WASHINGTON, DC: As British spy Christopher Steele finally agrees to be interviewed by US Attorney John Durham, the sordid truth about the Obama Clinton Russia Hoax begins to unravel. It is only a matter of time before the long-running campaign of illegal spying on Americans and the criminal use of NSA surveillance programs is revealed.
And laid at the feet of the Obama White House and Barack Obama himself.
All the way to the Oval Office
The United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, Durham has been on the case since at least October 2018. His first actions being conducting a criminal leak investigation of DOJ official James Baker. Baker is at the center of the FBI conspiracy with Comey and Andrew McCabe. (Ex-top FBI lawyer James Baker: DOJ inspector general FISA probe will find ‘mistakes’)
With every new revelation about the corrupt attempts to exonerate Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump emerges, the trail leads inexorably to Barack Obama’s inner circle.
From spying on Americans to the framing of George Papadopoulos. To the launching of a counterespionage operation against Donald Trump, and abusing the FISA court process.
Crimes were committed at the highest levels of the government that could only have occurred with the knowledge and participation of the occupant of the Oval Office.
At the nexus of the whole affair is President Obama. It simply could not have happened without his knowledge and consent, if not his instructions. It is obvious that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did conspire with the CIA Director John Brennan, the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and the head of the FBI James Comey.
Together they set forth to frame Donald Trump with Kremlin disinformation in the form of the Steele dossier. Weaponizing the CIA, DNI, DOJ, and FBI to fraudulently launch a counterespionage investigation. Abusing the FISA court in the process. Their tools included leaking classified documents. Targeting the incoming President with the phony Steele dossier.
Launching a heavily biased Special Council inquisition using the same conspirators who framed Donald Trump in the first place.
It was all a nefarious conspiracy to paralyze the government and attempt to overthrow the will of the people, the Constitution, and the legitimately elected President of the United States.
“POTUS wants to know everything”
Does anyone think for a minute that this just occurred naturally? It is inconceivable that the CIA, State Department, DOJ, and FBI could be conducting this type of subversively delusional operation without the direct knowledge and approval of the President himself. Proven by his own cabal’s words.
“POTUS wants to know everything” Peter Strzok texted his co-conspirator Lisa Page on one occasion. “The White House is running this”, on another occasion.
Such honesty needs no explanation. But Lisa Page gave one. It meant exactly what it said it meant, she testifies.The Weissmann Strzok “insurance policy”
Strzok did promise Lisa Page that Trump would never be President. “We’ll stop it”, he texted. He talked about an “insurance policy”. The man who was instrumental in fraudulently clearing Hillary Clinton was at the center of both the launch of the Trump counter-intelligence operation and the Mueller inquisition.
He and Andrew Weissmann were instrumental in using the Steele Dossier to lie to the FISA court. They both knew it was fraud to begin with. How Weissmann and Strzok ended up on the Mueller inquisition is a testament to its corrupt motives and beginnings.
It was a cynical exercise in the surreal destruction of the rule of law at the very top of the Justice Department of our own government. A treasonous abrogation of every standard of law and decency.
So if “POTUS wants to know everything”, what exactly does that mean?
It means Obama was in on the scheme from the very beginning. He helped orchestrate it. It means that the corruption and scandal behind the desperate measures of the coup plotters is much bigger, and goes much deeper than the public is aware.
Orchestration and authority could only come from the top
The orchestration and coordination of the Clinton campaign with the DNC, the State Department, the DOJ, and the White House was seamless. The use of British, Australian and Italian intelligence assets to spy on the Trump campaign was without pretext or precedent.
Sydney Blumenthal making regular forays to the John Kerry State Department to help create and spread the veracity of the Steele dossier. Incredibly, we now know that the FBI used Blumenthal to vouch for the veracity of Christopher Steele in the first FISA application.
Unmasking, Leaking, Spying on Americans
But why were they so desperate to stop Trump? And how does any of this implicate Barrack Obama? Start with unmasking, leaks and Susan Rice. Ben Rhodes and Susan Rice unmasked Trump associates hundreds of times. Samantha Powers at the UN unmasked over 300 people in 2016 alone. James Clapper unmasked and leaked the Michael Flynn intercepts.
So, Hillary wasn’t lying (for once) when she said, “If That F-ing B*stard Trump Wins, We All Hang From Nooses.”
It goes all the way up.
I would like to see those found guilty of crimes be brought to justice, I am not going to hold my breath. It will be a long hot summer with more and more informaton released, things we have suspected. With Durham on the job for only a couple of months, how did IG Horowitz miss so much and determine there was no political bias? Horowitz cannot be trusted. Sessions did nothing about the skate party, uranium one, or destruction of evidence under subpoena, I dont trust him either.
Spying on 2 supreme court justices, Justice John Roberts. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. One winds up dead.
Who coordinated this? https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/11/30/fbi-raids-home-of-clinton-foundation-whistle
The subtle subtext of royal attire…
The moment he’s out of office, he’s indictable.
@Greg: You will believe anything, The elements of the ruby tiara are made to resemble a classic symbol of the British monarchy: the Tudor rose. What I noticed more than simply 1 of over 90 tiaras the queen has in her jewelry collection, was the security guy in the back making sure Obama didnt lift the queens clutch.
I also heard that Trump’s formal duds were patterned after Burgess Meredith’s Penguin tux. Nobody told him his waistcoat was 6 inches too long? The bottom is supposed to be nearly even with the cutaway jacket. I notice in the photo that the Queen is keeping her purse well out of Donald’s reach.
In all seriousness, an interesting fact about the tiara is that Elizabeth designed it herself after receiving the rubies as a gift from the nation of Burma. The necklace originally belonged to her great-great grandmother, Victoria.
@Greg: Wow. that makes Trump indictable!
It means it’s a race to destroy Trump before the facts destroy Obama and the rest of the deep state.
Oh? Did this start before the decision on Obamacare?
Well, those who believe in and love America and the Constitution will be outraged. Democrats will make excuses and justifications.
@Greg:
You simply don’t see the utter desperation you people suffer, do you? It just goes right past you…
The moment he’s not President, I don’t care. However, while he is President, all your false accusations and politically motivated “investigations” causes damage to the nation and should stop.
@Greg: Glad you took the time to research her tiara some people will make up the weirdest things then they go viral and people believe them. Rubies are not ascribed the powers of your link, The Magical Powers of Gemstones. Ruby: Boosts love, romance and passion, helps build friendships, gives courage enthusiasm and generosity. I think it was more about the design than superstition.
Dons coat, really, you are reaching for scraps the dogs would ignore. Don did well, again, even running across a cheeky old vet with eyes for our First Lady.
@Deplorable Me, #7:
I suppose I should have posted the photo in Sunday Funnies. Do you think someone actually takes seriously the idea that the Queen of England was wearing a ruby hat to ward off evil? Everyone knows belief in the power of magic hats isn’t really a progressive affliction.
How about that Penguin suit, though? Did some undercover leftist Deep State saboteur slip past Trump’s security personnel and swap waistcoats?
@Greg: Nothing to say about Barrys involvement with spying on the campaign?
@Greg: So now there is nothing left to criticize the President except the clothes he wears. Just shows how pathetic you lefties really are. Did any right thinking people criticize how you peeled potatoes in Vietnam?
@kitt, #10:
I think Obama’s entirely warranted presidential response to a perceived national security threat—that is, a candidate who might be compromised by and/
or cooperating with an adversarial foreign government—is being deliberately mischaracterized in an effort to create a diversion from Trump’s current problems. Failure to investigate would have bordered on criminal negligence.
Surveillance was essential. “Spying” is Barr’s word. It’s entirely clear at this point that Barr is not impartial, and certainly not as independent of Executive Office influence as an Attorney General should be. Barr is acting as Trump’s instrument.
If this had been a “deep state conspiracy” to prevent Trump’s election, the conspirators would have gone public with their suspicions before the election, and Comey would not have revealed that Clinton was still under investigation at so critical a point. No one’s behavior supports the theory that the investigation was undertaken to prevent Trump’s election—nor as a means of discrediting his presidency, since virtually nobody expected him to be elected. I just don’t see any logic to the argument.
@Greg: Still making up facts I see. You surely do not read about the “FACTS” that have been emerging when the unedited documents are revealed.
@Randy:
Many of your “facts” are purely imaginary—the equivalent of Queen Elizabeth’s evil-repelling tiara. Why was Hillary never indicted for her “many, many” crimes? For the same reason that Obama never will be, despite Trump owning the guy in charge of the Department of Justice: There’s no real evidence that any such crimes actually took place. They’re all sub-plots on a reality TV show Donald has taken to the White House.
@Greg:So, the Obama administration decided they needed to initiate illegal surveillance on American citizens as early as 2014. It is a fact that the Obama administration illegally initiated surveillance on the Tea Party orientated organizations and directed the IRS to provide the DOJ with CDs of tax records. Then, He initiated surveillance on many of the Republican candidates for president. When Trump was selected as the candidate, surveillance was increased. Clinton and the Steele dossier was used to try to cover up the illegal surveillance by pretending that there was collusion with the Russians to elect Trump. It is quite easy to follow the documents “facts” that have been revealed lately. Only a true believer like you could never see the light.
@Greg:
Do you actually read some of the comments you and other liberals make about Trump on a regular basis? Why wouldn’t I believe it? The number of satire sites posting humorous fake stories is growing and it gets harder and harder to distinguish them from the latest liberal butt-hurt.
Now you sound like AOC and her “I was just kidding” explanation of her prediction of 12 years of civilization left.
Considering the FACT that Democrats had INVENTED every bit of “evidence” they used to authorize spying on an opposition campaign and candidate, it was not very warranted… except from a totalitarian government mindset. The only thing that warranted Obama authorizing spying on the campaign was that he was certain Hillary was to be the Democrat candidate and she was a likely loser. Totalitarian regimes don’t allow chance and personal choice to interfere with their agenda.
@kitt:
Nah, Trump’s tux is a welcome distraction from the illegal surveillance that Obama conducted and the severe damage he did to our nation.
@Deplorable Me:
I don’t know why people believe a lot of things that they do.
Things like that, for example. It’s utter nonsense. A preliminary investigation was begun based on very troubling, credible concerns involving a matter of national security. It DOES NOT take hard, incontrovertible evidence to warrant preliminary investigation when a serious national security question is involved. If it did, our nation would be in serious trouble. A moment of clear thought should be sufficient for anyone to understand this.
@Deplorable Me: People are ignorant when they have not been provided with the facts. If they still do not understand after they have seen the facts, they are stupid. You can not fix stupid.
@Greg:
What concerns began the investigation, what made them credible?
@kitt: As far as I can see, the concerns were that if HRC was not elected and was unable to cover up all the illegal activities of the Obama Administration, someone could go to jail and Obama’s phony legacy would be trash.
@Greg:
Like Hillary deleting 33,000 emails under subpoena because they were “personal”? Or Mueller deleting important aspects of testimony and evidence for the sake of “brevity”? Or that no one was allowed to read Mueller’s report? Yeah, there are some things people believe simply because it’s easier than believing the truth.
Uh, no. It isn’t.
“Concerns” based on evidence that came from suspicious quarters and which no one even bothered to try to verify. The reason for that is becoming clear; it appears the Clinton campaign phonied the whole thing up, then handed it off to Steele to peddle because letting Blumenthal do it would draw too much suspicion. NOTHING about any of those “concerns” is credible. Every goddamn bit of it is based on lies and, worse, everyone involved knew it from the beginning. Right up to the final report; build on a foundation of lies that is not holding up very well under scrutiny.
Especially when there is a dire political need to conduct illegal surveillance on the opposition Presidential campaign and its candidate. That, of course, was the bottom line; conduct surveillance on the opposition candidate because Obama’s candidate was a lying, criminal, incompetent drunken liar.
@Randy: Some people are ignorant because that feels better than facing the truth. Like, for instance, NONE of our resident liberals being able to face the fact that their liberal media and all their seditious Democrats LIED to them all about any evidence that had on Trump colluding with Russians and being a traitor. They probably knew it was all lies, but didn’t care. Once it was verified that it was all lies, they just shrug it off and seek the next batch of lies to believe. They like being lied to because the truth destroys their entire ideology.
@Greg:
If only your logic applied to your own Party. If it did, you’d agree it’s right and proper to investigate Obama, and to further press on Clinton’s email scandal to seek indictment. But as you don’t, any backing of this collusion hoax as somehow warranted is just partisan posturing. You have zero case for our government to spy on Trump. There’s not enough evidence, though there is evidence that this was a political move to impair Trump.
Yes it does. Otherwise, the Democrats will come for you when you become a legal threat to their power. That’s how it happened in many country where they stacked the bodies.
You and your party have gone to far, and we’ve stopped you. Keep digging you hole. Your party already lost 2020.
@Deplorable Me: What’s troubling is that their are still paid propaganda operatives like Greg merely repeating the same lies…over and over again.
At what point do the Dems run out of money and useful idiots like Greg, to wage such evil wars of information?
And the Dems don’t understand how brutal Trump’s counter investigation is going to be. Obama was the first reality TV president, and he’s not nearly as protected as his sycophants would believe. Trump already dismantled his “legacy”. Now he might take more…given the Dems illegally tried to throw an election.
@Nathan Blue: Unlike Democrats, who have nothing to fear from lying and failing because the media will apologize for them and suppress as much bad press as is possible. Not so with Republicans, so they have to be very sure and careful to make sure they have all their ducks in a row before they make their first move. Once they break that barrier, though, it will be Katy, bar the door. We see how exposed the evidence already is; it will move rapidly and relentlessly.