by Mary Grabar
Since 1980, when it was first published, Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States has been spreading the idea that the United States is irredeemably corrupt.
This book is fake history, based on falsified evidence, misquotations with critical words left out, and plagiarized disreputable sources.
Yet, a record-breaking 3 million copies have been sold, over 100,000 educators have signed up at the Zinn Education Project, and over 300,000 follow it on social media. It is widely used in Advanced Placement U.S. History high school classes and in teacher education programs. It is quoted in school books. In Portland, Oregon, and surrounding areas, for several years now, A Young People’s History has been used in all eighth-grade classrooms.
Zinn claims other historians have not told the truth about the atrocities committed by Columbus on down. People reading it cry and get angry, sometimes taking to the streets.
The Zinn book was the most popular book for Occupy Wall Street protestors, awards are given to organizers of Marxist groups in Zinn’s name, and the Antifa member who tried to blow up an ICE detention facility left behind a manifesto with the parenthetical note, “see howard zinn, ‘a people’s history of the united states’” (sic).
This is not to say that every protestor out there knocking down statues, burning buildings, or attacking police has been directly inspired by Zinn. But after 40 years of continuous publication, I think it’s safe to say that Zinn’s book has had some influence.
Zinn’s book is full of the ideas that are inspiring riots this year, such as “systemic racism,” “wealth inequality,” and “police brutality.”
First, Zinn writes, “there is not a country in world history in which racism has been more important, for so long a time, as the United States” (23).
Zinn describes our founding in this way: “Around 1776, certain important people in the English colonies…found that by creating a nation, a symbol, a legal unity called the United States, they could take over land, profits, and political power from favorites of the British Empire. In the process, they could…create a consensus of popular support for the rule of a new, privileged leadership” (59).
Zinn writes that the American “system” of government is so corrupt, neither the Civil War nor the Civil Rights Movement did much for black Americans.
Peaceful protest, civil rights laws, and voting, in Zinn’s book, do not work. Police brutality, Zinn claims, is “’normal’” and “endlessly repeated in the history of the country, coming randomly but persistently out of a racism deep in the institutions, the mind of the country” (463).
Just like many of the liberal written Text Books A PEOPLES HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES is Lies and Howard Zinn is the one who wrote these lies Zinn should be banned f rom America for Life if he has not died already
Zinn described himself as “something of an anarchist, something of a socialist. Maybe a democratic socialist.” He suggested looking at socialism in its full historical context as a popular, positive idea that got a bad name from its association with Soviet Communism. In Madison, Wisconsin, in 2009, Zinn said:
Let’s talk about socialism. I think it’s very important to bring back the idea of socialism into the national discussion to where it was at the turn of the [last] century before the Soviet Union gave it a bad name. Socialism had a good name in this country. Socialism had Eugene Debs. It had Clarence Darrow. It had Mother Jones. It had Emma Goldman. It had several million people reading socialist newspapers around the country. Socialism basically said, hey, let’s have a kinder, gentler society. Let’s share things. Let’s have an economic system that produces things not because they’re profitable for some corporation, but produces things that people need. People should not be retreating from the word socialism because you have to go beyond capitalism.
He was a new leader of the communist movement in America
Gosh… the basics of left wing media today!
@MOS#8541: Socialism and communism are great ideas… in theory. The problem is (and ALWAYS is) that human nature always takes over. The human flaw of greed inevitably gets in the way of socialism carrying out its noble mission. There is also that human failing of desiring freedom and ambition to better their own lives. This fatal human flaw usually results in it becoming necessary to come down hard on people who feel they actually possess some human rights.
So, ending slavery and then codifying their rights (necessary because Democrats trampled them) did nothing for blacks? Really?
Um… “the system” would be Democrats, not the United States.
Another example that when facts will not support the left wing agenda, they’ll just make up new ones.