By Wendi Strauch Mahoney
The United States Department of JusticeĀ (DOJ) has politicizedĀ J6 to such an extent that it has effectively withheld exculpatory evidence from J6 defendants and their attorneys. As Mike Davis, former Chief Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, pointed out, a lawyer should not have toĀ go to a āroom in the basement of the Capitol during COVIDā to find a needle in a haystack.
Outrageous spin from media claiming videos Tucker showed are āpublicā or at least accessible to defendants. The idea any defendant or defense atty can easily access the security footage is simply not true (as theyāll tell you) and suggestion all clips can be made public is a lie.
— Julie Kelly šŗšø (@julie_kelly2) March 7, 2023
There are allegedly over 40,000 hours of J6 footage that have not yet been made public.Ā Tucker CarlsonĀ ādestroyed the insurrection narrativeā on Mondayās show with video excerpts from the event. Carlson commented,Ā āTaken as a whole, the video record does not support the claim that January 6 was an insurrection. In fact, it demolishes that claim. You would never have known from the media coverage.āĀ President Trump praisedĀ McCarthy and Tucker Carlson for the release of the footage.
Hundreds of people are still being mistreatedĀ and held in jailsĀ without a trialĀ for entering the Capitol. ManyĀ did nothingĀ more than look around. Carlson showed video evidence of Jacob Chansley being escorted around by the Capitol police. According to the DOJ, he is currently serving 41 months in prisonĀ āfor criminal conductāĀ that amounted to his wandering around with a Viking hat, a megaphone, and an American flag. His lawyer thinks heĀ may be released soon.
I was told the QAnon shaman was leading an insurrection not the one who is being led by police throughout the capital building. No wonder all the footage was kept from us for 2 years.
As always they lied to us all! pic.twitter.com/nzWWIgryiz— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) March 7, 2023
On Tuesday, Davis commented on the DOJ handling Chansleyās case on Bannonās War Room. Davis states
ā[The] Justice Department has an obligation under the Constitution to provide to defendants exculpatory evidence. Tuckerās video showed clear exculpatory evidence that Jacob Chansley should not be in prison for 41 months.ā
Davis explained thatĀ āitās not good enoughāĀ just to tell attorneys that video footage is available.Ā āThere is this constitutional case called Brady where the prosecutors have to turn over to the defense attorneys exculpatory evidence. They didnāt do that here.ā
Meanwhile, Democrats like Sen. Chuck Schumer are condemning Carlsonās āshameful hourā on the Senate floor while asking Fox News to stop releasing the January 6 videos. He says Carlson and others areĀ ālying about the J6 protestsāĀ by saying it was not an insurrection.
Let this sink in:
Today's Democrats are defending prosecutors' failure to turn over evidence of a defendant's innocence.
A prosecutorial failure that is a clear and very serious constitutional violation.
This is no longer our parents' and grandparents' Democrat Party.
Theseā¦ https://t.co/k7xAFcM4Et
— šŗšø Mike Davis šŗšø (@mrddmia) March 7, 2023
CNN featured commentary from documentary producer Ken Burns, who said Carlson isĀ ārewriting history at the most dangerous level. Itās a huge threat to our republic.āĀ Burns alleges Carlson is lying and evokesĀ Nazi Germanyās Potemkin villagesĀ to conceptualize how Carlsonās narrative is merely a faƧade for the facts.Ā āItās terrifying; it feels like a Soviet system, the way the Nazis might build a Potemkin village,āĀ said Burns.
ššš World's worst take ever. https://t.co/tqz1jgUVvq
— Catturd ā¢ (@catturd2) March 7, 2023
Adam Kinzinger said Fox is āknowingly lying to its viewers,ā but raw video evidence is hard to dispute. Even Elon Musk is beginning to piece the truth together.
Besides misleading the public, they withheld evidence for partisan political reasons that sent people to prison for far more serious crimes than they committed.
That is deeply wrong, legally and morally.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 7, 2023
Julie Kelly Has Done Her Homework on J6
Investigative journalist Julie Kelly has faithfully reported on the facts of the J6 defendants, digging through thousands of pages of evidence and lawsuits and attending court hearings. She says most of the attorneys for J6ers wereĀ āforced to signāĀ requests from the DOJ to protect the department from releasingĀ āmost evidentiary material before gaining access to discovery.āĀ Chansley was one of those required to sign the DOJās protective order.
In March 2021, Jacob Chansley's attorney consented to the DOJs request for a protective order related to most evidentiary material in his case. This is the same protective order all Jan 6ers (with a few exceptions) are forced to sign before gaining access to discovery: pic.twitter.com/5Aky9WYm4V
— Julie Kelly šŗšø (@julie_kelly2) March 7, 2023
And for those who adamantly maintain there is nothing to see here, āitās all public,ā they sayāKelly shows evidence of the āstrict rulesā related to video with āhighly sensitive materialā that cannot be shared. Kelly firstĀ reported on ChansleyāsĀ āpeaceful interactionāĀ with the nine Capitol Police officers in May 2021.
This is for the "it's public!" crowd. The surveillance video was designated "highly sensitive" material in March 2021. Defendants must adhere to strict rules before viewing any security video and those are clips ONLY relevant to their case.
And they cannot be shared. pic.twitter.com/pKTv6Kf4hl
— Julie Kelly šŗšø (@julie_kelly2) March 7, 2023
The facts are that some did vandalize property on January 6. Damage to the Capitol allegedly ārequired the expenditure of more thanĀ $1.4 million dollarsĀ for repairs.ā However, as a whole, the protest cannot be called a violent insurrection, nor was it comparable to 9/11, asĀ Mitch McConnellĀ orĀ Nancy PelosiĀ might have you believe.
It seems as though MAGA protestors were the only ones who died that dayāsome, likeĀ Roseanne Boyland, were violently beaten. It has been extraordinarily difficult to get the word out thatĀ Officer Brian SicknickĀ was not ābeaten with a fire extinguisherā but, in fact, died the following day of natural causes. Newly released footage shows āSicknick walkingĀ around after the timeĀ the Democrats said he was murdered.ā
But if they did that, it would indicate that they were aware of the exculpatory evidence and that their pursuit of the conviction was hypocritical. They didn’t, of course, want everyone to know of their hypocrisy.
All of that is absolutely true. Only, it all applies to the Democrats.
This story is still unfolding.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2023/03/09/the-chair-of-the-january-6-select-committee-just-made-a-damning-admission-n2620394