J6 Defendants: Victims of Shameful Politicization of Justice

Loading

By Wendi Strauch Mahoney

The United States Department of JusticeĀ (DOJ) has politicizedĀ J6 to such an extent that it has effectively withheld exculpatory evidence from J6 defendants and their attorneys. As Mike Davis, former Chief Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, pointed out, a lawyer should not have toĀ go to a ā€œroom in the basement of the Capitol during COVIDā€ to find a needle in a haystack.
 


 
There are allegedly over 40,000 hours of J6 footage that have not yet been made public.Ā Tucker CarlsonĀ ā€œdestroyed the insurrection narrativeā€ on Mondayā€™s show with video excerpts from the event. Carlson commented,Ā ā€œTaken as a whole, the video record does not support the claim that January 6 was an insurrection. In fact, it demolishes that claim. You would never have known from the media coverage.ā€Ā President Trump praisedĀ McCarthy and Tucker Carlson for the release of the footage.
 

 
Hundreds of people are still being mistreatedĀ and held in jailsĀ without a trialĀ for entering the Capitol. ManyĀ did nothingĀ more than look around. Carlson showed video evidence of Jacob Chansley being escorted around by the Capitol police. According to the DOJ, he is currently serving 41 months in prisonĀ ā€œfor criminal conductā€Ā that amounted to his wandering around with a Viking hat, a megaphone, and an American flag. His lawyer thinks heĀ may be released soon.
 


 
On Tuesday, Davis commented on the DOJ handling Chansleyā€™s case on Bannonā€™s War Room. Davis states
 
ā€œ[The] Justice Department has an obligation under the Constitution to provide to defendants exculpatory evidence. Tuckerā€™s video showed clear exculpatory evidence that Jacob Chansley should not be in prison for 41 months.ā€
 
Davis explained thatĀ ā€œitā€™s not good enoughā€Ā just to tell attorneys that video footage is available.Ā ā€œThere is this constitutional case called Brady where the prosecutors have to turn over to the defense attorneys exculpatory evidence. They didnā€™t do that here.ā€
 

 
Meanwhile, Democrats like Sen. Chuck Schumer are condemning Carlsonā€™s ā€œshameful hourā€ on the Senate floor while asking Fox News to stop releasing the January 6 videos. He says Carlson and others areĀ ā€œlying about the J6 protestsā€Ā by saying it was not an insurrection.
 


 
CNN featured commentary from documentary producer Ken Burns, who said Carlson isĀ ā€œrewriting history at the most dangerous level. Itā€™s a huge threat to our republic.ā€Ā Burns alleges Carlson is lying and evokesĀ Nazi Germanyā€™s Potemkin villagesĀ to conceptualize how Carlsonā€™s narrative is merely a faƧade for the facts.Ā ā€œItā€™s terrifying; it feels like a Soviet system, the way the Nazis might build a Potemkin village,ā€Ā said Burns.
 


 
Adam Kinzinger said Fox is ā€œknowingly lying to its viewers,ā€ but raw video evidence is hard to dispute. Even Elon Musk is beginning to piece the truth together.
 


 
Julie Kelly Has Done Her Homework on J6
 
Investigative journalist Julie Kelly has faithfully reported on the facts of the J6 defendants, digging through thousands of pages of evidence and lawsuits and attending court hearings. She says most of the attorneys for J6ers wereĀ ā€œforced to signā€Ā requests from the DOJ to protect the department from releasingĀ ā€œmost evidentiary material before gaining access to discovery.ā€Ā Chansley was one of those required to sign the DOJā€™s protective order.
 


 
And for those who adamantly maintain there is nothing to see here, ā€œitā€™s all public,ā€ they sayā€”Kelly shows evidence of the ā€œstrict rulesā€ related to video with ā€œhighly sensitive materialā€ that cannot be shared. Kelly firstĀ reported on Chansleyā€™sĀ ā€œpeaceful interactionā€Ā with the nine Capitol Police officers in May 2021.
 


 
The facts are that some did vandalize property on January 6. Damage to the Capitol allegedly ā€œrequired the expenditure of more thanĀ $1.4 million dollarsĀ for repairs.ā€ However, as a whole, the protest cannot be called a violent insurrection, nor was it comparable to 9/11, asĀ Mitch McConnellĀ orĀ Nancy PelosiĀ might have you believe.
 
It seems as though MAGA protestors were the only ones who died that dayā€”some, likeĀ Roseanne Boyland, were violently beaten. It has been extraordinarily difficult to get the word out thatĀ Officer Brian SicknickĀ was not ā€œbeaten with a fire extinguisherā€ but, in fact, died the following day of natural causes. Newly released footage shows ā€œSicknick walkingĀ around after the timeĀ the Democrats said he was murdered.ā€

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

ā€œThere is this constitutional case called Brady where the prosecutors have to turn over to the defense attorneys exculpatory evidence. They didnā€™t do that here.ā€

But if they did that, it would indicate that they were aware of the exculpatory evidence and that their pursuit of the conviction was hypocritical. They didn’t, of course, want everyone to know of their hypocrisy.

ā€œItā€™s terrifying; it feels like a Soviet system, the way the Nazis might build a Potemkin village,ā€ said Burns.

All of that is absolutely true. Only, it all applies to the Democrats.