Alexander Vindman timeline related to the effort to impeach Trump

Loading

Thread via Truth Ninja

Link to an overall timeline related to the effort to impeach Trump over the Ukraine “call”.
 
Let’s be clear, we are simply laying out a timeline that calls for investigation, not implying “guilt”.
 
To those who don’t want the big picture, here are the specifics regarding Vindman. It starts with Burisma and an organization called The US Ukraine Business Council (USUBC). Top players in the USUBC are Michael Bleyzer and Tom Firestone. (2)
 
Michael Bleyzer is a Soviet/Ukrainian born energy billionaire out of Houston. He was a top donor to Rick Perry and has a long donor/law firm relationship with Rudy Giuliani. Firestone is a former EDNY Prosecutor. Burisma was a donor/chair holder at USUBC. (3)
 
Tom Firestone worked for a legal firm Baker & McKenzie (also associated with USUBC). The mysterious “Zelensky lobbyist”, Marcus Cohen is also purported to have worked at the same law firm as Firestone. Cohen met with Alexander Vindman on several occasions as a lobbyist. (4)
 
Vindman first met with Cohen on 4/15/19. On 5/20/19 Vindman is in Ukraine with Perry/Volker/Sondland for Zelensky’s inauguration. (5)
 
*It should be noted that at this point Marie Yovanovitch has been recalled. It is later noted that she conducted numerous meetings and presentations with USUBC, including meetings where she worked directly with Vadym Pozharsky of Burisma. (6)
 
**Pozharsky was Hunter Biden’s top contact at Burisma. Burisma also became a client of Hunter’s law firm Boies, Schiller, Flexner, and of Blue Star Strategies, owned by former Clintonites Sally Painter and Karen Tramantano. (7)
 
***One more interesting side bar is that Tom Firestone (USUBC/BakerMcKenzie/EDNY) worked at EDNY at the same time as Burisma attorney John Buretta. Buretta would end up getting all cases against Burisma closed after Biden had Shokin removed. (8)
 
****Lastly in regards to EDNY, Firestone and Buretta were both there at the same time as current Special Counsel, Jack Smith. (9)
 
5/19/19, Yuriy Lutsenko, Shokin’s replacement who dropped all charges against Burisma, claims there is no evidence of any wrong doing by the Bidens. (10)
 
This sets off the media misdirection that Ukraine couldn’t have been showing bias because there was never an investigation of “Hunter Biden”. No one ever claimed this. But Burisma was benefiting the Bidens, hence the potential concern for Joe Biden. (11)
 
5/??/19 Nazar Kholodyntsky, head of Ukraine’s Anti-Corruption unit tells Rudy Giuliani that the Burisma investigation should be reopened. (12)
 
7/10/19 After a meeting concerning asking for Ukraine’s help to investigate Burisma and the 2016 election, Vindman contacts “NSC lawyers”. Fiona Hill (later associated with Dossier source Igor Danchenko) does the same. (13)
 
7/10/19 William Taylor tells Ukrainian officials that Giuliani has told him a call between Trump and Zelensky is unlikely to happen. (14)
 
7/25/19 At the strong urging of Rick Perry, Trump calls Zelensky and discuss the DNC server hack and the Biden’s ties to corruption via Burisma. Alexander Vindman is listening to the call and is suspected to later tell CIA Agent Eric Ciaramella. (15)
 
*It should be noted that Perry benefactor Michael Bleyzer is vehemently anti-Trump. Perry will later recommend that Bleyzer be seated on the board of Ukrainian Naftogaz. A month after the Perry Ukriane trip, Bleyzer received a lucrative 50 year drilling contract in Ukraine. (16)
 
**During the inauguration trip, Vindman claims he was approached multiple times to become the Defense Minister of Ukraine. Claiming it would have been a “great honor” (17)
 
Vindman in his impeachment testimony would again and again make the case that Trump was proposing an illegal quid pro quo by withholding military aid to Ukraine. Apparently ignorant to the fact Biden had used this tactic numerous times during the Obama Administration. (18)
 
The questions remain:
 
1: What happened and what was discussed between Marcus Cohen and Alexander Vindman during the various lobbying sessions. Sessions that would take place 1 month before traveling to meet Zelensky? (19)
2: Is Vindman associated with or connected to Michael Bleyzer, Tom Firestone, Burisma (or any execs), John Buretta or anyone from USUBC, which was funded by Burisma, while he was sabotaging Trump’s investigation into Burisma? (20)
3: What was Vindman’s relationship with Ciaramella before, during, and after “the call”? Why would he use Ciaramella? Why choose a CIA Analyst who had previously attempted to leak Trump information for a previous impeachment attempt? (21)
4: What was Vindman’s relationship with Fiona Hill or Brookings Institute? Did he have any knowledge of or participation with the Steele Dossier? Did he know Igor Danchenko? (22)
5: What were Vindman’s contact or associations with Adam Schiff or anyone on his staff, before during or after “the call”? (23)
6: Was Vindman at any time associated with or in communication with Sam Vinograd, who would allegedly recommend Mark Zaid as the attorney for Eric Ciaramella? Vinograd, a friend of Adam Schiff via Aspen Institute. (24)
7: Did Vindman ever attend or have any association with Aspen Institute? The Atlantic Counsel, or any NGO associated with Burisma, impeachment, etc.? (end)
8: Also, will Vindman discuss what him and Perry talked about during the inauguration trip? Was there ever talk of setting up Trump? Perry URGING Trump to call, Vindman being on the line…seems very coincidental.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

vindman is a scumbag. He is guilty o sedition and should be sent to prison.
The new Congress needs to investigate his involvement in a sham impeachment of President Trump that was without cause.

Another lowlife creature lower then a snake in a wagon rut

The bottom line is that the Democrats thought idiot Biden’s stupid admission of extortion of Ukraine was so corrupt that it would be wonderful if they could accuse Trump of it. They used Trump’s totally benign conversation with Zelenski as their pretext.

Soon everyone will see WHY idiot Biden needed to be investigated. Far too late, though.

Years ago while driving I was listening to a talk show. I heard this guy blathering wildly about how the U.S. should be helping Ukraine. He explained that his family came from Ukraine and now he was in the U.S. military. All he talked about was how the U.S. was letting Ukraine down and we needed to send money to them. He was introduced as Alexander Vindman. My first thought was “Hell, man, your in the U.S. military. Why are you pimping for another nation?”

I later learned Ukraine was the most corrupt nation in Europe. A few years later Vindman made the news he was in Ukraine with Gov. Perry. Why? What did he bring to the table except the ability to speak the language, which in many areas of Ukraine, is Russian?

Vindman is a grifter. He needs to be making small rocks out of big rocks for his treason.

for his treason

Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

Helping Ukraine is not levying war against the United States, nor is it giving aid and comfort to, or adhering to, our enemy, since Ukraine is not our enemy.

Would you like Ukraine to be our enemy? That’s a whole different discussion.

Vindman actively “testified” against a sitting President who was investigating an one-camera admission of quid pro quo by a man making millions through his son, illegally.

That makes him aiding and abetting a domestic enemy, and one himself.

That’s Treason, by the definition at least.

“…or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

Strange how it’s “investigating a political rival” back in 2020, and impeachable, but now it’s perfectly fine to invent charges on Trump…even after he said he’s running in 2024.

Unequal application of the Law makes a government illegal.

Bidens-quid-pro-quo-1024x609.jpg
Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

Sorry sonny, scumbag vindman is guilty.

Vindman is a traitor, who’s committed Treason. Agreed.

What’s amusing is that Vindman, Democrats, and the Deep State are using the same tactics Putin uses to prevent democracy from taking his power.

How is our nation now any different than Russia when you can get prison time for “illegal parading?”

in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

When you are pimping for financial/military/et al aid for another nation, you are giving them Aid and Comfort. That is what Vindman, Grifter, did.

Helping Ukraine is not levying war against the United States, nor is it giving aid and comfort to, or adhering to, our enemy, since Ukraine is not our enemy.

Being a friend is a two way street. I help you, you help me. But for the life of me, I can’t think of anything that Ukraine has ever done that was helpful to the United States making it our friend. It has just been another typical European nation, suckling at the U.S. teat whenever possible. Perhaps you have something in mind?

Would you like Ukraine to be our enemy?

I would like these nations to stand on their own two feet and not look to the west for the money for their military industrial complex that only puts American dollars into their elite’s pockets. Zelensky is another grifter. Frankly, I pray for the day when Zelensky is told “That’s all, Bubba. No more aid.” Watch how quickly he changes his tune and starts cleaning up his act. And it is just that, an act.

Last edited 1 year ago by retire05