Sounds like a Local Crime Story to me, huh?
Not a “big national story.” Not a “hot, quickly-moving story.”
Hm! I wonder why.
Could it have something to do with the fact that the New York Times assigned dozens of reporters to smear Kavanaugh and wrote four blistering op-eds — by the Editorial Board itself — calling Blowsey-Ford’s claims “credible” and demanding we #BelieveAllWomen?
As John Sexton asks: Gee, how come the New York Times isn’t writing editorials noting that Tara Reade is credible and, unlike Blowsey-Ford, told at least two people about the rape who both confirm that they were told that story at the time?
https://twitter.com/JMacNYC/status/1250456626810716164
And as our executive editor @deanbaquet pointed out in a recent interview with my colleague @benyt, Kavanaugh "was a live, ongoing story that had become the biggest political story in the country. It was just a different news judgment moment."
— Kate Kelly (@katekelly) April 15, 2020
So, Kavanaugh's confirmation was a live, ongoing story, but Joe Biden's presidential run is NOT a live, ongoing story.
Jesus. Who the F do these democrat water-carriers think they're fooling?
— Bill Mc7 (@BillMc7) April 15, 2020
NYT reporter who wrote stories & book trying to tarnish reputation of Kavanaugh says she agrees with Dean Baquet that former VP/Senator and presumptive Dem presidential nominee Joe Biden is not a major news figure and his sexual assault allegation is not particularly newsworthy. https://t.co/egjTWKveSQ
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) April 15, 2020
The coauthor of the book hasn’t even bothered to respond. But she’s still advertising the book accusing Kavanaugh in her Twitter bio.
I guess she hasn’t bothered to comment on this story, or answer questions about her silence, because she’s too busy retweeting very important, game-changing, “hot” quickly-moving national stories like this:
Anyone who still works for the New York Pravda(Times)is either a total fool or a complete idiot this liberal rag can never get to the truth and covered up for Lenin,Stalin and Mao as well as Castro
NYT only attacks those with a chance to win and are conservative.. Political corpses like Creepy uncle Joe just dont fit the profile.
Even the accusations against Weinstein had to come as an avalanche before the liberal media took notice. He was a Democrat cash cow and his exploits were widely known… and most of his “victims” were looking to advance their careers. But, in absolute reality, no Democrats care about some poor volunteer churn getting raped by a Democrat Senator or Presidential candidate. Her well-being is not nearly as important as the Democrat “greater good” (i.e. POWER).