By Ace
Google says we aren’t allowed to discuss math.
By the way, in addition to being a monopoly in video uploading, Google is also a clear monopoly in placing third-party ads. I think they control 90% of that market.
My ad revenue (placed through Google) is basically down to zero, as Google contrives every reason to put me on advertising blacklists.
Am I supposed to also just start my own monopoly ad placement company too, before I can speak freely?
Well, I guess I can speak freely, in the sense that the Tech Monopolists have closed off any opportunity I have to make money from my speech.
Just make your own internet, peons!
White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany on Tuesday evening highlighted an incredible statistic that is included in State of Texas v. Pennsylvania, et. al.”Expert analysis using a commonly accepted statistical test further raises serious questions as to the integrity of this election, the lawsuit reads.
“The probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four Defendant States-Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin– independently given President Trump’s early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion, or 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000.’“The odds of Joe Biden winning all four of those states collectively is less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power,” it continues.
Wait, a quadrillion to the fourth power is much, much more than just a quadrillion. A quadrillion is I think 10 to the 16th, and that raised to the fourth power would be ten to the 20th.
Well, anyway, it’s very unlikely. And it is officially illegal to say so.
Well, if Kayleigh McEnany said it and then the statement was confirmed by PJMedia, well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
@Banjo Boy Ronald J. Ward: Actually the reference You can read Cicchetti’s Declaration in the appendix of the lawsuit here, starting on page 20.
It was just reported by PJMedia. Yes I left out the link so if you want to read the article you can find it yourself.
Is this guy doing some sort of courtroom comedy? Maybe it was a setup to demonstrate the White House will repeat complete nonsense?
@Greg: Dont worry Snopes will be right on that debunking it cause it was actually 1 in 10 quadrillion.
@Ronald J. Ward: It’s in the lawsuit. Maybe you should read.
I would put the chances of Biden winning legally substantially less than that. Hell, he couldn’t even win the primaries until the DNC rigged it so everyone else dropped out and supported Biden. Fraud from the very beginning.
@Ronald J. Ward:
Just go have Brian Stelter and SNL confirm your biases instead, little guy. They’ll tell you what to think. Google will shunt your searches into their narrative, and facebook and youtube will censure you in case you wander off the plantation.
They are the bad guys, Ron/AJ.
You’re the bad guys.
@Greg:
Stats and polls only matter to Leftists when they are conjuring them, and when they confirm what they want them to.
The Right represents Americans who can understand and apply math, science, and logic.
The Left now represents massive ignorance and poor education.
Look out for the Dragon and someone who is tampering with the results and the M.S. Media covering up for the Democrats
@Nathan Blue:
Then why doesn’t Donnie love us?
@Greg: Trump loves everyone. He does not, as the liberal media and Democrats do, seek to MAKE people ignorant.
It’s like what are the odds that, at only ONE ballot counting location 100% of all the military votes were for Joe Biden?
Yet not anywhere else?
52% of all veteran households voted Trump.
Trump held a 10% advantage over Biden in those 4 battleground states.
That even after the Biden/Dem lie that he called all our military names.
Maybe this is why counting votes takes so long. Changing votes is time consuming.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/election-supervisor-shows-on-video-how-dominion-software-allows-changing-adding-votes_3613406.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-10-6
Statistics reasons from the computation of the likelihood of an event given the circumstances involved. What must take place when voting stops, with one person in the lead, and then resumes, some time later, with the other person in the lead? Does this not require additional ballots? What am I missing? And there are no such previous switches in previous elections? And observers are not allowed to witness this stop/start? And the voting machines are fitted up to render fractional vote totals? Please supply me with a fractional voter, who voted .278 of the time. No fraud here. Grand Theft.
@mathman: It actually happens all the time Mid terms …how many republicans led in congress seats then had results overturned after the election with “found ballots”?
Canvassing has turned into a blanket party for down ticket Republicans.
@kitt: See NY right now.
@Deplorable Me: Sure 12 votes in a drawer
Watching the Wisconsin hearing
@kitt: Question… why not 13?
@Deplorable Me: or 15 its a gaslighting of see just not one or two to seal the election let congress call the race.
@Deplorable Me:
Oh, please. Trump actively promotes any crackpot theory or bit of viral disinformation that he believes might be useful to him.
@Greg: You mean like “Russian collusion”? Crackpot theories like THAT? Those that cost $35 million and more? Democrats are the EXPERTS in “crackpot theories”, aka LIES.
By the way, the reason that the “statistician’s” quadrillion-to-one computation is totally bogus is that it’s based on a totally bogus underlying assumption: that the counting of votes would progress from beginning to end in a totally uniform manner, so that any random samplings taken anywhere along the way would be absolutely identical and consistent in their composition. In other words, that the ratio of votes for Trump to votes for Biden would remain identical at every point in the counting process.
Such an underlying assumption is nothing short of crazy. It was known for weeks ahead of election day that Trump would take an early lead, but Biden would rapidly catch up as the count progressed. This is because Trump actively promoted voting in person on election day and attacked all other means of casting a ballot; democrats actively promoted early voting by whatever means state election authorities made available, out of growing concern for COVID-19. Since ballots submitted in different ways were processed at different point in the counting process, inconsistency in how the totals for each candidate would rise was built in.
@Greg:
No, in a totally LEGAL manner. It took fraud to achieve the results Biden got.
The fact is that an 81.2 million voter majority have totally had it with The Donald Trump Show. He has been fired. The show has been cancelled. There will be no Season Two, nor will there be summer reruns.
The former host may find a recurring spot on Court TV.
@Greg: Biden would be lucky to come away with 60 million votes. Fraudulent votes are not real people. 75 million REAL people voted for Trump, more than for any other candidate in HISTORY. Biden is such a waste of space, he needed massive fraud to drag is groping carcass across the finish line, and there was so much it was easily detectable.