Terry McAuliffe:
“Nobody cares,” McAuliffe said. “Nobody cares about what Donna Brazile has said in a book. Nobody.”
CNN Told Hosts To Discredit Donna Brazile To Cover For Clinton
Fox News’ Tucker Carlson reported Monday that according to sources, CNN had reporters discredit former DNC interim chair Donna Brazile over her revelations that made Hillary Clinton look bad.
Carlson said, “According to highly informed sources we spoke to–highly informed–top management at CNN directed its employees to undermine Brazile’s credibility. Anchors and producers were vocally offended by her attacks on their friends, the Clintons. If you’ve been watching that channel, you may have noticed CNN’s anchors suggesting that Donna Brazile cannot be trusted, precisely because she took part in efforts to break the primaries for Clinton.”
Nasty.
How many excuses for the failures are we going to hear? The Dems have a long history of racism the treatment of Black conservatives are a good example, uncle Toms, house Ni&&ers ect especially if they pay their taxes.
Can anyone with an understanding of the definition of journalism imagine the media coming to the defense of a political party instead of examining a titillating and salacious bombshell story? What IS more important? Protecting the Democrats or reporting facts that the American people need to know in order to make political decisions?
The answer to that questions depends upon your own definition of “journalism”.
In fact, Donna Brazille CANNOT be trusted. She wasn’t bothered enough by what she found within the DNC to immediately report it, because she assumed Hillary was going to win. She fed Hillary debate questions because that’s how Democrats “prepare” for debates. So, the accusations made in her book should be vetted, something liberals are not too adroit in. But, currently, it is far too important for the corrupt, liberal media to protect the Democrat party than to find and report the truth.
Then they might take a look at what happens when the media stops being a journalistic entity and becomes that official propaganda arm for a political party.
Oh, and I think they disagree with her because she is a woman. And black.
@Bill… Deplorable Me: Ony 37% of people have a favorable opinion of the democratic party, I guess they polled washington dc
@kitt: No doubt that’s a padded number as well.
The Demac-RAT party the party of fewer freedoms more red tape more buracarcy and bigger goverment