The indictment was political theater never meant to be tried in court.
More than an investigation, the Mueller probe was the wellspring of a political narrative. That becomes clearer as time goes by and more information ekes out . . . such as new confirmation that, months before Mueller was appointed in May 2017, it was already well understood in Justice Department circles that there was no case of criminal “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Never was that made more obvious than by the Justice Department’s quiet announcement late Monday, under the five-alarm noise of the coronavirus scare, that it has dropped the special counsel’s indictment of Russian companies — an outcome I predicted here at National Review nearly two years ago.
A little refresher is in order.
As detailed here many times, one of the biggest problems confronting those weaving the collusion tale was the inability to prove that Russia hacked the Democratic email accounts. As Ball of Collusion outlines, that’s not the only fundamental problem. There is also the fact that the Democratic emails, in which Hillary Clinton was not an active correspondent, did not actually hurt her campaign at all — certainly not the way her own email scandal did (a scandal for which there was no way to blame Moscow). There is also the dearth of evidence that the Trump campaign was even aware of, much less complicit in, Kremlin intelligence operations. Still, very basically, it would be impossible to prove that Trump had conspired in Russia’s hacking unless prosecutors could first establish that Russia had done the hacking.
Let me repeat something else I said several times: This is not to say that Russia is innocent. Again, I accept the intelligence agencies’ conclusion on this point (though a number of others, including some former U.S. intelligence officials, do not). But the point is that Mueller could never have proved it beyond a reasonable doubt under courtroom due-process standards. Any competent defense lawyer would have had a field day with the Obama Justice Department’s failure to have the FBI take possession and conduct its own forensic examination of the servers that were hacked. And what fun defense counsel would have had with DOJ’s delegation of that rudimentary investigative task to a DNC contractor with close ties to the Clinton campaign. (Yes, the forensic conclusions blaming Russia were paid for by the same folks who brought you the famously dodgy Steele dossier.)
Speaking of dodgy, recall that Team Mueller and the Justice Department dodged every case that would have called for proving Russia’s cyber theft. Even when they indicted WikiLeaks chief Julian Assange, the very Ground Zero of “collusion,” they resisted charging him with the Russian hacking scheme. Given that prosecutors and the FBI spent years investigating the president of the United States for this crime of the century, it should seem astonishing that they passed on charging the guy they’ve told us is the central conspirator with this crime. But you weren’t astonished if you were reading National Review . . . because you knew they were not going to charge any crime that called for proving Russia’s culpability in court. Their evidence is shaky and, if there were ever an acquittal, the Trump-Russia political narrative would be kaput, while the Putin regime celebrated a huge propaganda coup.
So why did Team Mueller publicly file an indictment against Russians?
Because they figured it was a freebie. The prosecutors assumed that they would never have to . . . you know . . . prove the case. The Russian defendants were in Russia. There was no way Putin would ever extradite them for an American criminal trial. The prosecutors knew that. What they wrote was not meant to be a real indictment. It was meant to be a press release. It was meant to be what Team Mueller was best at: the spinning of a narrative. I explained it this way at the time:
When prosecutors are serious about nabbing law-breakers who are at large, they do not file an indictment publicly. That would just induce the offenders to flee to or remain in their safe havens. Instead, prosecutors file their indictment under seal, ask the court to issue arrest warrants, and quietly go about the business of locating and apprehending the defendants charged. In the Russia case, however, the indictment was filed publicly even though the defendants are at large. That is because the Justice Department and the special counsel know the Russians will stay safely in Russia. Mueller’s allegations will never be tested in court. That makes his indictment more a political statement than a charging instrument. To the extent there are questions about whether Russia truly meddled in the election, the special counsel wants to end that discussion.
It all seemed so well choreographed. The indictment was, of course, reported as gospel-truth by the anti-Trump media — the same folks who tell you, whenever a Democrat is charged with a crime, that an indictment is merely an allegation, that nothing is proven until it’s proven in court.
Alas, Team Mueller made a mistake. A reckless bet, the kind made by people under the misimpression that they are playing with the house’s money. To quote from my column nearly two years ago:[Team Mueller] charged not only Russian individuals but three Russian businesses. A business doesn’t have the same risks as a person. A business can’t be thrown in jail. And while members of Mueller’s prosecutorial stable have a history of putting real businesses out of business, a business that is run by a Putin crony and serves as a front for Kremlin operations is not too worried about that either.
Since they had no concerns about being imprisoned or bankrupted by prosecution and fines, there was nothing to discourage these businesses from doing what Team Mueller blithely assumed no Russian defendant would ever do: retaining lawyers to show up in federal court, demanding the trial to which American law entitled the companies, and demanding all the discovery to which American due process guaranteed them access.
It was a debacle.
First, the prosecutors tried to get the case and all pretrial discovery postponed on the ground that the businesses in question, Concord Management and Concord Consulting (each controlled by Yevgeny Prigozhin, a food-supply oligarch said to be a Putin crony), had not been properly served with the indictment. This was absurd. Service of process is the way you get a business to come to court; these businesses were already in court, demanding to proceed with the prosecution that Team Mueller had chosen to start.
Some Deep State heads really should roll over this and all the other crap they pulled to try to get Trump.
Actually, I’d love to see how the mere threat of that might cause one or more of these creeps to roll on their Deeper State bosses.
Maybe all the way up to Hillary and Obama.
All the more reason for the MSM and dems to keep the Coronavirus at the forefront- to divert attention away from Spygate. It also came out last week that the coupsters knew in January ’17 that PT and Gen. Flynn were innocent of the bogus Russian collusion accusations.
Makes them sort of sound like illegal immigrants and we KNOW Obamaites don’t prosecute them.
Sounds like what an asshole supervisor where I worked tried to do to an employee he didn’t like and wanted to write up for sleeping on the job. Seems the guy was doing avionics work under the floors of an airplane for a long time, but he could recount people than came in and out of the airplane and the conversations they had. So, the supervisor wrote him up for “excessive stillness leading to a non-working environment”. In other words, he had NOTHING but tried to save face with some bullshit phony accusation. Perhaps all assholes think alike.
Not a PEEP about this from the NYT or anyone else about this. Sure, they’re all busy trying to blame a pandemic on Trump, but this just takes a column; Fox reported on it, so it’s not like there weren’t enough words left over after the Trump blame-a-thon.
It was never important. It was just a smokescreen. Just like we KNEW. A total and complete waste of time and money.
Given that the Russian troll farm was unlikely to respond to any DoJ subpoenas for documents or testimony, and that no one could be extradited from Russia, how, exactly, would Andrew C McCarthy expect such evidence to be obtained? The indictments were part of a much larger investigation. That they ultimately had to be dismissed surprises nobody, and proves nothing.
Who does he think was behind the operation, if not Putin and his associates?
@Greg: Says the guy working for a Russian troll harm…haha.
@Greg: Well, we’ll never know if they would, do we, since they called Mueller’s bluff and he folded his hand. This was nothing but window dressing, just something to say, “Look, we indicted Russians and everything!” A farce.
But we all already knew that.