McConnell Claims Democrats Have “Buyer’s Remorse” After Pelosi Puts “Hold” on Impeachment

Loading

Following the House vote to pass two articles of impeachment on to the Senate for final adjudication, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put a hold on the process: “We cannot name managers [to present our case to the Senate] until we see what the process is on the Senate side. So far, we haven’t seen anything that looks fair to us.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called it a stall and a comedy:



Speaker Pelosi suggested that House Democrats may be too afraid to even transmit their shoddy work to the Senate. The prosecutors are getting cold feet in front of the entire country and [are] second-guessing whether they even want to go to trial.

They said impeachment was so urgent that it could not even wait for due process but now they’re content to sit on their hands.

It is comical.

Editors at the Wall Street Journal said Pelosi’s stall has moved the impeachment process “from folly to farce.”

McConnell said Democrats were now suffering from “buyer’s remorse”:

I am glad that leading Democrats seem to have buyer’s remorse about the least fair, least thorough, and most rushed impeachment in American history. They should. But for the sake of the country I wish this understanding had dawned on them yesterday.

The Constitution gives the House the sole power of impeachment, and the Senate the sole power to try all impeachments. It’s similar to an indictment handed to a grand jury to hear the evidence and rule on guilt or innocence. The House indicted Trump under two articles and the Senate will conduct a hearing of the evidence before voting to acquit or affirm. It’s a two-step process.

But the process can’t continue until the Senate receives the articles and hears the evidence supporting them.

According to Noah Feldman, one of the four lawyers who testified during the House impeachment hearings, “if the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.”

McConnell thinks Pelosi’s delay in transmitting the articles to the Senate is a ruse, seeking leverage over the Senate: “Some House Democrats imply they are withholding the articles for some kind of leverage. I admit, I’m not sure what leverage there is in refraining from sending us something we do not want. Alas, if they can figure that out, they can explain.”

He added:

Following weeks of pronouncements about the urgency of the situation … the prosecutors appear to have developed cold feet. Democrat prosecution seems to have gotten cold feet, and to be unsure about whether they want to proceed to the trial — like I said, a very unusual spectacle. So we’ll see whether House Democrats ever want to work up the courage to actually take their accusation to trial.

If the articles are transmitted, the Senate has two options: to vote to dismiss them out of hand and move on to other matters, or to hold a trial and acquit the president.

The president wants a trial:

So after the Democrats gave me no Due Process in the House, no lawyers, no witnesses, no nothing, they now want to tell the Senate how to run their trial.

Actually, they have zero proof of anything; they will never even show up. They want out. I want an immediate trial!

The Wall Street Journal summed up the present situation:

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
110 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Ronald J. Ward: Can we take those inane interpretations one at a time?
Nah Cause they have nothing not 1 thing to do with Fascist Nancy wanting to control 2 branches of government and dismiss the 3rd.
Here we have Nancy and her articles of impeachment

One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

@kitt:

The party of Trump has adopted blatant dishonesty and an abject disregard of facts.
It’s simply the truth which is understandable why you can’t grasp it.

@kitt:

Can we take those inane interpretations one at a time?

We could. And simply by using nothing but the honest facts of the issues he lists. Not emotion, not opinion, truth.

But AJ/Ward proves that emotion is the basis for opinion by the left. And that opinion is not subject to actual facts or events or the history behind them. He hates Trump (the emotion part) and because of that, he has formed his opinion. Reality eludes him.

Unfortunately, this is also the state of the legacy media. AJ/Ward also denies that fact also proven by a study done by UCLA years ago.

@Ronald J. Ward: You are an idiot court jester, nothing more nothing less. Feeding solely on leftwing nothing burgers, to arrogant to admit you are dying of starvation.
Take your 11 points and never look further than what is there, ever, dont look.
Refuse to live as you wish us to live move to North Korea they have the total government control you beg for.

@Ronald J. Ward:

You are again running from reality while only demonstrating a hatred of democrats or non-Trump supporters.

Not true. You’re projecting, and doing so rather after-the-fact. You’re rabid within a ideological trap, and now quite taken by it’s temptations.

You’re angry because I’m identifying a reality that goes against the man and party you believe in.

All of this is complete projection. No one here speaks or acts as the scapegoat you’ve been taught to see your party’s “enemies”. Trump is disposable, like all presidents, and everyone here at FA knows that.

You’re mirroring the boogeyman your party made you fear. You’re psychologically compromised, but I see cracks forming as you increase your rhetoric. Consider for a moment that you actually embody the very thing you claim to be fighting against?

That’s the beginning of wisdom, boy.
Go for it.

@Ronald J. Ward:

The party of Trump has adopted blatant dishonesty and an abject disregard of facts.
It’s simply the truth which is understandable why you can’t grasp it.

Simple partisan rhetoric spoken by a man reduced to tribalistic thought. You’re understanding of things is hardly comprehensive, and hardly the truth.

@retire05:

Contradicting themselves further, Lindsay and Moscow Mitch are both saying and demanding the exact opposite in senatorial impeachment proceedings than they did with Bill Clinton.

@retire05: How so?

Given proof of the denial of reality. The reality of republican hypocrisy just didn’t settle well to your ears. And even though it went viral and with late night comics going into overtime, you knew nothing of it and needed an explanation. Once informed, you still seem to be in denial. What’s up with that?

Lot of falsehoods going on out there today and lots of republican/Trump lickers abetting them.

@Nathan Blue:

Not true. You’re projecting,……….

Trumps has indisputably lied about how many times in his 3 years of presidency? I’m thinking it exceeded 10K some time ago. True? And now the GOP and Fox News has aligned themselves with the liar in chief. True?

The projecting argument may have had credence nine hundred and ninety some times ago. No more. The party of Trump is indeed the party of blatant dishonesty and abject mendacity. Even you and you cohorts can’t distinguish the truth from fact because you’ve adopted the alternate fact stratagem.

You’re not arguing any of my above @Nathan Blue: or @Ronald J. Ward: GOP conspiracy theories and lies because my accusations are true. It’s just like you can’t legitimately argue that Trump isn’t a liar as that would be ridiculous. This is why you have to distract and resort to sophomoric name calling.

The thing about this prolonged impeachment, it continues to show how fraudulent the GOP is and how much they have to hide.

@Ronald J. Ward:

The party of Trump is indeed the party of blatant dishonesty and abject mendacity

You keep repeating this, ad nauseum, but never say how except for your list that can be totally disputed. But why bother disputing your claims. It would make no difference because you have already confused opinion with fact.

The thing about this prolonged impeachment, it continues to show how fraudulent the GOP is and how much they have to hide.

Perhaps you didn’t get to watch the impeachment “hearings.” What was fraudulent was the Democrats clear violation of House rules and refusal to grant the minority party its rights.

It’s just like you can’t legitimately argue that Trump isn’t a liar as that would be ridiculous.

I could argue that the things Trump says are not “lies” in the legal sense of the word, but simple braggadocio. I could also argue that while you seem to be bothered by Trump’s “lies” you seem to have no problem with the “lies” told by previous presidents including FDR, Kennedy, LBJ, Carter and Clinton.

Your opinion does not become fact because you believe it to be. And as far as sophomoric name calling, you do excel in that arena.

I understand you are a person of “color” and have no use for those who are not. So be it. But to pretend that you are a truth teller has to be the joke of the year.

@retire05:

What was fraudulent was the Democrats clear violation of House rules and refusal to grant the minority party its rights.

Using your very own words: You keep repeating this, ad nauseum, but never say how. It’s almost like Mexico is going to pay for the wall or something. It’s been said, and repeated, but the check’s still in the mail.

I could argue that the things Trump says are not “lies” in the legal sense of the word, but simple braggadocio. I could also argue that while you seem to be bothered by Trump’s “lies” you seem to have no problem with the “lies” told by previous presidents including FDR, Kennedy, LBJ, Carter and Clinton.

Gee, so Trump is as honest as the day is long because per you, the legal sense of the word somehow validate what Trump says however, that legal sense of the word just doesn’t apply to FDR, Kennedy, LBJ, Carter and Clinton?

Your opinion does not become fact because you believe it to be.

I don’t incorporate the alternative facts factor into my arguments whereas the party of Trump proudly has. You demand links and then run from them when presented. My check, unlike yours, is cashable.

@Ronald J. Ward:

The thing about this prolonged impeachment, it continues to show how fraudulent the GOP is and how much they have to hide.

Well, I guess you’ve chosen a “side”, junior.

Good luck.

As for me, I’m free to think what I’d like.

The raw psychosis you’re displaying is incredible, and can’t be helped without willing therapy.

Whoever you’re mad at, it’s not me, little dog. You’ll get no satisfaction here.

my accusations are true.

You don’t have any “accusations”, just parroting of what you’ve read and internalizing them in a very unhealthy way.

The Dems and media took your preexisting anger and weaponized it against innocent people like those here at FA. You don’t know us, and you’ve not listened to anything…just forced your own ignorance and phobias to match anything you wanted.

By the way, every opposition party says the President they lost to is a “liar”. Clinton was a liar (legally, as well), Bush was a liar (WMDs), Obama was a liar (If you like your plan you can keep your plan), so this “Trump is a liar” isn’t worth anything.

If I got to mic you for 24 hours, I could soundbyte plenty and paint you a liar.

As I said, you’re angry, but your not at the right place. Get some therapy before your party uses your anger to commit real violence, which I feel you are quite capable of doing without even knowing it before it’s too late.

@Nathan Blue:

You keep slinging accusations yet still short on substance.

By the way, every opposition party says the President they lost to is a “liar”.

You again seem to be trying to minimize or better yet, normalizing the serial liar that Trump is, trying to sell a false narrative that Trump is not vastly different in telling the truth than his predecessors. He is. And you know it.

As I said, you’re angry

Yes, we all understand you keep saying it just as Mitch and Trump say many things, But much like what Mitch and Trump say, what you say lacks credibility, You claim I’m angry simply because that shifts when arguments fail to stand to scrutiny.

It’s a lot like Retire05’s argument claiming Trump is exonerated from lying because of “the legal sense of the word” but that “legal sense of the word” goes away when applied to FDR, Kennedy, LBJ, Carter and Clinton? You guys simply make no sense while claiming you make sense. And of course, no mention of Nixon, Reagan on Iran Contra scandal, or GWB on weapons of mass destruction.

It’s actually rather amusing watching you guys spin in circles, kinda like watching kids playing musical chairs but instead watching adults playing musical suck Trump butt.

Don’t worry, every one of AJ’s idiotic “conspiracies” has been verified as fact. AJ just forgot because his head can only hold so many leftist talking points without overwriting some facts that have been pointed out to him.

@Ronald J. Ward: I”m saying you are psychologically compromised, and all you do is continue to give me much “substance” and nothing with credibility.

You lost this…uh…exchange several years ago.

But yes..blah blah blah…Trump is a liar…everyone else is mad but me…yadda yadda.

Declaring victory doesn’t actually win you anything, little dog. Your parents failed you.

You guys simply make no sense while claiming you make sense.

Who are “you guys?” Who the hell are you talking to? Any one at this site would win a live argument with your beta-male jackassery, so you might want to get some therapy and realize you’re a hateful bigot, programmed to find “those Trump supporters” in any venue you deem fit.

@Deplorable Me: This is fun. We’re spinning him up so bad I think he’s about to come apart. It’s entertaining, and he might be forced to examine just how un-actualized he is.

His identity is tied to Trump Hate and the Democrat Party, and since he knows Trump will win 2020, he has to build up these excuses and come talk shit at a “conservative” site to use people he doesn’t know as a foil for his hysterics.

Pretty much proves everything that voters got tired of regarding the Dems tactics. Good thing they have some real thinkers in their midst, waiting to rebuild their broken party.

@Ronald J. Ward: @ 3:40PM

It’s actually rather amusing watching you guys spin in circles

@Nathan Blue: @5:13 PM

This is fun. We’re spinning him up so bad I think he’s about to come apart. It’s entertaining

Kinda like my granddad use to say “Just give the fools a rope and watch them hang themselves”.

@Nathan Blue:

Who are “you guys?” Who the hell are you talking to?

Aside from the usual distraction after falling spectacularly on your face, that’s likely the most reasonable question ever asked at this site and I’ll answer to the best of my ability. I honestly have no clue.

@Ronald J. Ward:

I honestly have no clue.

First thing the jester said that has made sense.

@Ronald J. Ward: I see your psychosis makes it impossible for you to actually engage the conversation at hand.

You’ve won nothing, and instead you illustrate all the points that the majority of FA posters are trying to make.
I’ll ask again since your cowardice prevents you from answering: Who the hell are you talking to? What paternal bugaboo are you trying to get back at?

It isn’t us, little dog.

@kitt: I better stop pushing him in his fractured state, lest he let his rage fill in for actual confidence and goes and hurts himself or someone else…

@Ronald J. Ward:

You keep repeating this, ad nauseum, but never say how.

Well, let’s see;
refusing to take impeachment hearings to a full House vote as has been done in every other impeachment in history
instructing witnesses to not answer questions posed by Republicans
refusing a minority witness day with witnesses called by the minority
and last, but certainly not least…………
allowing a witness to leave the witness table to join with the chair of the committee at the bench to question other witnesses

Not that I expect you to admit that these actions were a violation of House rules.Gee, so Trump is as honest as the day is long because per you, the legal sense of the word somehow validate what Trump says however, that legal sense of the word just doesn’t apply to FDR, Kennedy, LBJ, Carter and Clinton?

Since you didn’t seem to comprehend my response, we can at least establish that English is your second language.

I don’t incorporate the alternative facts factor into my arguments

You don’t incorporate facts of any kind into your arguments. Only emotion which is your hatred for President Trump and any American who supports him and what he is doing for our nation.

Just for posterity sake, I think it important to address a few facts regarding this thread.

1. Donald Trump is our current president, and he won the 2016 presidential election.
2. He has not as of yet legally been impeached, since the articles have not been passed to the Senate.
3. There’s overwhelming evidence that the Democrats have misused impeachment as a means of bypassing fair and Democratic elections. This now has consequences that I don’t think they understand are coming.
4. It is almost guaranteed that the Durham investigation will yield indictments, and at least one jail sentence.
5. it’s not so much that Trump is winning, but our country is winning, which we who are responsible members of the electorate care about. Trump is disposable to us, but we’re very pleased that he has been one of the few presidents to do the things he promised to do.
6. The poorly constructed legacy of Barack Obama has been completely wiped away.
7. Trump has had failures, both before his presidency and during his presidency. This is a feature of anyone who does anything in life, especially those high achievers like Warren Buffett, Elon musk, Donald Trump, etcetera.
8. Prominent Black like Trump, and are exiting the Dem Party.
9. The combination of the above points is an anathema to the media, entertainment, and educational institutions in that their policies and ideals have not made them into the famous rock stars that they hoped they would be. It’s induced a hysteria.
10. Foreign globalist attempted to take over our country with the installation of Barack Obama, and infiltrate every part of our government to make it liberal and permanent. They failed. The impeachment is this invasive and treasonous element being extricated from our Constitutional republic.

Balance is being restored.

@retire05:

Since you didn’t seem to comprehend my response, we can at least establish that English is your second language.

The expected elementary response when one comes up short and have exhausted their other distraction tactics: 1) you don’t understand and 2) we can’t hear what you’re saying.

You quoted me as saying:

Not that I expect you to admit that these actions were a violation of House rules.Gee, so Trump is as honest as the day is long because per you, the legal sense of the word somehow validate what Trump says however, that legal sense of the word just doesn’t apply to FDR, Kennedy, LBJ, Carter and Clinton?

This is partially my quote and partially yours which you yourself combined. Yet here you are talking to me about my communication problem. It’s as if your seriousness could get any more comical.

@retire05

Your opinion does not become fact because you believe it to be.

And then we have @Nathan Blue:

Just for posterity sake, I think it important to address a few facts regarding this thread

which is simply a long list of Trump sucking and Obama bashing.

Which leads us back to you guys flip flopping and falling face first in your own nonsense.

Merry Christmas

@Ronald J, Ward:

Not that it went unnoticed that when I listed some of the things the Dems did that violate House rules, you completely ignored that list only to come back and present yourself as the FA hall monitor.

Which leads us back to you guys flip flopping and falling face first in your own nonsense.

You’re the one falling on your face and trying to mimic the Dervish. You have never presented your case. Present your case instead of constantly blathering declarative statements that have no basis in actual fact or only serve to insult those who support President Trump..

You’re as dishonest as Adam Schitt-for-brains and the rest of the Dems that are following him down the pathway to Hell.

@Nathan Blue:

Just for posterity sake, I think it important to address a few facts regarding this thread.

10. Foreign globalist attempted to take over our country with the installation of Barack Obama, and infiltrate every part of our government to make it liberal and permanent. They failed. The impeachment is this invasive and treasonous element being extricated from our Constitutional republic.

So, among your “facts” listed, Obama, unlike Trump, was not a duly elected president but rather installed by foreign globalist. And unlike Mitch and Trump loading up the courts with extreme right wing young judges to lifetime seats, these foreign globalist intentions were to “infiltrate” our government.

Are we actually going back to the argument that Obama was brought in from Kenya as a baby?

@Ronald J. Ward: Ar

e we actually going back to the argument that Obama was brought in from Kenya as a baby?Are we actually going back to the argument that Obama was brought in from Kenya as a baby?

Sorry could you tell me where that was posted?
I guess since to have been tagged and bagged to need to grasp at straws, outlawed by your party.
Schiff still wants a former White House Attorney to testify on firing perjure Comey.
Guess he missed the whole Mueller report. They want to bring additional charges for something he did not do. Obstruct an investigation he was told 3 times by Comey himseld was not happening.
As Trump is likely to get re-elected you can button up for 5 more years of a non functioning Congress if Dems can maintain control of the House.

@kitt:

Sorry could you tell me where that was posted? (to my question to Nathan if we were actually going back to the argument that Obama was brought in from Kenya as a baby?)

Nathan stated a list of what he claimed to be facts. # 10 stated:

Foreign globalist attempted to take over our country with the installation of Barack Obama, and infiltrate every part of our government to make it liberal and permanent. They failed. The impeachment is this invasive and treasonous element being extricated from our Constitutional republic.

It was once circulated in the realm of conspiracies theories of the right that Obama, not being from here, was slipped in as a baby with the intentions of growing up, becoming POTUS, and transforming us to a Muslim culture or such.

Nathan’s extreme conspiracy theory which he states as “facts” that Obama was installed by foreign globalist to infiltrate our government is brow raising as it’s rather unhinged and unconfirmed but also because it channels an argument that people have been indoctrinated to a level of hatred and fear of liberals that they will stand by Trump regardless of what he does. Trump can shoot someone dead on 5th ave and get a pass because we can’t let liberals “transform” us or “infiltrate” Muslims or gays or Mexicans and so forth.

And yes Kitt, I know Schiff still wants this and Comey lied and the Mueler report that and do-nothing democrat congress (even though Ds have sent almost 500 bills with around 300 being bipartisan to the R senate and the Rs have done nothing) and can I get a “but Hillary” hell yes Amen- all of which has absolutely nothing to do with Nathan saying for fact that Foreign globalist attempted to take over our country with the installation of Barack Obama, and infiltrate every part of our government.

@Ronald J. Ward:

Nathan said:

Foreign globalist attempted to take over our country with the installation of Barack Obama, and infiltrate every part of our government to make it liberal and permanent. They failed.

Being the dishonest player you are, you misquoted Nathan saying:

Nathan’s extreme conspiracy theory which he states as “facts” that Obama was installed by foreign globalist to infiltrate our government

There is a huge difference between “attempted” and “was” but hey, misquoting someone never slowed you down before so why should anyone expect you to be honest and another’s statement now?

Oh, but then, in your last line, you go back to Nathan’s actual quote without acknowledging you misquoted Nathan in the first place.

Games. That’s all you know. That and your hatred for anyone who just might support our President. Oh, and your hatred for white people. Let’s not forget that.

@Ronald J. Ward: Which judges are the “extreme right wing” judges? List them and the actions that deem them right wing…

Or admit you are lying and shut up.

@retire05:

“I did not say he beat his wife” has 8 different meanings contingent on voice inflections of each word.

Foreign globalist attempted to take over our country with the installation of Barack Obama, and infiltrate every part of our government to make it liberal and permanent. They failed.

Put another way, with the foreign globalist installation of Barack Obama, they attempted to….

Seems to be saying Foreign globalist attempted with their Obama installment.

I realize damage control is needed and I’m sure it will be comical along with somehow being my fault but Nathan might want to elaborate on precisely what these foreigners did and didn’t do, particularly as they are supposedly grounded in facts.

Why wasn’t Obama “duly elected” as was Trump?

Off for Christmas dinner and such for a few hours but will check by to see how deranged this becomes. I’ve already said Merry Christmas. I didn’t want to say Happy Holidays in light of how touchy and sensitive conservatives have come to be.

@Ronald J. Ward: There were 2 Birth certificates presented only 1 had foot prints and a witness to the birth.
You see it doesnt really matter to me where the subversive snut was dropped, his commie slut mum was an American Citizen.
A closer look at Barrys appointments being called Czars (The US constitution states No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: )
We all dont agree 100% with each other we can agree to disagree on the small stuff.
The Senate has been busy with more important duties confirming judges so speedy trials can be assured. It has been Turtlemans long time habit to hold bills that he knows a president wont sign.
As far as the globalists comment, where did he, a first term congressperson, get the money for his campaigns? (he broke the DNC bank allowing Clinton to buy it cheap) 8 are being indicted for funneling foreign money into democrat campaign coffers, one a Mueller witness and convicted pedo.

UPDATE: Bill Barr Indicts 8 Including Mueller Top Witness for Funneling Millions in Foreign Donations to Schiff, Hillary Clinton and Democrats — New Data Shows Bill and Hillary Involved

@Ronald J. Ward:

Seems to be saying Foreign globalist attempted with their Obama installment.

That’s correct. It’s not worth arguing, because of course Obama is sacrosanct to Leftists…failure that he was.

Obama was duly elected, yes. He was also a cardboard cut-out and engineered to win post Bush. Sealed records, token “looks black, acts white”, and a reality television-like sheen made him the kind of candidate honest parties don’t run.

Clinton was asked to step aside with the assurance she’d be the candidate in 2016. HRC stepping aside with the promise of 2016 IS FACT, and no…I can’t tell you about where I got that information from.

It’s also curious that the statements made by Pelosi went out the window and they went full speed ahead on impeachment.

Couldn’t be those Soros ties to Burisma and Ukriane, eh?

But I know…my analysis can be written off as “conspiracy theories”.

So, little dog, you “facts” that Trump is a liar and all that are just conspiracy theories…so easy to say that, isn’t it?

Indeed, so much fun to spin up bigoted fools…

Yes, AJ…go have family time and try not to kill anyone.

@Ronald J. Ward:

“I did not say he beat his wife” has 8 different meanings contingent on voice inflections of each word.

Inflection has nothing to do with a declarative statement. If it did, only verbal testimony would be allowed in a court of law. Instead, in may instances, written testimony is allowed in a court of law.

Foreign globalist attempted to take over our country with the installation of Barack Obama, and infiltrate every part of our government to make it liberal and permanent. They failed.

Now, let me change this just a bit:

“Foreign globalist attempted to take over our country and infiltrate every part of our government to make it liberal and permanent. They failed.”

The subject of the sentence does not change nor does the statement. Apparently, no one ever taught you how to diagram a sentence.

@kitt:

You see it doesnt really matter to me where the subversive snut was dropped, his commie slut mum was an American Citizen.

And there it is again, a refusal to say right out that Barack Obama was an American citizen. Yeah, you somewhat acknowledged some credibility in 1 birth certificate yet still seem to cast doubt because you claim there was more than 1.

There’s also the hypocrisy where Trump gets a pass for his admitted sexual assaults of vagina grabbing, the reality of over 24 other women accusing him of sexual assaults, is history of infidelity, and so forth whereas you go into an angry frothing unconfirmed rage of Obama’s mother. So again for Trump, things like this just does not matter.

A closer look at Barrys appointments being called Czars (The US constitution states No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: )

And more fear mongering conspiracy theories. The term “CZAR” is not and has never been an official government title but rather a term used often my the media. Associating Obama to “czars” was just another scam from the right to implicate him to Nathan’s repeated conspiracy- that some foreign entity is “infiltrating” our government. Dishonest repeated nonsense of the right to scare people.

As far as the globalists comment, where did he, a first term congressperson, get the money for his campaigns? (he broke the DNC bank allowing Clinton to buy it cheap) 8 are being indicted for funneling foreign money into democrat campaign coffers, one a Mueller witness and convicted pedo.

More unsubstantiated talking points pretending to be factual. But for what it’s worth, I’m no fan of how the DNC promotes their candidates. Care to name these 8 being indicted as that might help me get a better understanding of what you’re talking about. What is or who is pedo?

@Nathan Blue:

So, little dog, you “facts” that Trump is a liar and all that are just conspiracy theories…so easy to say that, isn’t it?

Seems to be some kind of contagious moment of stupid going around the FA table all of a sudden. You guys need to slow down or at least put on a bib so the froth doesn’t short out your keyboards. Trump lying is a conspiracy theory? Do you mean he really doesn’t lie or is it like everything else and it just doesn’t matter?

@retire05:
Thanks for the English lessen but Nathan cleared it up above:

Seems to be saying Foreign globalist attempted with their Obama installment.

That’s correct.

@kitt: @Nathan Blue: @retire05: Just to clear a few things up with facts.

1) Barack Obama was born in the USA as an American Citizen.
2) Obama was a duly elected President by the American people.
3) Nathan’s accusations of foreign infiltration is fear mongering
4) Ukraine did not interfere with our elections.
5) Russia did interfere with our elections.
6) Donald J.Trump is an outright pathological liar.
7) McConnell is doing all he can to keep evidence of Trump’s innocence or guilt from the people.

@Ronald J. Ward:

There’s also the hypocrisy where Trump gets a pass for his admitted sexual assaults of vagina grabbing,

I know you’ve been asked about a hundred times, but let’s try again… WHERE has Trump ever claimed to have grabbed a vagina or been indicted or convicted for sexual assault (as the perv you continue to worship and accept has)?

And more fear mongering conspiracy theories. The term “CZAR” is not and has never been an official government title but rather a term used often my the media. Associating Obama to “czars” was just another scam from the right to implicate him to Nathan’s repeated conspiracy- that some foreign entity is “infiltrating” our government. Dishonest repeated nonsense of the right to scare people.

But, numerous past Presidents had “czars”. Obama had them, too, and called them czars. Notably, he had a communist/anarchist as his “jobs czar” and a pedophile that supported NAMBLA (no doubt YOU are a member) as “safe schools czar”. No matter how you characterize the impression of Obama’s czars, he had them and many were very, very bad choices. But, then again, HE was a bad choice.

Ukraine DID interfere in our elections and they have ADMITTED it.

@Deplorable Me:

: @Nathan Blue: : Just to clear a few things up with facts.

1) Barack Obama was born in the USA as an American Citizen.
2) Obama was a duly elected President by the American people.
3) Nathan’s accusations of foreign infiltration is fear mongering
4) Ukraine did not interfere with our elections.
5) Russia did interfere with our elections.
6) Donald J.Trump is an outright pathological liar.
7) McConnell is doing all he can to keep evidence of Trump’s innocence or guilt from the people.

The above specifically addressed 3 people and you weren’t one of them. It’s regrettable for you that you’ve spent your Christmas frantically reloading a page that sat idle for 24 hours and now archived in the history of FA files, waiting for me to return as I indicated I would, only to be compelled to inject your normal nonsense into a conversation in which you were not invited.

But in light of the Christmas spirit and good will to all, yes Deplorable, I see you, you’ve been recognized, we all see you (or at least I do as I doubt many will return to a forum long rolled off the main page).

And while I have no interest in engaging in you rhetoric and blind Trump loyalty as it only leads to your rabid silliness (no offense, I realize that’s the playbook ploy here) if it’s therapeutic for you (and again it’s Christmas after all), consider my response as again falling for it, like Charlie Brown punting Lucy’s football. You win.

Happy Holidays!

@Ronald J. Ward: Merry Christmas!

1) Barack Obama was born in the USA as an American Citizen.
2) Obama was a duly elected President by the American people.
3) Nathan’s accusations of foreign infiltration is fear mongering
4) Ukraine did not interfere with our elections.
5) Russia did interfere with our elections.
6) Donald J.Trump is an outright pathological liar.
7) McConnell is doing all he can to keep evidence of Trump’s innocence or guilt from the people.

1)I never said where he was born
2)Yes he was anyone here ever deny it?
3)How many House congressmen and those in the Senate have dual citizenship?
https://www.quora.com/Does-anyone-in-the-US-Senate-or-House-have-dual-citizenship
4&5) Both had their moments
6) DGAF none of what any of you claim makes a pinch of difference in my life, Barrys lies did.
7) In case you missed it, Mitch doesnt have the articles.
Wishing you a prosperous 2020 but cant be anything else with this Economy!.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY JESUS.

@Ronald J. Ward:

The above specifically addressed 3 people and you weren’t one of them.

Don’t you have better things to do on a Christmas Day than stalk me? 3 paragraphs and not a response in the lot. Just obsessive stalking. You are to be pitied.

Ask Santa for some guts next year and seek therapy for your stalking.

@kitt:#7 I wonder, why didn’t the Democrats take their opportunity to expose Trump’s guilt? All they offered was the opinions and suppositions of some people; no evidence of any guilt whatsoever. Yet, AJ can’t bring himself to criticize them. But, then, even if they, like Clinton, raped women and cheated on his most cheatable wife in the Oval Office of the People, he would still support them.

@kitt:

1)I never said where he was born
That’s kinda it. You refuse to let go of the conspiracy theory. You’re not going to admit he was born here.

2)Yes he was (Obama duly elected) anyone here ever deny it?
It’s being insinuated Obama was “installed” by foreign globalist. That’s what you seem to be unwilling to deny.

3)How many House congressmen and those in the Senate have dual citizenship?
https://www.quora.com/Does-anyone-in-the-US-Senate-or-House-have-dual-citizenship

None

4&5) Both had their moments

Wrong. Ukraine did not interfere in our elections. Russia did.

6) DGAF none of what any of you claim makes a pinch of difference in my life, Barrys lies did.

That’s what I’ve been saying. Nothing Trump could possibly do would offend you whereas anything Obama did would.

7) In case you missed it, Mitch doesnt have the articles.

Because he’s pretty much promised to not even have a realistic trial but rather issue an instant acquittal.

@Ronald J. Ward: Can anyone explain how Obama attended college as a foreign student? What documents would he have produced to achieve that status.

@Randy: He linked to politifactless on the dual citizenship answer.
If it is all desendants Ive heard up to 89 % technically have the dual citizenship, if they wish to immigrate
He didnt get the joke., way to serious
The Law of Return grants all Jews (given the law’s definition of “Jew” described above) the right to immigrate to Israel and claim Israeli citizenship upon arrival in Israel. Israeli law distinguishes between the Law of Return, which allows for Jews and their descendants to immigrate to Israel, and Israel’s nationality law, which formally grants Israeli citizenship.
23 and me anyone 😉
His other weak swipes were to pathetic.

@Randy: Well, AJ won’t, because he doesn’t face up to facts, but he did it because, like Wahoo Warren, he lies and cheats to steal every advantage he can get. AJ also hasn’t the guts to address why Obama never just cleared up the question by releasing the pertinent, usually publicly-available documentation. Why was it important to him to keep the seemingly simple question shrouded in mystery?

Liars don’t seem to actually mind lies and lying.

So I wonder why Greg, AJ and all the Democrats are not denouncing this?

https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/27/joe-biden-comply-senate-subpoena-impeachment-trial/

https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/27/chris-cuomo-lloyd-doggett-joe-biden-senate-testify/

Biden is pledging to refuse to honor a subpoena, one which he, unlike the Executive Branch of the government, has no legal right to refuse; what’s HE hiding? What’s HE afraid of? He makes the same argument Trump has made but without the support of the Constitution. In short, he is merely afraid what questioning under oath would reveal and how it would be used against him.

Nah… It’s OK when Democrats do it.

@Ronald J. Ward: @kitt: @Deplorable Me: Sad though, given the embarrassment Ron/AJ endures by way of losing arguments to FA posters time and time again, at least he’s learning something.

Propaganda only goes so far, and you can’t base your identity on Leftist indoctrination.

Eating crow to watch an actual executive erase the legacy of an installed cardboard nobody like Obama must unhinge him, and also it’s threatening the power taken by Soros et al…thus the “impeachment” suddenly moves forward by corrupt Dems who said it wouldn’t.

Trump is extricating these parasites and they are, naturally, resisting. How they’ve recruited so many hapless drones to whine for them is interesting, but not surprising.

Beta males like Ron/AJ are addicted to anger, and sadly waste their lives posting hate at sights like this.

It’s a safe place to “look for a fight” because you’re never actually fighting…just parsing words and pretending.

I guess the rest of us can take some satisfaction in knowing our actual understanding of liberty and the Constitution allows room for lost souls like Ron/AJ to eventually grow up and find the truth.

FOX News, January 11, 2020 — Trump signals he’d seek to block impeachment trial testimony from Bolton, others in exclusive interview

Republican witnesses, one and all, each having direct, first-hand knowledge of exactly what happened…

“I think you have to for the sake of the office,” Trump replied when asked by host Laura Ingraham if he would use executive privilege to stop testimony from Bolton, who said this week he would be willing to testify.

He then referenced several other officials, including acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former Energy Secretary Rick Perry, saying he would like for them to testify but can’t allow it because of executive privilege concerns.

“I would love everybody to testify,” Trump said. “I’d like Mick to testify, I’d like Mike Pompeo to testify, I’d like Rick Perry to testify. I want everybody — but there are things that you can’t do from the standpoint of executive privilege.”

What a guy, to selflessly sacrifice the opportunity to prove his innocence and be Totally Exonerated, all to protect the integrity of his Sacred Office… I ask you—has there ever before been a moral giant such as He, walking amongst we lesser Americans?

@Greg: Perhaps if the Democrats had created a more fair and equitable procedure in the House, they could expect some cooperation. Oh, well. Live and learn… maybe.

The procedure in the House was entirely fair and equitable, but to a process that is intended to reveal truth. If the truth is your enemy, that process is also your enemy.

There were thirteen republican witnesses who have direct, first hand knowledge of the truth who were subpoenaed by the House to come forward tell it. None were allowed to do so. They were ordered to defy those lawful subpoenas by the man who is under investigation.

The Senate majority leader has publicly stated that the Senate trial will not be impartial; that he is following the marching orders of the man who is under investigation; that testimony of those who know the truth will not be heard, and that the outcome of the trial is foreordained, contrary to the affirmation oath that he and every other voting senator will swear before God.

Expect to be reminded of this endlessly, and for names of every complicit oath breaker to be mentioned every time the matter comes up between the end of the Senate trial and the 2020 elections.

@Greg: No, the House process contained no fairness or equity. No evidence, either. It was a judicial joke… a BAD joke. Now the Democrats will suffer the consequences of their overstepping and abuse.

Trump’s propaganda outlets have repeated that lie endlessly, but it remains a damnable lie.

Trump has abused his powers of office in every way he can think of to obstruct Congress and conceal evidence of his crimes, while Mitch McConnell has publicly and shamelessly stated his intention to willfully break the affirmation oath he will swear before God, and turn Senate republicans into Trump’s accessories. Trump has systematically pulled the Republican Party down to his own level of hypocrisy and depravity, and made those in it his servile tools.

He has also seduced many evangelical Christians as well, to the point where they reflexively reject anyone who dares to point out Trump’s moral failings and calls for a return to traditional Christian principles of word and deed.