On September 13, the 20th anniversary of the signing of the federal assault weapons ban, The New York Times ran a column explaining that the very term “assault weapon” is one the “Democrats created” in the 1990s in order to ban “a politically defined category of guns.”
Moreover, the Times points out that the threat posed by the private ownership of “assault weapons” is mythological in comparison to FBI stats on the actual use of such guns in crime.
According to the NYT, America was “suffering from a spike in gun crime…in the early 1990s” so “Democrats created and banned [an entire] category of guns.” The ban lasted from 1994 to 2004 and although crime fell during that time, a “detailed study found no proof” the decline was due to the ban.
Hard numbers showed the percentage of “assault weapons” recovered by police during the ban only rose from 1 percent to 2 percent.
On top of all this, the Times points out that “assault weapons” are not the gun of choice for criminals anyway–and never have been. “In 2012, only 322 people were murdered with any kind of rifle, FBI data shows.” And as Breitbart News reported on January 15, 2013, deaths in which an “assault rifle” were involved constituted less than .012 percent of the overall deaths in America in 2011.
The New York Times did report one clear outcome of the “assault weapons” ban in 1994–Democrats got creamed at the polls in November.
The propaganda media could be office holders in the Procrastinator’s Club, if they aren’t already. Maybe they are the ones who started it. I wonder what the average time of when something they don’t want to report is something they finally do report.
I am glad that people are waking up to their propaganda. I’m guessing the new york times is trying to keep more subscribers from canceling, and to get more to subscribe, so they HAVE TO TELL THE TRUTH once-in-a-while to keep or get them.
To be an “assault weapon”, it has to be full auto. There have been only 2 murders with legally owned machine guns since 1934.