by WILL JONES
Covid vaccine boosters in older people are killing one person for every 800 doses administered and should be withdrawn from use immediately, a leading vaccine scientist has said.
Dr. Theo Schetters, a vaccinologist based in the Netherlands who has played a leading role in the development of a number of vaccines, has analysed the official data from the Dutch Government and found a very close correlation between when fourth vaccine doses were administered in the country and the number of excess deaths, as shown in the chart below. Importantly, in the Netherlands the booster rollout in different regions was staggered over a number of weeks allowing an analysis by region, which confirms the effect.
Dr. Schetters, who is a recipient of the Medal of Honour of the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Montpellier in France, told Dr. Robert Malone, an inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, that medical doctors are currently seeing “all sorts of symptoms that they do not know what it is” and that “in the Netherlands now it’s very clear that there is a good correlation between the number of vaccinations that are given to people and the number of people that die within a week after that”. It is essential to look at all-cause mortality, he said, as the vaccine “potentially affects all organs”.
So it potentially affects all organs. And that’s what the medical doctors now see, they see all sorts of symptoms that they do not know what it is. And because the adverse effects are so not just single one adverse effect, but can be anything, they surface very difficult to a statistical level. And that’s why we do analysis on all cause mortality, because say, okay, and if we do not know what is exactly related to vaccination, of course, the coagulation problems, myocarditis, we know that, but there are many more things happening at the moment. And so that’s why we look at all cause mortality, and in the Netherlands now it’s very clear that there is a good correlation between the number of vaccinations that are given to people and the number of people that die within a week after that. So let’s say in this week we gave 10,000 vaccinations. Then in this week, we have something like 125 excess in death in that week.
The correlation is striking, he said, to the extent that if you have more vaccines in a week then you also have more excess deaths, and if you have fewer vaccines in a week, you have fewer deaths. Dr. Schetters says he has written to the Director of the Institute of Health in the Netherlands to alert him to the findings.
So what we’ve done is we have written a registered letter to the director of our Institute of Health and presenting the results and expressing my concerns. And just with the question, from a precautionary point of view, please reconsider vaccination strategy because I think this is a real warning. And so it’s not that everybody dies. Actually I do a rough calculation, it’s one in 800
During the interview, Dr. Malone explained that his own organisation, consisting of 17,000 medical practitioners and scientists, has released a statement that the vaccines should be withdrawn as they are no longer justified on a risk-benefit ratio, a statement with which Dr. Schetters agreed. Dr. Malone said:
I stand as the President of the International Association of Physicians and Medical Scientists. So we’re 17,000 that are only physicians and medical scientists, all verified, no nurses, not because we don’t like nurses, but it has to do with the positioning with the press and messaging. So that’s the basis for our organisation.
Months ago, we came out with a press conference in a clear unequivocal statement that one can find at www.globalcovidsummit.org, where we made a clear, unambiguous statement. In our opinion, as an organisation, these vaccines should be withdrawn. They are no longer justified on a risk-benefit ratio. And as the person who is responsible for the genesis of this technology, I’m often criticised. Didn’t I realise what I was doing? And there’s no way for me to have known that the normal standards for regulatory development and testing and clinical would be circumvented.
But I stand as someone who has intimate, detailed knowledge of the technology and its risks and benefits, the nature of the formulations, the role of the pseudouridine, all of those things.
It’s my opinion and that of the organisation that I represent, that the data are now sufficiently clear that, in our opinion, the ongoing campaign for vaccination is no longer warranted.
Dr. Schetters’ analysis is in line with the observations we have been making on the Daily Sceptic in recent weeks as we have been following what appears to be a correlation between the spring fourth dose booster rollout among over-75s in England and a wave of now over 11,000 non-Covid excess deaths that are currently unexplained (see the charts below).
The latest official data from the Office for National Statistics, released on Tuesday, show there have been 11,370 excess non-Covid deaths registered in England and Wales in the 13 weeks since April 23rd. If all of these were a result of the spring boosters (of which 4,182,483 have been delivered up to July 22nd) it would be a rate of one every 368 doses. That figure is an upper bound, of course, as not all the additional deaths will be due to the boosters, but it shows the U.K. data are broadly in line with the Netherlands data. Note that a higher vaccine injury rate would be expected in the U.K. where the fourth doses are only being given to the over-75s, as the rate increases with age.
In the week ending July 22nd, the most recent week for which data are available, 10,978 deaths were registered in England and Wales, which is 1,680 (18.1%) above the five-year average for the week. Of these, 745 mentioned COVID-19 on the death certificate as a contributory cause and 463 mentioned COVID-19 as underlying cause, leaving 1,217 deaths from a different underlying cause. Note that this was the week of the brief but intense heatwave (with recorded temperatures topping 40°C for the first time in some areas), so some of these will be heatwave deaths, as will many of the additional Covid deaths (being people who happened to have Covid at the time).
Deaths by date of occurrence rose dramatically in the most recent week, which might be assumed to be connected with the heatwave of July 18-19th. However, the data by date of occurrence show the spike occurring in the week ending July 15th, too soon for the heatwave. One explanation for this may be that the ONS uses a ‘statistical model’ to calculate death occurrences for recent weeks and this model may not cope well with unpredictable phenomena like heatwaves. If so, we should see adjustments in the next few reports as more real data become available. Note that the cause of the spike in non-Covid excess deaths during June remains unclear.
Here is the cumulative curve of excess non-Covid deaths by date of registration along with the cumulative total of spring boosters.
How much do they want to depopulate the Earth like they Zero Population radicals want. You might want to read Rainbow Six by Tom Clancy
Look at the “4th Vaccination 60+” graph.
The blue line—the number of 4th vaccinations—peaked between 10 and 15 weeks because of the COVID surge, which itself accounted for the red-line peak in excess deaths. The COVID surge was what motivated so many 60+ persons to get boosters to begin with. The booster rate wouldn’t have peaked if COVID and excess deaths had been rapidly falling.
As the peak in booster shots given passed and the rate of shots rapidly dropped. the red-line rate of excess deaths began to rise. At around week 21 excess deaths climbs above the booster administration rate. If you want evidence that boosters were holding the excess death rate down, you’re looking at it.
This is the same sort of deceptive misinterpretation of data that we see from climate change denialists.
greggie the epidemiologist now is the expert who is deciphering the COVID data. What a joke. greggie does not have all of the data and fails to show any confounding data, yet he considers his comments fact. The village idiot strikes again!!
What I said has to do with the logical interpretation of a simple graph, not special medical knowledge.
The “logic” of the article’s interpretation is bogus. It’s intentional deception. Most people don’t like being deceived.
I’ll correct a couple of things for clarity, not that it will help:
greg, I can see you never worked in anything involving stats, qualitative analysis, science, or trend data.
Just stay out of both Covid and Climate Change.
You don’t have the mind, or education, to give useful discourse on the topics.
De-Globalization started back in the 90s. Certain nations are now facing extinction, and they are throwing their “hail marys” to prevent that end, such as “climate change” (a totalitarian power-grab using bad data and false-fear), and Covid (A man-made virus released from a nation we can’t ever get real facts from that was meant to re-shift the world order, among many things).
In short, the Swiss and the Germans are f*cked. This is their desperate move to keep the 20th Century Liberal World Order (by naming it something else).
I notice you haven’t explained the errors in my logic. You never do.
The 4th Booster graph clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the COVID boosters.
The vaccination booster rate increased dramatically in response to the Omicron surge.
The excess death surge—which always lags behind a spike in the rate of infection—rapidly fell off as a result of the increased vaccination rate.
As the increased booster rate fell off, the excess death rate rebounded. As the as the booster rate continued to fall, the excess death rate continued to climb.
The rising death rate is due in part to the fine public service work that moronic anti-vaccination propagandist are doing.
By the way, ivermectin and hydroxychloroqine have now been shown to be worthless at reducing COVID hospitalizations and deaths. People died because Trump and assorted profiteering social media goofballs pushed that nonsense to his adoring audience. Add that to the long list of reasons why Trump should NEVER be trusted.
greggie the village idiot, if it is snowed in Colorado last week (happened) then the graft showing the temperature shows global warming is over using your logic!
Hey we told you so, and were banned from SM, beware there is lots more.
Actually greggie, you continue to exceed as the village idiot. There are many studies and actual treatment that showed the effectiveness, but those studies have been deleted from the major media sites. They were effective treatments when included with a cocktail of zinc, antibiotics and a few other ingredients. The left and the big pharma and the AMA prevented the use. It was real doctors who treated real patients and not people with degrees who never treated patients who discovered the effective treatment. It was the MRNA “vaccine” that was fake. It didn’t prevent people from getting COVID , did not minimize the effects of COVID and did not instill active immunity as a person who actually was not vaccinated and got COVID. The CDC and the scarf lady have admitted this. You are wrong again greggie.
The studies were deleted because on peer review they were found to be seriously flawed. They’re the same studies that set off the viral hydroxychloroquine/ivermectin mania on social media.
Multiple rigorously conducted double blind studies have since showed both drugs to be ineffective at reducing COVID death and hospitalization rates.
The one individual that I personally knew who refused vaccination and later treated her worsening COVID symptoms with telemarketed hydroxychloroquine died in the hospital a couple of weeks later.
All vaccines carry a small degree of risk, but the risk of being hospitalized or dying from what they can protect you against is MUCH greater.
Stupidity can kill, too. No one suggests self-diagnosing and treating with hcq. It is also affective early in the infection, just as with ivermectin. But, of course, you know that, you simply prefer to continue lying about it.
Yeah, all vaccines have risks and these were created in haste to address a deadly pandemic. They were designed to treat COVID19, not all the unknown variants that came after. Just as the variants proved less harmful than the original, so the vaccine was less effective against the variants. Thus, the balance between benefit and harm narrowed sharply.
The vaccine was also not intended for young, healthy people. This idiot regime mandating everyone, down to 3 year olds, to be vaccinated was gross negligence and stupidity, even as the knowledge of the possible, if not likely, harmful effects became more and more obvious.
“Multiple rigorously conducted double blind studies have since showed both drugs to be ineffective at reducing COVID death and hospitalization rates.”
Incorrect. The government used compromised agencies to falsely give “studies” that lied to us and promoted the emergency-authorization situation we simply didn’t have.
It’s scientific fact that HQC and Ivermectin work.
Hundreds of thousands of people in America alone could have been saved.
Remind me again why we doubt the left’s version of “experts”?
No greggie, the flawed studies were those that were concerning applications in the latter stages of COVID. The government and CDC started out with the “miracle MRNA vaccine” that didn’t work. They recommended putting patients on ventilators and people died of bacterial pneumonia. The hydroxychloroquine/ivermectin were highly effective as a therapy as soon as COVID was identified. There is quite a number of successful therapies performed by doctors who actually treat patients. There are whole countries that used these therapies successfully. It is your government that lied about the effectiveness of the MRNA vaccine, the masks and the initial treatments and you still believe them.
At some point, like the CDC, all those who denounced viscerally the HCQ and ivermectin treatments as if they were promoted as miracle cures will relent to the evidence and admit, “Yeah, we kinda got it a little wrong… about EVERYTHING.”
People have to do their own research and not rely on the “official line” about HCQ and ivermectin treatments.
One thing I learned about both of those treatments is that, to work, one, or the other must be used as soon as possible after symptoms appear.
In my case I felt funny/bad and tested myself for covid.
Came back positive and took my ivermectin right then, plus for the entire 5 day course.
My symptoms were 100% gone in three days and I tested negative after the 5th day.
The neighbor who infected me last June was a 4-jab taker who looked at ivermectin as “horse paste.”
She’s STILL sick.
Side note, some of Bankman-Fried’s ill-gotten gains he used to spread false stories against ivermectin. The NYT definitively stated that Ivermectin is ineffective against COVID-19. The study they cited was funded by Samuel Bankman-Fried. Dem donor and globalist elitist wannabe.
Though I’m sure it’s not where it originated, I first heard of the use of ivermectin to treat COVID from farmers and ranchers. Unlike idiots who hear about such treatments and think, “If a little is good, a LOT would be GREAT!”, they are well versed on how to dose based on weight. It would be very easy to convert a treatment for a 2,000 lb animal to a 180 lb animal (a human). Farmers and ranchers are also used to self-diagnosis and treatment, as they can’t take a few days off to get better; they have to work every day, something leftists have no understanding of the concept.
Yeah, my brother would treat himself with penicillin from the feed store when he began to feel like the flu or a cold. He even gave me a shot once and, yeah, it knocked the early flu symptoms in the dirt. Of course, you can’t be an idiot and do that, but it’s called “self reliance”, another concept foreign to leftists.
Meanwhile, back in reality: Covid-19 vaccines have saved more than 3 million lives in US, study says
Countries with the lowest vaxx have the lowest death tolls.
Such a correlation doesn’t imply causation.
Spread is naturally slower and infection rates lower when a nation’s population is less urban and less mobile; less urban and less mobile, generally speaking, also describes nations that have have lower vaccination rates. You can only make valid statistical comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated outcomes when those factors are the only significant differences. Otherwise, you don’t really know what you’re comparing.
Collected data has consistently demonstrated that the rates of serious illness, hospitalization, and death are significantly lower among those who have been vaccinated. This is an observed, quantifiable effect. Calculating the mathematical degree of that effect allows statisticians to project what the likely toll would have been, if no one at all had been vaccinated.
name some of those studies greggie!
From the National Center for Studies That Provide Results Skewed For Political Purposes
The facts are this:
Pharma was keen on trying out a new technology, mRNA, but had no ability or reason to use such a new and experimental drug en mass. It’s genetic in nature, so they needed a crisis to exploit.
Enter the intentionally released Covid-19 virus.
From there, the US and other government illegally suppressed reliable treatments such as Ivermectin and HCQ so they could force the “vaccine.”
MILLIONS DIED BECAUSE OF THIS.
The crimes against humanity committed by pharma and their government cucks are fact. They will be prosecuted, and punished, in time.
No amount of your lies, greg, will put this false-narrative of yours back into the heads of Billions of world citizens who know the truth now.
YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, AND WORKING FOR OUR ENEMY.
greg is completely full of shit. One does not need to be blind, deaf and dumb to realize the poster aka greg is not a serious contributor. greg is a paid troll designed to bring disinformation to an otherwise truthful discussion.
German Data Analyst Reveals Data from Health Insurance Shows 4 Times Increase in Sudden Deaths Following COVID Vaccine Rollouts
The real question I have is why this sh*t-stain greg is still pushing a debunked narrative that no one believes anymore.
Are these people that desperate?
The Covid attack on the globe is exactly what it appeared to be. These people ARE what they look like.
greg’s on the wrong side of this.
The absurdity of what you people have unleashed — a new informational warfare that’s predicated on your lying to normal people — is diabolical, at it’s core.
We KNOW the “vaccine” was not as billed, and it’s still killing thousands.
Meanwhile, Pharma has reaped TRILLIONS as a result of this farce.
That could be true. Those nations made full use of ivermectin and HCQ, so that could be the reason for fewer deaths.
The reality is that we know our enemy now and are fighting to take them down.
Covid was released intentionally, and millions died because reliable antivirals weren’t used.
The vaccine wasn’t very effective, and we know this now.
Releasing viruses, rigging elections, starting wars.
This illegal regime of ours is the culprit, fascistic and wrong.
And ask yourself WHY create an utterly new TYPE of vaccine when the old type works great?
Old vaccines use a live or dead virus incubated inside a chicken egg.
Look at this chart:
Chicken and eggs are the highest food items listed for price inflation under joe.
joe wants us eating bugs, not poultry.
The poultry industry has been under attack by joe.
Billions of chickens have been killed by joe’s admin.
joe wants eggs to be a thing of the past.
So, joe needed some other type of vaccine that doesn’t rely on eggs.
mRNA “vaccines” were developed by the elite globalists like Bill Gates and the WEF more to bypass eggs than to help protect people from disease.
The fact that mRNA “vaccines don’t work was a feature (not a bug) because culling humans off the planet was the true goal, as is getting rid of poultry and forcing bugs into people’s diet.
Don’t forget 81% of all bugs grown for human consumption have parasites that hurt humans.
(Ivermectin is good for that, btw.)
Hey, remind me again who was responsible for bringing those vaccines online. Remember when idiot Biden, Kamala, Pelosi and any other Democrat with a mouth denounced the vaccines?