By Jim Hoft
The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history. The tremendously popular incumbent candidate, President Trump, was easily winning the race on election night in a landslide and then suddenly multiple states took a break, quit counting, and by the end of the week the election was flipped to Joe Biden.
Then, as the President and his team attempted to address the fraud and alleged abnormalities, the courts refused in any case evidence to be brought before a court of law.
We’ve heard over and over from Big Media that President Trump and his team lost numerous court cases linked to the 2020 election. But this is not accurate.
Here’s what we identified from our research of an accurate and updated list of court cases:
- There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
- In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
- In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
- In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
- In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
- In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
- 30 cases remain active
Here is a link to the list of cases.
Advertisement – story continues below
2020 Election Court Cases by Jim Hoft on Scribd
In the 2020 election:
- Thousands of instances of fraud were alleged
- Multiple states changed laws to provide for absentee ballots and the remedy is alleged to be not legal
- The FBI to date has done nothing to review the alleged fraud
- The DOJ denied any alleged material instances of fraud
- The Democrats are accused of the alleged election fraud
- The state legislatures certified their results with millions of ballots in question
The state legislatures certified their results with millions of ballots in question
Nope they let others do their constitutional job. SOS, Guvners, election commissions, the laws they passed are toothless, the head of WEC admitted to breaking the law, so did the Clerk of Dane county, just business as usual for them.
John Roberts
I understand no one wanted to address the issue. To open the first evidence to examination would open a gigantic can of worms and begin an avalanche of evidence and proof of fraud. It would be a tremendous and chaotic conflict.
But, sadly, that is what the Democrats imposed upon us when they decided their incompetent, corrupt, lying, foreign influenced candidate could not possibly win a fair election and turned to fraud.
There is but one way to give this already failing regime the air of legitimacy; hear all the evidence, investigate the fraud and prove it didn’t turn the election. Refusing that only means there WAS fraud, everyone accepts there was fraud, and everyone is fine with elections being an embarrassing joke.
@kitt:
I had a friend who worked the mail-in ballot recount. She was there in Dane County for 12 days over Thanksgiving. She said there were mail-in ballots sent with no addresses, no double signatures, original count did not match signatures and when they objected to a ballot, it was put in a pile to lay out on a table face down and then there was the process of “draw down.”
Draw down was questionable ballots all laid out on a table upside down and if there were 10 bad ballots, the Election officers simply pulled out 10 ballots not knowing what the votes were on them. Crazy.
Also, there were BBM (ballots by mail) that were not folded, had only one bubble filled for President and no other candidates, perfect bubbles inked in (obviously by machine and not human hand), no registration trail and on and on and on. When a ballot was challenged, the Election officials would certify that ballot anyway, if it were for Biden. Rules issued for ballot recount in the morning, would be changed in the afternoon.
Wisconsin truly has some ballot integrity issues and the only people that can change that is the Legislature of the state. And get this; if a poll watcher was a Republican, they had to give the Election officials their names and cell phone numbers. Needless to say, most of those poll watchers had their cell phones hacked.
Impeach this fake ruler Impeach this Dictator from America
@retire05: Robin Voss, a shameless lifetime grifter, never gaveled in our legislature to address the hearings. The Campaign should have left Dane county out and really examined Brown County who took a Facebook “grant”, I know a young lady who discovered someone voted using her maiden name, yes she reported it.
Unless they actually fine or jail someone the whole “lets fight this” is moot.
The WEC needs to be disbanded criminals all.
@kitt:
If the State Legislatures don’t give a damn about the Constitution, only power, then it is up to the citizens to make them care by making them unemployed because they failed to do their damned job.
It makes me sick that no evidence has been allowed in any of the court rulings. Texas doesn’t have standing? How it that possible when the outcome of elections in other states affects all states?
Of course, John Roberts, who seems so concerned about his legacy, will go down in history as one of, if not the worse Chief Justices in our history. Just read his opinion on Obamacare. Disgraceful.
@retire05: People who don’t want to know the truth about the election make me sick. The absolutely hate our Constitution.
If it’s not accurate, then it’s a lie and it needs to be referred to as a lie.
The state legislatures are starting to take action, something they should have done before this happened. All the Republican controlled states need to do the same. If successful, we may just have free and fair elections that are constitutional. What a novel idea for a “Republic”. Of course if SCOTUS cowers again and allows the dem guvs and courts to violate the Constitution then it’s all moot. It also may not be enough though to help Senate republicans. Stabbing your base in the back is probably far more damaging than the fraud. The RNC is poised to have a huge fundraising and turnout problem for the 2022 midterms. It wouldn’t be surprising if they lose seats, especially in the Senate.
@another vet: #9
I understand that the Left wants to bring state elections under federal control, turning the USA into a one-party nation like Iraq used to be.
Unconstitutional, but who cares?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tucker-democrats-sweeping-for-the-people-act-would-enshrine-fraud
@Petercat:
Yep. We got rid of that crap over there only to have it manifest itself over here. Sound and look familiar?
All they want is 100% permanent control of the country. The warning signs are already there- censorship; threats of violence and intimidation both from within and outside government; militarization of the Capitol; a double standard of justice; rigging the election system to ensure fraud which will favor one party, etc. etc. We are a banana republic.
@another vet:
When the governors, and other election officials, created election rules that were against the Constitution, the State Legislators should have raised such a ruckus that the roofs of the State Capitals flew off. They did not. Instead, they were mute and said nothing.
Those are the elected legislators that need to be challenged and voted out of office. Yes, yes, I understand they will claim they had no authority to call their legislations into session. But there was not one thing preventing them from taking their cause to the people and the people demanding the governors follow the rules and call them into a special session. They were ALL complicit in the election fraud that we all know happened.
Now, it’s too late. The Great Experiment died on January 6, 2021.
Elections are the last bastion of a free society. If you can control elections, as Nancy Pelosi and her mob are attempting to do with H.B. 1, you no longer have a free society but a dictatorship run by the select few. Oh, we will still have a House of Representatives, a Senate and an Office of The Presidency, but it will be only a sham, all run by the “special” people and big tech.
Microsoft is now saying that they will no longer donate to the campaigns of Republicans who voted in opposition of the election certification. Who knew that D.C. was no longer the place where the voices of the people were heard, but the place where the only voices heard were those of big tech and big money? Anyone who didn’t realize that decades ago were blind.
1984 is proving to be prophetic.
That’s because not one single attorney representing a plaintiff in any such lawsuit has referenced any items of credible, admissible evidence that would be submitted if their case went to trial.
Submitting a complaint to a court does not automatically mean a trial will follow. Before a case is accepted and scheduled for trial, a judge must first be convinced there’s a sound reason to believe the complaint merits the court’s time and attention. Allegations alone are not credible evidence. Belief that a story is true is not evidence that it actually is. No assumption of guilt is made that is accepted as truth unless it is proven to be false. If we abandon any of those fundamental legal principles, justice and truth will cease to matter.
Can Joe Hoft not figure that out? If not, Joe Hoft is a blathering, empty-headed moron.
Those are his credentials?
@Greg:
And you know that how? List the cases that you have (in your uneducated capacity) read the court transcripts.
You really need to stop playing “Legal Eagle” because you are doing nothing but repeating the pablum put out by the left wing sites (like LawFare) that you frequent. With every “legal” post you make you show that you are a freaking clueless idiot.
Of course, when pushed to give credence to your claims (opinions) you run like the cowardly rabbit you are.
@retire05: Passing a change to election law was not the problem. IMPLEMENTING it without going through the constitutional process was and that was opposed, it was simply tossed aside, much like all the cases challenging the fraud Democrats utilized.
@Greg:
You must think we are all pretty stupid; perhaps as stupid as someone that would support Biden. How do you determine if evidence is credible or not until you examine it? All that has been done by the opposition to date is simply say, “Nuh uh. Didn’t happen. Some biased political hack has certified the results, so that means they were legitimate.” That ain’t cutting it, scooter; it only makes the doubts worse.
Likewise, all your little “Impeachment Theater; The Sequel” isn’t going to hurt Trump one bit. It’s not going to incriminate him. It’s not going to weaken him. It’s not going to criminalize him. All it proves is that Democrats still live in fear of him, can’t defeat him (but through lies, fraud and trampling the laws and Constitution). Impeaching Trump (again) when he had committed no crime (again) without due process or evidence (again) only reinforces the belief that Democrats care more about their hatred for Trump (and his success, defense of the Constitution and support for law and order) than they do about the country. His popularity and political power will only increase and Democrats look more petty, immature, unconstitutional and small.
@retire05:
Agreed. The change needs to start at the state level which is what I think President Trump is pushing for. From the above GP link. it looks like the state legislatures are moving in that direction.
The damage they’ve done is irreversible. No one wants to confront it because of the fallout but they aren’t considering the fallout if they don’t confront it. As an example, when H.B. 1 came out, Tom Cotton raised alarm bells. Previously he towed the left’s line that all of this has been “disproven”, when it hasn’t since there haven’t been any evidentiary hearings and that doesn’t even take into account the unconstitutionality of it all. If this was a free and fair election like he has argued, then why is he up in arms over H.B. 1?
It’s their end goal. They aren’t even hiding it anymore. Senate republicans enabled it. SCOTUS enabled it. Right now I’d probably classify all the Senate republican seats held by those who caved who are up for re-election in 2022 as “toss-ups” or “leans blue” even if they should be a “Republican hold”.
@retire05, #14:
I knew that question would follow, because you throw it out every time it’s pointed out that Trump’s election fraud claims are a load of steaming, unadulterated horse manure.
How do I know? I know because scores of individual judges—both democrat and republican—have repeatedly thrown the lawsuits out for lack of merit, and those which have been appealed to higher courts have generally been treated in the same fashion.
In case you have somehow missed it, judges are the persons who are the recognized expert arbiters in such disputes. As their official titles suggest, they’re also the authorities that are have been empowered by our constitutional laws to render binding legal judgments. In the matter of the election fraud lawsuits, there has been a remarkably consistent consensus of opinion among many such legal experts that the lawsuits are without merit owing to the plaintiff’s failure to reference any credible admissible evidence which they intended to present in court.
I am the one here who is deferring to their expert judgement. You are the one who seems to believe that Trump’s goofball partisan lawyers and assorted hack writers for the right-wing media are better qualified to judge credibility, admissibility, and merit than are the judges themselves.
This blatant disdain for law and for the results of normal legal process—even when consistently presented many times over—is very much in line with Trump’s infantile effort to kick over the constitutional election process in the Capitol Building on January 6th. In an American president, such behavior goes beyond entirely unacceptable. If the GOP has any spine at all, they’ll stand up for the Constitution and the laws based upon it by assisting in his conviction in the Senate. Based on their recent behavior, however, I do not expect them to rise to the occasion and do that, even though doing so it the only way they could reclaim the integrity of their party.
@Greg: The Democrats have admitted Trump won. They set up a Kangaroo court that the Supreme Court wont participate in. If he lost it would be simple to prove just hand over the evidence.
Whats good because of Justice Roberts declining to hear the case it isnt constitutional.
Trump won they know it, we know it, hence this scam impeachment show, to try to CYA when the evidence is presented and a rerun of the election is demanded.
He never conceded, Biden is a squatter.
@Greg:
ROTFLMAO, at you. You really fancy yourself an arm chair lawyer, don’t you. Tell me, how many court actions have you litigated in front of a judge? How much education have you had in juris prudence? Oh, that’s right; you don’t answer direct questions only provide blather that is meaningless.
You don’t answer my question because you have no answer. You have never read even one of the court procedures that ended in the judge’s ruling. You are just a bag of hot air claiming to be a good little citizen deferring to the decision of the judges.
You are not. You are a Commie bastid that comes here, loaded with your talking points from your radical left wing internet outlets and the b/s propaganda told to you by your handers.
You truly are pathetic, Comrade Greggie. And it is amazing to me how you fear anyone to the right of Stalin. And like the Russians who suffered so severely under Stalin, you don’t realize that the purge is coming for you.
@Greg: You should have read the article you are commenting on. You’d stand a chance of looking less foolish.
They haven’t examined any of the evidence.
If you want to make the argument that the evidence is invalid, then show HOW it is invalid. You have no credibility, and neither does CNN, MSNBC, NYT, or any of the other left wing propaganda outlets. PROVE you are correct.
@retire05, #19:
As I pointed out, I’m the one who is accepting the consistent opinions of scores of individual judges, both republican and democrat, who actually are the legal experts. You are the one who presumes to know more than they do.
@Deplorable Me, #20:
There was none mentioned by the lawyers to be examined. If there had been, the lawsuits would have gone further.
@Greg: So… they haven’t examined any of the evidence.
@Greg:
And the only way you would know that is to have read the court transcripts. So which ones have you read? Provide a link to those transcripts.
@retire05, #24:
Since you place so much importance on reading all of the transcripts, no doubt you can easily provide links yourself. Feel free. You talk about transcripts a lot, but I’ve never seen you post a link to any that support your claims.
I’ll trust the judges who made the decisions, given that there were many of them and their opinions were remarkably consistent. I have neither the time, the expertise, nor the inclination to question the dismissal of every court case some Trump sycophant has filed—particularly when I realized his voter fraud pitch was a scam-in-the-making weeks before the election had even taken place. Subsequently, his top lawyers were clowns. I’ve had more than enough of the Trump circus. Having this idiot in office has been like being changed to a chair in the middle of his reality TV audience.
@Greg: The Wisconsin Supreme court found the votes invalid maybe look that decision up.
Biden is a squatter.
@Greg:
Oh, my, Barrister Greggie, transcripts actually show what happened during any trial or court hearing. But then, as a legal eagle, you should have known that.
What claims have I made in regard to the court actions on election fraud? Name them. Quote me, verbatim.
The Germans and Russians, and your beloved Chinese, all relied on the decisions made by their judges. How did that work out for those people?
For your convenience I bolded the part of your response that tells all anyone needs to know about your legal acumen.
No, you haven’t. You are obsessed with Donald J. Trump. He stood against every Communist doctrine you subscribe to. If you have, as you say “had enough” you would not still be talking about him, but you are.
I said once (or maybe more) time that you have no honor, no personal pride. You continually humiliate yourself here at FA and no amount of telling you to stop seems to have any effect. You really do need psychiatric counseling, Comrade Greggie. But then, you are a Manchurian candidate.
@Greg: “I’ll continue to believe only what reinforces my bias and prejudice. NOTHING supports the possibility that Biden actually won the election, but I WANT to believe it so I WILL believe it.”
@retire05, #27:
A lot more blather, but still no links to any of the transcripts you’re always rattling on about… You’ve never linked to even one transcript citing specific credible, admissible evidence that would have been presented in the context of a trial. The reason being that none of these idiots had any.
Truth be told, they only wanted to pile up filings and gain access to courtrooms to spout more bullshit accusations as part of a disinformation campaign.
When Rudy finally got into a courtroom, he had nothing. Under oath before a judge, he wouldn’t even repeat his assertion that fraud had taken place.
You’re no judge of anyone’s integrity or honor. You don’t understand these concepts anymore than you understand the meaning of truth. As with Trump himself, they’re just empty words thrown out in arguments or speeches as a means of attack. They refer to qualities that Trump is devoid of and that he has led the Republican Party to abandon. People like John McCain knew what they meant.
@Greg: Likewise, you’ve linked to nothing that refutes a single accusation of the fraud carried out by Democrats.
The Virginia Board of Elections rule allowing officials to count ballots that arrived without a postmark up to three days after the election was illegal, a state judge ruled.
Virginia Circuit Court Judge William Eldridge ruled the state’s late mail-in ballot law violated state statute and permanently banned the law in future Virginia elections, the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) announced Monday. PILF sued the state’s board of elections in October on behalf of Thomas Reed, a Frederick County, Virginia election official.
“This is a big win for the Rule of Law,” PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said in a statement. “This consent decree gives Mr. Reed everything he requested – a permanent ban on accepting ballots without postmarks after Election Day and is a loss for the Virginia bureaucrats who said ballots could come in without these protections.”
@Greg:
You’re the one pretending to be such a legal eagle, not me. You’re the one making claims that you cannot substantiate, not me. I have never even brought up the issue of the suits/courts. You have, and I have only asked that you prove your claims that they were rejected due to lack of evidence, which you never have.
And having never read the court transcripts, you know that how?
Actually, I am a very good judge of character. You lack character.
What concepts? What truth? A vague response doesn’t cut it with me and obviously you are a slow learner because you don’t seem to understand that.
You said:
Obviously not because here you are again, dragging Trump into the conversation. Are you mentally deranged or just a flat out liar?
John McCain forfeited his honor for power. No dispute on that issue but it did endear him to the rabid left.
My legal knowledge as nothing to do with anything. I didn’t dismiss any election fraud complaints for lack of merit. Scores of individual judges did. Presumably most of them know something about the law—undoubtedly more than you do.
I’m not the one who believes Trump won the election by a landslide, that the invasion of the Capitol was a false flag operation mounted by ANTIFA, or that Joe Biden is a senile pedophile who is a secret Chinese Communist agent.
@Greg:
No, you believe a guy who couldn’t even win the primary without DNC shenanigans, with a running mate that won NOTHING in the primary, who could not ever articulate any policies, programs or plans, just slogans and catch phrases, who didn’t even campaign and when they did could not draw crowds more than a few dozen won in a landslide. You believe people who have NEVER committed any violence suddenly, upon being asked to be peaceful, stormed the Capital. And Biden isn’t a secret CCP agent; it’s pretty much out in the open.
You’re clueless. Joe Biden has been a prominent Democratic Party figure for decades; thirty-six years in the Senate, 8 years as Vice President, and now President of the United States. He regularly won reelections for his Senate seat by carrying around 60 percent of the vote, and won the Presidency by a historical popular vote margin of well over 7 million votes.
——
On a side note: January 25, 2021 – Dominion files defamation lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani
@Greg: Dominion is threatening dozens of suits even the My Pillow guy.
Lets get them in court and find out why the machines were connected to the internet, show how they were hacked in real time, find out why they had an over 90 % fail rate in GA.
Force them to reveal who actually owns the company and software.
What of the forensics done in MI? 6000 votes switched, missing security seals.
Your media is failing you, mushroom boy.
Those that have the means say “Bring it.”
Why do you call Amy and Liz liars?
The court-ordered forensic audit, carried out by Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG), found that Dominion systems in Antrim County, Michigan recorded a shocking 68 percent error rate while tabulating votes. The report noted that the faulty software far exceeds the “allowable election error rate” of 0.0008 percent set by the Federal Election Commission.
Shockingly, the auditors claimed that the widespread errors were a feature, not a bug, stating that the voting system “intentionally” generates a high number of ballot errors which can then be used to manipulate the vote tally.
The report also found that all security logs from Election Day, and the days prior to and after November 3, had vanished.
@Greg:
Sure it does. If you have no legal knowledge, which you don’t, you should refrain from commenting on things you have no knowledge of. It makes you look stupid.
Do you have some high dollar crystal ball that allows you to know any areas of expertise that I might have? Where can I buy one of those?
Trump lives perpetually rent free in your head. What happened to “
” as you continue to bring him up?
And yet, during the election season, I asked you what Beijing Biden had ever achieved beside lining his own pockets and the pockets of his family members. That was just another question you avoided answering.
Great. Discovery should be very, VERY interesting.
Rudy should defend himself in court. Possibly he could recover what Trump stiffed him for by inflating his own legal expenses.
@Greg: Why lie?
Has Rudy said he was stiffed?
Do you know the term the Big Lie?
Do you know its origins?
I know you dont pull this out of your own ass you simply repeat what you hear on your TV or Salon.
Davos, Klaus Schwab introduces his Opening speaker and your hero Xi.
These people are sick.
Lies are a concern?
Why we’re NEVER going to forget. From FRONTLINE, January 26, 2021: Trump’s American Carnage
@Greg: pbs is a propaganda outfit shameless NWO shills.
BTW lying makes you look to stupid to debate any point.
@kitt:
Yes, yes, we get it: every news source is shit except the one you use.
I doubt you’ve ever watched anything on PBS.
@retire05:
He probably owns the same model that that allows you to magically intuit what his areas of expertise are.
How can everything be propaganda except for that which is in agreement with Donald Trump? Does that make sense?
@Greg: Biden needed the DNC to get everyone else to drop out before he could “win”. Kamala, even with her ethnic gimmicks, couldn’t win a single primary. I doubt he honestly received 60 million votes. The rest is fraud. He is universally regarded as incompetent and an idiot.
Because the left wing media is nothing but propaganda. Russian collusion proved that conclusively, then when they suppressed the laptop story to protect Biden from having his corruption exposed before the election further confirmed it. The leftist media cannot and should not be trusted on bit.
@Deplorable Me: Kamala is so honored to serve with a man she accused of being both racist and a rapist.
@kitt: Yeah, that’s what they call “credibility”. Either Kamala lied about Biden being a racist and rapist, or she lied about her CARING about him being a racist and rapist or now she is lying that he ISN’T racist and rapist.
@Michael: How much credibility do you believe sources who constantly supported Russian collusion have? How much credibility to you believe sources that suppressed the information on Hunter’s laptop have? Just wondering what you think you are defending and supporting.
Does this sound familiar?
February 6, 2021 – What has led to the coup in Myanmar?
Fortunately, constitutional processes are stronger than that here. We don’t overturn the result of national elections managed by the governments of our 50 individual states based on groundless allegations of massive election fraud. We assume that this system assures the integrity of the result unless credible evidence is produced that demonstrates the existence of significant irregularities. Our system does not assume that the results of each election are false unless it can be proved that they are valid, any more than our criminal justice system assumes the guilt of anyone accused of a crime unless they can prove that they didn’t commit it.
These are fundamental American principles. They’re why we are America, and not some authoritarian banana-republic dictatorship ruled by anyone who can muscle or con their way into power. Rejecting these fundamental principles is fundamentally unAmerican.
@Greg: Sounds like they refused to prove it just as the elections officials here have failed to prove Biden won.
Guess what machines they used.
Have you read the Time article on how they rigged the election?
Trumps voters are not backing down on demanding proof call us domestic terrorists we laugh and put it on a t-shirt. You dumb bastards are friggin jokes.
TRUMP WON. Prove otherwise quit hiding the evidence.
BTW this isnt a murder trial its an election paid for by the taxpayers yes they have to prove the findings you retard.