Donald Douglas:
“Life in post-racial America,” via Instapundit.
At the New Orleans Times-Picayune, “Mississippi man beaten after he’s warned restaurant wasn’t safe for whites, witness says.”
And at USA Today, “Witness: Beaten man told eatery ‘not safe for whites’.”
Also at Fire Andrea Mitchell, “Courtez McMillian beats West Point Marine Ralph Weems in Michael Brown revenge racist attack.”
Witness: Beaten man told eatery ‘not safe for whites’
They are calling it a “Michael Brown revenge attack.” Note that white victim Weems had already entered the establishment when his friend Knighten was warned by man outside “that it wasn’t a safe place for whites, because people were upset by the killing of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo.” Clearly, the man outside knew that there were a number of blacks inside had previously made it known that they wanted to commit “vengeance” on a white. How can this possibly be called “revenge” when it was an innocent veteran who was confronted by these thugs, then followed, attacked and beaten. And how can they possibly claim it is not a “hate crime” when the whole reason for these thug’s actions was to specifically target an unsuspecting white as the recipient of a racist mob’s “social justice.”
With races reversed, this is no different than the KKK of the last century attacking innocent blacks for “being black” and in the wrong place at the wrong time. Of course it’s a “racially motivated hate crime!”
As I have noted, Eric Holder has stated that there is no such thing as a black on white hate crime.
@DrJohn#2 – Then Mr Holder needs to explain to me and to the American people how, by virtue of being in a minority, you are somehow above being a racist. That a black person attacking a white person is not a racist act, when it is the opposite, white attacking a black it automatically constitutes as a hate or racial crime.
I think America needs to hear this explanation. Especially those of the white persuasion who have had family members murdered, robbed, raped, beaten by blacks.
If he cannot then he needs to undergo psychoanalysis or a psychiatric evaluation to prove he can handle his most important position in a lucid manner.