Day Two of Judge Ketanji Brown Hearings: Lies in Claiming She Doesn’t Know CRT is Taught in the School Whose Board She Serves On, Lies About Why She Consistently Under-Sentences Child Pr0n Criminals

Loading

by Ace

She serves on the board of a Georgetown school. The school recommends books by Ibrahim X. Kendhi, including “Anti-Racist Baby,” which claims that babies are born racist and must be taught “anti-racism” and must also be forced to confess their racism.
 
She lied and claimed that CRT is only “an academic theory taught in law school” and does not include books written by foundational “thinkers” in CRT like Ibrahim X. Kendhi.
 


 
She is also a fan of Derrick Bell, another race-hustler, racist, and CRT figure. Bell has admitted that he “lives” to “harass white people.”
 
She endorsed a book by him in which he stirs up hatred against white people by claiming that white people would sell black people as slaves again to “space aliens.”
 

derrickbell.png

Christopher F. Rufo
@realchrisrufoMar 17
This isn’t a speech from thirty years ago. It’s from January 20, 2020. She endorses a book that was foundational to critical race theory and made the case that, given the choice, whites would trade African-Americans away to space aliens and banish them from the universe.
 
This isn’t just metaphorical. Bell told NPR’s Fresh Air he believed whites would make the trade in real life. He argued in the book that the history of slavery was not only “an example of what white America has done,” but “a constant reminder of what white American might do.”

She lied about why she endorsed that book, saying that she just had foggy memories of it, because her parents had it on the coffee table in 1970 when she was a small child.
 
Trouble is, the book wasn’t published until 1992.

Christopher F. Rufo
 
@realchrisrufoMar 17
 
UPDATE: Jackson’s math doesn’t add up. She was born in 1970 and “Faces at the Bottom of the Well” wasn’t published until 1992, when she was 22 years old and a student at Harvard–during the exact timeframe that Derrick Bell was engaging in his nationally-publicized protest.
 
In other words, her story that her parents had “Faces at the Bottom of the Well” –a key text of critical race theory–on their coffee table when Jackson was growing up is absolutely false. Jackson made up the story and is obscuring her connection to CRT. The Senate should ask why.

The Daily Wire has more.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court pick, has repeatedly embraced champions of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in lectures and speeches while nodding to the progressive idea with the use of terms such as “microaggression.”
 
…A review of a handful of Jackson’s lectures and speeches from the past seven years shows that the nominee has a strong appreciation for leading proponents of CRT, a progressive idea that holds in part: “racism is endemic to, rather than a deviation from, American norms,” legal scholar Kimberle Crenshaw, who coined the term, wrote in 1989. While Jackson has avoided openly championing CRT, she has complimented its advocates and suggested that the progressive theory informs her legal analysis.
 
…She supported her advice with a story from her own college experience. She said a fellow student hung a Confederate Flag outside his dorm room window, and that she lost valuable class and study time protesting for the university to force the student to remove it.

“I remember thinking how unfair it was to us that in addition to having to be victimized by the sentiments that that symbol expressed and by what we perceived to be the unacceptably lax response of the university, we were also missing classes, and could not just be regular students, focusing on the work we had to do, like the rest of our peers,” she said.

In January 2020, Jackson gave a lecture to the University of Michigan Law School as part of its Martin Luther King, Jr. Day celebration. In a speech on “Black Women Leaders In The Civil Rights Movement Era And Beyond,” Jackson said she took inspiration from one of the works of the late Derrick Bell, who is often touted as the godfather of CRT.
 
Bell’s 1993 book, “Faces At The Bottom Of The Well: The Permanence Of Racism,” was a fixture of Jackson’s childhood. The work is “a pioneering contribution to critical race theory scholarship, and it remains urgent and essential reading on the problem of racism in America.”

“My parents had this book on their coffee table for many years, and I remember staring at the image on the cover when I was growing up; I found it difficult to reconcile the image of the person, who seemed to be smiling, with the depressing message that the title and subtitle conveyed. I thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years when I started preparing for this speech, because, before the civil rights gains of the 1960s, black women were the quintessential faces at the bottom of the well of American society, given their existence at the intersection of race and gender — both of which were highly disfavored characteristics,” Jackson said.

Here’s her explanation for why she has always, in every single case before her, sentenced child pr0n violators below the federal guidelines and much below what prosecutors requested: She claims that in the age of the internet, people shouldn’t be punished too much for having lots and lots of child pr0n.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This nominee should be withdrawn. This type of Peronist not right for the Court.

Given the senate, she’s a shoe-in.
As bad as she is, they will shove her down America’s throat all the harder.

She lies it seems to come to her naturally, like Camel A. The content of her character is half empty.

Ketanji Brown Jackson Calls Illegal Aliens ‘Noncitizens’ in Senate Hearing

Joe Biden’s nominee to replace Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, labeled illegal aliens in the United States as “noncitizens” before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday.

During the second day of her confirmation hearing before the Senate, Jackson answered a question from Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) about a D.C. District Court ruling in which she bypassed federal statute to declare that former President Donald Trump’s administration could not expand expedited deportation.

“Expedited removal … a way in which Congress had given the authority to the Department of Homeland Security to make a decision about how to deport people, who are noncitizens,” Jackson stated, opting for President Joe Biden’s preferred characterization of illegal aliens.

In the 2019 case, the pro-mass immigration group Make the Road New York sued the Trump administration for its expanded expedited deportation of illegal aliens.

Whereas expedited removal had long only applied to illegal aliens who crossed by land, were encountered near the border, and had been in the U.S. for no longer than 14 days, Trump sought to expand the process to include illegal aliens encountered across the U.S. for up to two years after they arrived.

Jackson issued a preliminary injunction to halt the policy on the grounds that the administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and did not sufficiently weigh the impact that the policy would have on illegal aliens.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed, telling Jackson that she exceeded her legal authority because the statute left this matter to the discretion of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and did not empower a federal judge to override that judgment.

Grassley noted that Congress gave DHS “sole and unreviewable discretion whether expedited removal would apply to an alien who has not been paroled or admitted to the United States.”

“The law specifically says that Homeland Security, not the courts, was responsible for making that decision. Could you please explain why you believe a federal court could review something congress called ‘unreviewable?’” Grassley asked.

Jackson defended her ruling, stating:

The challenge was not about the actual determination. The challenge was about the procedures that the agency undertook to make that determination. And so that statute said … that the agency had ‘sole and unreviewable discretion to decide and in interpreting that, I took into account the language of that statute and the language of another statute that Congress has enacted to direct agencies with respect to the manner in which they exercise their discretion. [Emphasis added]

Later, though, the D.C. Circuit appeals court reversed Jackson’s decision.

“We hold that the district court properly exercised jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e) over the Associations’ claims, but that there is no cause of action under the Administrative Procedure Act to scrutinize the Secretary’s designation decision so long as it falls within statutory and constitutional bounds,” the court stated.

As Breitbart News previously reported, Jackson has used the terms “noncitizen” and “undocumented non-citizens” in prior rulings rather than using the terms “alien” and “illegal alien,” which are regularly used in court and federal statutes.

Ketanji Brown Jackson Has Absolutely No Idea When Human Life Begins. “Um, I Don’t Know”

For decades, science has confirmed that human life begins at conception. But that’s apparently shocking news to Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Joe Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court had absolutely no idea when human life begins when Senator John Kennedy asked the easy and obvious question of her during his questioning in today’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

SENATOR: “When does life begin, in your opinion?”

JACKSON: “Senator, um… I don’t know.”

Medical experts and medical textbooks have confirmed for decades that human life begins at conception/fertilization.

“The life cycle of mammals begins when a sperm enters an egg.”

Okada et al., A role for the elongator complex in zygotic paternal genome demethylation, NATURE 463:554 (Jan. 28, 2010)

“Fertilization is the process by which male and female haploid gametes (sperm and egg) unite to produce a genetically distinct individual.”

Signorelli et al., Kinases, phosphatases and proteases during sperm capacitation, CELL TISSUE RES. 349(3):765 (Mar. 20, 2012)

“The oviduct or Fallopian tube is the anatomical region where every new life begins in mammalian species. After a long journey, the spermatozoa meet the oocyte in the specific site of the oviduct named ampulla, and fertilization takes place.”

Coy et al., Roles of the oviduct in mammalian fertilization, REPRODUCTION 144(6):649 (Oct. 1, 2012) (emphasis added).

A survey asked over 5,500 biologists when human life begins and 96% of them agree that human life begins at the point of conception or fertilization.

All abortion zealots are cowards when it comes to discussing the beginning of a life. They don’t want any limits on abortion, wanting it for any reason at any time, right up to and beyond the moment of birth.

comment image

Last edited 2 years ago by TrumpWon

In this case, the judge is at least consistent in her radical views. Not only should the unborn not be protected but, when they have been allowed to live post abortion, it is ok to be a predator involving children of any age in heinous and horrific sex acts for the gratification of the sexually dysfunctional.

In the eyes of Democrats, apparently, you have to violate laws in order to get protection under the law.

This isn’t a speech from thirty years ago. It’s from January 20, 2020. She endorses a book that was foundational to critical race theory and made the case that, given the choice, whites would trade African-Americans away to space aliens and banish them from the universe.

These vindictive racists try desperately to justify their racism, but they always ignore the FACT that in the majority of cases, it was BLACKS that SOLD the first slaves to slave traders. So, are blacks inherently racist as well and would THEY sell whites (or other blacks) to extra-terrestrial aliens?

This is the problem with the CRT mindset and anyone with that ignorant and racist mindset needs to be kept as far away from the Supreme Court as is possible. Of course, this is EXACTLY what Democrats want, so their choices should be automatically rejected.

When both Cruz and Hawley went into deep dives questioning her rational for lenient sentencing the judge response she had not reviewed the cases. That is a bold face lie. Hawley had his tweet in the news for over a week. By saying she had nit familiarized herself with the two cases was a dodge of the questions. She is hiding something sinister and it is all the more reason the 48k pages of documents of her time on the US Sentencing Commission must be released.

As soon as a nominee begins to evade questions they they absolutely should know the answers to and have expressed opinions on it in the past, the hearings should close down and the nominee rejected. The purpose of the hearings is to delve into the nominee’s qualifications and when they refuse to discuss the evidence of their qualifications, the point is made. A great, big, resounding NO.

CRT is Brainwashing the youth with the same liberal Anti-Ameriocan way of thinking and parents should object more often to this PC Brainwashing that’s going on are the Schools and Collages

The nominee is in serious trouble. The cable networks are not even coving the hearings. Have to ask yourself why.

The nominee is in serious trouble. The cable networks are not even coving the hearings. Have to ask yourself why.

So they can describe how brutal, racist, cruel, aggressive, unfair all the Republicans were.

Oddly, I’ve seen plenty of live hearing coverage on CNN, with later recaps.

He needs the recaps cause he needs to be told his opinion on what he just saw.

This judge has no business on the Supreme Court. She is a threat to the safety of children.

Democrats are covering up her abysmal record.

Shouldn’t even be a judge.

You guys sure do like your pedophilia smears.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

You guys sure do like your pedophilia smears.

Well, there’s not much to compliment about pedophilia or pedophiles.

There’s not much to like about horse manure, either, yet it keeps being smeared around.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

She is your nominee. She is a perfect representative of the radical left.

Judge Jackson’s Nomination ‘Is Sad Day For America’

I can’t see that myself, but I don’t own a pair of “radical left” viewers. I never ordered X-Ray Specs when I was a kid, either.

There’s not much to like about horse manure, either, yet it keeps being smeared around.

Well, all you have to do is… STOP.

Senate Republicans aren’t actually assessing Jackson’s qualifications. They’re just hitting all of their base’s hot button issues to score cheap points ahead of the midterm elections. Maybe they can shoot down a black female Supreme Court nominee in the process. Her thinking on the bench might upset the delicate balance of the GOP’s universe.

greggie, if you look back on your recent posts and really understand what you wrote, one can easily understand why you qualify for the village idiot because of you wandering about babbling nonsense. You have no idea what is happening in the real world as you continue to live in your fairy land..

Senate Republicans aren’t actually assessing Jackson’s qualifications.

A qualification is to set personal ideology aside and make judgements based on the law. What we clearly see is that Jackson is not qualified in this regard. Idiot Biden’s puppets would not have selected Jackson is she was qualified in this regard. Checking boxes and racially scoreboarding doesn’t serve the people, it only panders for votes. Pandering for votes is all the Democrats are about.

Smears have no evidence, with is enabler there is enough to know protecting children or punishing those that cause them harm, isnt on her radar.
Kavanah was smeared.

Last edited 2 years ago by kitt

“If I decide right now that I’m a woman, then apparently, I’m a woman. Does that mean that I would have Article III standing to challenge a gender-based restriction?”

Check in your pants, Ted. What a dick this guy is.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

He isnt a biologist, that seems to be the standard.
This person just refusing to answer a pretty easy question define woman.

Cruz was stating what you leftists actually promote. Silly, isn’t it?

Trump still has Ted’s cojones in a jar on his desk.

“TRUUUUUUUUUUUUP! TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP! TRUUUUUUUUUUUP! TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP!”

The Liberty Daily? That’s a new horseshit hauler. “Straight-up Pedophile Apologism”. Hyperbole much?

Gee greg is the NYT a good source?
If so then Hunter Biden better hope that this person doesnt get to the supreme court so he can have his trial before her.
I know how lady Gaga got her gig at the installation ceremony or was blackmailed into it.

Davis: ‘This Is A Cover Up’ On Judge Jackson’s Unreleased Records

Last edited 2 years ago by TrumpWon

Why Ketanji Brown Jackson Is Not Qualified for Supreme Court

Ketanji Brown Jackson only needs to fulfill three qualifications to become one of the most powerful people in the world for the rest of her life: she must be a left-wing black woman. Let’s see if she qualifies.

Left-wing? Check. She sympathizes with degeneracy and depravity at the expense of children, just like abortion advocates and opponents of Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill, as Josh Hawley has documented:

Black? She certainly looks black. But from the liberal point of view, there is more to blackness than skin tone and ancestry. As Joe Biden croaked at the ostensibly black Charlamagne tha God, “I tell you if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.”

Ketanji Brown Jackson says she was inspired by Derrick Bell. Bell is the intellectually depraved Harvard Law professor credited with creating critical race theory, according to which America is inherently evil and so are white people. As an appeals court judge, she has said that CRT ideology ought to influence sentencing, presumably meaning that whites should have harsher sentences and blacks more lenient ones on the basis of their race.

Ketanji says she was also inspired by the 1619 Project, which endeavors to replace American history with a fictional account promoted by the New York Times, in which the Revolutionary War was fought not to preserve liberty but to suppress it on behalf of slavery. By embracing this malign and pernicious ideology, Ketanji Brown Jackson confirms that she is black even from the exclusive liberal viewpoint.

But is she a woman? Let’s see:

She can’t know if she is a woman if she does not know what a woman is. Since she cannot confirm that she is a woman, Ketanji Brown Jackson is not qualified to serve on the Supreme Court as a Democrat appointee.

I guess not being a biologist, she has no ability to make judgements on abortion issues either, huh?

It would stand to reason, yes…

Ketanji Jackson did not just hand out lenient sentences on sex crimes, she wrote about it at Harvard!
Ketanji Brown Jackson: Prevention Versus Punishment Toward a Principled Distinction in the Restraint of Rel… by Jim Hoft on Scribd

Democrats Nervous over Judge Jackson’s Apparent Lack of Preparation for Hearing
Democrats Nervous over Judge Jackson’s Apparent Lack of Preparation for Hearing (rumble.com)

Sources on capital hill are reporting that durbins office phones have melted down. Calls are for durbin to release the 48k pages of documents from the time jackson served on the US sentencing commission along with pre sentence documents from the seven cases where the judge dramatically sentenced below recommended guidelines as well as prosecutors recommendations.

The nominee is now in serious jeopardy and some say the nomination should be withdrawn.

Maybe she needs a tip…