“Guns Are How A Civil War Ends… Politics Is How It Starts”

Loading

There aren’t any soldiers marching on Charleston… or Myrtle Beach. Nobody’s getting shot in the streets. Except in Chicago… and Baltimore, Detroit and Washington D.C.

But that’s not a civil war. It’s just what happens when Democrats run a city into the ground. And then they dig a hole in the ground so they can bury it even deeper.



If you look deep enough into that great big Democrat hole, you might even see where Jimmy Hoffa is buried.

But it’s not guns that make a civil war. It’s politics.

Guns are how a civil war ends. Politics is how it begins.

How do civil wars happen?

Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can’t settle the question through elections because they don’t even agree that elections are how you decide who’s in charge.

That’s the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you hate each other but accept the election results, you have a country. When you stop accepting election results, you have a countdown to a civil war.

I know you’re all thinking about President Trump.

He won and the establishment, the media, the democrats, rejected the results. They came up with a whole bunch of conspiracy theories to explain why he didn’t really win. It was the Russians. And the FBI. And sexism, Obama, Bernie Sanders and white people.

It’s easier to make a list of the things that Hillary Clinton doesn’t blame for losing the election. It’s going to be a short list.

A really short list. Herself.

The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an election. We all know that. But it’s not the first time they’ve done this.

The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn’t really win. The Supreme Court gave him the election. There’s a pattern here.

Trump didn’t really win the election. Bush didn’t really win the election. Every time a Republican president won an election this century, the Democrats insist he didn’t really win.

Now say a third Republican president wins an election in say, 2024.

What are the odds that they’ll say that he didn’t really win? Right now, it looks like 100 percent.

What do sure odds of the Dems rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don’t accept the results of any election that they don’t win.

It means they don’t believe that transfers of power in this country are determined by elections.

That’s a civil war.

There’s no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to kill a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government.

This isn’t dissent. It’s not disagreement.

You can hate the other party. You can think they’re the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next election. When you consistently reject the results of elections that you don’t win, what you want is a dictatorship.

Your very own dictatorship.

The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to the left, is its own. Whenever Republicans exercise power, it’s inherently illegitimate.

The attacks on Trump show that elections don’t matter to the left.

Republicans can win an election, but they have a major flaw. They’re not leftists.

That’s what the leftist dictatorship looks like.

The left lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats.

Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can’t scratch his own back without his say so, that’s the civil war.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Dumber then a sack full of rocks liberal Dumb-O-Crats some claiming the 2nd Amendment only means flintlocks Just how dumb are they the 2nd Amendment dos,nt for say Flintlocks its just the Brainless Jackass Party is too stupid to read anything but the Washington Compost and New York Pravda

They escalated a whole lot after Trump’s win because the network isn’t pretending anymore. It sees the opportunity to delegitimize the whole idea of elections.

In 2000 the left came really close to having a 16 year administration. In 2016, they again lost their opportunity for another 16 year monarchy. That loss REALLY pissed them off, as apparently it takes more than 8 years to “fundamentally transform” a free society into socialism. One problem is the first 4 years must be for doing the things that will assure reelection. SOCIALISM will not assure reelection; the things the left wants to do will not assure reelection. They can only do those things afterwards, but they still have to walk softly in order to usher in another friendly administration that will finish the work.

Trump upended all that and right now he is showing a stark contrast to the oppressive, socialistic, controlling government the Democrats offer.

And they don’t like it one bit.

I hate the talk of guns and politics, who is saying this ends with guns? Good start to gun confiscation. Its about showing the left they are flat out wrong holding ground gained and knowing we dont need them. There is a wish list that we may never obtain, we too must start at square one, that means infiltration.They have a 100 year gain on us, our advantage is they are sloppy, and careless.

But that’s not a civil war. It’s just what happens when Democrats run a city into the ground.

Actually, it’s what happens when you flood a national market with 300 million guns, and that number vastly exceeds the count of adults who are both responsible enough and intelligent enough to own them.

Gun industry gathers just a few miles from mass shooting

@Greg: More guns sold under the Obama admin I guess people didnt feel very safe. Your article is about an annual event it is held every year. Guns are not going to go away just because they make you feel bad. There are plenty of places you cant own a gun and they are not any safer. More people were killed by government automobile regulation than guns. The higher the gas milage the less safe a car is, so Obama increased it, the heartless mass murderer.
Your side is losing the civil war your ideology sucks, and we will prove it.

@Greg:

Actually, it’s what happens when you flood a national market with 300 million guns, and that number vastly exceeds the count of adults who are both responsible enough and intelligent enough to own them.

Yes, that is what happens. This is what the intention is. There is the threat that an abused public will rise up and go get a government that represents THEM.

The Obama administration took corruption to new heights. It has permeated every agency that controls human freedoms and this MUST be reversed.

Why aren’t there 300,000,000 gun deaths a year? Why do liberals make such efforts to PROMOTE violence?

Yes, that is what happens. This is what the intention is.

I don’t believe the intention of the Second Amendment was to arm angry idiots.

There is the threat that an abused public will rise up and go get a government that represents THEM.

A significant portion of the angry and abused public are responsible for their own damn failures, but looking to place the blame on somebody else. At least that’s what I’ve always heard in response from the right, whenever democrats have pointed out the inequities and injustices of the system.

Who, exactly, are you suggesting should be shot to make a world more to your liking? Because, in my experience, that’s the point when things go totally to hell.

@Greg:

I don’t believe the intention of the Second Amendment was to arm angry idiots.

Perhaps you can point out the “angry idiots” you refer to. The intention of the 12th Amendment wasn’t to put corrupt anti-Americans in office, either, but that’s how Obama got there and almost ushered Hillary in as well.

A significant portion of the angry and abused public are responsible for their own damn failures,

Yeah… those who voted for Obama and Hillary. Strangely, some of them are behind the “civil war” to remove a duly elected President because their despot lost.

Who, exactly, are you suggesting should be shot to make a world more to your liking?

First, show me where I made that recommendation. Perhaps the people you refer to all the illegal immigrants and thugs the left protects, excuses and provide a happy hunting ground in their sanctuary cities with “total gun control”.