Too funny:
Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.
Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.
Men’s upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.
The principal investigators – psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen, of Aarhus University in Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to influence behaviour today.
Professor Petersen said: ‘While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon, it has – in a sense – always been with our species.’
In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of resources were not made in courthouses or legislative offices, but through shows of strength.
With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesised that upper-body strength – a proxy for the ability to physically defend or acquire resources – would predict men’s opinions about the redistribution of wealth.
The researchers collected data on bicep size, socio-economic status, and support for economic redistribution from hundreds of people in the United States, Argentina and Denmark.In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.
Men with less upper body strength are more likely to support the welfare state – like Labour leader Ed Miliband
Professor Petersen said: ‘Despite the fact that the United States, Denmark and Argentina have very different welfare systems, we still see that – at the psychological level – individuals reason about welfare redistribution in the same way.‘In all three countries, physically strong males consistently pursue the self-interested position on redistribution.’
Men with low upper-body strength, on the other hand, were less likely to support their own self-interest.
So, “Men with low upper-body strength, on the other hand, were less likely to support their own self-interest.” eh? — hahaha — boy, does this study not fit me. Maybe I’m an outlier.
‘In all three countries, physically strong males consistently pursue the self-interested position on redistribution.’
More likely, we pursue the national-interested position on redistribution.
Redistribution of wealth is, after all, bad for the nation as a whole.
do they mean redistribution of fat? or redistribution of muscle?
or redistribution of liquid?
or REDISTRIBUTION of C..P?
this last one would fit the DEMOCRAT
it looks to me that they have cause & effect reversed.
the right wing males are more likely to be willing to work hard to get ahead thus building more upper body strength .
tomd
yes it make more sense