Posted by Curt on 26 August, 2022 at 9:14 am. 7 comments already!


by Al Perrotta

In 1934, the FBI gunned down gangster John Dillinger. In 2020, the FBI put one between the eyes of Uncle Sam.
The once-exalted Federal Bureau of Investigation actively helped fix the U.S presidential election for Joe Biden. Mark Zuckerberg spilled the beans during an appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast Thursday. Rogan asked about Facebook censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story in the weeks before the 2020 election. Zuckerberg pointed the finger squarely at the FBI. In essence saying the FBI told him the laptop was Russian propaganda that needed to be shutdown.
Here’s his exact words:

Basically, the background here is the FBI, I think, basically came to us some folks on our team and was like, “Hey, just so you know, like, you should be on high alert … We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. We have it on notice that, basically, there’s about to be some kind of dump of that’s similar to that. So just be vigilant.”
“But,” you’ll hear the media say, “The FBI didn’t specifically mention the laptop. Zuckerberg (and his algorithms) put two and two together on his own.” First off, Zuckerberg was already working to rig the election for Biden. But more to the specific point, a host of FBI whistleblowers has told Sen. Ron Johnson that their leadership was going around declaring the laptop Russian disinformation. Even though they had the laptop and knew it to be legit. They’d already been investigating Hunter Biden’s business dealings for years. Further, FBI honchos ordered agents, “You will not look at that Hunter Biden laptop.”
Here’s how else we know. After the story broke in the New York Post, and Big Tech quashed the story, a business associate of the Biden’s named Tony Bobulinski testified to the veracity of the allegations on the laptop. He swore to the FBI the emails showing Joe Biden being deeply involved in Hunter’s China business dealings were legit. That Biden was “The Big Guy” set to get a 10% cut.
By October 21, 2020, the CIA, DOJ and FBI were publically saying the laptop was not part of any Russian disinformation campaign. But the damage was done. And the word was still suppressed by the media to the point Joe Biden could still dismiss the laptop story as a “Russian plot” in his final debate with Trump … without challenge from the moderator.
Did the FBI run to their pals at Facebook and Twitter and say, “We were wrong. It is legit”? No.
Plus, and this is no small matter, what is the FBI going to Facebook for anyway to shut down news stories? That alone is a clear violation of the 1st Amendment.
In a survey after the election, some 17% of Biden voters said they would not have voted for him had they known about the information on Hunter Biden’s laptop. Information that proved Biden was not only corrupted by the Chinese, but lying right to the face of voters when he swore he had no knowledge of Hunter’s business dealings, let alone any personal connection to deals with the Chinese Communists.
17% out of 81,000,000 cast for Biden … in an election decided in three states by a total of around 50,000 votes.
‘Not Going to Change the Outcome of an Election Again’
There’s another element to this story you must keep your ears tuned for. The FBI whistleblowers shared the excuse given them why the FBI wanted to quash the laptop and laptop story before the election.
The FBI, they were told, was “not going to change the outcome of an election again.”
Referencing what? Days before the 2016 election, then-FBI Director James Comey announced the bureau was reopening its investigation of the Hillary email scandal in the wake of her entire trove of official government emails being discovered on the laptop of former NY congressman Anthony Weiner, the disgraced husband of Hillary’s right hand gal Huma Abedin.
Hillary and her acolytes claim this announcement cost her the election.
A couple quick points:
Comey re-closed the investigation a couple days later, claiming that the FBI went through all the emails and there was nothing new there. (That actually turned out to be false, but what do you expect from Comey?) It’s not the FBI’s fault Hillary didn’t campaign enough in Wisconsin and Michigan. And was Hillary Clinton. Hillary was guilty. Hillary’s entire collection of State Dept. emails — classified and all — showing up on the laptop of a guy under investigation for sending dirty photos to underage girls is no small thing. What is the FBI doing in 2020 using a Hillary Clinton talking point to quash a legitimate news story about Joe Biden anyway?
But here’s the big point easily missed. Why did Comey re-open the Hillary investigation only days before the 2016 election? Because Deputy Director Andrew McCabe had buried the Weiner laptop discovery for a month to protect Hillary. (McCabe’s wife getting some $700K in campaign funds from Clinton operative/Va. Governor Terry McAuliffe had nothing to do with it, I’m sure.)
The NYPD had discovered the emails laptop when investigating Weiner’s lurid interactions with underage girls, contacted FBI agents in New York. The agents in New York notified FBI Headquarters and … nothing. For weeks, McCabe did not act. His hand was forced when the NY office kept yelling bloody murder, and the NYPD was starting to leak information about the Weiner laptop. He finally told Comey and Comey had to do something. Namely, say he’s reopening the case, pretend there was nothing to see, close the case as soon as possible.
So the very excuse used in 2020 to quash the Hunter Biden laptop and help elect the Democratic candidate was based on the very same FBI quashing the Anthony Weiner laptop in 2016 to help elect the Democratic candidate.
And as Paul Sperry at Real Clear Investigations reports, the very same unit in the FBI’s Washington office that was quashing the Weiner laptop and operating the bogus Crossfire Hurricane intelligence operation against Trump in 2016 is the same counter-intelligence unit behind the raid of Mar-A-Lago. A direct bid to interfere in the 2024 election.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x