JUST AS WAS TRUE when the Mueller investigation closed without a single American being charged with criminally conspiring with Russia over the 2016 election, Wednesday’s issuance of the long-waited report from the Department of Justice’s Inspector General reveals that years of major claims and narratives from the U.S. media were utter frauds.
Before evaluating the media component of this scandal, the FBI’s gross abuse of its power – its serial deceit – is so grave and manifest that it requires little effort to demonstrate it. In sum, the IG Report documents multiple instances in which the FBI – in order to convince a FISA court to allow it spy on former Trump campaign operative Carter Page during the 2016 election – manipulated documents, concealed crucial exonerating evidence, and touted what it knew were unreliable if not outright false claims.
If you don’t consider FBI lying, concealment of evidence, and manipulation of documents in order to spy on a U.S. citizen in the middle of a presidential campaign to be a major scandal, what is? But none of this is aberrational: the FBI still has its headquarters in a building named after J. Edgar Hoover – who constantly blackmailed elected officials with dossiers and tried to blackmail Martin Luther King into killing himself – because that’s what these security state agencies are. They are out-of-control, virtually unlimited police state factions that lie, abuse their spying and law enforcement powers, and subvert democracy and civic and political freedoms as a matter of course.
In this case, no rational person should allow standard partisan bickering to distort or hide this severe FBI corruption. The IG Report leaves no doubt about it. It’s brimming with proof of FBI subterfuge and deceit, all in service of persuading a FISA court of something that was not true: that U.S. citizen and former Trump campaign official Carter Page was an agent of the Russian government and therefore needed to have his communications surveilled.
Just a few excerpts from the report should suffice to end any debate for rational persons about how damning it is. The focus of the first part of the IG Report was on the warrants obtained by the DOJ, at the behest of the FBI, to spy on Carter Page on the grounds that there was probable cause to believe he was an agent of the Russian government. That Page was a Kremlin agent was a widely disseminated media claim – typically asserted as fact even though it had no evidence. As a result of this media narrative, the Mueller investigation examined these widespread accusations yet concluded that “the investigation did not establish that Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.”
The IG Report went much further, documenting a multitude of lies and misrepresentations by the FBI to deceive the FISA court into believing that probable cause existed to believe Page was a Kremlin agent. The first FISA warrant to spy on Page was obtained during the 2016 election, after Page had left the Trump campaign but weeks before the election was to be held.
About the warrant application submitted regarding Page, the IG Report, in its own words, “found that FBI personnel fell far short of the requirement in FBI policy that they ensure that all factual statements in a FISA application are ‘scrupulously accurate.’” Specifically, “we identified multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation, based upon information the FBI had in its possession at the time the application was filed.”
It’s vital to reiterate this because of its gravity: we identified multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation, based upon information the FBI had in its possession at the time the application was filed.
The specifics cited by the IG Report are even more damning. Specifically, “based upon the information known to the FBI in October 2016, the first application contained  seven significant inaccuracies and omissions.” Among those “significant inaccuracies and omissions”: the FBI concealed that Page had been working with the CIA in connection with his dealings with Russia and had notified CIA case managers of at least some of those contacts after he was “approved as an ‘operational contact’” with Russia; the FBI lied about both the timing and substance of Page’s relationship with the CIA; vastly overstated the value and corroboration of Steele’s prior work for the U.S. Government to make him appear more credible than he was; and concealed from the court serious reasons to doubt the reliability of Steele’s key source.
Moreover, the FBI’s heavy reliance on the Steele Dossier to obtain the FISA warrant – a fact that many leading national security reporters spent two years denying occurred – was particularly concerning because, as the IG Report put it, “we found that the FBI did not have information corroborating the specific allegations against Carter Page in Steele’s reporting when it relied upon his reports in the first FISA application or subsequent renewal applications.”
To spy on a U.S. citizen in the middle of an election, one who had just been working with one of the two major presidential campaigns, the FBI touted a gossipy, unverified, unreliable rag that it had no reason to believe and every reason to distrust, but it hid all of that from the FISA court, which it knew needed to believe that the Steele Dossier was something it was not if it were to give the FBI the spying authorization it wanted.
In 2017, the FBI decided to seek reauthorization of the FISA warrant to continue to spy on Page, and sought and obtained it three times: in January, April and June, 2017. Not only, according to the IG Report, did the FBI repeat all of those “seven significant inaccuracies and omission,” but added ten additional major inaccuracies. As the Report put it: “In addition to repeating the seven significant errors contained in the first FISA application and outlined above, we identified 10 additional significant errors in the three renewal applications, based upon information known to the FBI after the first application and before one or more of the renewals.”
Among the most significant new acts of deceit was that the FBI “omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Subsource, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she did not recall any discussion with Person 1 concerning Wikileaks and there was ‘nothing bad’ about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin.”
In other words, Steele’s own key source told the FBI that Steele was lying about what the source said: an obviously critical fact that the FBI simply concealed from the FISA court because it knew how devastating that would be to being able to continue to spy on Page. As the Report put it, “among the most serious of the 10 additional errors we found in the renewal applications was the FBI’s failure to advise [DOJ] or the court of the inconsistences, described in detail in Chapter Six, between Steele and his Primary Sub-source on the reporting relied upon in the FISA applications.”
The IG Report also found that the FBI hid key information from the court about Steele’s motives: for instance, it “omitted information obtained from [Bruce] Ohr about Steele and his election reporting, including that (1) Steele’s reporting was going to Clinton’s presidential campaign and others, (2) [Fusion GPS’s Glenn] Simpson was paying Steele to discuss his reporting with the media, and (3) Steele was “desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being the U.S. President.”
If it does not bother you to learn that the FBI repeatedly and deliberately deceived the FISA court into granting it permission to spy on a U.S. citizen in the middle of a presidential campaign, then it is virtually certain that you are either someone with no principles, someone who cares only about partisan advantage and nothing about basic civil liberties and the rule of law, or both. There is simply no way for anyone of good faith to read this IG Report and reach any conclusion other than that this is yet another instance of the FBI abusing its power in severe ways to subvert and undermine U.S. democracy. If you don’t care about that, what do you care about?
* * * * *
But the revelations of the IG Report are not merely a massive FBI scandal. They are also a massive media scandal, because they reveal that so much of what the U.S. media has authoritatively claimed about all of these matters for more than two years is completely false.
Ever since Trump’s inauguration, a handful of commentators and journalists – I’m included among them – have been sounding the alarm about the highly dangerous trend of news outlets not merely repeating the mistake of the Iraq War by blindly relying on the claims of security state agents but, far worse, now employing them in their newsrooms to shape the news. As Politico’s media writer Jack Shafer wrote in 2018, in an article entitled “The Spies Who Came Into the TV Studio”:
In the old days, America’s top spies would complete their tenures at the CIA or one of the other Washington puzzle palaces and segue to more ordinary pursuits. Some wrote their memoirs. One ran for president. Another died a few months after surrendering his post. But today’s national-security establishment retiree has a different game plan. After so many years of brawling in the shadows, he yearns for a second, lucrative career in the public eye. He takes a crash course in speaking in soundbites, refreshes his wardrobe and signs a TV news contract. Then, several times a week, waits for a network limousine to shuttle him to the broadcast news studios where, after a light dusting of foundation and a spritz of hairspray, he takes a supporting role in the anchors’ nighttime shows. . . .[T]he downside of outsourcing national security coverage to the TV spies is obvious. They aren’t in the business of breaking news or uncovering secrets. Their first loyalty—and this is no slam—is to the agency from which they hail. Imagine a TV network covering the auto industry through the eyes of dozens of paid former auto executives and you begin to appreciate the current peculiarities.
In a perfect television world, the networks would retire the retired spooks from their payrolls and reallocate those sums to the hiring of independent reporters to cover the national security beat. Let the TV spies become unpaid anonymous sources because when you get down to it, TV spies don’t want to make news—they just want to talk about it.
It’s long been the case that CIA, FBI and NSA operatives tried to infiltrate and shape domestic news, but they at least had the decency to do it clandestinely. In 2008, the New York Times’ David Barstow won the Pulitzer Prize for exposing a secret Pentagon program in which retired Generals and other security state agents would get hired as commentators and analysts and then – unbeknownst to their networks – coordinate their messaging to ensure that domestic news was being shaped by the propaganda of the military and intelligence communities.
But now it’s all out in the open. It’s virtually impossible to turn on MSNBC or CNN without being bombarded with former Generals, CIA operatives, FBI agents and NSA officials who now work for those networks as commentators and, increasingly, as reporters.
The past three years of “Russiagate” reporting – for which U.S. journalists have lavished themselves with Pulitzers and other prizes despite a multitude of embarrassing and dangerous errors about the Grave Russian Threat – has relied almost exclusively on anonymous, uncorroborated claims from Deep State operatives (and yes, that’s a term that fully applies to the U.S.). The few exceptions are when these networks feature former high-level security state operatives on camera to spread their false propaganda, as in this enduringly humiliating instance:
All of this has meant that U.S. discourse on these national security questions is shaped almost entirely by the very agencies that are trained to lie: the CIA, the NSA, the Pentagon, the FBI. And their lying has been highly effective.
For years, we were told by the nation’s leading national security reporters something that was blatantly false: that the FBI’s warrants to spy on Carter Page were not based on the Steele Dossier. GOP Congressman Devin Nunes was widely vilified and mocked by the super-smart DC national security reporters for issuing a report claiming that this was the case. The Nunes memo in essence claimed what the IG Report has corroborated: that embedded within the FBI’s efforts to obtain FISA court authorization to spy on Carter Page was a series of misrepresentations, falsehoods and concealment of key evidence:
As the Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi – one of the few left/liberal journalists with the courage and integrity to dissent from the DNC/MSNBC script on these issues – put it in a detailed article: “Democrats are not going to want to hear this, since conventional wisdom says former House Intelligence chief Devin Nunes is a conspiratorial evildoer, but the Horowitz report ratifies the major claims of the infamous ‘Nunes memo.’”
That the Page warrant was based on the Steele Dossier was something that the media servants of the FBI and CIA rushed to deny. Did they have any evidence for those denials? That would be hard to believe, given that the FISA warrant applications are highly classified. It seems far more likely that – as usual – they were just repeating what the FBI and CIA (and the pathologically dishonest Rep. Adam Schiff) told them to say, like the good and loyal puppets that they are. But either way, what they kept telling the public – in highly definitive tones – was completely false, as we now know from the IG Report:
Well… asking a foreign country to try to make sure all our aid money doesn’t go into criminal’s pockets, I guess. At least as Democrats look at it, anyway.
It does NOT bother Democrats and those are the only options. As long as it is directed at political opponents (enemies), the ends justifies the means.
If you followed the correct people in the media we knew most, not all, of this before it was released to the public.
The legacy or main stream media was used as a tool of lying “reliable” sources and reads 1 thin line in all of its pages and hides behind it, No political bias.
Only because of the alternative right leaning medias reports do the allow minor reporting on how badly they behaved.
Nothing happened with the last report I expect the same results.
The “correct people” being only those who tell you what The Leader wants you to hear?
From Business Insider, December 14, 2019 – Trump slams Fox News for interviewing Comey and Schiff, stating ‘only pro Trump Fox shows do well’ on the channel
It wasn’t “an accusation”, it was a statement of fact. They cancelled a scheduled interview with him. It wouldn’t do to have people confused by hearing the other side of the story. How would they know what they’re supposed to think?
@Greg: Brother the correct people were investigative reporters, they did not report from anon sources. They used their skills to uncover a trail of facts and followed those. I have no love for Fox brand of propaganda, no tolerance for MSNBC or CNN s style. Other than the historic hearings my Boob tube is a thing to dust. I read my news filtering out intentional inflammatory propaganda and BS opinion editorials. My choices not at all unbiased.
Every time a huge story was uncovered those that broke the news were scorned called names, such as Mark Levin when he put together unmasking and the FISA revelation. Wasn’t long before he was proven 100% correct. John Soloman has been highly accurate, Dan Bongino very accurate. Judicial watch has broken some big stories. Each of them have their own brand.
So tell me who in your preferred sources of news have been accurate?
The only things I admire about Trump are his kids didnt turn out badly, and he is a fighter he isnt about to be cowed by fools. He should wait til after the interviews before he makes judgement, I wont see them I am not a subscriber.
The FBI made Trump a victim of a crime, not a pathetic snowflake feelings victim like poor Ms Home wrecker Page.
You deserve to have your nose rubbed into the pile of mindless conspiracies you spouted here. Repeating baseless accusations
The IG came to his own conclusions, the report is quite clear as there was insufficient accurate evidence to convince a judge a warrant was justified, they had to lie to get it. I happened to watch the senate hearing.
Trump was joking there would be no way for the Russians to get the emails that were already bleach bit treated. (China does have them thanks to her sloppy IT habits). The FBI knew that and it was all over the news. We were appalled that she could choose which emails to hand over as evidence, have her lawyers with no security clearance assist her. Then Delete over 30K while under subpoena.
I think the only think in the report that was new to me was the FBI lawyer changing the CIA memo to remove the fact that Carter Page had been helping expose Russian agents and that the FBI actually DID verify their “evidence” was all garbage. Otherwise, I can say we had already been informed of most of the details. Notably, it didn’t come from secret sources; every bit of it could have been reported by the media but they chose to only promote their anti-Trump, anti-America agenda.
Oh my God, Greg…. don’t tell me YOU just wrote that! You, the supporter of the media that suppresses anything that has not been verified to promote the liberal agenda and has not been approved for broadcast by a Central Committee on Propaganda. You may NEVER repair your credibility.
You know, the justification for the “investigation” might be credible if you close one eye and squint the other, but the CONTINUATION of it was unforgivable. The “evidence” promoting and supporting the surveillance fell apart almost immediately yet those anti-Trump, anti-justice members of the FBI not only continued but intensified their efforts. In fact, the more they looked and found nothing, the more they intensified their efforts because they had crossed the Rubicon and unless they could destroy Trump, they themselves would be destroyed.
Note: they didn’t destroy Trump.
@kitt: The “correct people” are all those that when we post links citing DOCUMENTS and EVIDENCE, Greg and his ilk declare are illegitimate because they do not have the Liberal Propaganda Seal of Approval. He won’t confess that HIS sources have withheld the truth from him to keep him ignorant and that ignorance makes him look foolish.
That’s certainly how Obama did it. Least free press ever, during the Obama years. Glad Trump freed them.
Remember when Obama kicked a reporter off AF1 because Obama didn’t like the reporter’s reporting? Do you remember the legacy press going bat guano crazy then like they did when Jim Acosta was kicked out of the pressers? Nope. Didn’t happen.
Trump has not shut down any newspapers. He has not jailed any journalists. He has not wire tapped journalists or their parents. He fights back against their shady reporting by calling them “fake news” and the legacy press goes ballistic over that.
The state of American journalism is pathetic. People no longer trust it not because of Trump, but because it has become nothing more than an arm of the DNC.
@retire05: What Trump did was expose the rampant, endemic bias and dishonesty inherent in the corrupt liberal media. For years the media has been mildly biased, quietly trying to guide public opinion rather than strictly record facts. Trump was such a kick to the nuts for them, they dropped all pretense to open minded fairness and became a full-time propaganda mouthpiece for the Democrats. No longer could people not notice or refuse to admit the bias and, as a consequence, the media’s credibility has suffered.
Did Trump “cause” it? In a way, yes. He caused it by winning his election against the will of the left, which includes the media.
Not years, DM, DECADES
It all goes back to Walter Lippmann, an icon in journalism schools (often called the Father of Modern Journalism), as a stellar journalist who believed that it was the responsibility of a journalist to create opinion in the masses, not simply report facts and allow the masses to make their own decision on events of the day. Let us not forget that Lippmann was a Socialist and proponent of Russia.
@retire05: Greg thinks Trump is our leader, thats the difference between Socialists and Americans, They are weak and require to be led by the nose, taxed and regulated into submission. To us Trump is an Employee, all those elected are employees, there to represent us, do what benefits us.
Trump threatens everything they have created, built since the Wilson administration.
Best Analogy I have for liberals is the disease that spreads in the deer herd Chronic wasting, a worm that gets into the brain from feeding together at the government and Media bait feeders.