Georgia investigator’s notes reveal ‘massive’ election integrity problems in Atlanta

Loading

By John Solomon and Daniel Payne

In a nationally televised interview in January, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rattled off an impressive list of measures his state used to ensure the November election count was accurate. “We had safe, secure, honest elections,” he declared to “60 Minutes.”
 
That rosy assessment, however, masked an ugly truth inside his agency’s own files: A contractor handpicked to monitor election counting in Fulton County wrote a 29-page memo back in November outlining the “massive” election integrity failures and mismanagement that he witnessed in the Atlanta-area’s election centers.
 
The bombshell report, constructed like a minute-by-minute diary, cited a litany of high-risk problems such as the double-counting of votes, insecure storage of ballots, possible violations of voter privacy, the mysterious removal of election materials at a vote collection warehouse, and the suspicious movement of “too many” ballots on Election Day.
 
“This seems like a massive chain of custody problem,” the contractor Carter Jones warned in the memo delivered by his firm Seven Hill Strategies to Raffensperger’s office shortly after the election.
 
That glaring notation was written around 4:00 p.m. on Election Day, when Jones observed absentee ballots arriving at the county’s central absentee scanning center at Atlanta’s State Farm Arena “in rolling bins 2k at a time.”
 



 
“It is my understanding is that the ballots are supposed to be moved in numbered, sealed boxes to protect them,” he wrote, noting these ballots weren’t.
 
He also feared the flow of absentee ballots seemed too voluminous. “Too many ballots coming in for secure black ballot boxes,” he observed.
 
You can read the full report obtained by Just the News from the Secretary of State’s office here.
 
Jones also raised concerns about the temporary workers brought in by a firm called Happy Faces to scan and count ballots after an election observer purported to witness a conversation in an elevator in which one of the workers revealed his intention to “f*ck sh*t up.”
 
“I must keep an eye on these two,” Jones wrote. “Perhaps this was a bad joke, but it was very poorly timed in the presence of a poll watcher.”
 
He wrote that the two suspect workers had been assigned to a “team confirming and boxing ballots that have already been scanned to prepare them for later audit” because “this is the place where they could do least to achieve their declared objective.”
 
But Jones expressed larger concerns about the temporary staffing agency’s recruitment of workers. “What is Happy Faces doing to vet the people who they are sending to make sure that they are not sending in people who do actually want to ‘f*ck sh*t up?'” he asked.
 
Spokespersons for Happy Faces did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokeswoman for Fulton County said she would speak to elections personnel that worked with Happy Faces, but she had not responded further as of press time.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“The public emergence of the Jones report Thursday doesn’t confirm enough suspect votes to overturn Georgia’s election results, or prove a plot to commit widespread ballot fraud. ”

What this exposes is that there was absolutely no control over ballot tabulation in Atlanta. Not following procedure isn’t just sloppy; it opens the door to abuse and fraud. It follows with the changes to voting rules and laws Democrats pushed which made fraud and abuse easier. No doubt that it happened.

Did it swing the election? I think so, but there needs to be audits and investigations to know and even then, the further from the election we get, the more opportunity for the destruction of evidence (ballots are now reported as missing). Whether it changed the outcome (it probably did) or not, it shows that more rules and enforcement of the rules (such as not allowing the observers to be run off) is absolutely necessary.

Adding further to the likelihood that there was fraud and the authorities know it is the fact that this report has been suppressed even while the very observations documented within it have been accused (and denounced) as having happened. If there was no fraud, why the fear of examining the evidence.

brad is a obama/biden flunkie. he is up for reelection and is in serious trouble. the elections fraud is unraveling and the demorats are very nervous. AZ. has garland pissing his pants. threating the state over elections rights not even knowing the Constitution garners the state’s rights to control the voting process is a major flaw against the AG, and this loser was a Supreme Court nominee?
If one steps a few feet back and ponders the congressional landscape the frightening revelation is that there is nothing on the horizon. it is vacuous.