists have sinister plans for America ever since Karl Marx wrote his books Das Kapital and The Communists manifesto and Hanoi Jane who once urged some collage kids that they hope and Pray we will finaly become Communists noting that Communisms a totaly secular/Humanists idea
It’s David French and the similarly obsessed who can’t seem to shut up about Hillary Clinton. He desperately needs new material.
Maybe if the hildebeast would just go away he might be able to.
is there any good reason why the slut is still around? whore dog billy and now the cuckold, drunk kerry wants to run for the pres. oh how many times did kerry shot himself for purple hearts?
Indeed. To them, it doesn’t matter. They don’t want the facts, they want Hillary’s version of her truth and nothing else. Otherwise, they may have to consider the worthlessness of their failed ideology and the harm it does. Can’t be having that.
So, when Hillary inserts herself into the conversation, it isn’t proper to respond to that insertion? The irony of Hillary’s dramatic reading was lost on most; a liar reading lies to people who prefer lies to truth.
It’s less that the right ‘can’t shut up’ about Hillary and more that as the left keeps ‘obsessing’ about finding some means, ANY means (try another avenue, dammit!) to try and get rid of the duly-elected President, how more and more keeps surfacing about the various unethical, unsavory, improper, borderline (if not actually) illegal steps taken by Ms. Clinton and her minions to rig the election on her behalf.
Funny how we were reassured over and over again by certain of our left-leaning friends here that the investigations of her majesty were not soft-pedaled and pre-determined – yet as the lefty initiated investigations of supposed mis-doings by the Trump campaign dig deeper and deeper, proof that at least some of the Hillary ‘matters’ had the deck stacked in her favor and that any collusion with Russian’s that took place was by the DNC (or operatives being paid by the DNC/Hillary campaign) trying to undermine the opposition keeps appearing.
Perhaps if the left would quit ‘obsessing’ about trying to depose the legitimate leadership of the country Hillary could fade into well-deserved obscurity.
I, for one would be happy to never hear her name again.
Unless, of course it was the announcement of her conviction and sentencing from any of her various investigations being pursued with the same zeal and effort being applied to the ones against DJT.
As I predicted, Hillary has responded again to the revelation that she did some minor wrist-slapping of one of her campaign officials that sexually harassed one of the staff. I said that her weak, oblique response to why she largely ignored the incident, which led the perve to continue his behavior, would draw criticism and she would take a different tack. She released a Facebook post just before Trump’s SOTU (hoping either to draw all the attention from his speech or that her post would be largely unnoticed, I don’t know which) that, like her emails and numerous other massive failures she has engineered, if she had it to do over, she wouldn’t… whatever the hell that is supposed to mean.
At this point, can anyone imagine what the nation would be like if SHE were President? Brrrrrrrr…..
As has been pointed out many times before, if there was actual evidence establishing the reality of Hillary Clinton’s “many, many crimes,” years of endless taxpayer-funded investigations would have uncovered it, and she would have long ago been prosecuted.
The man in the White House is a fraud. He got elected by selling a fraudulent narrative. That’s the story of his life. He became a billionaire by convincing people of the reality of his bullshit. That’s his primary skill.
In fact, the left has pretty much quit Hillary Clinton. She’s part of the past. Only the right continues to obsess about her. The danger represented by Donald Trump is both clear and present.
@Greg: Gee you like frauds. Obama certainly is and was one.
I’m getting the impression you simply haven’t been paying attention.
There’s some required reading for you in order to catch up… unless you have been purposely avoiding the news of current events because the little liberal world of fascist-style governmental attacks on personal liberty is falling apart. The fact is, there is a bit of a problem over at the Department of Justice. It seems a former President was turning it into a Gestapo-like organization that was designed to carry out the will of any liberal that needed a little muscle applied to any Republicans in the way of the march towards socialism. That also served the purpose of protecting any prospective liberal that would seek to continue that march but might find HERself in a bit of a self-made quagmire.
But, this is coming to an end. McCabe has been exposed for what he is. Comey has been exposed. Mueller is on the verge of exposure. Your Democrats are fighting tooth and nail to keep the latest revelation of Obama’s FISA abuses from seeing the light of day, but they’ve failed and that is going to hurt them… REAL bad.
So, we pretty much know what Hillary has been up to and we now know (instead of merely suspecting) why the obvious has not been prosecuted. So, calm down, cool your jets, take a chill-pill… you’re worst fears are about to be realized.
Trump is no fraud; he’s the REAL DEAL. He said what he would do if he became President and now he is doing it. No, the fraud was Obama. He proclaimed his administration would be the most open, transparent and honest administration in history (where is the media tearing THAT lie apart?). Well, we are just now getting the transparency which is revealing what a corrupt, anti-American regime it was.
Well now, that IS a fact. She, another massive fraud, is indeed relegated to the waste bin of history, but you had best tell her for she doesn’t seem to know it yet. You should tell your Hollywood crybabies as well, because they think she is so revered, topical and pertinent that they keep dredging her up every chance they get. I’m with you, though… I am sick to death of her corrupt, criminal, sore loser face and hope she would Bleachbit herself out of existence, like she did 33,000 “yoga” emails.
That’s exactly what it was. The series being broadcast now about the scandals of the Clintons from their time in the late 70’s through his impeachment and suspension of his law license, from the ‘suicide’ of Vince Foster, the deaths of several acquaintances of the Clintons which continue to this day. Whether Trump can or is appropriately labeled as ‘good’, there can surely be no doubt about the pure evil of the Clintons.
Not true. Depends on who is doing the investigation and whether they want to find anything or whether they cover up anything they might find. It is very hard to see fine details with your eyes closed.
@Redteam: Yeah, a real investigation doesn’t declare the subject innocent before the investigation begins. But Greg regards that as “justice”.
@Bill… Deplorable Me: The knew they were not going to bring her to trial, which is why they destroyed the evidence…just in case.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice are not part of a complex, politically motivated conspiracy designed to cover up the “many, many crimes” of Hillary Clinton. That’s just the bullshit line being pushed by the Trump administration and his Congressional lackeys, who have pretty much sold their souls at this point.
The GOP majority has become a Trump tool. They’ve abandoned their responsibility to the nation, allowing the destruction of Constitutional checks and balances to empower a dangerous blowhard who gives them things they want.
So why, according to Strzrok declare they needed to go soft on the questioning of Hillary because “she might be the next President”? Because they were so interested in finding the facts and punishing those responsible?
I provided you a pretty comprehensive reading list in #30. Don’t you WANT to learn?
Odd that those who have been routinely leaking information from the “investigation”, most of it false and purposely planted to pinpoint leaks, object to this information being released. We will see what the reason was that the FBI has been “losing” texts and documents, stonewalling and obstructing.