Judicial Watch Obtains IRS Documents Revealing McCain’s Subcommittee Staff Director Urged IRS to Engage in “Financially Ruinous” Targeting

Loading

Judicial Watch today released newly obtained internal IRS documents, including material revealing that Sen. John McCain’s former staff director and chief counsel on the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee, Henry Kerner, urged top IRS officials, including then-director of exempt organizations Lois Lerner, to “audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous.”  Kerner was appointed by President Trump as Special Counsel for the United States Office of Special Counsel.



The explosive exchange was contained in notes taken by IRS employees at an April 30, 2013, meeting between Kerner, Lerner, and other high-ranking IRS officials. Just ten days following the meeting, former IRS director of exempt organizations Lois Lerner admitted that the IRS had a policy of improperly and deliberately delaying applications for tax-exempt status from conservative non-profit groups.

Lerner and other IRS officials met with select top staffers from the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee in a “marathon” meeting to discuss concerns raised by both Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) that the IRS was not reining in political advocacy groups in response to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.  Senator McCain had been the chief sponsor of the McCain-Feingold Act and called the Citizens United decision, which overturned portions of the Act, one of the “worst decisions I have ever seen.”

In the full notes of an April 30 meeting, McCain’s high-ranking staffer Kerner recommends harassing non-profit groups until they are unable to continue operating. Kerner tells Lerner, Steve Miller, then chief of staff to IRS commissioner, Nikole Flax, and other IRS officials, “Maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is financially ruinous.” In response, Lerner responded that “it is her job to oversee it all:”

Henry Kerner asked how to get to the abuse of organizations claiming section 501 (c)(4) but designed to be primarily political. Lois Lerner said the system works, but not in real time. Henry Kerner noted that these organizations don’t disclose donors. Lois Lerner said that if they don’t meet the requirements, we can come in and revoke, but it doesn’t happen timely. Nan Marks said if the concern is that organizations engaging in this activity don’t disclose donors, then the system doesn’t work. Henry Kerner said that maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is financially ruinous. Nikole noted that we have budget constraints. Elise Bean suggested using the list of organizations that made independent expenditures. Lois Lerner said that it is her job to oversee it all, not just political campaign activity.

Judicial Watch previously reported on the 2013 meeting.  Senator McCain then issued a statement decrying “false reports claiming that his office was somehow involved in IRS targeting of conservative groups.”   The IRS previously blacked out the notes of the meeting but Judicial Watch found the notes among subsequent documents released by the agency.

Judicial Watch separately uncovered that Lerner was under significant pressure from both Democrats in Congress and the Obama DOJ and FBI to prosecute and jail the groups the IRS was already improperly targeting. In discussing pressure from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (Democrat-Rhode Island) to prosecute these “political groups,” Lerner admitted, “it is ALL about 501(c)(4) orgs and political activity.”

The April 30, 2013 meeting came just under two weeks prior to Lerner’s admission during an ABA meeting that the IRS had “inappropriately” targeted conservative groups.  In her May 2013 answer to a planted question, in which she admitted to the “absolutely incorrect, insensitive, and inappropriate” targeting of Tea Party and conservative groups, Lerner suggested the IRS targeting occurred due to an “uptick” in 501 (c)(4) applications to the IRS but in actuality, there had been a decrease in such applications in 2010.

On May 14, 2013, a report by Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration revealed: “Early in Calendar Year 2010, the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to identify organizations applying for tax-exempt status” (e.g., lists of past and future donors). The illegal IRS reviews continued “for more than 18 months” and “delayed processing of targeted groups’ applications” in advance of the 2012 presidential election.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

John Mccain the co-arthuor of Campaign Finance Reform

McCain is a stain
It is possible he is insane
He had nothing to really gain
Patriotism he only feigns
Couldnt live up to the family name
All he brought to it was shame
His traitorous actions is his fame

Well, fire the son-of-a-bitch.

Interesting idea. Make an enforcement policy unpleasantly consequential enough to lawbreakers that it becomes an actual deterrent. Where else have we seen this approach taken—and strongly defended—recently?

Think real hard. It will come to you.

Before the GOP was divided into GOPe’s antiTrump’ers vs pro-Trumpers, it was divided by the Taxed Enough Already-ers vs the GOPe’rs.
The TEA party’ers were starved out by the GOPe’rs.
McCain’s man was just one of them.
I recall the GOPe doing fundraising for Democrats just so a TEA party’er lost.
Tomorrow is the Utah primary for Orin Hatch’s Senate seat.
Romney is a GOPer, a globalist and an anti-Trumper with hopes to lead all the GOPe, anti-Trumpers in all of Congress.
Mike Kennedy (a doctor, lawyer and state legislator) is pro-Trump.
Mitt’s been encouraging Dems to register as Republicas to vote for him as the Dem hasn’t got a chance in Utah.
We’ll see how that worked late Tues or Weds.

@Greg:

Interesting idea. Make an enforcement policy unpleasantly consequential enough to lawbreakers that it becomes an actual deterrent. Where else have we seen this approach taken—and strongly defended—recently?

That’s how it is supposed to work, when imposed evenly regardless of political affiliation. Obama changed all that. Criminal liberals skate scott-free while innocent conservative groups are harassed by the Federal government.

@Deplorable Me, #6:

The IRS went after more conservative organizations because more of them were abusing the law. Half of them think taxation is theft and tax evasion is a patriotic act. They’ll repeatedly cut the IRS’s enforcement enforcement budget, then turn around and whine about their political opponents’ “disregard for the law.” They make absurd claims about “draining the swamp” while turning turning the hen house over to the foxes. One of their previous binges led to the coining of the term, “the culture of corruption.” This time, they’re going even further. They’ve blatantly put money directly into their own pockets, and nobody seems to care or even notice.

NEW MEMO SHOWS HOW REPUBLICANS USED TAX BILL TO ENRICH THEMSELVES

@Greg:

The IRS went after more conservative organizations because more of them were abusing the law.

No, they went after them because they were conservative. Period. They didn’t investigate liberal organizations; they only focused on conservatives… because they were conservative. They harassed them and they illegally shared their private information. They did this to NO liberal organizations. Also noteworthy is they none were prosecuted for anything.

Either admit the facts or stop discussing the issue. You will have to face the fact that the Obama administration was a corrupt organization that used the power of the federal government to attack innocent citizens that did not share their politics. It’s as simple as that.

@Deplorable Me, #8:

They didn’t investigate liberal organizations

Yes, they most certainly did, and that has been well documented. There was an Inspector General Investigation that looked into that very question—not that Trump cultists ever cared what was revealed as a result.

In Targeting Political Groups, I.R.S. Crossed Party Lines

As IRS Targeted Tea Party Groups, It Went After Progressives Too

Proof the IRS Didn’t Target Just Conservatives

IRS inspector general: Liberals also on target list

@Greg: No. They weren’t.

So, why were THESE 501(c)3’s and 4’s not harassed?

Senate Report: Billionaires covertly funding environmental machine

The left promotes IRS scrutiny of conservative groups, but don’t want unions on liberal groups given the same treatment

Vulnerable Dems want IRS to step up

Why does Media Matters receive tax exempt status?
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/05/republicans_angry_at_irs_targeting_tea_party_gop_defends_501c3_and_501c4.html

Groups funded by Soros which receive no scrutiny
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

Soros funds news orgainizations
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/05/11/dont-hear-george-soros-ties-30-major-news-organizations/

Soros funds media organizations
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/05/18/soros-spending-48-million-funding-media-organizations/

Soros wants to reorganize global economics
http://www.mrc.org/commentary/unreported-soros-event-aims-remake-entire-global-economy

Audit shows IRS targeted conservatives, not liberals
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/27/irs-auditor-reaffirms-conservatives-not-liberals-w/

292 Tea Party groups targeted, 6 progressive
http://washingtonexaminer.com/treasury-irs-targeted-292-tea-party-groups-just-6-progressive-groups/article/2532456

IRS treated “progressive” groups more kindly than “Tea Party” groups
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/351930/lookout-list-not-much-broader-originally-thought-contrary-reports-eliana-johnson

IRS did not treat “Progressive” and “Tea Party” the same on BOLO list
http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/25/gop-congressman-hits-back-against-dem-claim-that-irs-targeted-progressives-too/

Conservative groups harassed while liberal groups get tax-exempt status
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/04/Leftist-Groups-Enjoy-IRS-Tax-Exempt-Status-While-Tea-Party-Suffers

Conservative groups targeted in the name of opposing Citizens United ruling; liberal groups untouched

It’s all about Citizens United

On the RARE occasions when a liberal group was routinely looked into, it was brief quick and OVER. Only conservative groups were harassed, their applications dragged out, their personal information shared and then… approved.