When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MOS #8541
3 years ago
wow, democraps lying. the bizarre reality is that neanderthal nadler, gay schiff, and sexual predator schumer do not care about the past, and these comments. their only hope is to destroy Trump and America. nadler, schiff, slut hillary, fake “james brown” waters, bar fly polosi, were all hoping for leadership position once Trump was removed from office.
kitt
3 years ago
It did little these types cant be shamed.
Deplorable Me
3 years ago
Democrats don’t seem to understand the damage they cause with their short-term schemes. You’d think Harry Reid would have taught them that with his short-sighted lifting of filibuster which has resulted in an unprecedented number of non-ideologically liberal judges being appointed, turning the judicial system back into one that follows the Constitution instead of leftist ideology.
With impeachment, Democrats can probably rest easy that Republicans won’t abuse it as Democrats have.
Greg
3 years ago
On the particular occasion Cipollone’s video clips relate to , Ken Starr and republican leaders were promoting the removal of President Bill Clinton because he lied when questioned about having had consensual sexual relations with an adult White House aid—a personal matter that hardly rose to the level of a national security concern.
Trump is accused of abusing his powers of office to extort a personally useful investigation of his most likely 2020 presidential opponent from a foreign government. In the process, he delayed the release of necessary aid to a friendly government under military attack by one of our own nation’s geopolitical adversaries; withheld important meetings needed to lend credibility to the besieged government; undermined our own State Department’s policy initiatives; and removed State Department personnel pursuing those official goals who became obstacles to his own personal objectives. He used his personal lawyer and a team of highly questionable persons, several now under indictment, to pursue those personal objectives. He has since misused his powers of office to methodically obstruct the congressional investigation into the matter, to lock down related documents and witnesses, and to intimidate whistle blowers.
Any arguments advanced for or against the impeachment and removal from office of a president can only be fairly judged in the context of the particular situation that has occasioned them. The same identical arguments can be valid in one case, but not in another.
On the particular occasion Cipollone’s video clips relate to , Ken Starr and republican leaders were promoting the removal of President Bill Clinton because he lied when questioned about having had consensual sexual relations with an adult White House aid—a personal matter that hardly rose to the level of a national security concern.
It’s called “perjury” and it happens when under oath. Oh… and he also obstructed justice and tried to influence witnesses. All crimes… REAL crimes. He could have simply told the truth, but telling the truth is not a Clinton trait.
Trump is accused of winning an election. That’s his crime. Nothing more. This is why Democrats have proceeded without any actual evidence of any impeachable crime.
wow, democraps lying. the bizarre reality is that neanderthal nadler, gay schiff, and sexual predator schumer do not care about the past, and these comments. their only hope is to destroy Trump and America. nadler, schiff, slut hillary, fake “james brown” waters, bar fly polosi, were all hoping for leadership position once Trump was removed from office.
It did little these types cant be shamed.
Democrats don’t seem to understand the damage they cause with their short-term schemes. You’d think Harry Reid would have taught them that with his short-sighted lifting of filibuster which has resulted in an unprecedented number of non-ideologically liberal judges being appointed, turning the judicial system back into one that follows the Constitution instead of leftist ideology.
With impeachment, Democrats can probably rest easy that Republicans won’t abuse it as Democrats have.
On the particular occasion Cipollone’s video clips relate to , Ken Starr and republican leaders were promoting the removal of President Bill Clinton because he lied when questioned about having had consensual sexual relations with an adult White House aid—a personal matter that hardly rose to the level of a national security concern.
Trump is accused of abusing his powers of office to extort a personally useful investigation of his most likely 2020 presidential opponent from a foreign government. In the process, he delayed the release of necessary aid to a friendly government under military attack by one of our own nation’s geopolitical adversaries; withheld important meetings needed to lend credibility to the besieged government; undermined our own State Department’s policy initiatives; and removed State Department personnel pursuing those official goals who became obstacles to his own personal objectives. He used his personal lawyer and a team of highly questionable persons, several now under indictment, to pursue those personal objectives. He has since misused his powers of office to methodically obstruct the congressional investigation into the matter, to lock down related documents and witnesses, and to intimidate whistle blowers.
Any arguments advanced for or against the impeachment and removal from office of a president can only be fairly judged in the context of the particular situation that has occasioned them. The same identical arguments can be valid in one case, but not in another.
@Greg:
It’s called “perjury” and it happens when under oath. Oh… and he also obstructed justice and tried to influence witnesses. All crimes… REAL crimes. He could have simply told the truth, but telling the truth is not a Clinton trait.
Trump is accused of winning an election. That’s his crime. Nothing more. This is why Democrats have proceeded without any actual evidence of any impeachable crime.