Running An “Election” On Closed-Source Venezuelan Voting Software

Loading


 
Thread: (h/t Instapundit)

1/n “The circumstances & events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with #Smartmatic software electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in Venezuela.”

—Whistleblower documented in sworn affidavit obtained by @SidneyPowell1, on why he came forward.

2/n “I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this #2020election for President of the United States… What happened in the United States was that the vote counting was abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software.”

3/n “I want to point out that the software and fundamental design of the electronic electoral system and software of #Dominion and other election tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the #Smartmatic Electoral Management System.”

4/n “Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government.”

5/n “Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected… Smartmatic agreed to create such a system & produced the software & hardware that accomplished that result for President Chavez.”

6/n “After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated using #Smartmatic software. One such election was in December 2006… [another was] On April 14, 2013,”

7/n “In that election, Nicolás Maduro ran against Capriles
Radonsky… Inside that location was a control room in which there were multiple digital display screens – TV screens – for results of voting in each state in Venezuela. The actual voting results were fed into that room…”

8/n “and onto the displays over an internet feed, which was connected to a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that room were able to see in “real time” whether the vote that came through the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them.”

9/n “By two o’clock in the afternoon on that election day Capriles Radonsky was ahead of Nicolás Maduro by two million votes. When Maduro and his supporters realized the size of Radonsky’s lead they were worried that they were in a crisis mode and would lose the election.”

10/n “So, the decision was made to reset the entire system. Maduro’s and his supporters ordered the network controllers to take the internet itself offline in practically all parts in Venezuela and to change the results.”

11/n “It took the voting system operators approximately two hours to make the adjustments in the vote from Radonsky to Maduro… By the time the system operators finish, they had achieved a convincing, but narrow victory of 200,000 votes for Maduro.”

12/n “I saw first-hand that the manipulation and changing of votes can be done in real-time at the secret counting center which existed in Caracas, Venezuela. For me it was something very surprising and disturbing.”

13/n “But later, in 2017 when there were elections where Maduro was running and elections for legislators in Venezuela, [REDACTED] and Smartmatic broke their secrecy pact with the government of Venezuela.”

14/n “So I think that’s the greatest proof that the fraud can be carried out and will be denied by the software company that [REDACTED] admitted publicly that Smartmatic had created, used and still uses vote counting software that can be manipulated or altered.”

15/n My comments: These are obviously some incredibly serious allegations given in sworn testimony, ones that warrant further investigation assuming they check out. They are not all in the same order as in the affidavit—I just wanted to offer a rough sense. Related article next:

16/end @charlottecuthbo‘s article:

Trump campaign lawyer @SidneyPowell1 released an explosive affidavit on Nov. 16, from a whistleblower who purports to have witnessed how election software secretly manipulates votes without leaving a trace.
theepochtimes.com/whistleblo…

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Even inventory systems designed to keep accurate count fail, show the item to the store helper cant find it on the shelves, the computer says we have 3 of these, no one is walking out with 3 toilets without being seen, but there is only the display. had the same issue with a grill but where did 4 unboxed full size gas grills and a lawn mower where they had 2 “in stock” just 3 things this year alone that items in the computer inventory did not match real world. Ya human error during physical inventory. None of the items could fit down baggy pants, but real funny to imagine someone trying.
Time to release the Kraken do a full audit everywhere get rid of this system and contract it to an American company.

From Epoch Times:
A recount monitor in Georgia discovered a 9,626-vote error in the hand recount in DeKalb County, according to the chairman of the Georgia Republican Party. “One of our monitors discovered a 9,626-vote error in the DeKalb County hand count. One batch was labeled 10,707 for Biden and 13 for Trump—an improbable margin even by DeKalb standards. The actual count for the batch was 1,081 for Biden and 13 for Trump,” David Shafer wrote on Twitter on Nov. 18. “Had this counting error not been discovered, Biden would have gained enough votes from this one batch alone to cancel out Trump’s gains from Fayette, Floyd, and Walton,” Shafer added, referring to the three Peach State counties which discovered memory cards with uncounted votes on Monday and Tuesday. Shafer said that two official counters signed off on the miscounted batch. GOP attorneys turned over an affidavit (pdf) on the incident to the Georgia …

@kitt: Humans do indeed err. However, they don’t always err in the same direction. That’s fraud.