Putin’s Power Play in Syria: Did Obama Blink or Wink?

Loading

Arthur L. Herman:

If you thought Vladimir Putin’s military intervention in Syria was the result of some mad dictatorial impulse, better think again.

Wednesday, the New York Times ran a story about how American military analysts have been stunned by the precision and planning of the Russian operation in Syria. “What continues to impress me is their ability to move a lot of stuff real far, real fast,” the commander of the U.S. Army in Europe said, since it means that Putin’s military is fully capable of large-scale expeditionary power projection—something we used to think was solely an American specialty.

The Russians have also seamlessly carried out more bombing runs in a single day than the hapless American-led coalition conducts against ISIS in a month.

They’ve launched a new design of cruise missile against anti-Assad rebels that may match, or even surpass, American technology; and have overall displayed a professionalism and readiness that shocks observers who remember the sad old post-Cold War Russian military, or even the one that launched the invasion of Georgia seven years ago.

But the Times buried the real story in the third paragraph, which states that Russian air power “might soon back an Iranian-led offensive that appeared to be forming in the northern province of Aleppo on Wednesday. That coordination reflects what American officials described as months of meticulous planning,” i.e., between the Russians and Iran.

This confirms what many of us have suspected: Moscow and Tehran were only waiting for Obama to commit himself to a nuclear deal with Iran and then present it to the Senate and the UN Security Council, before they made their joint move on Syria. “The broad outlines were decided months ago,” said Lieutenant General Richard Zahner the Army’s former top intelligence officer in Moscow. Those plans were developed in late July, to be exact, when Iranian Quds Force commander Qassim Suleimani traveled to Moscow—in other words, at the same time that Iran was negotiating the details of its nuclear deal with Obama and Kerry.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

As the Taliban rolls into the Warduj district after taking Kunduz, the fundamental limits to any US counterattack are imposed by the fact the Obama administration has already pulled the supply plug on the forces there. The iron momentum of logistics is now in play.

Last May the Northern Supply route was shut down. The Stars and Stripes reported at the time: “A logistics route through Russia that carried as much as 40 percent of the supplies for NATO’s coalition at the height of military operations in Afghanistan has been shut down.”

The Indian Express notes that the bribe money which kept the roads open has dried up. “As drawdown progresses in Afghanistan, US draws its Pak purse strings.”

Coalition Support Fund (CSF) … in theory, was meant to reimburse Pakistan for its military operations against militants in tribal areas on the Afghanistan border, which would help NATO forces in their operations against the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. In practice, CSF came to be seen as a payout to Pakistan for allowing US military supplies from Karachi to travel through its territory into Afghanistan.

The cost and energy of putting the US Armed Forces in reverse is titanic, nobody would dream of disrupting it now. “Serious planning for the withdrawal began in 2011 and ended up costing nearly $30 billion.”

The enemy has been watching the Obama policy for years. All they had to do was wait till things passed the point of no return and then strike.

Sure, Richard Fernandez wrote this about Afghanistan, but the same applies to Iran and Russia. in Syria.

Putin is not idiot. He waited until reversing course would be prohibitively politically expensive on Obama’s part….not to mention financially expensive as well.

@Nanny G:

The best thing about Russia getting Crimea back… Catherine the Great took it from the Turks… What happened right after Russia retook Crimea? The Russian FSB searched all the Turks living there… Why? NATO sponsors Islamist terrorism when it suits them.

Ukraine is the same scenario as Serbia… NATO bombs Serbia so the IMF can make loans for rebuilding and get control of Serbian iridium assets… The Kiev junta is just another IMF coup… NATO… North Atlantic Terrorist Organization.