Planned Parenthood Is More Influential than the NRA

Loading

Left-wing politicians and activists, along with many in the media, appear convinced that the National Rifle Association represents everything brutal and dangerous about American gun culture.

Indeed, we’ve been told repeatedly by grim-faced pundits that — even after the recent Parkland school shooting — GOP politicians dare to accept dirty NRA dollars and, simultaneously, to oppose gun-control measures such as the bump-stock and assault-weapons bans so popular on the far left.



This means, gun-control activists crow, that the NRA is a nasty lobbying group exercising sinister influence over our politics.

But political lobbying hasn’t always been considered such a high crime. Even now, left-wing action groups coalesce around students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School as they lobby for increased gun control, and there has been nary a peep in opposition.

Among those groups is an ever-present progressive specter, a professional lobbying group in its own right: Planned Parenthood. Along with Everytown for Gun Safety, MoveOn.org, and the Women’s March LA, Planned Parenthood has chipped in to help the students strategize for next month’s March for our Lives rally.

According to a recent Buzzfeed report, Planned Parenthood is “teaching and hosting trainings” for young activists across the U.S., working with gun-control advocate and former Democratic congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, and “helping the students with logistics, strategy, and planning for next month’s March for Our Lives rally and beyond.”

Planned Parenthood did not respond to National Review’s request for clarification regarding the exact nature of its support for the Parkland students.

But, of course, there have been no charges that these activist groups are exercising improper influence over the political process. Not only are the NRA’s attackers wrong to suggest that the Second Amendment group is somehow responsible for the Parkland shooting, but their outrage over its spending is so obviously selective.

Newsweek, for example, pushed back against NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch by pointing out that the NRA spent $5 million on lobbying last year. And several outlets — not to mention progressive politicians — have noted the money that GOP politicians accept from the NRA.

But when Senate Democrats shot down a largely popular 20-week abortion ban last month, there was no Newsweek article noting Planned Parenthood’s lobbying statistics. Nor do mainstream outlets ever point to the campaign contributions that Democratic politicians accept from Planned Parenthood and its close cousin NARAL.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

There should be no taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood as long as they dole out abortions (and reap the profits of parting out the corpses) and having Planned Parenthood involved with promoting “safety for children” is the highest level of cynical, humanity-hating hypocrisy.

To all you useful idiots gun control(Especialy idiots like David Hogg) the NRA has not killed no one put Planned Parenthood has the highists murder rate

So, Planned Parenthood would be acceptable to you, so long as they provide no family planning services beyond advising abstinence? Why the comparison with the NRA in the first place? Oh. Right:

FBI ‘investigating whether Russian money went to NRA’s campaign to help elect Donald Trump’

The possible conduit in question, Alexander Torshin: Editorial: FBI wants to know if NRA laundered Russian money for Trump