The 2020 Pulitzer Prize for commentary was awarded Monday to Nikole Hannah-Jones for an essay in the New York Times that falsely claimed the American Revolution was fought primarily to protect slavery.
The essay, titled “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true,” launched the Times‘ controversial 1619 project.
The essay incorrectly claimed that the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 (signing began weeks later, on August 2).
However, the far more egregious error was Hannah-Jones’s claim about the cause for which the Revolution was fought. She wrote: “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”
That passage, which appeared in the original text, has since been updated to include the word “some” (emphasis added): “Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons some of the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery.”
Historians were outraged by Hannah-Jones’s false claim. One of them, Northwestern University Professor Leslie Harris, was enthusiastic about the 1619 Project, but furious about the inaccurate claim. Harris recalled in Politico:
On August 19 of last year I listened in stunned silence as Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for the New York Times, repeated an idea that I had vigorously argued against with her fact-checker: that the patriots fought the American Revolution in large part to preserve slavery in North America.
I vigorously disputed the claim. Although slavery was certainly an issue in the American Revolution, the protection of slavery was not one of the main reasons the 13 Colonies went to war.
Overall, the 1619 Project is a much-needed corrective to the blindly celebratory histories that once dominated our understanding of the past—histories that wrongly suggested racism and slavery were not a central part of U.S. history. I was concerned that critics would use the overstated claim to discredit the entire undertaking. So far, that’s exactly what has happened.
The current version of Hannah-Jones’s essay preserves other controversial statements, such as the claim that “Anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country,” which repeats (almost verbatim) a claim then-President Barack Obama made in 2015 to National Public Radio that racism is “still part of our DNA.”
The Times also shared a Pulitzer Prize in 2018 for its reporting on the “Russia collusion” narrative, which was later disproven (albeit reluctantly) by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 election.
In August 2019, Times editor Dean Baquet told the newsroom that the newspaper intended to shift its coverage from Russia to race. With the collapse of Russia conspiracy theories, which the Times had used to attack President Donald Trump from the day of his inauguration, the paper needed a new narrative. The 1619 Project is the centerpiece of that new narrative — with Trump, implicitly, the inheritor of America’s racist past.
What a load of poppycock if their putting this lie into the liberal written Text Books then its time to take up Home or Private Schooling and stop the Brainwashing/Indoctrination by the NEA and the Globalists
My mother’s father was a rabid anti “Uncle Joe”! He told me in 1920 Uncle Joe said his KGB agents would infiltrate, and soon control the press, education and labor. Granddad said KGB took control of Columbia and NYT in 1930. So HE (grand dad) was not shocked when the KGB controlled Columbia awarded their Pulitzer to the NYT’ “ace” reporter (and not known to many, a KGB agent) Duranty,
Columbia and NYT are still run by Russian agents( Times has diff owners but the management and writers are still Russian agents.) Nothing has changed in 90 years!
Tmes admitted about 25 years ago that Walt was in fact a Russian operative. So What! His work was still “1st rate!”!
If “no big deal!” why did they lie about it for almost 60 years?
The Pulitzers, like the Nobels, have lost all value and prestige since they began handing them out like candy to far left trick-or-treaters.
What a moron slavery wasnt abolished in England until Slavery Abolition Act 1833 yup 1833. NYT seems to print any brain fart rewrite of history or current events.
Project 1619 is an abomination, hang on to those old printed encyclopedias, the older the better before the progressives got their hand into rewriting and lying about what really happened.