‘It’s such balderdash’! Jay Caruso shreds ‘nearly 2,000-word screed’ complaining that Clint Eastwood’s Richard Jewell is mean to journalists

Loading

Yesterday, we told you about the Philadelphia Inquirer’s Will Bunch, who was so outraged and offended that Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” depicts journalists in a less-than-positive light, he wrote a whole column about it:

If you’ve just about had it with journalists trying to paint themselves as victims while they’re out there victimizing other people, you’re definitely not alone. Washington Examiner Magazine managing editor Jay Caruso is fed up, too.

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/1205183500393033729

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/1205183501286424576

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/1205183502016274433

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/1205183502800637957

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/1205183503647854592

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/1205183504318959617

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/1205183505128407046

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Sounds like Washington Examiner Magazine managing editor Jay Caruso has his finger on the pulse.

The really sad thing is that too many people think what they see in movies is real history.
They’re MOVIES!
They’re meant to fill seats with bottoms, paying bottoms.

Clint Eastwood’s depiction is probably romanticized and simplified.

When Obama completely made up a girlfriend for his fictional “biography” the press defended him, our first closeted gay president.