Earlier today ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Jim Jordan, delivered remarks outlining the political schemes of the committee led by Chairman Elijah Cummings.
In a brief 5 minute outline, Representative Jordan explains the motives, purposes, and narrative intents of the Pelosi plan to build a false impeachment premise. WATCH:
Jordan’s approach is spot-on. The baseline to deconstruct the insufferable plans of Pelosi’s three-headed cerberus (Schiff, Nadler and Cummings) is to expose the plan prior to the roll-out.
Once the electorate become aware of the Pelosi scheme, they can then see through the insufferable narrative engineering. It’s all a con; and all designed for maximum political value.
There is a unified plan amid the resistance movement to use the impeachment process for political gain. Part of that plan includes the exploitation of testimony from Michael Cohen to facilitate their designed sequencing of events. Following Cohen’s testimony Robert Mueller will deliver his final report on the Trump-Russia probe.
Again, there is very little doubt the approach has already been mapped out in post-election meetings between: Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, the Democrat committee heads, allies in the lawfare community, political allies inside the executive branch (IC, DOJ, FBI etc.), along with feedback from political networks, DNC (Perez) and major resistance donors.
The baseline here is that everything the institutional-left does, is sequential and planned. This is what they do. This is all they do. None of the characters within the institutions of professional leftism create anything; build anything; have a life purpose for anything, other than organizing their efforts to exploit control of others via politics. This is all they know how to do. When you develop your skills to see their patterns you can then see the predictability behind it.
When we approach the term “impeachment” we are not discussing it as the technical and legal approach for removal of a President; but rather the political use of the process to damage President Donald Trump. The House Democrats and their allies writ large will use this process to try and stop President Trump’s reelection.
Professional political Democrats would not be using “impeachment” in the constitutional sense of the process; but rather weaponizing the process –as a tool itself– to: •target the executive office; •diminish the presidency (“isolate”/”marginalize”, Alinsky rules); and position themselves for 2020.
Optics and innuendo are key elements, tools per se’, in the Alinsky narrative engineering process. That’s why Pelosi, Schumer and the democrat machine are going bananas about getting a raw Mueller report and not a version from AG Barr {explained here}.
The Mueller report about (total lack of) collusion will be a let down, and end of one chapter of the coup. Cohen is designed to start up a new chapter, a new series of “investigations”, loaded with salacious and wild accusations, backed up with nothing, to assuage the pain of doting liberals finding out (surprise!) there was NO collusion… EVER.
@Deplorable Me: It’s all part of the coup. According to Cohen Trump didn’t want to win the election. But then he colluded with Russia to do just that? The only known collusion was between Hillary, the DNC, and the Obama administration with foreign agents including those from Russia. Then there was the “Roger Stone told Trump about the pending Wikileaks”. Anyone who gets their news from outside the fake news MSM knew that was coming out. It was public knowledge. All one had to do was go to Wikileaks’ Twitter site and there it was. And Wasserman-Schultz talking innuendo crap? What’s she still doing in Congress after what she did with her Pakistani team that grabbed all those Congressional emails? If she wasn’t a demokrat, she’d probably be behind bars or at least out of Congress. But we all know the demokrats aren’t held to same set of standards and laws as the rest of us lowlife peons. Another demokrat clown show.
Cohen testified to Jim Jordan that he (Cohen) did NOT want a job at the White House. CNN just reported that Cohen lied as every one of their sources said he did.
When you’re anti-Trump and you’ve lost CNN…………………………………………….
@retire05:
And when you perjured yourself, assuming he was under oath. Mark Meadows also made a criminal referral on him for violating FARA and brought out Lynne Patton to refute his racism accusations. Candace Owens also came out today and said Cohen tried to get her to lie about PT. When your “star witness” goes down in flames like this, it shows you’ve got nothin’. This was just a clown show for the dems and their crazed fan base.
Jim Jordan is having Twitter posts read into the record as evidence in support of the claim that Cohen wanted a White House job. I’m not sure Twitter posts are sworn testimony.
@Greg:
So your preachers are confused as to what is sworn testimony and what is supporting evidence. Damn they are really stupid.
Michael Cohen says there is an investigation regarding Trump that has not been publicly disclosed
Oops. I guess it just was.
Cohen’s closing remarks. Well said. He’s more articulate than his former boss. He’s also more credible, even though a convicted felon.
@Greg:
It doesn’t have to be “sworn testimony” to be evidence.
No doubt the Democrats put their best people on it to write it.