WaPo:
Donald Trump’s absence at Thursday’s Republican presidential debate created a big opportunity for Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas — a big opportunity to fail, that is.
All the talk going in was that Cruz, running second nationally and in Iowa, would get more time to make his case for the White House before Monday’s caucuses, while Trump held his rival event across town in Des Moines. True enough. But with the blustery billionaire missing from the debate stage, Cruz also became the de facto front-runner and faced what was clearly the toughest questioning from Fox News moderators.
He could have buckled under the pressure. He didn’t.
In the biggest test yet of how he would handle the media scrutiny that comes with being the Republican standard-bearer — and there was plenty of scrutiny from the moderators — Cruz appeared ready for anything, especially challenges to his immigration record which have tripped him up before.
That’s not to say he carried the first-place mantle with total grace. At one point, he complained to co-moderator Chris Wallace about the attention he was drawing.
“Chris, I would note that that the last four questions have been, ‘Rand, please attack Ted. Marco, please attack Ted. Chris, please attack Ted. Jeb, please attack Ted,” Cruz said.
The audience booed as Cruz aired his grievance, though it wasn’t clear whether the response was aimed at the questioning or the griping. Perhaps it was some of both. Either way, the tea party darling seemed to sense the mood was souring and skillfully pivoted into a joke. After Wallace assured Cruz that the contrasts the moderators were trying to draw was part of debating, Cruz said this:
“Gosh, if you guys ask one more mean question, I may have to leave the stage,” he said — an obvious jab at Trump’s refusal to show up and take any questions at all. The crowd applauded.
Cruz did have a point, though. He was not only on the receiving end of pointed questions but also the subject of questions posed to other candidates — and not in a good way. Let’s review the four inquiries preceding the above Cruz response that got his dander up:
BRET BAIER: Senator [Rand] Paul, you are definitely not in the establishment category. But at the beginning of this campaign, you said you were your own man when asked about your father, former Texas congressman and three-time presidential candidate Ron Paul. Senator Cruz’s campaign is out with a video saying that Cruz is the intellectual and political heir to your father’s 2012 campaign and the liberty movement. And your father now says it’s realistic that Donald Trump will be your party’s nominee. So did you make a mistake by not fully — more fully embracing your father politically at the beginning of this campaign?
WALLACE: Senator Rubio, does Senator Cruz’s record match his rhetoric?
WALLACE: Governor Christie, you have compared both Senators Cruz and Rubio to Barack Obama, saying that we cannot afford another inexperienced president. You’ve also said that Senator Cruz’s vote to curtail the NSA surveillance program made America less safe. Is either of them ready to be commander-in-chief?
WALLACE: Governor Bush, here’s the question — I’m going to ask Governor Bush the question. You criticized several candidates in this field on this stage for what you call unrealistic ideas about how to fight terrorists, including Rubio and Cruz, on the issue of their refusing to give the president authority to enforce the “red line in Syria.” But, given the fact that your brother got us into two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have still not ended — that have still not ended — what lessons have you learned from his mistakes, sir?
Cruz’s memory is a bit off (these questions were not asked consecutively), but they were clustered closely together. The middle two were open invitations to bash Cruz. And while the first and last ones were ostensibly about Paul and his father, and Bush and his brother, they included references to Cruz that at minimum left ajar the door to criticism. Paul swung it wide open in his response; Bush chose not to walk through.
And here are some more very tough questions that were put to Cruz himself:
Cruz’s initial jab at Trump during his first comment was effectively humorous, but the joke about leaving the stage if he got hit with one more mean question fell flat. I found it unfortunate to watch Cruz perform below his usual debate standard last night.
The Iowa results will yet be interesting, I believe.
If a majority of Iowa is going to support Cruz, they sure didn’t show it when Cruz cracked a couple of clumsy jokes. The first one, where he got “the Trump portion of the debate out of the way” did not get much of a positive response. The second one, about threatening to walk of the stage if he got another mean question, should have been much better received after the reaction to the set-up (talking about all the candidates attacking him), but it wasn’t. Seems that crowd was not cutting Cruz any slack.
Nationally, the call from the Trump crowd to boycott the debate didn’t work out too well, either.