Donald Trump’s January 6 Tweets Resurface in a Big Way, Smack Libs in the Face

Loading

By Teri Christoph

Twitter may often be a cesspool of toxic digital waste, but it also serves as a kind of public record of historical events. Case in point: Donald Trump’s resurfaced tweets from January 6, 2021.
 
Now that his account has been reinstated, the entire world can access the trove of Trump’s tweets — the good, the bad and the covfefe. Conservatives are flooding their tweet streams tonight with retweets of two messages Trump sent on January 6, and they paint a picture far different from what libs like AOC and lame ducks like Liz Cheney would have you believe.
 
After nearly two long years of being deprived of Trump’s tweets, his supporters clearly welcome the opportunity to revisit his words and put the day’s events in perspective.
 
Tweet #1:
 


 
That’s certainly a point you don’t hear the Jan 6 commission discussing.
 
And then there’s Tweet #2:
 


 
When Elon Musk floated a “Should Trump’s account be reinstated?” trial balloon yesterday in the form of a Twitter poll, libs like AOC quickly jumped in and did what the left does: repeated the party line. She tweeted, “Idk man, last time he was here this platform was used to incite an insurrection, multiple people died, the Vice President of the United States was nearly assassinated, and hundreds were injured but I guess that’s not enough for you to answer the question. Twitter poll it is.” You could almost see Liz Cheney looking on with pride.
 
As Trump himself would say: Wrong!
 
RedState’s Nick Arama addressed AOC’s misinformation campaign in a post earlier today, stating:

All of that was misinformation — Trump didn’t “incite an insurrection” on Twitter; indeed, he called for people to act “peacefully and patriotically” at his rally, and then followed that up with calling for peace on Twitter, before he got banned.

Also, that bit about Mike Pence almost being assassinated? Yeah, not so much.

The Vice President was not “nearly assassinated.” That’s a bit like how she describes her own fanciful experience of the day — when she was in her office, some distance away from the Capitol building. But then she flipped out when we nailed her false story to the wall.

Could Trump have done more on January 6? Yes. Should he have done more? Yes. These tweets do not exonerate him from the things he could have done that day to quell the anger. But they do prove he was not using Twitter to foment violence and did make attempts to calm things.
 
Liberals are so used to having their own words and agendas amplified on platforms like Twitter and Facebook, with Big Tech happily propping them up, that having Elon Musk come along and work toward parity has got them seething. They’d like nothing better than to have Donald Trump’s words from January 6 hidden forever, stricken from the record that only they are allowed to write.

Read more
 

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
89 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Even in the face of this, Leftists are STILL saying things like “he said it after the fact to CYA…”blah blah blah.

No, no he didn’t.
He said it in the moment.

A move to charge/arrest Trump is Treason against our nation.

“He said it in the moment.”

If by “in the moment” you mean “after the attack had dragged on for quite a while,” then yes.

Hey dumbfuck greg, notice the time stamp is 2:38 and 3:13 pm

At 1:30 Trump’s mob had already bludgeoned their way through the final police barricade on the back steps of the Capitol.

Just after 2:00, they were entering through the window they smashed out.

At 2:24 Trump tweeted: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution.”

At 2:44 Ashli Babbltt was shot while climbing through the last door between the mob and elected officials. She was wearing a Trump flag as a cape.

By 3:00 the rioters had invaded the Senate chamber.

Trump was following events every step of the way, ignoring pleas from EVERYBODY to call off his mob and send help.

Why do think Gateway Pundit edited out the timestamps?

A timeline of how the Jan. 6 attack unfolded — including who said what and when

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

This silly parsing of time isn’t going to work, nor is it relevant.

THERE WAS NO INSURRECTION. TRUMP DID NOTHING ILLEGAL, BUT A CRIMINAL DEEP STATE WHO LITERALLY SET UP A FALSE FLAG BY INFILTRATING PROTESTING ORGANIZATIONS AND THE DELIBERATE INVITATION OF PROTESTORS INTO THE CAPITOL, DID.

Trump was following events every step of the way, ignoring pleas from EVERYBODY to call off his mob and send help.

Uh, except we literally have him on camera doing just that.

He’s innocent and everyone knows it, ESPECIALLY the paid propaganda pigs like you.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

“He’s innocent and everyone knows it, ESPECIALLY the paid propaganda pigs like you.”

Again with the telling people what they “actually” think, despite whatever they may say.

Again with the telling people what they “actually” think, despite whatever they may say.

How so, Groomer?

I wasn’t addressing you, Baby Raper.

Baby Raper? Um, clever, NOT!!!

You need to do better. So far, you’re batting zero.

Again with the telling people what they “actually” think, despite whatever they may say.

Then tell us what Trump is proven guilty of.

Again with the telling people what they “actually” think, despite whatever they may say.

That’s exactly how the Left works right now. If Colbert, Oprah, Kimmel, and the rest suddenly said Trump was great, and said why, you’d be a Trump fan and telling us why…

…overnight.

You’re here to stop anyone from talking about things that CNN et al is saying are “actually” true.

Projection on your part, once again.

Why do you and greg seem like one person, answering each others comments like you’re forgetting to switch?

One person, two accounts…or…

One demon, two people?

Platitudes

From National pubic radio

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

You’ve never listened to NPR once in your entire life.

You’ve never listened to NPR once in your entire life.

And you know that how, Groomer?

Mind your own business, Baby Raper.

Last edited 1 year ago by Michael

When you express your mind numbing arrogance on a public forum, it becomes everyone’s business, Groomer.

Why are you so fixated on references to child molestation (as if we don’t already know)?

“Why are you so fixated on references to child molestation”

It’s the most horrific thing I can think of, so it seems appropriate to saddle you with the name.

It’s the most horrific thing I can think of, so it seems appropriate to saddle you with the name.

You know nothing about me so………

Nice try. No cigar. Instead of Groomer, would you prefer I just call you “Loser?”

Your call, Goat Fellator.

Really, that’s the best you’ve got?

What the hell do you teach? Coloring in pre-school?

“You know nothing about me so………”

I know roughly as much about you as you know about me.

Wrong. You know nothing of me; where I lived, how I make a living, what I do for a living, my marrital status, if I have children and if I do, how many. You don’t know my religious, political,social or educational beliefs I hold. You just guess.

Now go to bed like a good child and we’ll play again tomorrow,

Those are all irrelevant details compared with what you DO reveal.

You forgot to switch back to the “michael” account again, greg.

It’s the most horrific thing I can think of, so it seems appropriate to saddle you with the name.

If you actually find that horrific, why do you support the party that promotes and protects poisoning the minds of young children with the most degenerate and destructive sexual concepts in our schools? Something doesn’t quite add up, scooter.

michael contends that it’s “Christians” forcing their beliefs on him, while not understanding the LGBT, woke Atheist Communist Left IS a religious ideology that is being installed illegally as a state religion in our schools and government.

America is a Christian-based nation. The Constitution doesn’t work unless you believe and serve God.

So the Left is using our nation to set up their own, quite parasitically.

The values of the Left aren’t new, aren’t insightful, aren’t liberating, and aren’t intelligent.

They are the same old paganism. Nothing new under the sun.

Apparently they believe we are all happy to be recipients of their degenerate ideological policies and are not being burdened with them while expressing our beliefs is somehow forcing them upon them. They can do their thing and we do ours, but they MUST leave the children out of it.

Well, you can’t have one nation when there are two completely different belief sets on human life, morality, and social conduct.

The Left has attempted to set up their own crazy nation within our own.

No more.

“No more.”

Ah, there’s the Internet Tough Guy we all know and love!

Ah, there’s the Internet Tough Guy we all know and love!

Nah. I’m just informing you your religion of insanity is one notice, and we’re done letting you destroy our families and nation.

I have no issues relieving my true identity to you, as long as you’re the “tough guy” and reveal yours.

I am 6 foot tall, weigh about 195lbs, work out 5 days a week at the gym, have a successful business, have a masters from a patriot-league school, married, kids, a veteran, have written 5 books, am involved in my community and Church, and I’m the kind of man you who would destroy the soul of the country should be worried about…because I’m positively influencing men to seek God and take responsibility for their lives.

As I’ve said, when it comes to your paganism that is destroying our nation…

NO MORE.

Not in my house, and hundreds of millions of other houses.

Indeed, you are free to believe and act as you will..that’s the premise of this Christian nation we live in…it’s the only Faith that allows for such.

But you don’t get to replace God with your false “gods.”

Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

There are lots of kids with two moms or two dads. It’s not illegal, however much you might wish it were. Do you want mention of that reality to be forbidden in class?

There are tons and tons of kids whose parents are divorced. Divorce, while legal, is against the religious beliefs of a sizable number of Americans, as well. Should we hide that, too?

Last edited 1 year ago by Michael

Why does it have to be mentioned in class at all? What does that have to do with mastering mathematics, English, spelling, the sciences, government or health?

And we aren’t just talking about discussing the composition of the parental unit, are we?

“Why does it have to be mentioned in class at all? What does that have to do with mastering mathematics, English, spelling, the sciences, government or health?”

Parents and family units are mentioned frequently in school textbooks—in math word problems, just to give one example. It’s reasonable to try to ensure that as many kids as possible are represented.

Even beginning a letter home with the greeting “Dear parents” ignores the fact that many kids don’t live with their parents and is potentially taken by kids as a thumb in the eye from a trusted adult.

“And we aren’t just talking about discussing the composition of the parental unit, are we?”

It’s certainly a large part of what we are talking about.

That’s not curriculum. There is NO reason to be teaching homosexuality, specifically. There is NO reason to be teaching the sexual acts. There is NO reason to be implying that an individual’s sex they were born with can be wrong or changed.

This is indoctrination. This is poisoning of the mind. This is child abuse. This is what the Democrat party upholds and why they should NOT have political power over the nation.

There are lots of kids with two moms or two dads. It’s not illegal, however much you might wish it were.

Anything that is NOT beneficial to a child should be illegal. But noooooo, you on the left had to push the concept that a child can have two parents of the same gender even though it is biologically impossible. Ignore the research that has proven that a child with two parents, of opposite genders, raises more mentally stable children.

Also, homosexuality, as with gender dysphoria, is a mental illness. So why do you wish to put children in that environment?

There are tons and tons of kids whose parents are divorced. Divorce is against the religious beliefs of a sizable number of Americans, as well. 

Divorce, except for extreme circumstances, should be more difficult to obtain, not easier to obtain. Again, children deserve better and children of divorced parents are less stable mentally. But again, you on the left, in your effort to give us a Gramsci-type irresponsible society, made divorce easier reducing people to nothing more than rutting monkeys.

Homosexuality is not a mental illness. Being MAGA, on the other hand…

Last edited 1 year ago by Michael

Trying to indoctrinate young children into homosexuality goddamn sure is a mental illness. Believing one should be a different sex than they were born is a mental illness and should be treated as such for children (an adult can decide to do whatever they wish, on their own dime).

Trying to indoctrinate young children into homosexuality goddamn sure is a mental illness.

By “trying to indoctrinate,” you seem to mean “acknowledging that it exists.”

It doesn’t need to be “acknowledged” to K thru 5th graders. It isn’t material to young children. They don’t understand it and they don’t care. The only reason to indoctrinate youth into that culture (and the indoctrination involves the most degenerate elements of the culture) is to recruit and enlist young children into a sick cult.

No one says homosexuality behavior doesn’t exist.

What you fail to prove, with your decades old, and very hackneyed response, is that homosexual people as an identity exist.

No science for that.

There’s hormones, behavior, and actions.

I once assumed we’d find a gene for “homosexuality” and that would be that.

But we never did. Instead, science shows sexuality to be a continuum and not an “identity” as you seem to cling to.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

Homosexuality is not a mental illness.

Homosexuality isn’t ANYTHING.

Humans have sexuality. They have flesh. How they use it is up to them. The lie is that there is some “class” that is homosexual.

NO THERE IS NOT. There are impulses, choices, and consequences.

We don’t base our laws on allowing murder, so we don’t tolerate a lack of morals and discipline with sexuality, either.

Those asherah poles are always something we deal with.

I agree
Faggotry is a mental disorder The influence it bears in children is harmful and not the least bit beneficial.
Gender confusion is even worse.

There are lots of kids with two moms or two dads

There’s really not. Not at all, but those who hate God and seek to control the narrative seed the idea that there is.

Turn back now, pilgrim.

“The Constitution doesn’t work unless you believe and serve God.”

That’s some grade-A horseshit.

“The Constitution doesn’t work unless you believe and serve God.”

That’s some grade-A horseshit.

Ummm, apparently you have never studied John Adams.

And unfortunately this bozo is a teacher or so he says

Bozo claims he lives in California. No surprise. Anyone with any intellect is fleeing that state.

Last edited 1 year ago by retire05

Is this Michael?

EXCLUSIVE: CA High School Teacher, Former Teachers’ Union President and Gay Club Advisor Caught Soliciting Underage Boy – Older Brother Confronts Him in a Viral Video

9316BD35-6AB0-4780-A841-3D219934533C.webp

Please spare me your Facebook memes with misattributed quotes.

Homosexuality is not a mental illness.

Actually, it is. Just as pedophilia, S& M and pederasty are.

Being MAGA, on the other hand…

Do try to learn to debate without cheap shots being your only retort.

Please spare me your Facebook memes with misattributed quotes.

When have I ever posted a meme, from anywhere? Misattributed quotes? Your debate skills are pathetic. You should stick with the mentally deficient.

Do try to learn to debate without cheap shots being your only retort.

I’ll start “debating” as soon as you do. Typing “Actually, it is. Just as pedophilia, S& M and pederasty are” is simply contradicting whatever I say.

Contradiction is part of debate. Judas Priest, does some school district actually pay you or is that just a bunch of b.s. that you are a “teacher?”

Contradiction is part of debate.

Simply contradicting,” as I actually wrote, is not debate at all. You and Nathan are of the mind that simply typing the opposite of what the other person types is what grownups do. It isn’t.

You call homosexuality a mental illness. The people who actually treat mental illness—the trained professionals—say it isn’t. They removed it from the DSM thirty-five years ago.

Simply contradicting,” as I actually wrote, is not debate at all.

Neither is wordsmithing, something you have a strong propensity to do.

You call homosexuality a mental illness. The people who actually treat mental illness—the trained professionals—say it isn’t.

And the people who treat mental illness also seems to think it is fine to mutilate a child that suffers from gender dysphoria. So your point is?

They removed it from the DSM thirty-five years ago.

I know that. And why? Do you know how that decision transpired or the fact that out of the hundreds of psychologists/psychiatrists that attended that California meeting, due to the threats they received from the gay movement, less that 50% of them attended that vote or voted against that decision and that those who did vote against it were harassed, threatened, and had their families threatened?

Show us just how much you really know, Groomer. It will be a nice change.

That’s some grade-A horseshit.

Nah. It’s an observable fact. As we watch dictator Biden and other pagans erode our systems, because they don’t believe in the basic tenant they were built on — to believe in and serve God — the results are undeniable:

War, famine, totalitarianism, poverty, crime, etc. No amount of DOJ/Social Media collusion can cover it up.

Your ideology has failed…miserably.

As it always does.

Even 450 of your prophets can’t change that.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

At 1:30 Trump’s mob had already bludgeoned their way through the final police barricade on the back steps of the Capitol.

You mean the doors had been swung open and the FBI-incited mob had been welcomed in.

Trump was following events every step of the way, ignoring pleas from EVERYBODY to call off his mob and send help.

He couldn’t call off the mob because it wasn’t his; it belonged to Pelosi, Bowser and the FBI. It belonged to the Democrats.

No, I mean what actually happened, which was captured on numerous security cameras and police body cams.

One of the foundation stones of Trump’s personality cult is the denial of fully documented reality.

You mean the doors had been swung open and the FBI-incited mob had been welcomed in.

Yeah, you probably should look at more video than the cherry-picked propaganda your January 6th propaganda committee liars provide you.

I’ve noticed that you never post links to any, nor to any real evidence of Trump the Skunk’s election fraud lies. Just cult propaganda.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

I’ve posted dozens of links to verifiable election fraud, and I believe the videos I refer to were posted here. So, there is something else you can shove up your ass. Also, this…

Did idiot Biden lie when he said:
… the Afghanistan withdrawal went perfectly?
… the southern border is secure?
… Border Patrol mounted agents whipped illegal immigrants?
… inflation is transient?
… gas was $5 a gallon when he took office?
… Putin caused all the inflation?
… there was no vaccine when he took office?
… he has traveled 17,000 miles with Xi?
… that there are no background checks at gun shows?
… that the Georgia election law suppresses the ability to vote?
… the “surge” of illegal immigrants he caused happens every year?
… that he would only serve one term?
… that the disaster at the border is Trump’s fault?
… that the information on Hunter’s laptop was “Russian disinformation”?
… that he had no knowledge of Hunter’s foreign business deals?
… the Supreme Court had decided election fraud cases?
… that he hasn’t taken lobbyist money?
… that he vaccinated (at the time) 70% of the population?
… he has driven an 18-wheeler?
… that he was a coal miner?
… he was a civil rights activist?
… he was arrested in the Capital?
… he was arrested in S. Africa?
… 350 million Americans had been vaccinated?
… no foreign leaders had criticized him?
… about nation building and putting soldiers in Afghanistan?
… about not leaving Afghanistan until all Americans were removed?
… that the collapse in Afghanistan “caught him by surprise”?
… he visited the Tree of Life synagogue after an attack on it?
… that he was going to end COVID?
… he was working “around the clock”?
… he had an opportunity to go to Annapolis and play football?
… that the 2nd Amendment banned weapons?
… the .223 and 9mm round were the most powerful rounds?
… told union members that since he took office, they have more money, more savings?
… that he was responsible for a planned Social Security cost of living increase?
… he would fire anyone on his staff that showed disrespect to anyone?
… there was no action on COVID19 “for months” under Trump?
… Officer Sicknick was murdered at the Capital?
… Republicans were defunding police, not Democrats?
… the economy was “in a tailspin” when he took office?
… the Capital riot was the worst incident of violence since the Civil War?
… the trillions of dollars Democrats were spending would cause inflation?
… Trump said white supremacists were “fine people”?
… there were Russian bounties?
… Democrat spending would not increase the deficit?
… no one making less that $400,000 would see tax increases?
… his infrastructure bill was “paid for”?

With respect to Trump’s Big Lie, you have linked to nothing but conspiracy theories.

As I’ve noted countless times, if actual credible evidence up to courtroom standards existed, it would have been presented in multiple courtrooms. There were MANY republican judges hearing the cases and appeals, some appointed by Trump himself. Accomplice #1, Rudy Giuliani, wouldn’t repeat any of his stolen election claims in a courtroom under oath—because repeating them under oath would be perjury.

If such credible evidence actually existed, it would also all be available on a centralized internet location for all the world to see.

Conspiracy theories are not evidence, no matter how many people buy into them.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

You are a liar, you have been linked to many proven documented lawless actions that took place during the 2020 selection.
The travesty that was repeated in AZ this midterm cycle is a fine example, get rid of the machines and early voting, kill most mail in voting.
If it was in 1 central location you wouldnt accept it anyway so that argument is retarded.

Last edited 1 year ago by kitt

Nope. Never once. Only conspiracy theories, propaganda videos, and reports that never hold up to close inspection.

I’ve certainly heard recordings of Trump trying to coerce state officials into going along with his bullshit. It’s known for a fact that he attempted to get the DoJ to issue a statement that the results were fraudulent—again without a shred of real evidence.

Trump is a liar. He’s full of himself, and full of b.s.

Arizona’s former weather girl is no different.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

You deny having been presented the facts, just as you will deny having been asked to answer for idiot Biden’s lies:

Did idiot Biden lie when he said:
… the Afghanistan withdrawal went perfectly?
… the southern border is secure?
… Border Patrol mounted agents whipped illegal immigrants?
… inflation is transient?
… gas was $5 a gallon when he took office?
… Putin caused all the inflation?
… there was no vaccine when he took office?
… he has traveled 17,000 miles with Xi?
… that there are no background checks at gun shows?
… that the Georgia election law suppresses the ability to vote?
… the “surge” of illegal immigrants he caused happens every year?
… that he would only serve one term?
… that the disaster at the border is Trump’s fault?
… that the information on Hunter’s laptop was “Russian disinformation”?
… that he had no knowledge of Hunter’s foreign business deals?
… the Supreme Court had decided election fraud cases?
… that he hasn’t taken lobbyist money?
… that he vaccinated (at the time) 70% of the population?
… he has driven an 18-wheeler?
… that he was a coal miner?
… he was a civil rights activist?
… he was arrested in the Capital?
… he was arrested in S. Africa?
… 350 million Americans had been vaccinated?
… no foreign leaders had criticized him?
… about nation building and putting soldiers in Afghanistan?
… about not leaving Afghanistan until all Americans were removed?
… that the collapse in Afghanistan “caught him by surprise”?
… he visited the Tree of Life synagogue after an attack on it?
… that he was going to end COVID?
… he was working “around the clock”?
… he had an opportunity to go to Annapolis and play football?
… that the 2nd Amendment banned weapons?
… the .223 and 9mm round were the most powerful rounds?
… told union members that since he took office, they have more money, more savings?
… that he was responsible for a planned Social Security cost of living increase?
… he would fire anyone on his staff that showed disrespect to anyone?
… there was no action on COVID19 “for months” under Trump?
… Officer Sicknick was murdered at the Capital?
… Republicans were defunding police, not Democrats?
… the economy was “in a tailspin” when he took office?
… the Capital riot was the worst incident of violence since the Civil War?
… the trillions of dollars Democrats were spending would cause inflation?
… Trump said white supremacists were “fine people”?
… there were Russian bounties?
… Democrat spending would not increase the deficit?
… no one making less that $400,000 would see tax increases?
… his infrastructure bill was “paid for”?
… the majority of illegal immigrant families are sent back?
… no family members of his or staff would get government jobs?
… the government was going to “buy American”?

greg is an absolute idiot. The big lie is there was no election fraud. That lie must be perpetuated in order to make claim for idiot biden having been elected, not selected.
The democrats know the election in 2020 was stolen, they stole it.

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

With respect to Trump’s Big Lie, you have linked to nothing but conspiracy theories.

If that was the case, you would have responded with an answer that debunked the “conspiracy theory”. You haven’t. You have responded only with “that’s just a conspiracy theory”. You have NEVER answered why there was a fake water main break at STATE FARM ARENA election night, all the observers were told counting would stop and were sent away, and once they left, new ballots were brought out, the counting resumed and an inexplicable spike in votes for idiot Biden (which corresponded with similar spikes in other battleground states) was recorded.

No, no courts ruled Republicans “had no evidence” of election fraud, and there WAS election fraud
https://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/commentary/no-evidence-of-vote-tampering-the-lefts-biggest-election-2020-lie-137241/
 
81 cases of election fraud, NONE have been decided in court


 
You are ignorant and stupid because you choose to be.

Conspiracy theories are not evidence, no matter how many people buy into them.

You refer, of course, to “Russian collusion”, “obstruction”, “tax evasion”, “emoluments”, “Alpha Bank”, “bounties”, “quid pro quo” and “insurrection” conspiracies which brainless, lemming, stupid, naive Democrats buy into, without evidence, on a weekly basis.

The WEC advised to cure ballots even without witness addresses with red ink. This was against the law, every one of those ballots should have been sent back to the voter for corrections, 10s of thousands of them.
Many election laws were broken in every swing state, chain of custody had no meaning in GA.

Last edited 1 year ago by kitt

There’s just no evidence of any kind of “insurrection” on J6th…outside of the one waged by the deep state and their false flag.

Same with Trump. NO EVIDENCE of him doing anything wrong.

You’re reaching, and failing.

At 2:44 Ashli Babbltt was shot while climbing through the last door between the mob and elected officials. She was wearing a Trump flag as a cape.

Oh, my. I’m sure the coward who was the DC Capital cop that shot an unarmed woman was absolutely terrorized and fearful of a Trump flag being worn as a cape. Judas Priest only knows how many he would have killed had they been dressed in Batman capes.

A white cop knells on the neck of a black drug addict who did time in the big house in Texas for robbery and sticking a gun into a pregnant woman’s stomach and he gets life in prison. A black cop shoots an unarmed white woman who was a 10 year veteran and he gets royal treatment and hid out at a military base, not to mention no after action report required, no internal PD investigation, no suspension even with pay. He gets his murderous ass covered by the Democrats.

You’re a pig, Comrade Greggie.

Unless you get help, your hate will consume you.

Unless you get help, your hate will consume you.

Leftist, heal thyself.

Oh, I’d say the paganist hate gripping the Left is the only threat we’re facing here in America.

We DON’T hate you. But you hate us. That’s the issue.

It’s what the System™ is all squawking at the same coordinated time. The twitter trolls are all saying Trump’s “timing” was off….not because it was, but because their mob will believe it.

What they do is vaccinate people to the truth by giving them false narratives and off-the-shelf lunacy, like this “Trump didn’t say it at the right time” nonsense.

HE DIDN’T HAVE TO SAY A DAMNED THING.

There is reality and then there is the left’s version of reality, which is a complete and total lie. When facts are revealed, their version of reality crumbles.

Rep. Matt Gaetz: “On First Day of Republican Control, We Should Take Over J6 Committee and Release Every Second of Footage That Will Exonerate Our Patriots”

Interesting SCOTUS case hit the docket: Brunson vs Adams, et al. We have never seen anything like this before.
Have any of you heard of Brunson vs Adams, et al?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

Above is the link to the 18 page filing. I have never seen anything like this before. The history behind this case: Two brothers, Loy Brunson and Raland Brunson, both filed a court case in Utah. Loy’s case is still pending in Utah, but Raland’s case has now made it to the Supreme Court docket. As most of you probably know, getting a case docketed with SCOTUS (while it is still undecided in the 10th circuit court of appeals) is odd. How did it get here? Their case hinges on constitutional amendment violations of the right to due process. When an election has concerns of fraud, constitution allows for a 10 day investigation to look at the potential fraud questions and determine if fraud did or did not occur. This case is NOT one of election fraud, it is about congress and the senate NOT doing their oath of office and violating Amendment I to the constitution, Article VI of the constitution, the 14th Amendment of the constitution, section 3, the 5th and the 9th Amendment of the constitution, as well as a couple of Utah State Constitution articles. Most pertain to due process, the right to investigation, and not performing the 10 day investigation when questions of election fraud were presented to congress. It began in the state of Utah, then transferred to federal court when there were originally 3 defendants listed, Biden and Harris as well as Nancy Pelosi, and then 381 other defendents AND over 100 Jane/John Does to the defendent list. All are Federal Government members that are named so far.

The case was filed in early 2021, it was granted a motion to dismiss by the Federal Government, and it was refiled on Appeal to the 10th circuit court. In August 2022, they realized that they did not have to wait for a decision from the 10th Circuit of Appeals. The SCOTUS Rule 11 allowed them to bypass the 10th Circuit and go straight to the SCOTUS.

For more about Rule 11, look here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/rule_11 What is rule 11? “A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court.” Hmm. This case qualifies as imperative public importance to deviate from normal appellate practice and requires immediate determination?

Here is where it gets interesting. At this point, SCOTUS will usually dismiss back to the 10th circuit appeals waiting a decision from them. Essentially kicking the can down the road. But that did not happen. Appeals court is where most cases like this die out and get dismissed yet again.

What is outlined below is reported by the Brunson family on their website for this court case: (keep in mind Raland Brunson is acting Pro=Se, he does not have an attorney representing him).

September 23, 2022 the Petition for Writ of Certiorari Received.

September 28, 2022 Raland received A phone call from SCOTUS. The Clerk of the SCOTUS calls Raland requesting for a revision of the Petition that would include more information on the lawsuit and wondering how soon they could get it.

October 17, 2022, Raland gets a 2nd phone call from SCOTUS

Clerk. She asks “how are you doing on your revision of the Writ with the additional information that we need?” Raland said “We’re working on it as we speak” She said “how soon can we get it?” Raland said “Right away”

October 20, 2022, the Revised Petition shipped to the SCOTUS.

October 24, 2022, Petition docketed. The clerk of the Court tells Raland that they have everything they need. The U.S. Attorneys have until Nov 23, 2022 to respond showing why the Supreme Court of the United States should not move on this case. This means that SCOTUS agreed that this case met the Rule 11 criteria or it would not be docketed. It would have been denied and punted back to Circuit 10 appeals court and await a decision.

So guess what happened on November 23rd?? The United States did not respond. Instead, this happened:

November 23, 2022: The Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice replaces the U.S. Attorneys. Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit, thus allowing the SCOTUS to move forward.

What does THAT decision mean? That means that the United States decided that SCOTUS justices can hear this case at any time, in conference, and if 4/9 or greater vote yes, it will be moved on to a hearing. Or, they can decide themselves to rule on the case if they choose. The waived right to respond essentially puts all control in the hands of the 9 Supreme Court Justices.

If you want to follow along, the Brunson brothers have a page dedicated to this SCOTUS adventure. http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html

So the meat and potatoes of this case. We start here. Who are the “et al” in this case? 385 named people, and 100+ John/Jane Does. The 385 named people? Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris, Michael Pence, and 382 other sitting house members and senators. Each of them are listed in the above docket. Have a gander to see if your state rep/senator is listed!

Why was this court case filed? The allegation is this: “for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.”. This is in reference to the 2020 election. When the case came before congress to investigate the allegation of fraud put forward by 100 members of congress, the other 380+ members voted no. The senate did nothing to stop the certification without the 10 day investigation period either.

The oath of office they broke? “”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

The question at hand: How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don’t believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims from from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully manipulated the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a “rigged” election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.

So lets back up just a little bit and remember what day this was. January 6th, 2021. Everyone knows “that day”. There were 100 members of congress set to request a 10 day investigation into possible election fraud. A few members spoke on the house floor, and then “January 6th” happened. When the congress reconvened late that night, they voted down the investigation into fraud that was introduced, they stated that no further election fraud concerns would be heard “in light of the days events”, they were pushing through to certify the election. And that is what they did.

What remedy are they seeking? They are asking that all 385 defendants be charged with Treason for failure to uphold the US Constitution, they be incarcerated for a period no less than 5 years, be fined no less than $10,000, they be removed from their government seat, and banned from ever holding a political position ever again.

Again, we have never in history seen a case such as this. There is no precedent of this magnitude. What will SCOTUS do with this? Who knows. I am following along purely from the “what in the holy hell Batman” that this case is, that it made it to the docket of the SCOTUS, and what they will decide to do with this. Will it go to hearing? Will they have enough votes to go to hearing? Will they decide on a Rule 11 emergency quick decision? SO many questions. It is watching history unfold from a precedent factor in and of itself. We have never seen someone acting Pro-Se be granted a Rule 11, file a lawsuit against nearly 400 sitting congress and senate members, much less the President, VP, former VP, and others not named. Stay tuned!

SCOTUS: Biden And Congress Face Treason Case For Failure To Uphold The US Constitution! (rumble.com)

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

A Huge Case Is About To Be Adjudicated by SCOTUS. Brunson Vs Adams Et Al. Alleges Hundreds Of Congress Members Breached Their Oaths.

This case doesn’t have anything to do with the rightful winner of 2020 and everything to do with hundreds of members of congress failing to make sure the vote was legit before certifying it therefore putting our national security at risk.

As a reminder in Dec 2020 ODNI said there’s was signs of foreign interference. Also multiple state legislators sent letters to their US reps asking them to delay certification for a week or two so they could get their arms around what just happened. But nope. The certification was rammed through at like 2:30 am after a convenient fed boi provacateur led “riot” shut down all debate re: 2020 election shenanigans. How convenient.

Interesting SCOTUS case hit the docket: Brunson vs Adams, et al. We have never seen anything like this before.

Have any of you heard of Brunson vs Adams, et al?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

Above is the link to the 18 page filing. I have never seen anything like this before. The history behind this case: Two brothers, Loy Brunson and Raland Brunson, both filed a court case in Utah. Loy’s case is still pending in Utah, but Raland’s case has now made it to the Supreme Court docket. As most of you probably know, getting a case docketed with SCOTUS (while it is still undecided in the 10th circuit court of appeals) is odd. How did it get here? Their case hinges on constitutional amendment violations of the right to due process. When an election has concerns of fraud, constitution allows for a 10 day investigation to look at the potential fraud questions and determine if fraud did or did not occur. This case is NOT one of election fraud, it is about congress and the senate NOT doing their oath of office and violating Amendment I to the constitution, Article VI of the constitution, the 14th Amendment of the constitution, section 3, the 5th and the 9th Amendment of the constitution, as well as a couple of Utah State Constitution articles. Most pertain to due process, the right to investigation, and not performing the 10 day investigation when questions of election fraud were presented to congress. It began in the state of Utah, then transferred to federal court when there were originally 3 defendants listed, Biden and Harris as well as Nancy Pelosi, and then 381 other defendents AND over 100 Jane/John Does to the defendent list. All are Federal Government members that are named so far.

The case was filed in early 2021, it was granted a motion to dismiss by the Federal Government, and it was refiled on Appeal to the 10th circuit court. In August 2022, they realized that they did not have to wait for a decision from the 10th Circuit of Appeals. The SCOTUS Rule 11 allowed them to bypass the 10th Circuit and go straight to the SCOTUS.

For more about Rule 11, look here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/rule_11 What is rule 11? “A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court.” Hmm. This case qualifies as imperative public importance to deviate from normal appellate practice and requires immediate determination?

Here is where it gets interesting. At this point, SCOTUS will usually dismiss back to the 10th circuit appeals waiting a decision from them. Essentially kicking the can down the road. But that did not happen. Appeals court is where most cases like this die out and get dismissed yet again.

What is outlined below is reported by the Brunson family on their website for this court case: (keep in mind Raland Brunson is acting Pro=Se, he does not have an attorney representing him).

September 23, 2022 the Petition for Writ of Certiorari Received.

September 28, 2022 Raland received A phone call from SCOTUS. The Clerk of the SCOTUS calls Raland requesting for a revision of the Petition that would include more information on the lawsuit and wondering how soon they could get it.

October 17, 2022, Raland gets a 2nd phone call from SCOTUS

Clerk. She asks “how are you doing on your revision of the Writ with the additional information that we need?” Raland said “We’re working on it as we speak” She said “how soon can we get it?” Raland said “Right away”

October 20, 2022, the Revised Petition shipped to the SCOTUS.

October 24, 2022, Petition docketed. The clerk of the Court tells Raland that they have everything they need. The U.S. Attorneys have until Nov 23, 2022 to respond showing why the Supreme Court of the United States should not move on this case. This means that SCOTUS agreed that this case met the Rule 11 criteria or it would not be docketed. It would have been denied and punted back to Circuit 10 appeals court and await a decision.

So guess what happened on November 23rd?? The United States did not respond. Instead, this happened:

November 23, 2022: The Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice replaces the U.S. Attorneys. Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit, thus allowing the SCOTUS to move forward.

What does THAT decision mean? That means that the United States decided that SCOTUS justices can hear this case at any time, in conference, and if 4/9 or greater vote yes, it will be moved on to a hearing. Or, they can decide themselves to rule on the case if they choose. The waived right to respond essentially puts all control in the hands of the 9 Supreme Court Justices.

If you want to follow along, the Brunson brothers have a page dedicated to this SCOTUS adventure. http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html

So the meat and potatoes of this case. We start here. Who are the “et al” in this case? 385 named people, and 100+ John/Jane Does. The 385 named people? Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris, Michael Pence, and 382 other sitting house members and senators. Each of them are listed in the above docket. Have a gander to see if your state rep/senator is listed!

Why was this court case filed? The allegation is this: “for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.”. This is in reference to the 2020 election. When the case came before congress to investigate the allegation of fraud put forward by 100 members of congress, the other 380+ members voted no. The senate did nothing to stop the certification without the 10 day investigation period either.

The oath of office they broke? “”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

The question at hand: How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don’t believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims from from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully manipulated the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a “rigged” election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.

So lets back up just a little bit and remember what day this was. January 6th, 2021. Everyone knows “that day”. There were 100 members of congress set to request a 10 day investigation into possible election fraud. A few members spoke on the house floor, and then “January 6th” happened. When the congress reconvened late that night, they voted down the investigation into fraud that was introduced, they stated that no further election fraud concerns would be heard “in light of the days events”, they were pushing through to certify the election. And that is what they did.

What remedy are they seeking? They are asking that all 385 defendants be charged with Treason for failure to uphold the US Constitution, they be incarcerated for a period no less than 5 years, be fined no less than $10,000, they be removed from their government seat, and banned from ever holding a political position ever again.

Again, we have never in history seen a case such as this. There is no precedent of this magnitude. What will SCOTUS do with this? Who knows. I am following along purely from the “what in the holy hell Batman” that this case is, that it made it to the docket of the SCOTUS, and what they will decide to do with this. Will it go to hearing? Will they have enough votes to go to hearing? Will they decide on a Rule 11 emergency quick decision? SO many questions. It is watching history unfold from a precedent factor in and of itself. We have never seen someone acting Pro-Se be granted a Rule 11, file a lawsuit against nearly 400 sitting congress and senate members, much less the President, VP, former VP, and others not named. Stay tuned!

Will Four Trumpet Playing Brothers Bring Harmony to the Broken 2020 Election?

Four brothers in Utah play the trumpet together. They also have a case with the Supreme Court that has gotten some attention.

The case involving the Brunson brothers out of Utah is getting some attention. These brothers have filed their suit and it is currently with the US Supreme Court. They claim that the actions by US politicians to ignore requests and arguments from the people to investigate the 2020 Election fell on deaf ears. But the brothers argue that these politicians had a Constitutional duty to investigate.

According to their website, this case started after the corrupted 2020 Election:

Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a “Complaint” and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants. Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy’s lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland’s lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS

The case received more attention after it reached the Supreme Court. It now has been given a docket number 22-380 with the court.

As this effort moved forward, the brothers needed to serve the 388 defendants in the case. This took a lot of work and paper.

The brothers’ timeline shows that in late September the Supreme Court received their petition. The brothers received two calls after this from a clerk with the Supreme Court requesting additional information. The petition was then docketed in late October.

On November 23, the Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice replaced the US Attorneys on the case.

There are some people that care about this country and the Constitution. It’s heartening to know that there are people of means that will do the uncomfortable things that need to be done. Perhaps, this way, capitalism can defeat socialism. The left uses capitalism to fund their endless attacks on our way of life, our republic, our government, our nation; it’s about time those who have benefitted most from the capitalistic system use their gains to defend it.

Those who refuse to investigate this horrific tragedy the nation suffered in 2020 are cowards.

This case has a docket number albeit it will need 4 votes to take up the case. The complaints argument centers on the responsibility of Congress when it deems a potential threat to the Constitution. By their very oath, Congress is duty bound to investigate. Any interference in that obligation is treason.

FBI Ramps Up Spending to Fight MAGA Terrorism

Why has the FBI been unable to identify the dnc pipe bomber?

Where did they find the emails, in the January 6th committee’s trash can?

Apparently they were easy enough to obtain but the j6 clown show ignored them as the emails would contradict their established narrative. Interesting that in addition to this information, they also were not interested in Ray Epps or the pipe bomber.

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

Well, following that path wouldn’t lead them to blaming Trump, which was where they needed to go.

Not only did Trump exonerate himself when he said “be peaceful,” he was already cleared by asking for security.

This is about an illegal deep state regime inventing crimes that never happened on a political rival.

Nothing more.

I don’t know why Biden and our government say they hate Putin so much.

They act just like him.

Why did the j6 clown show not investigate Ray Epps or the dnc pipe bomber?