Leaked email shows Project Veritas begging donors to stay after removing James O’Keefe

Loading

by Libby Emmons and Jack Posobiec

An email obtained by The Post Millennial shows that Project Veritas has reached out to donors to ask them to stay with the company despite founder and CEO James O’Keefe having been pushed out by the board of directors. Project Veritas is a not-for-profit operating entirely on the generosity of donors.
 
“We hope that you might continue to give us a chance,” the email says, pleading with donors. “We can’t stress how separate the board’s role is from daily operations here at PV. We are still grinding and pursuing stories of great public importance.”
 
The email, sent by Bethany Rolando, who was one of the 16 signers of a letter sent to the Board of Directors reporting personal grievances against O’Keefe, offers the subject line “Update: We hold everyone accountable, especially ourselves.”
 
“We understand and share your frustrations,” the email reads. “We all love and respect James and hope he returns. This is difficult for everyone.”
 
The email states that “an independent two-dimensional audit is being arranged” to determine if financial wrong-doing has taken place, and if O’Keefe had broken administrative procedure.
 
These issues include “Breaking the Bylaws of the organization by unilaterally dismissing the CFO and co-opting another board member’s vote by saying that board member supported the dismissal,” noting that this second Board member “did not.”
 
One of the issues listed in the letter from those 16 staffers to the board was that O’Keefe had fired the CFO without board oversight. “Most recently,” that letter of February 6 read, “the treatment of Barry Hinckley and Tom O’Hara. These 2 highly respected individuals did what they thought was right for the betterment of the organizaion and got berated in public on Tuesday and effectively terminated by Thursday.”
 
Other statements also site professional relationships that apparently soured between O’Keefe and others, including an instance where O’Keefe called Spencer Meads a “pussy.”
 
Also listed in the email to donors, as a matter for the “independent two-dimensional audit,” is whether O’Keefe used “donations for private benefit.” In a statement from the board on February 20, concerns over O’Keefe’s spending were brought to the fore. Among these were staff morale and what the board claims were excessive expenditures.
 
“The board included this in its statement what it is aware of so far which clearly warrants this internal audit to ensure your hard-earned, and graciously donated, money is utilized appropriately.” The email states that they “hope to know more details around this soon.”
 
They also list concerns “with employment laws/workplaces safety regarding appropriate treatment of the employees was based, in part, on his interaction with senior staff in a Leadership call on January 31, 2023.”
 
Apparently, after this single phone call, “Staff across multiple departments were ready to leave PV immediately if his conduct remained unaddressed.”
 
The email offers that “over the last seven years,” the company saw turnover of 140 employees, noting that they either quit or were fired, and that due to 20 of those employees having been in managerial roles, that lead “to potential succession plan issues” that threatened “the long-term viability of the company.”
 
Which leads to O’Keefe. The email to major donors assures them that he was not removed, due to the fact that “he specifically said he did not resign, and the board did not fire him.” Instead, they noted that he was placed on “temporary suspension until the audit was completed.”
 
After 16 staffers sent a letter to the board detailing their concerns over O’Keefe’s behavior, including an allegation that he once stole a sandwich from a pregnant woman, the board convened a meeting to determine O’Keefe’s future with the company he founded.
 
O’Keefe responded to the board, and the staffers, in his own letter, demanding that the Board resign.
 
“I asked the board to resign for their conduct– they did not. So currently, I have no position at PV based on the board’s actions. So, I’m announcing to you all that today on President’s day — I’m packing up my personal effects from headquarters, and I’m intending to start anew,” O’Keefe said.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The Board complains about O’Keefe drawing much of the attention and support, but from the looks of the feelings of the donors, there was a reason for that. Perhaps the board should consider just how important a sandwich is.

Project Veritas Sues James O’Keefe Because He Left After They Fired Him – Demand Injunction to Stop O’Keefe From Working

Apparently, when the Project Veritas board of directors fired founder and CEO James O’Keefe, they didn’t expect the result to be a collapse in their operational business model. As the kids would say, Veritas f**ked around and found out.

Stunningly, Project Veritas is now suing James O’Keefe, the man they fired, for having the audacity to launch O’Keefe Media Group (OMG), and they are demanding a court order to stop O’Keefe from earning a living. [FULL pdf HERE https://randazza.com/wp-content/uploads/Project-Veritas-v.-OKeefe-Complaint.pdf

comment image

According to the lawsuit, O’Keefe will not stop doing the expose’ journalism and activism that O’Keefe is known for. Project Veritas is not happy, because many of the donors and supporters have left PV to follow James O’Keefe at OMG.

Veritas demands an injunction against O’Keefe, which may stop people -workers and donors- from leaving PV to join him. The lawsuit is a little extreme in the way it is written as an effort to convince a civil jury to find in their favor. [READ HERE]

Project Veritas sounds like they are an organization full of professional Republicans.

James O’Keefe Live on Timcast: 11 hours ago:

comment image