When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gasjim
10 years ago
I’m as conservative as the next person, but this one is a low blow. The inference in the posting, I think, is that the law is unimportant. His intent is clearly that legal or illegal the behavior is outrageous and unacceptable. I think most of us agree. Even if (as I believe his intent to mean) it wasn’t against the law per se, it was wrong.
Jm
retire05
10 years ago
It would seem the Administration has sent Dan Pfiffer out today to be the talking head of the POTUS.
When asked by Mike Wallace if the President was in the Situation Room during the Benghazi attack, Pfiffer responded “I don’t remember what room he was in. It’s a largely irrelevant fact.”
Then, on Face the Nation, Pfiffer was asked who changed the Benghazi talking points. He said “It’s an absolute tragedy what happened. Who edited what talking points, that’s largely irrelevant.”
Scandals coming from the Oval Office? It’s, according to Pfiffer, “largely irrelevant.”
In other words, the opinion of the administration on Benghazi, and the IRS scandal, any questios about the actions of the Oval office are off limits because they are irrelevant. If there is nothing to hide, what is this Administration hiding?
They keep trying to inflate those lead balloons with helium, who knows, they might get one to stay aloft one day and take some of the pressure off Obama. Oh, but that is one of the problems with surrounding yourself with tail wagging hand lickers of limited intellect, you get asinine feedback that makes the situation even worse. Keep pumping boys, you are only allowed so much incompetence and stupidity before even your most loyal supporters are looking at you with fish eyes.
Nan G
10 years ago
Was it Dan Pfiffer or our liberal-compliant press who started calling this ”Obama’s scandal week,” as if by calling it that it might all blow over next week.
LOL!
They tried, it is “old news.”
They tried, ”it is inappropriate, but legal.”
Now they are trying, ”it is irrelevant.”
I was in college when Watergate happened.
Believe me, none of these rhetorical ploys will work.
I’m as conservative as the next person, but this one is a low blow. The inference in the posting, I think, is that the law is unimportant. His intent is clearly that legal or illegal the behavior is outrageous and unacceptable. I think most of us agree. Even if (as I believe his intent to mean) it wasn’t against the law per se, it was wrong.
Jm
It would seem the Administration has sent Dan Pfiffer out today to be the talking head of the POTUS.
When asked by Mike Wallace if the President was in the Situation Room during the Benghazi attack, Pfiffer responded “I don’t remember what room he was in. It’s a largely irrelevant fact.”
Then, on Face the Nation, Pfiffer was asked who changed the Benghazi talking points. He said “It’s an absolute tragedy what happened. Who edited what talking points, that’s largely irrelevant.”
Scandals coming from the Oval Office? It’s, according to Pfiffer, “largely irrelevant.”
In other words, the opinion of the administration on Benghazi, and the IRS scandal, any questios about the actions of the Oval office are off limits because they are irrelevant. If there is nothing to hide, what is this Administration hiding?
They keep trying to inflate those lead balloons with helium, who knows, they might get one to stay aloft one day and take some of the pressure off Obama. Oh, but that is one of the problems with surrounding yourself with tail wagging hand lickers of limited intellect, you get asinine feedback that makes the situation even worse. Keep pumping boys, you are only allowed so much incompetence and stupidity before even your most loyal supporters are looking at you with fish eyes.
Was it Dan Pfiffer or our liberal-compliant press who started calling this ”Obama’s scandal week,” as if by calling it that it might all blow over next week.
LOL!
They tried, it is “old news.”
They tried, ”it is inappropriate, but legal.”
Now they are trying, ”it is irrelevant.”
I was in college when Watergate happened.
Believe me, none of these rhetorical ploys will work.