When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
39 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg
9 years ago
I think we could make a list of things that are wrong about this commercial and the scenario it depicts that would have little or nothing to do with anyone’s position on firearms. Sort of a “What’s wrong with this picture?” exercise, if you remember when those were popular puzzles.
I think we could make a list of things that are wrong about this commercial
I notice you didn’t bother to list any. The main thing that was wrong was that she didn’t shoot the SOB when he broke in.
Greg
9 years ago
I liked the fact that Security Girl’s apartment has an exterior door on the outside but an interior door on the inside, with a cheap knob and hardware so flimsy it would scarcely be up to the demands of a bedroom closet.
Redteam
9 years ago
@Greg: And it didn’t use a deadbolt and she didn’t push the dresser in front of the door, it was not a doorknob commercial, it was a handgun commercial. Did you see anything wrong with the handgun?
Greg
9 years ago
You really need to lighten up. You’re probably too tense and antagonistic to safely manage a handgun.
The main thing that was wrong was that she didn’t shoot the SOB when he broke in.
Right. Then she could have told the police that she didn’t realize it was the intoxicated husband of the next door neighbor who was angry because he thought his wife had locked him out of his own apartment.
Pete
9 years ago
Leftists will say anything to deny people the right to defend themselves.
Notice it isn’t law abiding gun owners who are misusing guns and killing innocents. It always seems to be a.mentally deranged leftist (but I repeat myself) committing these horrible gun crimes.
Always a leftist. . . As with the pro-life terrorist who assassinated Dr. George Tiller during his Sunday church services?
Always a leftist. . . As with Anders Behring Breivik?
I think you might have a problem with selective memory.
Nanny G
9 years ago
I appreciated that she didn’t pull the trigger.
I had an occasion like that, myself, back in Long Beach.
A fleeing felon broke into the house next door.
Police surrounded it on THREE sides (my place was only about four feet away on the last side!)
At one point I got my gun because I could see him running all over that place.
At one point he broke the window opposite my bathroom’s window (which was open with a screen on it.)
I stood in the bathroom with the gun pointed at him as he contemplated making the jump to my place.
He backed off.
I called 911 and asked police to come use my windows for a 4th side on the situation.
I evacuated my place when they came in.
They took the screen off my window and shot tear gas into the place next-door.
He surrendered without a shot fired.
Nathan Blue
9 years ago
@Greg: You have no point and are trying to draw people into a meaningless argument. Knock it off.
Want to ban firearms? Fine. Keep voting, lobbying, and promoting whatever you want. It’s a free country. I’m glad you have the right and would die so that you could keep it, even if I don’t agree with it.
Those with different views than yours will do the same and engender the values and culture they believe in. They have the same right as you.
The infection we’re fighting right now is the belief that there is a time and place to silence a certain voice, and that you are free to marginalize them for the good of all. The false narratives pushed during the Bush years encouraged the over-educated and under-experienced.
Just remember that people of good conscious, life-experience, and more maturity will be there to stop you from imposing your will and taking away basic freedoms this country has lived and thrived with for centuries.
You’re logical fallacy will come and go, leaving you either changed or simply alone.
It always does…
Nanny G
9 years ago
Why has the media been so quiet about Karl Halverson Pierson?
Oh, I get it!
The Arapahoe High School shooter was, ”a very opinionated Socialist.”
That’s how a fellow economics student described him.
And everything he did to get his gun was legal even in very restrictive Colorado!
UpChuck.Liberals
9 years ago
@Greg: Well sparky the last school shooting was by a avowed Socialist so the answer is yes the vast majority of the time, shooters are lefty loons or just plain loons. Wait, I’m being redundant aren’t I?
she didn’t realize it was the intoxicated husband of the next door neighbor who was angry because he thought his wife had locked him out of his own apartment.
The intoxicated husband of the next door neighbor might have recognized her voice as not being his wife when she called out to him. Even an intoxicated person knows to stand in front of the eyehole when knocking on a woman’s door. Why wouldn’t his key work in the lock if it were his own house?
Nathan Blue
9 years ago
@Redteam: What Greg is pushing for is the abolition of personal responsibility. If even one person could be killed by a careless gun owner, then guns should be banned. But he didn’t actually say that, so…
The goal is to thoroughly obscure and distort the issue, keeping your “opponent” talking until they say something you can latch onto and shift the non-argument onto any subject that takes you away from the original statement (see post 6 and self-righteous response 7).
In this country, we have the right to bear arms. You don’t have to exercise you’re right, and you don’t have to like it.
It’s just a fundamental disagreement going on. Libs think you can legislate happiness and equality. If you just spend enough money, just scream loud enough, just blame enough people and scapegoat anyone not one your team, you can achieve utopia (which was anything but).
Non-libs don’t believe you can make enough laws to cover the idea of personal responsibility and choice. Bad things will happen. Period. Deal with it.
Nathan Blue
9 years ago
This quote sums up everything wrong in our country and why the “left” view of what to do can and will ultimately fail:
“To minimize suffering and to maximize security were natural and proper ends of society and Caesar. But then they became the only ends, somehow, and the only basis of law—a perversion. Inevitably, then, in seeking only them, we found only their opposites: maximum suffering and minimum security.”
― Walter M. Miller Jr., A Canticle for Leibowitz
You’ve deduced all of that from the observation that Security Girl got herself a gun before thinking to replace a door and latch that probably wouldn’t keep out a determined raccoon?
If I had a point, it was that the best first step to personal security is thoughtful behavior. I would hate to think that that’s strictly a leftist idea.
Post #6 is total bullshit. That being the case, I don’t know what’s self-righteous about pointing that out with the evidence to the contrary cited in #7.
Everything isn’t right or left, one thing or the other. The choice isn’t between a total lack of firearm regulation or a total loss of firearm rights.
The goal is to thoroughly obscure and distort the issue, keeping your “opponent” talking until they say something you can latch onto and shift the non-argument onto any subject that takes you away from the original statement.
You have no point, and I think your subconscious has a problem telling “Security Girl” that she can’t own a gun to lawfully protect herself, so you keep prattling on about door locks.
Anything to change the argument into something nebulous and unattainable, beyond posturing.
You’ve thrown down the smoke to confuse the audience. Time to disappear backstage. Show’s over.
Greg
9 years ago
If she were my daughter, I might tell her that it makes little sense to sleep with a gun under her bed so that she doesn’t have to worry so much about worthless door locks. People seem to think that’s a leftist political statement. And here I am, arguing about it?
My error. No doubt about it.
Nanny G
9 years ago
@Greg: It’s an ad!
I guess those movie mistakes, like the sound of explosions in the vacuum of space and the way cars get wreaked, then fix themselves, then look wreaked again all during the same chase must drive you crazy.
You noted yourself it was a continuity error, an outside door in one scene, an interior door in another scene.
Why get all riled up about it now?
Speaking of ads that are crazy……who else has seen California’s ObamaCare ad featuring a rapping Obama and dancers?
It’s a hoot!
Nathan Blue
9 years ago
@Greg: Make sure you tell her to live in a house without windows while you’re at it. You don’t need a gun under you’re bed if you live in a bunker…even though the perp in the video was trying to get her to voluntarily open the door.
Just pointing out facts, like you. No politics at all…but please keep harping on post #6 since you assume it’s still a defensible place to pretend you’re not making a leftist political statement. You’re fishing for something to debate, but have nothing.
No Greg, it’s the same door. Nor is the lack of a deadbolt that unusual in some low-crime communities. It may not be wise in this day and age, but that doesn’t make it abnormal. One could argue that she might have just moved into the apartment and hadn’t been able to get the landlord to update the security, but that makes it more sensible for her to be armed. I hate to burst your bubble, but unless it’s a metal exterior door in a metal frame, a deadbolt will not keep out a determined and experienced intruder.
Then she could have told the police that she didn’t realize it was the intoxicated husband of the next door neighbor who was angry because he thought his wife had locked him out of his own apartment.
You aren’t very observant are you? The man clearly wasn’t intoxicated, and he had a male partner in a parked van waiting for him.
I notice you didn’t bother to list any. The main thing that was wrong was that she didn’t shoot the SOB when he broke in.
Artistic license. I believed it’s implied that she shot him. Otherwise it makes no sense to strap the Perp to an ambulance gurney when a couple officers could just drag him off in handcuffs. No doubt it was to avoid all the nasty anti-violence letters and emails from Greg’s squeamish flock of sheeple. I’m involved in low-budget, independent stage and video productions, and while we use primer loads and blanks, we rarely bother using squibs or blow away appliances. (You have to hire a pyrotechnics professional for that and they aren’t cheap.)
If I had a point, it was that the best first step to personal security is thoughtful behavior.
Are you implying that the guy banging on the door, not answering her ‘who is it?’ question and standing out of her sight, is all ‘thoughtful behavior’ on his part? That he had no responsibility for his safety?
Greg
YOU GAVE ME AN IDEA,
HOW ABOUT AN EXTERIOR OPEN DOOR ATTACH TO AN INTERIOR DOOR OPENING TO THE EXTERIOR,
SO THE PROWLER FORCE OPEN THE EXTERIOR DOOR WHICH OPEN ON THE EXTERIOR AND GET KNOCKT OUT BY THE INTERIOR DOOR WHICH SHE OPEN ALSO TO THE EXTERIOR FOLLOWING THE EXTERIOR OPEN DOOR
AS HE TRY TO GET IN THAT INTERIOR DOOR, OPENING TO THE EXTERIOR,
OH WAIT, WHERE DID HE GO,
Buffalobob
9 years ago
Argue with a troll and you’ll surly get troll spittle on your shirt.
Personally, I would have shot the intruder chest center the second he had fully entered the premises.
Breaking and entering. Home invasion. Call it what you want but the intent is clear. He wasn’t collecting for UNICEF.
Even in a state that requires AN ATTEMPT to retreat first, in this case there is not much to retreat into and the close proximity would ether require her to back up (trip and lose your life) or turn around (He’s probably faster and any reasonable person would assume he’s crazy and/or armed. A mans fist has been declared a weapon in courts, especially to a woman).
I suppose the liberals would prefer rape and strangulation as a more palatable result.
(Like Obamacare: UNTIL IT HAPPENS TO THEM!)
If this were a real incident, and she was unarmed, is there one liberal out there that does not believe she would have left that dwelling on a stretcher? Go ahead and say why!
The only thing I found wrong with the ad is that it at least gives the impression that the police showed up fast, and we all know that rarely happens.
Nostradamus
yes FOR SURE,
SOME TIME AGO,I was looking across the back door a house backyard,
there came two guys taking out all the jeens from the line,and run out
one had a red hair,
i went to tell the people owning the place and made a profile of the two guys,
the next day the same guys ring my door bell, i have a big german sheffard
barking at the long but narrow window< while i call the police,
they change their mind because of my dog they where looking at and left just as the police
arrive to pick them up, THE MORAL OF THE STORY, IF YOU HAVE A RED HAIR, DON'T GO FOR CRIME,
SOMEONE WILL NOTICE,
BYE
Some people seem to have difficulty understanding what’s being said plain and simple. It isn’t a complicated sentence.
Oh, I understand. The woman is a gun owner (therefore a conservative) and should be expected to act with thoughtful behavior. The criminal was an unemployed liberal that is surprised that he has encountered a conservative with a gun and he is therefore not expected to react with ‘thoughtful behavior’, but as a liberal would, and faint. Seems clear enough.
I must correct myself as I too made a few incorrect observations. On watching it again, it wasn’t the perp going up to the door in the very beginning shot, seen past the man in the van, it was the woman going to her door with the perp in the van. The interior shot threw me, as watching it again, we have to accept that time had passed before the man went to the door. Enough for the woman to change clothing into short-shorts and a chemise. We don’t know why the perp waited so long to make his move or why the writer decided to have the woman change clothes and get comfortable.
As far as crime and reality is concerned, this commercial is as poorly written as most that sell home protection products. It does send one message quite well, and that is that if you are the type of person who breaks into homes, eventually you will find yourself looking down the barrel of a gun. For that, as well as the suggestion that women have a gun for personal protection, I give it a “7” for those good messages and the well done videography, otherwise I give the writer and director a “3” overall for it’s problems.
to you slime killers of a young man in front of his wife just to steel his car,
the NJ POLICE WILL FIND YOU, YOU HAVE NO PLACE TO HIDE,
NO PLACE EVER YOU WILL BE FOUND AND SPEND YOUR LIVES IN PRISON,
EVERY LAW OFFICER HAVE YOUR PROFILE NOW,
YOU WILL PAY FOR YOUR CRIME, SOON,
YOU KNOW WHAT LONG ARMS OF JUSTICE MEAN,
THERE IS NO LIMIT FOR THEM,
I WOULD ADVICE THEM TO LOOK IN THE GARBISH
SO TO FIND GARBISH LIKE YOU,
Anders Behring Breivik – the Norweigen neo-Nazi – not an American.
Roeder – the diagnosed schizophrenic who murdered Tiller – does not equate to the leftists who go off on these rampage shooting attacks….or fly airplanes into IRS offices.
Very weak attempt to misdirect from the point that these violent attackers are typically leftists or jihadists, no matter how much the media tries to pin the attacks by such people as due to conservative Tea Party philosophy. So fine, Greg, you get me to adjust my previous statement to “leftists, jihadists and/or mentally ill.”
The actual point of outrageous media bias still stands – it isn’t law-abiding, conservative gun owners committing these acts.
ThunderGod
9 years ago
Only problem I had with the commercial is that she had the gun in the bedroom in a lock-box. If she were single, with no-one else home, that pistol should have already been with her in the living room.
Kind of like Obama still saying that obamacare is a good thing that is helping people, and that eventually we will all grow to like it.
Or when someone sets you up on a blind date with someone whom when you learn about them you find totally unattractive, and the “friend” still tries to get you to go with them. Yep, Exactly like Obama.
I think we could make a list of things that are wrong about this commercial and the scenario it depicts that would have little or nothing to do with anyone’s position on firearms. Sort of a “What’s wrong with this picture?” exercise, if you remember when those were popular puzzles.
@Greg:
I notice you didn’t bother to list any. The main thing that was wrong was that she didn’t shoot the SOB when he broke in.
I liked the fact that Security Girl’s apartment has an exterior door on the outside but an interior door on the inside, with a cheap knob and hardware so flimsy it would scarcely be up to the demands of a bedroom closet.
@Greg: And it didn’t use a deadbolt and she didn’t push the dresser in front of the door, it was not a doorknob commercial, it was a handgun commercial. Did you see anything wrong with the handgun?
You really need to lighten up. You’re probably too tense and antagonistic to safely manage a handgun.
Right. Then she could have told the police that she didn’t realize it was the intoxicated husband of the next door neighbor who was angry because he thought his wife had locked him out of his own apartment.
Leftists will say anything to deny people the right to defend themselves.
Notice it isn’t law abiding gun owners who are misusing guns and killing innocents. It always seems to be a.mentally deranged leftist (but I repeat myself) committing these horrible gun crimes.
@Pete, #6:
You really do want to go there, don’t you?
Always a leftist. . . As with the pro-life terrorist who assassinated Dr. George Tiller during his Sunday church services?
Always a leftist. . . As with Anders Behring Breivik?
I think you might have a problem with selective memory.
I appreciated that she didn’t pull the trigger.
I had an occasion like that, myself, back in Long Beach.
A fleeing felon broke into the house next door.
Police surrounded it on THREE sides (my place was only about four feet away on the last side!)
At one point I got my gun because I could see him running all over that place.
At one point he broke the window opposite my bathroom’s window (which was open with a screen on it.)
I stood in the bathroom with the gun pointed at him as he contemplated making the jump to my place.
He backed off.
I called 911 and asked police to come use my windows for a 4th side on the situation.
I evacuated my place when they came in.
They took the screen off my window and shot tear gas into the place next-door.
He surrendered without a shot fired.
@Greg: You have no point and are trying to draw people into a meaningless argument. Knock it off.
Want to ban firearms? Fine. Keep voting, lobbying, and promoting whatever you want. It’s a free country. I’m glad you have the right and would die so that you could keep it, even if I don’t agree with it.
Those with different views than yours will do the same and engender the values and culture they believe in. They have the same right as you.
The infection we’re fighting right now is the belief that there is a time and place to silence a certain voice, and that you are free to marginalize them for the good of all. The false narratives pushed during the Bush years encouraged the over-educated and under-experienced.
Just remember that people of good conscious, life-experience, and more maturity will be there to stop you from imposing your will and taking away basic freedoms this country has lived and thrived with for centuries.
You’re logical fallacy will come and go, leaving you either changed or simply alone.
It always does…
Why has the media been so quiet about Karl Halverson Pierson?
Oh, I get it!
The Arapahoe High School shooter was, ”a very opinionated Socialist.”
That’s how a fellow economics student described him.
And everything he did to get his gun was legal even in very restrictive Colorado!
@Greg: Well sparky the last school shooting was by a avowed Socialist so the answer is yes the vast majority of the time, shooters are lefty loons or just plain loons. Wait, I’m being redundant aren’t I?
@Greg:
The intoxicated husband of the next door neighbor might have recognized her voice as not being his wife when she called out to him. Even an intoxicated person knows to stand in front of the eyehole when knocking on a woman’s door. Why wouldn’t his key work in the lock if it were his own house?
@Redteam: What Greg is pushing for is the abolition of personal responsibility. If even one person could be killed by a careless gun owner, then guns should be banned. But he didn’t actually say that, so…
The goal is to thoroughly obscure and distort the issue, keeping your “opponent” talking until they say something you can latch onto and shift the non-argument onto any subject that takes you away from the original statement (see post 6 and self-righteous response 7).
In this country, we have the right to bear arms. You don’t have to exercise you’re right, and you don’t have to like it.
It’s just a fundamental disagreement going on. Libs think you can legislate happiness and equality. If you just spend enough money, just scream loud enough, just blame enough people and scapegoat anyone not one your team, you can achieve utopia (which was anything but).
Non-libs don’t believe you can make enough laws to cover the idea of personal responsibility and choice. Bad things will happen. Period. Deal with it.
This quote sums up everything wrong in our country and why the “left” view of what to do can and will ultimately fail:
@Nathan Blue, #13:
You’ve deduced all of that from the observation that Security Girl got herself a gun before thinking to replace a door and latch that probably wouldn’t keep out a determined raccoon?
If I had a point, it was that the best first step to personal security is thoughtful behavior. I would hate to think that that’s strictly a leftist idea.
Post #6 is total bullshit. That being the case, I don’t know what’s self-righteous about pointing that out with the evidence to the contrary cited in #7.
Everything isn’t right or left, one thing or the other. The choice isn’t between a total lack of firearm regulation or a total loss of firearm rights.
@Greg: As I said:
You have no point, and I think your subconscious has a problem telling “Security Girl” that she can’t own a gun to lawfully protect herself, so you keep prattling on about door locks.
Anything to change the argument into something nebulous and unattainable, beyond posturing.
You’ve thrown down the smoke to confuse the audience. Time to disappear backstage. Show’s over.
If she were my daughter, I might tell her that it makes little sense to sleep with a gun under her bed so that she doesn’t have to worry so much about worthless door locks. People seem to think that’s a leftist political statement. And here I am, arguing about it?
My error. No doubt about it.
@Greg: It’s an ad!
I guess those movie mistakes, like the sound of explosions in the vacuum of space and the way cars get wreaked, then fix themselves, then look wreaked again all during the same chase must drive you crazy.
You noted yourself it was a continuity error, an outside door in one scene, an interior door in another scene.
Why get all riled up about it now?
Speaking of ads that are crazy……who else has seen California’s ObamaCare ad featuring a rapping Obama and dancers?
It’s a hoot!
@Greg: Make sure you tell her to live in a house without windows while you’re at it. You don’t need a gun under you’re bed if you live in a bunker…even though the perp in the video was trying to get her to voluntarily open the door.
Just pointing out facts, like you. No politics at all…but please keep harping on post #6 since you assume it’s still a defensible place to pretend you’re not making a leftist political statement. You’re fishing for something to debate, but have nothing.
Snap, bang, flash.
Smoke…
Exit, stage left. Show’s over.
@Greg:
No Greg, it’s the same door. Nor is the lack of a deadbolt that unusual in some low-crime communities. It may not be wise in this day and age, but that doesn’t make it abnormal. One could argue that she might have just moved into the apartment and hadn’t been able to get the landlord to update the security, but that makes it more sensible for her to be armed. I hate to burst your bubble, but unless it’s a metal exterior door in a metal frame, a deadbolt will not keep out a determined and experienced intruder.
You aren’t very observant are you? The man clearly wasn’t intoxicated, and he had a male partner in a parked van waiting for him.
@Redteam:
Artistic license. I believed it’s implied that she shot him. Otherwise it makes no sense to strap the Perp to an ambulance gurney when a couple officers could just drag him off in handcuffs. No doubt it was to avoid all the nasty anti-violence letters and emails from Greg’s squeamish flock of sheeple. I’m involved in low-budget, independent stage and video productions, and while we use primer loads and blanks, we rarely bother using squibs or blow away appliances. (You have to hire a pyrotechnics professional for that and they aren’t cheap.)
@Greg: 15
Are you implying that the guy banging on the door, not answering her ‘who is it?’ question and standing out of her sight, is all ‘thoughtful behavior’ on his part? That he had no responsibility for his safety?
@Ditto:
could be. I thought it was implied that he ‘fainted’. Makes sense either way.
Nanny G
ON 8
GREG WOULD SAY YOUSAVE A LEFTIST’S LIFE,
BYE
Nathan Blue
that”s a good funny one,
thank”s for the laugh.
Greg
YOU GAVE ME AN IDEA,
HOW ABOUT AN EXTERIOR OPEN DOOR ATTACH TO AN INTERIOR DOOR OPENING TO THE EXTERIOR,
SO THE PROWLER FORCE OPEN THE EXTERIOR DOOR WHICH OPEN ON THE EXTERIOR AND GET KNOCKT OUT BY THE INTERIOR DOOR WHICH SHE OPEN ALSO TO THE EXTERIOR FOLLOWING THE EXTERIOR OPEN DOOR
AS HE TRY TO GET IN THAT INTERIOR DOOR, OPENING TO THE EXTERIOR,
OH WAIT, WHERE DID HE GO,
Argue with a troll and you’ll surly get troll spittle on your shirt.
BUFFALOBOB
OOPS HE WENT BACK OUT THE OUTSIDE DOOR,
Personally, I would have shot the intruder chest center the second he had fully entered the premises.
Breaking and entering. Home invasion. Call it what you want but the intent is clear. He wasn’t collecting for UNICEF.
Even in a state that requires AN ATTEMPT to retreat first, in this case there is not much to retreat into and the close proximity would ether require her to back up (trip and lose your life) or turn around (He’s probably faster and any reasonable person would assume he’s crazy and/or armed. A mans fist has been declared a weapon in courts, especially to a woman).
I suppose the liberals would prefer rape and strangulation as a more palatable result.
(Like Obamacare: UNTIL IT HAPPENS TO THEM!)
If this were a real incident, and she was unarmed, is there one liberal out there that does not believe she would have left that dwelling on a stretcher? Go ahead and say why!
The only thing I found wrong with the ad is that it at least gives the impression that the police showed up fast, and we all know that rarely happens.
@Redteam, #21:
Some people seem to have difficulty understanding what’s being said plain and simple. It isn’t a complicated sentence.
Nostradamus
yes FOR SURE,
SOME TIME AGO,I was looking across the back door a house backyard,
there came two guys taking out all the jeens from the line,and run out
one had a red hair,
i went to tell the people owning the place and made a profile of the two guys,
the next day the same guys ring my door bell, i have a big german sheffard
barking at the long but narrow window< while i call the police,
they change their mind because of my dog they where looking at and left just as the police
arrive to pick them up, THE MORAL OF THE STORY, IF YOU HAVE A RED HAIR, DON'T GO FOR CRIME,
SOMEONE WILL NOTICE,
BYE
@Nostradamus:
You know what a liberal is, don’t you?
Someone who has yet to be mugged by reality.
@Greg:
Oh, I understand. The woman is a gun owner (therefore a conservative) and should be expected to act with thoughtful behavior. The criminal was an unemployed liberal that is surprised that he has encountered a conservative with a gun and he is therefore not expected to react with ‘thoughtful behavior’, but as a liberal would, and faint. Seems clear enough.
@Redteam:
I must correct myself as I too made a few incorrect observations. On watching it again, it wasn’t the perp going up to the door in the very beginning shot, seen past the man in the van, it was the woman going to her door with the perp in the van. The interior shot threw me, as watching it again, we have to accept that time had passed before the man went to the door. Enough for the woman to change clothing into short-shorts and a chemise. We don’t know why the perp waited so long to make his move or why the writer decided to have the woman change clothes and get comfortable.
As far as crime and reality is concerned, this commercial is as poorly written as most that sell home protection products. It does send one message quite well, and that is that if you are the type of person who breaks into homes, eventually you will find yourself looking down the barrel of a gun. For that, as well as the suggestion that women have a gun for personal protection, I give it a “7” for those good messages and the well done videography, otherwise I give the writer and director a “3” overall for it’s problems.
to you slime killers of a young man in front of his wife just to steel his car,
the NJ POLICE WILL FIND YOU, YOU HAVE NO PLACE TO HIDE,
NO PLACE EVER YOU WILL BE FOUND AND SPEND YOUR LIVES IN PRISON,
EVERY LAW OFFICER HAVE YOUR PROFILE NOW,
YOU WILL PAY FOR YOUR CRIME, SOON,
YOU KNOW WHAT LONG ARMS OF JUSTICE MEAN,
THERE IS NO LIMIT FOR THEM,
I WOULD ADVICE THEM TO LOOK IN THE GARBISH
SO TO FIND GARBISH LIKE YOU,
@Greg:
Riiight…typical leftist dishonesty.
Anders Behring Breivik – the Norweigen neo-Nazi – not an American.
Roeder – the diagnosed schizophrenic who murdered Tiller – does not equate to the leftists who go off on these rampage shooting attacks….or fly airplanes into IRS offices.
Very weak attempt to misdirect from the point that these violent attackers are typically leftists or jihadists, no matter how much the media tries to pin the attacks by such people as due to conservative Tea Party philosophy. So fine, Greg, you get me to adjust my previous statement to “leftists, jihadists and/or mentally ill.”
The actual point of outrageous media bias still stands – it isn’t law-abiding, conservative gun owners committing these acts.
Only problem I had with the commercial is that she had the gun in the bedroom in a lock-box. If she were single, with no-one else home, that pistol should have already been with her in the living room.
@Greg:
No, Greg. Post 6 is the reality that your leftist mindset doesn’t want to accept, so you engage in twisted misdirection to avoid reality.
Kind of like Obama still saying that obamacare is a good thing that is helping people, and that eventually we will all grow to like it.
anybody who are paid by the people should be on obamacare,even the unions and obama and family,
@Pete:
Or when someone sets you up on a blind date with someone whom when you learn about them you find totally unattractive, and the “friend” still tries to get you to go with them. Yep, Exactly like Obama.