Nick Walsh of CNN says it’s time to admit the Taliban is winning in Afghanistan. It’s an observation that would surprise people who remember Obama’s first term, when the administration, to use a basketball metaphor, was leading by 40 points going into the last quarter with no way it could lose. No one would have expected the enemy to come from behind, take the lead and likely take home the trophy.
But there it is. If there’s one word that news stories have over used in the last half decade it’s unexpected. Surprises keep popping up. For example the Washington Post writes that president Obama, who came to office amidst near universal adulation and widely praised for being inspiring and likeable has surprisingly few friends among world leaders.
In recent months, he has offended most of the United States’ Persian Gulf allies. “All I need in the Middle East is a few smart autocrats,” he joked privately, according to a recent profile in the Atlantic magazine. Publicly, he has said he “weeps” for Saudi and Kuwaiti children.The United States’ European allies, he complains, have grown too dependent on American firepower to keep them safe.
Even the United Kingdom, a U.S. “special” partner, has received criticism. Obama seemed to blame the postwar chaos in Libya on British Prime Minister David Cameron, who he said “became distracted by other things” and didn’t do enough to bring order to the fractious country.
That surprise unpopularity is sometimes explained by the fact that he is too cerebral. But even coarse interactions don’t play out as expected. The Washington Times notes Obama was clipped by Havana and got nothing from Castro despite all the money he showered on the old Communist. Iran, whose coffers the president filled with billions of dollars has demonstrated a shocking lack of gratitude. The president is reportedly trying to coax the ayatollahs into a meeting by offering them terms that would be familiar to any television pitchman: a deal good for a limited time only.
President Barack Obama has sent two letters to senior Iranian leaders in recent months requesting a meeting with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, according to Persian language reports recently translated by a Middle East research organization….Obama purportedly wrote in the correspondence “that Iran has a limited-time opportunity to cooperate with the U.S. in order to resolve the problems in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, and promised that if Iran agreed to a meeting between him and Rouhani, he would be willing to participate in any conference to this end,” according to MEMRI’s translation of the report.
Old allies, some would say client-states, have been surly lately. CNN reported the Saudis unexpectedly snubbed Obama at the airport, sending the mayor of Riyadh to greet the president because King Salman, who had been at the airport earlier to greet other Gulf rulers, had already gone home. If any slight was intended, it was studiously unacknowledged because as Michael Pregent in Foreign Policy argued Obama needed Saudi Arabia to keep a lid on the wave of terror boiling out of the region.
While the public might not regard Saudi Arabia as a great ally Pregent pointed that in MENA “friends” means not really bad enemies.
How many terror plots has Iran helped the U.S. thwart? None. Did Iran stop Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad from facilitating the flow of al Qaeda fighters into Iraq to kill American soldiers there? Of course not. Instead, Iran’s leaders continue to direct attacks against U.S. interests, resulting in the deaths and maiming of American soldiers.
In that context the Kingdom is a friend. The only way the president can still look statesmanlike is to set the bar as low as possible. Obama recently appealed to Vladimir Putin to restrain Assad from destroying his Syrian allies and the ceasefire, an act which the New York Times described in this way: “in a strongly worded statement, the White House said that Mr. Obama had urged Mr. Putin to use his influence with President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to press him to stop attacks against opposition forces and abide by his commitment to a partial cease-fire.”
The editorial board of the Washington Post is less polite than the Gray Lady. It calls the ceasefire a sham whose only virtue is being better than nothing. “The Syrian cease-fire has achieved diplomatic zombie status: It is dead but lives on in the otherworldly rhetoric of its promoters, headed by the Obama administration. … In Geneva, the head of the opposition’s delegation said it would not return to U.N.-sponsored peace talks until the government stopped its attacks and allowed aid convoys to enter besieged areas.” Maybe a special, time-limited offer can lure the rebels back to the table.
Obama’s vertiginous fall should elicit no schadenfreude even among those who dislike him. The American prestige which kept the Long Peace has declined along with his fortunes affecting not only him but everyone else. Wolves who for so long kept a distance will in their boldness narrow the circle and slink ever closer to what was formerly safe.