Obama’s Decision on ISIS Is Flawed but a Beginning

Loading

Tom Rogan:

Submitting a draft authorization for use of military force (AUMF) and a clarifying letter, President Obama is asking Congress to end the Islamic State. This move signals new American seriousness about theundeniable threat that ISIS poses to the world. Nevertheless, there are two specific strengths and two specific weaknesses to President Obama’s proposal.

Strengths first. Albeit with qualifications, this AUMF shows that Mr. Obama has finally recognized his commanders’ longstanding advice: ISIS won’t be defeated without U.S. ground forces. Unfortunately, thanks to the Iraqi army’s weakness and the sectarian criminality that defines Iranian-sponsored militias, U.S. ground forces are indispensable. Their presence (hopefully with Jordanian support) will enable the coalition to do two things: First, mobilize the Sunni tribes of eastern Syria and western Iraq in a second “awakening” rebellion against ISIS. Second, support those Sunni tribal forces, Kurdish forces, and Iraqi military units with air-attack controllers. Skill for skill, courage for courage, ISIS is no match for the U.S military. This is not bluster but a fact of history.

In addition, with the AUMF authorizing action against “associated persons” (“individuals and organizations fighting for, on behalf of, or alongside [ISIS] . . . against the United States or its coalition partners”) around the world, the battlefield will now necessarily expand. Again, this is critical in two specific regards. First, it will allow the U.S. to puncture — both physically and psychologically — ISIS’s shroud of ordained protection. Thus far, ISIS has been able to recruit others across the world by suggesting that its survival against U.S. air strikes proves that it enjoys divine protection. Soon ISIS’s global supporters will find that their flag is, rather than a banner of sacred pride, a magnet for high explosives. Further, by also authorizing action against “associated persons.” the AUMF will help U.S. agencies smash ISIS support networks — recruitment facilitators and financial fundraisers — wherever they might be. Hopefully, we’ll be seeing some unexplained heart attacks in Qatar.

Nevertheless, this AUMF, the product of the Obama national-security team, is far from perfect.

For a start, its three-year sunset clause will feed the ISIS propaganda that the American public is timid and short-sighted, and it will encourage ISIS leaders to believe they can wait America out. It will also concern U.S. allies in the Middle East who are desperate for a long-term U.S. commitment to regional stability. At a strategic level, it will greatly magnify fears (especially from the Sunni Arab monarchies) that America will abandon them to Iran.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

the AUMF authorizing action against “associated persons” (“individuals and organizations fighting for, on behalf of, or alongside [ISIS] . . . against the United States or its coalition partners”) around the world, the battlefield will now necessarily expand.

Will this mean Turkey will pay for its duplicity?
See all the proofs of Turkey’s alliance with ISIS at Gateway Pundit’s “ISIS Detainee: Turkish Intelligence Forces Helped Smuggle Weapons to Jihadists in Syria.”
Plenty of photos there, too.

ISIS Detainee: Turkish Intelligence Forces Helped Smuggle Weapons to Jihadists in Syria

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/chp-lawmakers-accuse-turkish-government-of-protecting-isil-and-al-nusra-militants.aspx?pageID=238&nID=67750&NewsCatID=338

Kurds Document Turkey’s Support of ISIS in Pictures

We’ve been conducting airstrikes against ISIS for over 6 months already—nearly 1,000 to date. There are already around 4,500 U.S. troops on the ground in Iraq. We’ve been providing munitions and support to the Kurds since last August. The beginning of whatever this ultimately turns into was 6 months ago.

Vietnam in another location.