Corrupt Mueller Gang’s Russia Scandal Falls Flat – At Least They Learned Not to Indict a Russian Company This Time

Loading

It’s clear that the corrupt Mueller team intentionally held a press conference with corrupt Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein at the helm to squash the devastation from yesterday’s Congressional Hearing with Peter Strzok.  Their ill-timed presser came as the President was meeting with the Queen of England and only days before the President meets with the Putin, the Head of Russia.  It didn’t work.

The most corrupt Deputy AG in US history, Rod Rosenstein, announced he was holding a press conference just hours after his former investigator, Peter Strzok met with Congress.  The presser no doubt was timed to deflate the incriminating Congressional Hearing where Strzok looked more like a demon than the choir boy he hoped to portray.



Strzok failed miserably yesterday to convince anyone that he is anything but guilty of the numerous crimes instigated by the Deep State involving the Hillary email scandal, the Russia collusion scandal and the Mueller witch hunt.  Because of this, Mueller’s corrupt Special Counsel decided to again make an effort to change the headlines.  The Mueller team has done this repeatedly as the news of its corruption has been unearthed.  The Mueller gangsters this time opted to hold a press conference rather than release fake news leaks, many of which the President claims in the past were not even true.

The Mueller team uses the fake news MSM as cover and they oblige through reporting leaked stories from the Mueller team.  Their efforts have to date been to keep the fake news narrative running that President Trump colluded with Russia during the 2016 election to steal the election.  To date there is no evidence that this is the case, but yesterday’s Strzok Hearing provided plenty of evidence that Strzok, the Deep State, Democrats, the Hillary campaign, the Obama Administration and the MSM all colluded with Russia to take down the Trump campaign and later Presidency.

Strzok was horrible when claiming that he was a patriot rather than a villain during the Hearing.  He claimed that he could be trusted, in spite of the numerous texts to the contrary, to independently and objectively investigate Hillary and Trump.  The far-left angry inspector let Hillary off in her email scandal with no indictments in spite of evidence of numerous crimes but went after President Trump with a vengeance in spite of evidence of no crimes.  Strzok also expected to be believed in spite of carrying on an affair with a fellow FBI employee using government laptops and phones to carry on the tryst.

So in an effort to overshadow another of President Trump’s successful and historical events overseas, the corrupt Mueller cabal decided to hold a presser today.  The purpose of the presser, like the only other presser of note provided by the Deep State operatives, was to indict some Russians no one has heard of.  This comes only a few days before President Trump meets with Russian President Putin.

It’s unusual for the Obama Administration’s DOJ or FBI or the current team in these entities, as well as the Mueller team to hold a press conference.  Most news reported from these entities are leaked to the media.  The DOJ IG’s reports on McCabe and the Clinton Email Scandal include numerous incidents of leaks being provided to the MSM from these entities.  This culture of corruption started under Obama and continues to this day.  It’s ironic during today’s presser, that the corrupt DAG felt compelled to state that most the leaks to date have not come from the Mueller gang – leaving out who could have possibly leaked the reports if not the Mueller team.

Corrupt DAG Rosenstein claimed today that another batch of Russians that no one has ever heard of are being indicted for messing with the US election.  After the many months of lies, leaks and criminal actions, the DAG’s message went flat.  No one believes these Deep State fabricators anymore.   Strzok was the last straw and he showed that he is possibly the most dishonest and corrupt FBI agent in US history.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It’s my understanding that the DNC never let the FBI examine the server in question. The DNC had a company THEY paid to examine it make the determination as to what happened, so I’m SURE they got the straight skinny no matter who it makes look bad… as long as it wasn’t Democrats.

Now, if Trump doesn’t cuff Putin and bring him in, he will be described as “protecting” him.

We’ve heard nothing about the Concord Management case and the indictment against the original 13 Russians. They were supposed to return to court to try the case on July 9, but there has been a total news blackout. It should have been thrown out due to lack of evidence. That would completely discredit the Mueller investigation. Instead, we now hear about another 12 Russians being indicted. Are they trying to make us forget about the original phony indictments?

@Angel Artiste:

We’ve heard nothing about the Concord Management case and the indictment against the original 13 Russians.

Well, all you were SUPPOSED to hear about it was that there was indictments and that was supposed to make you forget about the damaging IG report. Concord sort of screwed that up, though, by foolishly wanting to defend themselves. No doubt there have been delays filed, which will be followed by more delays. This will continue until the purpose of the “investigation”, swinging the elections to the Democrats. Then they can say, “Oops, sorry.”

@Deplorable Me:
No, the judge in this case appeared to dismiss requested delays by Mueller, in favor of the “speedy trial” right of the defendant. Mueller does not seem to have any credible evidence to convict. I want to know the result of the hearing on July 9, but it seems as though it has been completely hidden. Obviously, this helps Mueller, who would be thoroughly embarrassed and discredited if the case is dismissed.

Corrupt Mueller Gang’s Russia Scandal Falls Flat – At Least They Learned Not to Indict a Russian Company This Time

Article titles as propaganda memes. . . Why even bother attaching an article?

“It’s clear that…”

No it isn’t, Mr. Hoft. Nor is there a single bit of informational content or reasoned argument in however many words you’ve wasted. It’s all attitude. The unspoken message is that the reader should Think like this.

This sort of garbage is going to turn any independent thinkers who might still remain in the pro-Trump audience at this point into a dump truck load of doorknobs. Which, I suppose, is the entire point.

@Greg: Oh… so the trial commenced?

@Greg: Would those be the antique doorknobs that the Clinton staff stole from the White House?

@Kitt: Yeah, but they gave them back when they got caught, so that makes them liberal-honest.

@Deplorable Me: Nope General Services Administration estimated that it cost $3,750 to $4,675 to replace missing doorknobs, medallions and office signs and the large presidential seal, Hillary and Slick had to return some of the things they took. It was only part of the14k in damages done by staffers with as much respect as most democrats have for the peoples house.

Putin should demand the evidence of meddling so he can prosecute and punish those intell people, like we did when someone here spent tax dollars to interfere with Isreals election.

@Kitt: Or like we are punishing those who fabricated “evidence” to interfere in our own election. The left regards them as heroes and, though partially exposed and weakened a bit, the deep state is still in operation. So far, the only one of that conspiracy that has been punished is Hillary and her punishment was losing an election. Nothing more than that.

The stories you heard about the 12 Russians yesterday took place during the Obama Administration, not the Trump Administration.

Why didn’t they do something about it, especially when it was reported that President Obama was informed by the FBI in September, before the Election?

A few sanctions and the expelling of a few diplomats is NOT the same as indictments!

@Nanny G: Obama took strong, decisive action. Remember? He told Putin, in a speech, to “cut it out.” I think that is what might be called being “more flexible”.

Trump Walks in Front of Queen Elizabeth, Causing Social Media Frenzy

The man is as dumb as a box of rocks. A doorknob would be several steps up the evolutionary ladder.

These Russian individuals did their work during the Obama years. Why didn’t Obama do something about it? Because he thought Crooked Hillary Clinton would win, that’s why. Had nothing to do with the Trump Administration, but Fake News doesn’t want to report the truth, as usual!

11:17 AM – 14 Jul 2018

They’re not “individuals,” you frickin’ nincompoop. They’re all known members of Putin’s Russian intelligence service. They were following the orders of the man you’ll soon be meeting with.

Why didn’t Obama do something about it? I agree. Obama should have done something. He should have made all of the entirely legitimate concerns about you, your campaign staff, and the existence of the FBI and intelligence community investigations public before the election. He should have swatted you like a fly. Then we wouldn’t be reading an imbecilic stream of lying Twitter posts, and you could be happily ripping off unsuspecting investors and stiffing contractors instead of kicking our nation’s institutions, honor, critical alliances, and economic stability to pieces.

He didn’t. That pretty much shoots down your “deep state” conspiracy bullshit, doesn’t it? What sort of “conspiracy” fails to do the one easiest and most obvious thing that would have virtually assured attaining the goal you attribute to it?

@Greg:

They’re not “individuals,” you frickin’ nincompoop. They’re all known members of Putin’s Russian intelligence service.

And that makes Obama’s inaction and Susan Rice’s stand down order better?

Obama was working to slip Hillary over on the American people. Outing the Russians, with whom Hillary had a really “close” and “profitable” “working relationship”, would have muddied the waters.

Hillary was supposed to win and then all of this was to be swept under the rug. Poof. Gone.

So, is Trump walking in front of the Queen a high crime or misdemeanor?

Now, before you go off on a rant about how embarrassing this is, let me tell you what is embarrassing: having a criminal like Hillary still exerting influence upon the justice system, something she flaunted, ignored and abused. Seeing how our justice system, the FBI and the intelligence community has been turned into a leftist political tool for all the world to see.

Obama and Hillary embarrassed the entire nation before the entire world.

So an I -Pod of his speeches would be better? lol Is hugging the queen protocol?
You forget so fast

Melania Trump Greets Vets, Plays Lawn Bowls with Children in Visit to UK

Awww… did some silly socialist Brits think our President should bow before their Queen? No head of state is obliged to treat another head of state as his/her superior. I can’t recall any America-loving President bowing to anyone.

@DaNang67: Doubting everything reported by the media, I looked at the video. It appears to me the Queen directed Trump where to stand and he moved to that position, which put him in front of her when they proceeded to inspect the guard.

Meanwhile, back home, a seditious plot to destroy a legally and duly elected President was in progress.

@DaNang67, #18:

Elizabeth was a sovereign head of state before Donnie Boy was out of first grade. He was a guest in her home and a guest in her country. The man is a national embarrassment. Small wonder that a quarter-of-a-million turned out in London to protest his presence.

@Greg: You stress about the dumbest shit, stress this Mrs Sarah Sanders had tea with the queen.
Mueller has nothing I hope all the defendants show up and he is embarassed AGAIN.

@Deplorable Me:

Meanwhile, back home, a seditious plot to destroy a legally and duly elected President was in progress.

Investigating a president for possible collusion with a hostile foreign power that was engaging in illegal activities to help get him elected isn’t sedition.

@Greg:

Investigating a president for possible collusion with a hostile foreign power that was engaging in illegal activities to help get him elected isn’t sedition.

It is when the investigating parties KNOW there was never any collusion. How do they know? Because THEY invented the story.

@Deplorable Me: Doesnt matter there is nothing they are just attempting to poison the well They are running out of ways to cover their asses. I would love to see if the texts demon guy withheld might contain the word assassination.

Mueller’s New Indictment of the Russian Hackers Is Full of Clues About Connections to Trump World

Interesting timeline. So far, details from the various indictments have provided the only real clues regarding the overall picture Mueller is putting together. He may lay everything out for public scrutiny without ever confronting Trump directly, leaving it up to Congress to either take appropriate action or suffer the political consequences of failing to do so.

@Greg:

As Slate’s Ben Mathis-Lilley pointed out, one seemingly noteworthy effort came when the Russians attempted to hack Hillary Clinton’s “personal office” on the same day Donald Trump publicly stated he hoped Russia would hack Clinton’s emails.

Second sentence. Gigantic lie. So, that’s where I punched out. If I wanted to get lies, I would visit the same sites you do.

I seem to remember when I provided you with the FBI stating Hillary’s emails had been hacked numerous times that you wanted PROOF. (?) OK, so where is the PROOF Trump or anyone in his campaign colluded with Russians? The left has been on this since 2015 and Trumps lines were tapped and his campaign infiltrated long before anyone made the false allegation and anyone in the campaign would have been warned and covered any evidence of it. Where is any proof anyone should even be suspicious? I mean, it’s not like he approved the sale of US uranium to a Russian-controlled company right after Melania got a half million dollars for a “speech”, so where is even the suspicion to be suspicious?

There isn’t any. Everyone but liberals know this and that is why articles such as your silly Slate piece has to lie in the first paragraph.

A LOT of people are also wondering why the only people who get indicted for anything related to the campaign and election are NEVER going to be brought to trial. THAT’S somewhat curious, isn’t it? Also, how well would a trial based on “evidence” provided by the DNC (not the FBI’s own analysis) go? Talk about something no prosecutor would touch… guaranteed embarrassment. Why would the DOJ even bother with such nonsense?

Well, the elections are getting closer and Mueller struck out; he’s been fanned repeatedly, so all he can produce it theater. Theater for the idiots. Enjoy the show.

@Greg: An indictment is an accusation, his first Russian Indictments were so air tight with evidence…right? We were all sitting on the edge of our seats for the trial of the century 24/7 news coverage, the Perry Mason moment where Trump rushes into the courtroom and confesses.

@Deplorable Me, #26:

OK, so where is the PROOF Trump or anyone in his campaign colluded with Russians?

That’s Robert Mueller’s work in progress. The fact that it’s very likely there to be found is the reason republicans are so desperate to undermine his investigation. Mueller most likely knows what the proof will be already. We won’t know until he’s ready to present it.

There’s nothing the least bit corrupt about Robert Mueller. Rot is the subject of his inquiry.

@Greg: If it is a “work in progress”, why do you keep referring to unproven accusations as fact? Mueller is, in fact looking for a CRIME, not a perpetrator. As shown, there is not even enough real suspicion to be suspicious, unless you are a whiny sky-screamer still butt-hurt over a lost election.

This is why Mueller employs so much theater and leaks to keep the interest of the ignorant high.

@Deplorable Me, #29:

As shown, there is not even enough real suspicion to be suspicious, unless you are a whiny sky-screamer still butt-hurt over a lost election.

Yeah, that would certainly explain unprecedented FBI surveillance authorized on multiple occasions by FISA judges, the appointment of an independent Special Counsel, multiple warrants authorizing searches and the seizure of evidence, a campaign manager in jail as an international flight risk, a growing list of indictments and guilty pleas, and the coordinated efforts by Congressional republicans, the Trump administration, and their pet media outlets to discredit the FBI, our intelligence community, the Department of Justice, Robert Mueller, and anyone else daring to look into the matter.

Meanwhile, Trump seems oddly well disposed toward the boss of the 12 indicted Russian intelligence officers accused of orchestrating attacks against our democratic election process, not particularly upset by his annexation of Ukrainian territory, and ill-disposed toward our NATO allies, who consider Russia one of their biggest worries.

It was on Putin’s behalf that Trump’s former campaign manager was indirectly working during earlier elections in Ukraine. Viktor Yanukovych was Putin’s boy.

There’s nothing in any of that to arouse suspicions? Please. The situation demands full investigation. There’s never before been a situation like this.

@Greg: He has nothing perhaps Trump will request from Putin the defendants show up to court, if it is like the first super Trial of the century will you still believe?

@Greg:

Yeah, that would certainly explain unprecedented FBI surveillance authorized on multiple occasions by FISA judges, the appointment of an independent Special Counsel, multiple warrants authorizing searches and the seizure of evidence, a campaign manager in jail as an international flight risk, a growing list of indictments and guilty pleas, and the coordinated efforts by Congressional republicans, the Trump administration, and their pet media outlets to discredit the FBI, our intelligence community, the Department of Justice, Robert Mueller, and anyone else daring to look into the matter.

Yeah, my point exactly. Based on WHAT? Carter Page’s trip to Russia? He was the focus, the genesis of all this and he has not been charged with a single crime. Why not?

Early morning FBI raids with guns drawn… of the residences and businesses of people already COOPERATING FULLY with the investigation. Cheap theater anyone? The same goes for putting Manafort in jail for an indictment. False imprisonment? More theater? Distraction from the IG revelations that the investigation is driven by a steady diet of pro-Hillary/anti-Trump bias?

How many “guilty pleas” and indictments have ANYTHING to do with Trump or his campaign? Oh yeah… that would be NONE. NOTHING. ZIP. NADA. LESS THAN ZERO. Mueller is a theatrical player in search of a crime, and though a blind squirrel can find a nut, Mueller can’t find ANYTHING.

Because there is NOTHING there, which they knew beyond any doubt from the beginning. The purpose of the investigation is the investigation.

Meanwhile, Trump seems oddly well disposed toward the boss of the 12 indicted Russian intelligence officers accused of orchestrating attacks against our democratic election process, not particularly upset by his annexation of Ukrainian territory, and ill-disposed toward our NATO allies, who consider Russia one of their biggest worries.

You keep citing “indictments” as if they were convictions. I direct your attention to the first indicted party that showed up for trial. Mueller ran screaming from the room, never dreaming any of these foreign parties would show up for trial. Why does he keep indicting people he has no intention of bringing to trial? How many acts does this cheap play have?

I would suggest you get your information from somewhere besides the Soros News Network. Trump STRENGTHENED NATO by getting them all to commit more to the common defense. Did Putin ask him to make NATO stronger? He also chastised Merkel for making RUSSIA stronger by entering into a pipeline deal that will provide Putin with billions of dollars in trade. Is he opposed to that because Putin told him to be?

There’s nothing in any of that to arouse suspicions? Please. The situation demands full investigation. There’s never before been a situation like this.

True. Nothing. It is 100% politically driven by the left. Now, it HAS been investigated fully. It’s time for the crybabies to admit, completely, that they was no collusion, there never was any collusion and there never was any viable SUSPICION of collusion (except by Obama, Hillary and the DNC). No, there has never been a situation like this; the left invented something totally new.

@Kitt: NOTHING will even satisfy the left. Look at their electoral prospects… what are they going to do, run Hillary again? They have nothing but phony conspiracies and trying to keep hatred alive and strong to motivate their useful idiots.

@Greg: These trials serve the rest of us well; they keep the under-thinking, over-speaking bigots like you preoccupied.

Meanwhile, in America:
1. Best economy in decades.
2. Obamacare taken down.
3. Treasonous Paris Climate Accords pulled out of.
4. Iran Deal destroyed.
5. NK deal made.
6. Hardball with Putin established (the libs don’t get it, but they wouldn’t would they).
7. Europe told to pay up.
8. Invasions across our border now being handled.
9. Dems showing how corrupt their party is while trying to reveal corruption in other organizations…

Best two years of a first term presidency, ever.

But yes, Greg…it’s a tragedy. Can’t wait to go back to a Dem President slow jamming on SNL and bowing to minor nations.

Early morning FBI raids with guns drawn…

…didn’t actually happen as described. Nobody had guns drawn on anybody. They were armed with warrants.

@Greg: Um hum. Says who? And why was that even necessary when both Manafort and Cohen were cooperating fully? Why didn’t Mueller just ASK for whatever he wanted? Why is Manafort in jail? He has only been indicted and his passport has been confiscated.

Theater. Enjoy the show, Greg.

And why was that even necessary when both Manafort and Cohen were cooperating fully?

Oh, no doubt they were. Those who commit white-collar crimes always cooperate fully when investigated.

@Greg: Well, let’s pretend for a moment you are not a liberal and this was a fact-driven argument. Where are the examples of them failing to appear, pleading the 5th, destroying phones and laptops and withholding requesting documents?