Posted by DrJohn on 1 February, 2021 at 6:00 am. 2 comments already!



Nicolle Wallace has Republicans and drone strikes on the noggin.

Yesterday, we caught MSNBC analyst and former FBI agent Clint Watts saying on Wallace’s show that if Anwar Awlaki had said what Trump said, the result would be a “drone strike.”

Wallace took it an insane step further on her show this evening, saying:

We had a policy, and it was very controversial, it was carried out under the Bush years, and under the Obama years, of attacking terrorism at its root, of going after and killing, and in the case of Anwar Awlaki, an American, a Yemeni-American, with a drone strike for the crime of inciting violence, inciting terrorism.
 . . . 

The way you root out terrorism, is to take on, in the case of Islamic terrorism, kill those who incite it.

Wallace might claim she was only talking about Awlaki and Islamic terrorism. But for the second night running to, in any way, shape, or form, put incitement to “domestic terrorism” in the same breath as killing with “drone strikes” is deeply dangerous, and insane. Why was she possibly even talking about drone strikes in the context of dealing with domestic terrorism?

Video and more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x