Posted by Curt on 1 October, 2019 at 10:37 am. 15 comments already!

Loading

In just ten days (September 20 through September 30) the broadcast networks overwhelmed their evening and morning shows with more than 7 hours of coverage devoted to a whistleblower’s complaint about President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukranian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the ensuing calls for impeachment.

Only 46 minutes of that coverage referenced Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden’s sweetheart deal with a Ukranian company. Even when networks mentioned Trump’s concern about Hunter benefiting from his father’s status as Vice President, they were quick to dismiss the allegations with the refrain: “no evidence of any wrongdoing.” See montage video below:

On the September 23 edition of ABC’s World News Tonight correspondent Jon Karl conceded: “Hunter Biden did make tens of thousands of dollars a month working for a Ukranian company while his father was Vice President. But” he dutifully added, “there’s been no evidence of any wrongdoing.”



CBS correspondent Ben Tracy, on the September 20 Evening News also exonerated the Bidens:  “The President’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani claims – without proof – that Joe Biden tried to bribe the Ukranian government to get his son out of legal trouble.”

Over on the September 20 NBC Nightly News, correspondent Hallie Jackson also downplayed any conflict of interest involving Hunter Biden: “The President’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani has suggested then-Vice President Biden tried to stop an investigation into a Ukrainian company that named his son to it’s board, despite no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.”


 
But if the networks dared to look just a little bit into Hunter Biden’s history with the Ukranian energy company Burisma, they’d find plenty of evidence of questionable behavior involving the  Bidens – that would be worth more than 46 minutes of coverage.

Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer reported, “Hunter Biden joined the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma in April 2014, according to RSB bank records. Hunter Biden had little background in energy. Over a 16-month period, Burisma paid $3.1 million to a bank account associated with Hunter’s business.”

The New Yorker’s Adam Entous, in a July 1 article headlined “Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?” detailed that at the time even Obama administration officials were worried about a conflict of interest:

“Several former officials in the Obama Administration and at the State Department insisted that Hunter’s role at Burisma had no effect on his father’s policies in Ukraine, but said that, nevertheless, Hunter should not have taken the board seat. As the former senior White House aide put it, there was a perception that ‘Hunter was on the loose, potentially undermining his father’s message.’ The same aide said that Hunter should have recognized that at least some of his foreign business partners were motivated to work with him because they wanted ‘to be able to say that they are affiliated with Biden.’ A former business associate said, ‘The appearance of a conflict of interest is good enough, at this level of politics, to keep you from doing things like that.’”

The following are a few more examples of network anchors and reporters brushing aside the Hunter Biden scandal:

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x